Premium Essay

American Court

In: Other Topics

Submitted By justinjburnett
Words 834
Pages 4
American court system paper
Justin Burnett CJA 224
April 30, 2014
David Benson

American Criminal Court System
American criminal court system and its purpose: The criminal court system in America is a tool that communities use for standards to be enforced and necessary to protect individual and the whole communities. The action taken against the lawbreakers is like that it solves three purposes. It takes away harmful people and removes them from the society; it uses others as an example to not be a part of criminal behavior; and it gives society a chance to change criminals into law-abiding citizens. This particular system has three specific parts: the courts the police, and the corrections and each one have their own different tasks. All these three bodies are depending on each other. The main purpose of American court is to give everyone the opportunity to justice; by punishing and convicting the guilty and help them stop doing bad and protect the innocent. It also guards the individual rights and freedoms. Here, all persons treated equally. If there is any conflict then trials can be the solution but the courts should be used at last. As there are two cases civil and criminal. Courts have two duties first find out the facts of disputes and second are what law is to apply on that fact.

Dual court system
A dual court system is a double organized entity that helps both courts one at a national level and one local. Australia and The United States are having the longest running and best known dual courts system in the world. The Laws of local nature are handled in local court and national ones in federal court. The federal court system also upholds and implements constitutional mandates. Each state government has right to create its own local laws for their people. So, federal laws are for everywhere and state laws vary state to state. Each track of…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Court Systems

...Court System Introduction The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware about the significance of the history of judicial system prevailing within the premises of United States. This paper intends to explore the Court System of United States. The major historical developments in the courts of United States will be discussed. Moreover, the rationale of the dual court system of the United States will be outlined. This paper will also explore the correlation between the historical developments and the dual court system of the United States. Discussion The development of the state courts within United States can be traced back from the colonial period. Every state in United States organizes its court system independently. Every state has been provided with the right to choose its own organizational structures and the possible jurisdictions of their respective courts. Various types of courts have been developed throughout the history of United States. The federal level states have trial courts normally called district courts and circuit courts which are the appellate tribunals. In New York most of the trial courts are considered supreme courts (Columbia Encyclopedia, 2007). The development of court system started in the colonial period. Local judges were called magistrates on the lowest level of their colonial judiciary. By the early eighteenth century, the development of formal courts started. After the American Revolution in 1775, distrust towards the......

Words: 1195 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Structure of the Courts

...separate state court systems and an extra court system for the District of Columbia, yet there is only one federal court system. I live in the state of Maryland. The court system of the state of Maryland shares similarities with the federal court system, yet, the systems are different. Each court system has its own structure. There is a difference in the source of laws. Also, the types of cases that are heard in the court system of Maryland are dissimilar than what is heard in the federal court system. The federal court system and the state of Maryland’s court system are each made up of three levels of courts. The federal court setup is made up of the following: the district courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court. The state of Maryland’s court system consists of appellate courts, circuit courts, and district courts. The courts are similar when it comes to the structure of the systems. The sources of laws for the federal court system and the state of Maryland’s court system are different. The federal court system’s sources of laws are the U.S. Constitution, the Code of Federal Regulations, the United States Code, and laws enacted by Congress or executive agencies. The Maryland Annotated Code and laws enacted by state and local governments are Maryland’s source of laws. Federal courts conduct trials for federal crimes including the following: treason, mail fraud, counterfeiting, etc. Also, the federal courts hear......

Words: 417 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...The case being presented today was State of New Jersey v. David Connor. This case is being presented in the Superior Courts of New Jersey at 50 West Market Street floor 10 Room 1004, Newark, NJ. The observation took place July 1, 2008 from 9AM until 3:30PM. The charges against the defendant David Connor are first-degree murder, second-degree aggravated assault, second-degree disturbing/moving human body, third degree unlawful possession of a weapon, and third degree possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose. David Connor has a co-defendant by the name of Tareek Gilliam. The judge presiding over the case is the Honorable Joseph Cassini. Romesh Sukhdeo is the assistant prosecutor from the Essex County Prosecutors Office and John McMahon is the public defender representing the defendant. Honorable Joseph Cassini began the morning addressing a motion to dismiss the indictment submitted by the public defender McMahon on the grounds that the prosecutor answered questions for the jury and the actions of the assistant prosecutor were inappropriate. The motion also stated that the assistant prosecutor became the witness. The judge also reviewed the proceedings that were mentioned in the motion to dismiss the indictment in which the prosecutor actually was answering questions the jury members had asked. Honorable Joseph Cassini sighted numerous cases including State v Bennett, A-2157-04T5 where the prosecutor misstatements and improper comments constitutes......

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay


...been attending court everyday for different reasons. Those reasons can be for traffic violations, civil law suits, or unlawful criminal acts that are committed. These acts are all handled and disputed in a court of law. The courts are empowered to make fair and blending decisions upon the facts that are provided through out the court hearings. As we know there are two types of courts such as civil court and criminal court and it is very important that we understand the differences between the two. The civil courts handle resolutions between private parties that usually consist of one party suing one another for some type of monetary damages. The criminal courts alleged offenders that are suspected for crimes that they committed and which at times they end in freedom for the offender or and prison cell. The court system is judicial brunch of government which the defendants go before a judge and their peers and to defend their innocence of a crime that they committed. The major role of the court is to settle people’s disputes in a civilized manner. Our court system is divided into four major components which are to uphold the law, protect individuals, resolve disputes, and reinforce social norms. The Untied States court system is run by a dual court system. There are two types of systems that make up the dual court systems and they are the Federal and State. The dual court system refers to the fact that the US has a federal court system and forty separate state court......

Words: 748 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Court issues. Stewart was diagnosed at the age of 23 with Bi-Polar Disorder. Stewart has seldomnly taken medication for the disorder. Stewart was abused by her parents and no longer keeps in contact with them. Stewart had prior use of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine, but her last contact with those drugs was one month ago. On the other hand, Stewart has an Associate’s Degree in Business and had obtained an employment position as an office manager in the past. Stewart was recently fired from her three year employment due to being arrested. Furthermore, Stewart has been married on two times and is currently divorced. Stewart has three children, ages 12, 15, and 17, but does not have custody of them for the past seven months because of a family court order. IV. Federal Sentencing Guidelines Overall Fairness Defendant #1: Judge, I believe the sentence of Manny Ramirez serves the interest of justice because it is enough time being in jail to pay the consequences for his actions. Ramirez was given multiple chances of shortened sentences and more probation time for minor offenses. Obviously, Mr. Ramirez did not learn his lesson the first time and he eventually got caught at the wrong time with his current offense. Based on the following actions, judge, the sentence of 21-27 months is fair enough to me and serves justice for what crimes he committed. Defendant #2: Judge, the sentence of Martha Stewart definitely serves the interest of justice based upon the seriousness......

Words: 1362 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The American Court System Behind Closed Doors

...The American Court System Behind Closed Doors America first established its judiciary system around the same time the 13 British Colonies became established as individual territories. When it came down to it, Federalist battled Anti-federalist over the writing of the Constitution of the United States. The Anti- Federalist were opposed to the idea of a one centralized government while the Federalists on the other hand were all for a centralized government. What came next was the establishing of the Judicial Branch known as Article III. The start of the first court system came along with Congress passing, The Judiciary Act of 1789. The act established the United States circuit courts which were also known to be United States federal courts and were located in each of the federal judicial districts. The act also established the United States Supreme Court and its justices. It wasn’t until 1912, that the district courts became exercised and became the new federal trial courts replacing the circuit courts as original jurisdiction. Circuit courts became known as federal court of appeals. They no longer have the right to try a case first, which is now the district courts role in the judicial system. With 13 circuit courts and 93 federal judicial districts the two courts make up most of the judicial system in our country. That’s why it is imperative that we know the differences and the similarities between each court. After observing both courts for about 5 or so hours, I......

Words: 3344 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay


...Week 1 Assignment State Court System Trial Courts Trial Courts are also called "Superior Courts." There are 58 Trial Courts--one in each county. In the Trial Courts, a judge, and sometimes a jury, hears testimony and evidence and decides a case by applying the law to the facts of the case. Superior Courts handle: * All criminal cases (felonies, misdemeanors, and traffic tickets) * All civil cases (family law, probate, juvenile, and other civil cases) * Appeals of small claims cases and other civil cases worth $25,000 or less * Appeals of misdemeanor cases Appellate Courts There are two types of Appellate Courts: * Courts of Appeal * California Supreme Court There are 6 Courts of Appeal and one California Supreme Court. Courts of Appeal The Courts of Appeal are California's intermediate courts of review. District headquarters for the Courts of Appeal are located in: * First District: San Francisco * Second District: Los Angeles * Third District:Sacramento * Fourth District: San Diego (Division One) * Fifth District: Fresno * Sixth District:San Jose People who are not satisfied with a Trial Court decision can appeal their case in an Appellate Court. When they "appeal", they ask a higher-level court to change what the Trial Court decided. The role of the Courts of Appeal is not to give new trials, but to review the Superior Court record (court files and transcripts) to decide if legal errors were made.......

Words: 801 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Us Courts

...historical developments of the U.S. courts began in the colonial days. Since then the American courts have taken their own path, and have evolved in order to better suit the social needs of today’s America. Presently, there are two judicial systems. The first one is the state and local courts established under the authority of state governments. The second is the Federal courts system created by Congress under the authority of the U.S. Constitution. Development of the American Courts The origins and foundations of American courts like other social, legal and cultural habits in America descended from Great Britain. The court system in American colonies resolved civil and criminal disputes. However, the court systems within each colony were not exactly the same. The Massachusetts Bay Colony had a General Court that created laws, conducted trials and imposed sentences. Later, county courts were created and the General Court was used for appeal hearings and for some cases that involved serious crimes. The colony in Pennsylvania allowed offenders to be their own lawyers and to plead their cases to a justice of the peace. Ultimately all American colonies had functioning court systems but they were not uniform. After the American Revolution, colonial court systems became state courts; and like colonial court systems, state courts were not uniform. Appellate jurisdiction which is the lawful authority of a court to review a decision made by a lower court existed however, there......

Words: 1430 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Far Were the Federal Government and the Supreme Court Responsible for the Changing Status of African Americans in the Years 1945-1968?

...divided into three branches, Legislative; Congress, Executive; President and Judicial; The Supreme Court. The Supreme Court therefore forms part of the Federal Government. The Federal Government played a significant part to change the status of African Americans from 1945 to 1968 in the sense that the Presidents during this period; Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson all started to become more involved in improving Civil Rights for Black Americans and passing acts. Eisenhower passed the Civil rights Act of 1957, Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and there were others which showed African Americans that progress was being made. The Presidents clearly initiated a change in America making sure de jure became de facto. However, there were many flaws in the work of the Federal Government and there were other factors which changed the status for African Americans such as the impact of the Second World War and the actions of the NAACP. President Harry Truman (1945-1953), established a liberal civil rights committee to investigate the violence against blacks. A report was produced called “To Secure These Rights” which underlined the problems that African Americans faced during this period. It said that the USA could not claim to lead the free world if Blacks were not equal. This proved that the Federal Government did play a part in changing the status for Black Americans as a previously racist President was motivated to change the way Blacks were treated which was a......

Words: 2234 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Court History

...Court History and Purpose Leon White CJA/224 January 6, 2015 David Hernandez Court History and purpose The American court system is a vital part of the criminal justice system. Courts are part of the judicial branch and serves as an instrument of social control. A court must have proper legal authority and are entrusted to make decisions that are binding within the adjudication process. The court system has the task of punishing wrongdoers who commit heinous crimes against society. The courts also have the job of determining which behaviors may or may not be acceptable as well as which sanction to hand down and the severity of the sanction as well as settling disputes in civil case. The U.S. operates on a dual-court system, which consist of a federal branch and a state branch. Each branch operates under it own jurisdiction but work towards a common goal. U.S. District Courts The U.S. district courts are described as federal trial courts, and serves as an entry point into the federal judicial system. This is where federal civil cases are decided and where individuals who are charged with violations of federal laws are put on trial. According the Schmelleger “The district courts are the workhorses in the federal system. As we have indicated, they are the trial courts where most disputes are resolved.”(Schmelleger, 2011) As of today there are 94 district courts a majority of federal cases held and resolved at the district level. However, only a small......

Words: 1133 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Drug Court

...Executive Summary The American court system is overflowed with people that suffer from substance abuse. For example drug and/or alcohol related crimes have been implicated in violent crimes, instances of domestic violence, child abuse and neglect cases. Therefore, drug court has come in to offer people arrested for substances abuse related crimes and opportunity to receive community-based treatment with judicial supervision to avoid potential incarceration. For this reason drug court has changed people’s lives in a variety of ways, which are often overlooked, are the positive impact on families and society. Overall, substance abuse offenders have a recurring problem for the criminal justice system as a result drug courts are an important strategy to reduce incarceration, provide drug treatment and reduce recidivism among nonviolent offenders. Another key point is research study by the National Institute of Justice in 2009 called the Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation confirmed that Drug Courts reduced crime and substance abuse, improved family relationships, and also increasing employment and school enrollment. (Marlowe, 2010) Another key point is drug courts have affected the offender’s criminal behavior and substance use with mandated drug and alcohol treatment. Henceforth drug courts has been a popular diversion program for drug offenders since it’s began in Dade County Florida in 1989. Overview Drug courts represent the criminal justice approach to ensure......

Words: 1915 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

American Criminal Court System

...American Criminal Court System Kabie Goss CJA/224 July 14, 2014 Samyra Hicks American Criminal Court System When thinking about the American Criminal Court System, there is a lot to think about. Most cases are not just opened and closed in one day like they are on television, and there are different courts to handle different situations. In this paper I will be describing what a court is and its purpose, as well as defining what the dual court system is. I will also describe the role that early codes, common law, and precedent played in the development of courts. Lastly, I will identify the role of the courts in criminal justice today. Court and its Purpose Merriam-Webster defines a court in three different ways, but they all seem to intertwine. The first definition is; “a formal legal meeting in which evidence about crimes, disagreements, etc., is presented to a judge and often a jury so that decisions can be made according to the law.” The second being, “a place where legal cases are heard.” The third definition states, “An official group of people (such as a judge and jury) who listen to evidence and make decisions about legal cases.” There are many different types of courts at the local, state, and federal level. Courts can hear both civil and criminal cases. The purpose of the court is to settle legal disputes whether civil or criminal, through a legal process, while protecting the rights and liberties of everyone involved, and to administer justice...

Words: 1147 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Central American Court of Justice

...Aunque desde el siglo XVI el teólogo español Francisco Suárez había preconizado una visión de la comunidad humana dirigida por el Derecho Internacional Público, al decir: “La razón de ser del Derecho de Gentes obedece a que el género humano, aún divido en naciones y reinos diferentes tiene sin embargo, cierta unidad, no solo específica, sino también política y moral” … (y agregaba), “jamás estas comunidades pueden separadamente bastarse a sí mismas, por eso tienen necesidad de algún derecho que las dirija en esta clase de relaciones y de sociedad” …sin embargo, tal concepción que en nuestro tiempo tiene plena aceptación, no fue desgraciadamente la que determinó al acontecer internacional de su época, ni el de los años posteriores a la misma. Al jurista holandés del siglo XVII, Hugo Grocio, cupo el honor de señalar los lineamientos que, a partir de entonces y por varios siglos seguiría la ciencia que regula las relaciones internacionales, influyendo de manera determinante, desde entonces, en las concepciones jurídicas y filosóficas teorizantes y en las actuaciones positivas y prácticas que se plasmaron en múltiples tratados, convenciones y acuerdos suscritos entre las diferentes naciones, Estados o potencias que actuaron impulsados por la necesidad de coexistencia, sobrevivencia, o por la simple voluntad, dentro de aquel acontecer encausado cada vez más por la naciente ciencia del Derecho Internacional Público. El concepto de soberanía absoluta de los Estados fue......

Words: 1238 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Slaves and the Courts

...Slaves and the Courts, 1740-1860 Katrina N. Hill American Public University System Abstract Years of research routinely done on the life of African American slaves and their struggles within the United States. However, many have forgotten about the injustice African American slaves faced in the United States Court system. During 1740-1860 African American slaves endured not only enslavement but, were neglected by the U. S. Courts. A number of slaves tried to secure their own freedom, only to find the legal system was not on their side. The United States Courts was responsible for hearing and ruling on some of the country’s most controversial cases. The research in this paper was greatly influenced by previous works, with the hopes of shedding light on the United States court systems as it related to African American slaves in this time frame. Slaves and the Courts, 1740-1860 According to Lubert (2010) Slavery has been the great moral failing of the American Revolution… a movement that was based on the self-evident truth that all men were created equal. The founding fathers believed that slavery was in fact an embarrassing contradiction that violated everything the American Revolution stood for (Lubert, 2010.). Even though documents such as the Declaration of Independence existed slavery was widely practiced and legally acceptable. Nearly twenty years after the Declaration of Independence was written. Fugitive slave law was...

Words: 1179 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...Court Management Executive Summary Larry Garcia, Stephanie Saucedo, Erick Orozco, Alfred Grayson CJA/394 Jan-24-2012 Barry Boggle The traditional and “problem-solving” roles of the judge may be at odds philosophically, ethically, managerially, and Procedurally Communities expect more from courts for example, rehabilitation, reform, and control/cure of substance abuse and other behaviors and conditions. But some social problems cannot be solved. For example, mental health courts have proliferated as a result of federal funding. However, advocates point out that mental illness is not a crime and, in some instances, may be treatable but not curable. Likewise, domestic violence issues are complex; while courts can address some aspects and implement practices that will not exacerbate the problems; the general dynamics of domestic violence make the problem difficult for courts to solve. Long-term monitoring of substance abusers and sex offenders may be unworkable or unconstitutional (Chris Woodworth). “While the Purposes and Responsibilities of Courts Core Competency requires knowledge of and reflection upon theoretic concepts, their history and development over time, this competency is practical. The Purposes and Responsibilities Competency gives meaning to, in fact properly grounds, day-to-day judicial administration and the other nine Core Competencies. Absent knowledge of the judiciary’s enduring purposes and continuing responsibilities, court leaders, both judicial......

Words: 626 - Pages: 3

Martial Arts | telefilm | Vikings - Saison 5 episode 4 streaming