Free Essay

Democracy and Development in India: a Comparative Perspective

In: Social Issues

Submitted By shivranjani324
Words 3182
Pages 13
Democracy and Development in India: A Comparative Perspective By Pranab Bardhan University of California at Berkeley

To most theorists of democracy in the West, India is an embarrassing anomaly and hence largely avoided. By most theoretical stipulations India should not have survived as a democracy: it’s too poor its citizens largely rural and uneducated its civic institutions rather weak. It is a paradox even for those who believe in a positive relationship between economic equality or social homogeneity and democracy. India’s wealth inequality (say, in land distribution, and even more in education or human capital) is one of the highest in the world. Indian society is also one of the most heterogeneous in the world (in terms of ethnicity, language, caste and religion), and social inequality, a legacy of the caste system, is considerable.

Yet this country, with the world’s largest electorate (it is now larger than the electorate in North America, Western Europe, and Japan combined), keeps lumbering on decade after decade as a ramshackle, yet remarkably resilient, democratic polity. Of course, depending on the defining features of democracy the depth of Indian democracy may be rather limited. It is useful to keep a distinction between three general aspects of democracy: (a) some basic minimum civil and political rights enjoyed by citizens, (b) some procedures of accountability in day-to-day administration under some overarching constitutional rules of the game, (c) periodic exercises in electoral voice, participation and representativeness. These aspects are of varying strength in different parts of India. In general while the performance in much of the country over the last sixty years has been really impressive in terms of (c),

notwithstanding some pitfalls and electoral malpractices, the performance in respect of (a) and (b) have been somewhat mixed, satisfactory in some respects but not at all in others. Also, except in three or four states, all these aspects of democracy are usually weaker at the local village or municipality level than at the federal or provincial levels.

There are several ways in which the historical and social origins of democracy in India are sharply different from those in much of the West, and the indigenous political culture has fundamentally reshaped the processes of democracy. These differences are reflected in the current functioning of democracy in India, making it difficult to fit the Indian case to the canonical cases in the standard theories of democracy.

• While in European history democratic rights were won over continuous battles against aristocratic privileges and arbitrary powers of absolute monarchs, in India these battles were fought by a coalition of groups in an otherwise fractured society against the colonial masters. And in this fight, particularly under the leadership of Gandhi, disparate groups were forged together to fight a common external enemy, and this required strenuous methods of consensus-building and conflict management through co-opting dissent and selective buyouts. The various methods of group bargaining and subsidies and ‘reservations’ for different social and economic categories that are common practice in India today can be traced to this earlier history. This has also meant that in India, unlike (or long

before than) in Europe, democracy has been reconciled with multiple layers of nationality, where a pan-Indian nationalism coexists with assertive regional nationalisms in the same citizenry. • Unlike in Western Europe democracy came to India before any substantial industrial transformation of a predominantly rural economy, and before literacy was widespread. This seriously influenced the modes of political organization and mobilization, the nature of political discourse and the individual’s relation to the public sphere. This also gave rise to the excessive economic demands on the state: democratic (and redistributive) aspirations of newly mobilized groups outstripped the surplus-generating capacity of the

economy, demand overloads sometimes even short-circuiting the surplus generation process itself. • In the evolution of democracy in the West the power of the state was gradually hemmed in by civil society dense with interest-based associations. In India groups are based more on ethnic and other identities. This has meant a much larger emphasis on group rights than on individual rights. A perceived slight of a particular group (in, say, the speech or behavior of a political leader from another group) usually causes much more of a public uproar than crass violations of individual civil rights even when many people across different groups are to suffer from the latter.

Such crass violations of individual rights are also routinely tolerated in India for the supposed fear of possibly offending group sensibilities. This gives perverse incentives for extremists and political opportunists. The issues that catch public imagination are the group demands for preferential treatment (like reservation of public-sector jobs) and protection against ill-treatment. This is not surprising in a country where the self-assertion of hitherto subordinate groups in an extremely hierarchical society takes primarily the form of a quest for group dignity and protected group-niches in public jobs.

• In Western history expansion of democracy gradually limited the power of the state. In India, on the other hand, democratic expansion has often meant an increase in the power of the state. The subordinate groups often appeal to the state for protection and relief. With the decline of hierarchical authority in the villages the state has moved into the institutional vacuum in the social space. For example, shortly after Independence popular demands of land reform legislation (for the abolition of revenue intermediaries, for rent control and security of tenure), however tardy and shallow it may have been in implementation, brought in the state in the remotest corners of village society.

In more recent days, with the progress of the state-supported Green Revolution, in matters of loans, tubewells, fertilizers, seeds, agricultural extension, land records, etc. or in the implementation of various antipoverty programs, the state is implicated in the texture of everyday village life in myriad ways. • In the theories of democracy socioeconomic cleavages are often regarded as obstacles to the functioning of democracy. John Stuart Mill considered free institutions as “next to impossible in a country made up of different nationalities” In Bardhan (1984, 1998) I offered a somewhat contrary hypothesis:

the Indian experience seems to suggest that the very nature of socio-economic heterogeneity may make the divided groups somewhat more interested in the procedural usefulness of democratic processes. In a country with an extremely heterogeneous society and the elements of even the dominant political coalition quite diverse, where no individual group is by itself strong enough to be able to hijack the state, there may be some functional value of democracy as a mutually accepted mode of transactional negotiations among contending groups and as a device by which one partner in the coalition may keep the demands of other partners within some moderate bounds.

• In Indian democracy the legislative process is often relegated to a second order of importance, giving short shrift to the deliberative process in the legislature that John Stuart Mill and other theorists of democracy valued so much. The legislature has become an arena for slogan-mongering, shouting matches, and a generous display of the theatre of the absurd. Sometimes quite radical pieces of legislation on complex issues get passed without much discussion. On many controversial issues the opposing parties do not try to resolve them in legislative deliberations but quite literally go to the streets for this purpose. They (including the ruling party) concentrate on organizing mass rallies and counter-rallies and a show of strength in popular mobilization, in the process sometimes bringing normal life

in the cities and towns to a stand-still. Contrary to what happens in most democracies, Indian political leaders, instead of spending time debating in the legislature, think first of a general strike or ‘bandh’ or road-blocking to register their protest and flex their muscles of mobilization, taking pride in how their followers have paralyzed the daily life of a city. By and large India is less of a legislative or deliberative democracy, more one of popular mobilization. • In the electoral process the Indian masses, particularly the poor and the socially disadvantaged, take a much more participatory role than in advanced industrial democracies. More than in establishing procedures of accountability, in India the really important impact of democracy has been

in the political awakening and enhancement of group self-esteem. Democracy has clearly brought about a kind of social revolution in India. It has spread out to the remote reaches of this far-flung country in ever-widening circles of political awareness and self-assertion of hitherto subordinate groups. • For a large federal democracy India, by constitutional design, differs from the classical case of US federalism in some essential features. Not merely is the federal government in India more powerful vis-a-vis the states in many respects (including the power to dismiss state governments in extreme cases and to reconstitute new states out of an existing state in response to movements for regional autonomy) but it has also more obligations, through mandated fiscal transfers, to help out poor regions.

In classical federalism the emphasis is on restraining the federal government through checks and balances, in India it is more on regional redistribution and political integration. Alfred Stepan (1999) has made a useful distinction between “coming-together federalism” like the US, where previously sovereign polities gave up a part of their sovereignty for efficiency gains from resource pooling and a common market, and “holdingtogether federalism” as in multinational democracies like India (or Spain or Belgium), where compensating transfers keep the contending nationalities together and where economic integration of regional markets is a distant goal, largely unachieved even after 60 years of federalism.

In the rest of this lecture I am going to draw some implications of these particularities of Indian democratic polity and history for the process of economic development.

The emphasis on group rights and group dignity, which may be justified on sociopolitical grounds, sometimes works against general economic development:

A perceived slight in the speech of a political leader felt by a particular ethnic group is usually much more politically salient than if the same leader’s policy neglect keeps thousands of children severely malnourished in the same ethnic group. It leads to policies of clientelism and patronage distribution (often in terms of personalized private benefits) in favor of particular groups rather than investment

in broad-based public goods and services. It leads to ‘reservations’ as the most popular tool of redistribution. Public sector job reservations for some historically disadvantaged groups, for example, fervently catch the public imagination, even though objectively the overwhelming majority of the people in these groups may have no chance of ever landing those jobs, as they and their children largely drop out of school by the fifth grade. Attention is thus directed at symbolic policies, and the patronage benefits are primarily enjoyed by the elite of these groups, deflecting public attention away from the more urgent and difficult challenges of improving the delivery structure of social services like basic education, health (public health and sanitation as well as medical care) and

nutrition. Reservations often become a surrogate for effective public action against poverty, disease and illiteracy. India is the world’s largest country of illiterates and school dropouts and of child and maternal mortality or anemia, and yet these are not electoral issues, at least not in the way political reservation is. In our infinitely-layered society as newer and newer groups get mobilized around group-centric benefits, the consequent political fragmentation makes decisive collective action for common goal formulation and policy implementation and coordinating short-run sacrifices for long-term benefits extremely difficult.

Economic reform, to the extent it is beneficial for development and to the extent it requires some reorganization

and retreat of the over-extended state, becomes more difficult in this context. The newly emergent groups, as they capture state power controlled by upper castes and classes for all these years, are obviously not too keen to give up the loaves and fishes of office or reduce the role of the public sector (where at the lower echelons the salaries are often three times what one would get in the private sector with similar qualifications). The huge bill for government salaries and subsidies contributes to the fiscal deficit, which fuels the fire of inflation, apart from draining away resources for public investment in infrastructure—both harming the poor.

Our democracy being one of popular participation and mobilization, that came into being before a transformation of the surplusgenerating capacity of the economy, several problems for further development of this capacity emerge:

Competitive populism–- short-run pandering and handouts to win elections–- hurts long-run investment, particularly in physical infrastructure, which is the key bottleneck for Indian development. Such political arrangements make it difficult, for example, to charge user fees for roads, electricity, and irrigation, discouraging public or private investment in these areas. (Political complicity in large-scale theft and under-pricing of electricity, for example, seriously block

investment in electricity). As the livelihoods of small producers are at stake, or there are severe constraints on their plan for expansion, when roads are bad or there are frequent power outages (when they cannot afford generators or captive power plants), populist democracy can hurt the poor most. Some people think that India’s particularly decrepit urban infrastructure may not be entirely unconnected with the fact that while cities produce 65% of GDP they account for about 30% of votes. More important is the fact that municipal governments have very little autonomy in raising own resources for infrastructural investment. User charges for water, sewage and solid waste disposal services are

politically under-priced and the antiquated and corrupt property tax system does not share in the ongoing real estate boom. When the exigencies of mobilization take politicians to the antics and stridency of street theater at the slightest opportunity, rather than to the long deliberative processes of committee discussion on complex issues, the necessary insulation of governance structure in long-term decision-making gets eroded. In this situation the opposition can also get away with being irresponsible and short-sighted (often opposing the Government for policies they themselves supported when in power).

The democratic politics of mobilization and patronage distribution put particular premium on leaders, small and big, who are good ‘fixers’ or experts in agitational politics, in organizing processions, rallies and strikes, not necessarily those who can give community leadership to constructive development projects or to fostering local entrepreneurship. In many cases a substantial number of elected politicians are criminals—this signifies not so much a collapse of public ethics, but more of the fact that the particular criminals involved—a type of agile systemmanipulating ‘social bandits’—are often the more effective organizers and mobilizers of people in a political environment that gives primacy to

mobilization. They are the popularly ‘elected godfathers’ quite familiar in the democratic politics of southern Italy.

More generally, the tension between the participatory and procedural aspects of democracy is the fundamental dilemma of democratic governance and development in India.

On fiscal federalism, while small steps toward the goal of an Indian common market are being attempted through harmonization of sales taxes across states and in the form of a GST in the near future, let me point to three kinds of tension in redistributive federalism that are growing:

As the logic of economic reform and increased competition (for capital that is constantly in search of more businessfriendly policies and infrastructure) leads to increased regional inequality, and as the logic of political development in India leads to coalition governments at the center dependent on the support of powerful regional parties, one of the toughest political economy issues in the coming years will be how to resolve the tension between the demands of the better-off states for more competition and those of the populous backward states for redistributive transfers. Even these redistributive transfers (or direct subsidies), however, do not usually go toward correcting the severe infrastructural deficiencies of the poorer states, thus contributing to the perpetuation of the regional inequality.

There is also a tension between the increased power of regional political formations on the one hand and their increasing vertical fiscal dependence on the central government on the other (not merely a large part of state revenue is from central transfers, about half of these transfers are ‘tied’, and thus subject to central discretion). In fact these discretionary transfers from the central government are often highly regressive (i.e. better-off states get more per capita), as are the transfers in the form of fertilizer and food procurement subsidies. There is also some tension between the state government and the local panchayats and municipal governments in many areas of development. As more money has started flowing from mainly central government to these local bodies on various development and welfare projects, on the

one hand these local entities become more interested in participating in the disbursement of funds and identification of beneficiaries; on the other hand, the local MLA’s and other political leaders at the state level try even more than before to hijack the process and undermine effective decentralization. The latter use the local entities more for mobilization and recruitment of party workers than for organizing community development.

Of course, on the positive side, it is democracy that has constantly generated and renewed pressure for welfare programs for the poor, even though ‘leakages’ continue to be excessively high. It has also encouraged the rights-based activism (for information, for jobs on rural public works, for food and education and forest land rights), which at the least make more poor people

politically aware of their entitlements to the benefits of development. It is also the case that all around India some localized green shoots in positive effects of democratic governance on development are now becoming visible-- in social service delivery, in social audits of malfeasance in public programs, in citizen associations demanding better infrastructural facilities, and in some regulatory reforms and measures of fiscal responsibility. There are faint signs that in some areas the electorate has started rewarding the economic performance of their elected leaders.

Democratic ‘voice’ is the only safeguard against the increasing predations of our corporate oligarchy. The grip of a corporate-political nexus is much too evident --in the matter of state allocation of access to land, monopoly rights on mining natural resources or telecommunication spectrum

-- in influencing the media that often set the agenda and shape public opinion -- in the running by politicians of educational institutions, distilleries, iron mines or cricket franchises (politics has now directly become ‘business by other means’). Mechanisms of accountability that our ramshackle democratic institutions allow provide the only antidote.

Am I a pessimist or an optimist, I am often asked. I usually refer people to Antonio Gramsci’s famous phrase (in a letter from prison to his brother) about “pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will”. But in the context of democracy and development in India, there is another expression of Gramsci that may be more appropriate: the challenge, he said, is to “live without illusions, and yet not to be disillusioned”.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Prospects of Shale Gas Development in India

...PROSPECTS OF SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA: A term paper by Tejal Johri (MPE1296) and Shruti Sharma (MPE1293) for Semester 1 Course: Environment and Development Department of Policy Studies, The Energy and Resource Institute (New Delhi) Submitted on 9th December 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Literature Review 4 Scope 6 Conclusion 10 Works Cited 11 Executive Summary The gradual shift of the US gas sector- from one of deficit to one of surplus has gathered appreciative appraisals from the rest of the world and initiated talks about the prospect of harnessing shale gas in other countries, as US reached the lowest CO2 emission level in the last 20 years due to shift to natural gas. It has been referred to as “the biggest energy innovation of the decade”, in light of the growing need for suitable alternatives to conventional oil and gas with increasing pressure on energy over time. 90% of global shale gas is currently produced by the US. India meets two-thirds of its petroleum requirements by importing of fuels that include coal, and this figure is expected to rise in the future in spite of India being a coal-rich country. Even with introduction of more efficient technologies and cases of higher CO2 emission reduction, our country’s import dependence on petrol, oil and gas will significantly rise in the future, raising the pressure on the resources. This concern for energy security calls for further research in technological solutions for......

Words: 3059 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Developing the Internet: Entrepreneurship and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective

...AND PUBLIC POLICY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE* Sandra L. Suárez Department of Political Science Temple University Gladfelter Hall Philadelphia, PA 19122 (215) 204-1468 ssuarez@nimbus.temple.edu and Mauro F. Guillén The Wharton School and Department of Sociology University of Pennsylvania 2016 Steinberg Hall-Dietrich Hall Philadelphia, PA 19104-6370 215-573-6267 guillen@wharton.upenn.edu November 2000 Version * This research has been funded by Temple University (Suárez) and the Wharton eBusiness Initiative, WeBI (Guillén). 2 DEVELOPING THE INTERNET: ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND PUBLIC POLICY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Abstract The internet has not diffused uniformly throughout the world. Data on 142 countries indicate that, aside from the levels of economic and infrastructural development, cross-national differences have to do with whether the legal system fosters entrepreneurship, and with whether institutional and political conditions are stable, and democracy is the form of government. Competition and privatization policies in the area of telecommunications do not have consistent effects. After examining international patterns of diffusion for the world as a whole, differences between two matched pairs of countries are systematically compared: Ireland and Singapore, and Argentina and Spain. Patterns of entrepreneurship and public policy in each country are shown to have differed systematically, with distinctive consequences for the development of the......

Words: 11450 - Pages: 46

Premium Essay

Comparative Attractiveness of China and India

...the economies in Goldman Sachs – Jim O’Neill – wrote an economic research paper “Building Better Global Economic, BRICs”, in this report, O’Neill listed four countries with their initial letters combined being BRIC – Brazil, Russia, India and China – as the world’s fastest developed economies that can be considered as the most promising emerging markets in the world. Latter the BRICs become BRICS with South Africa joining the group, together the five BRICS countries had represented approximately 3 billion people and a combined nominal GDP being US$ 14.8 trillion and US$ 4 trillion in combined foreign reserves (IMF 2013). However, within the five BRICS countries, China and India very similar and the only two Asian countries, they had many things in common – large size of country lands and large size of population as well, the relatively large gap between wealthy and poor households, together with the similar economic routes – both countries had their economies boosted in the 1970s and 1980s benefiting from the large sum of foreign direct investments (Halpin, 2012). Based on the above basic conditions, the consulting team hired by Australian Trade Commission (Austrade) would conduct a comparative analysis for the country attractiveness of China and India, standing in the position for the businesses in Australia who wished to expand their businesses to one or both of the countries, thereby to providing suggestions for these businesses. As for details, the report would compare......

Words: 2354 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Economic Development Perspective of Philippines

...country. Overall development of a country largely depends on economic policy design & its proper implementation. Every country has its own economic policies & specific way of their implementation. But some policies are same for all countries such as Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy, etc. Philippines, as a developing country has set various economic policies & strategies over time with a view to seeking development. In course of time it has adopted a wide variety of economic policies, many of which had long term effects (both positive and negative impacts) on the lives of its people. The crucial policies that the government of the country adopted over time are – Fiscal policy, Monetary policy, Income distribution strategy, Government policy, Tax policy, Trade policy, etc. The impacts of these policies have had widespread effects on various macroeconomic variables of the country. Various surveys and reports show that the economic growth has not been as expected. Growth of the variables has gone at a slow pace. GDP increases over time but with a high fluctuating rate. Rate of educated people, standard of health care, standard of living have improved but it is still poor in comparison with other countries of the region. It is one of the countries whose economy is based on agriculture. A huge portion of the country’s GDP comes from agriculture. But yet it has some major constraints due to what it is still facing some problems and fails to have that much development. Natural......

Words: 23470 - Pages: 94

Free Essay

Lifespan Perspective of Human Development

...important years in life for human development? Human development is a complicated and controversial subject. In the past, childhood has been attributed a majority of the concentration in regards to the development of a human being, and in some cases, adulthood has gotten all of the attention. However there is one perspective that considers all phases of life, known as the life-span perspective, which is universally accepted by most psychologists and implicated into their own respective theories. This perspective was originally introduced by Paul and Margaret Baltes, and was monumental as it considered all phases of life, rather than just childhood or adulthood (Berger 2010). There are five insights which are focused on to describe the context under which development occurs. According to the life-span perspective, development is multidirectional, multicontextual, multicultural, multidisciplinary, and plastic (Berger 2010). Let’s begin with multidirectional. Multidirectional means that human qualities change in all directions. A more traditional belief was that development took place up until the age of 20, becomes stagnant, and then declines. Life-span research has refuted this claim (Berger 2010). For example, when an elderly person’s spouse passes, the newly single elderly person can either lose motivation to live, or expand their social surroundings. Regardless of the outcome, development occurred even in these elderly years. The belief that development occurs in stages......

Words: 1178 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Evolution of Development Perspectives

... The Evolution of Development Perspectives   The Evolution of Development Perspectives The study below is a review of different articles and the evolution of development perspectives. The study reviews the work of different authors and their perceptions about the evolution of development. A brief summary of the developed economic models has also been included, as most journals have mentioned these theories in their reviews. Development has come a long way over the last sixty years as both a scholarly discipline and as an enterprise. It became very significant after the Second World War and was considered the same as industrialization. Its objective was very clear: to raise incomes and offer goods and services to poor people, who couldn’t have access to them before (Rapely, 2007, p. 1). Evolution can be defined as the self-transformation of a system under study (Witt, 2002, p. 9). Six decades ago, depression and political developments had made first world countries rely on Keynesian models in political and economic circles. This further influenced third world countries whose confidence was supported by the emergence of structural economics in a bid to enter the industrial age. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, those involved with development studies tried to answer the question relating to what it means for the economy to be......

Words: 2643 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Perspectives of Development

...PERSPECTIVES OF DEVELOPMENT From theory to reality Table of Contents Introduction 1 What is Development? 2 General approaches to development 4 Dimensions of development 5 Economic Development 5 Human Development 6 Sustainable Development 7 Territorial Development 8 Western Definition of Development in Practice 8 Conclusion 10 Works Cited 11 Perspectives of Development Introduction When the concept of international development was initially developed in the post-World War II era, the countries of the First World had 65 percent of the world’s income with only 20 percent of its population, while the Third World was home of 67 percent of the world’s population but had only 18 percent of its income. People embraced the word development as a desirable objective of postwar economic policy in the late 1940s. "Development" was not precisely defined, but it was taken to mean improved economic opportunity by increasing production of goods and services in a long-term way, through capital formation. In short, it was associated with economic growth. In the 1960s the association of development with economic growth came under increasing criticism by authors such as Dudley Seers, Gunnar Myrdal, Paul Streeten, Hollis Chenery, Mahbub ul Haq and institutions like the International Labour Organisation (ILO). They pointed out that developing countries did not experience much change in the living conditions of the masses of the poor in spite of the impressive......

Words: 3547 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Essay on Democracy in India

...Essay on Democracy in India Democracy is a form of government in which people are governed by their own elected representatives. It is a government of the people, for the people and by the people. In this system of government, it is the people who are supreme and sovereign. They control the government. They are free to elect a government of their own choice. Freedom of choice is the core of democracy. Democracy existed in ancient Greek and Roman republics but with little success. It had very little scope in ancient India. Democracy entered its golden stage in he twentieth century. Many countries in the world today follow the democratic form of government. Democracy depends on the following conditions (i) coexistence of ideas and of parties; (ii) the right to free discussion; (iii) universal adult suffrage; and (iv) periodic elections. Indian is the largest democracy in the world. The Constitution of Indian was enforced on 26 January, 1950. It ushered in the age pf democracy. India became a democratic republic infused with the spirit of justice, liberty, equality and fraternity. The Preamble, the Directive Principles of State Policy and the Fundamental Rights reflect the Indian ideology as well as the caste, creed, religion, property, or sex have the right to cast their vote. After and election, the majority party or coalition forms the government and its leader become the Prime Minister. Political parties are the vehicles of ideas. Parties act as the bridge between social......

Words: 856 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

A Comparative Development Approach of Brain

...Running Head: BRAIN ASYMMETRY A COMPARATIVE DEVELOPMENT APPROACH OF BRAIN ASYMMETRY: ZEBRAFISH (Danio rerio) AND MEDAKA (Oryzias latipes). Student Name Panther id Section number TA name 2 BRAIN ASYMMETRY 2 Introduction Asymmetry is an essential and conserved element of the mind, which is conceived to enhance data processing and task execution in traits central for species continued existence, such as nurturing, predator uncovering and memory (Güntürkün et al. 2000; Rogers 2000; Pascual et al. 2004; Vallortigara & Rogers 2005; Rogers & Vallortigara 2008). Moreover, asymmetry has been suggested as the basis of language and other behavioural traits (Sherman et al. 1982; Rogers & Andrew 2002; Hutsler & Galuske 2003; Toga & Thompson 2003) and anomalous asymmetry appears to relate with numerous neuropathologies comprising schizophrenia (Li et al. 2007), autism (Escalante-Mead et al. 2003) and neuronal degenerative disorders (Toth et al. 2004). In the past decade, scientific studies have provided vital insights into the developmental basis of brain imbalance. Exceptionally helpful are genetic model organisms that accept a comprehensive gene to behaviour analysis of this phenomenon (Concha 2004). For instance, recent research in the teleost zebrafish has revealed genetic mechanisms that regulate the growth of neuroanatomical asymmetries ( Halpern et al. 2003; Concha 2004) and recognized the first operational relations among genetics, asymmetric morphology...

Words: 1141 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Democracy and Development

...Democracy and Development Democracy and Development By: Sanders (SB) Collins Week 2 First Essay Assignment Professor: Don Anderson Strayer University SOC 300 The Challenge of Third World Development July 12, 2013 By discussing the relationship between democracy and economic development in this assignment we will attempt to compare the ways Howard Handleman, Ronald Inglehart and Christian Welzel all define the prerequisites argued or implied that are necessary for a working democracy. Is the emphasis centered on economics, cultural values, political values, or a combination of all three? Each author has their own perspective on the subject and we begin with a brief synopsis of each to better clarify our discussions. Howard Handleman spent much of his career with the International News Service and U.S. News and World Report as a correspondent and editor. In his text in Chapter 2, Handleman focuses on the political shifts that have taken place in much of the Third World. Governmental authoritarian regimes have fallen due to the call for democracy and freedom in many of the more than 150 countries that together make up the Third World. Probably the most notable example of this type of regime to collapse would be the end of the Cold War. After the Russian fall of power and the resulting loss of both economic and military support from the USSR many of its allies fell from grace and the call for democracy began to become......

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Tracing Development of Conciliation in India

...TRACING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONCILIATION IN INDIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to give sincere thanks to our director sir for giving me opportunity. I would also like to thanks evidence faculty Jagdeesh sir for guiding me throughout my project and giving valuable suggestions. Last but not the least, thanks to almighty for giving me strength to do this project. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………… PAGE 4-5 2. TEST OF CONSPIRACY……………………………………PAGE 5-6 3. RELEVANCY OF CONSPIRACY…………………………..PAGE 6-7 4. PRINCIPLE OF CONPIRACY…………………………… PAGE 7-9 5. EXISTENCE OF CONSPIRACY……………………………..PAGE 9-10 6. ADMISSIONS OF EVIDENCE OUTSIDE PERIOD OF CONSPIRACY... PAGE 11-12 7. INDIAN LAW WIDER THAN ENGLISH LAW………………… PAGE 12-14 8. RELATION WITH IPC……………………………………….PAGE 14-15 9. ACTS DONE BEFORE CONSPIRACY………………………..PAGE 15 10. CONSPIRACY HOW ESTABLISHED…………………………..PAGE 15 11. 185TH LAW COMMISSION REPORT AND SUGGESTIONS……..PAGE 15-19 12. CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………..PAGE 19-20 13. BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………….PAGE 21 INTRODUCTION S.10 of Evidence Act: Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common intention:- “Where there is reasonable ground to believe that two or more person have conspired together to commit an offence or an actionable wrong, anything said, done, or written by any one of such person in reference to their common intention, after the time when such intention was first entertained by any one of them,......

Words: 7070 - Pages: 29

Free Essay

India: How Spirituality Can Affect Democracy

...2012 India: How Spirituality Can Affect Democracy India is often referred to as the "Land of Spirituality". There is no major religion that they hold and this is one of the reasons that it is so diverse. However, this spiritual land is a well formed constitutional democracy. Could there be some correlation between the two? If we explore the major religions in India, we can see that perhaps the reason democracy is holding so well is because of these spiritual people. The six major religions in India are Hinduism, Islam, Jainism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Sikhism. These religions, all very different, have played a crucial part in forming India and keeping it so culturally diverse. These religions all promote equality and freedom of man and they contributed not only to India being a democracy, but they also helped India to be the superpower it is today. Hinduism is a religion that supports those that want to join. They do not convert others into Hinduism, nor do they have religious wars. "Hinduism offers lots of freedom to operate. An individual decides his Guru, and follows him or her. When many devotees come together a sect is formed.  Like democracy, the people select a leader." (Prlog.org) These sects often are made and unmade, relating to the constant changes in democracy. People would argue that Hinduism is a confused religion because there is a certain lack of structure to those that do not follow. Even those that are not democratic would argue that democracy is......

Words: 1212 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

A Comparative Analysis of Two Private Fm Stations in India.

...Comparative analysis of Radio Mirchi 98.3 & Fever 104 FM Objective: To perform a comparative analysis of two Private FM stations in India. To identify the strengths and weaknesses of both the stations. Abstract: This research is on the Comparative analysis between two private FM radio stations Radio Mirchi 98.3 FM and Fever 104 FM. The analysis is on the basis of their programming style, Programme schedule, audience preference, the Strengths and weaknesses of both the channels. Radio Mirchi 98.3 FM: Introduction: Radio Mirchi’s holding company Entertainment Network (India) Limited (ENIL) was incorporated in 1999. After successfully bidding for licenses in the Phase I auction in 2000, ENIL launched its first station in Indore on October 4, 2001. In the space of 24 months, Radio Mirchi made its presence felt in seven cities; along the way it also became the only private FM brand in all the four metros. Radio Mirchi was also the first off the mark to launch a station from the lot of cities included in Phase II. In quick succession it launched Bangalore, Hyderabad and Jaipur in early 2006 and completed the final rollout of the remaining 22 stations recently. Programming Style: The programming content of radio mirchi principally revolves around contemporary film music. It’s a fun-filled package of pure energy hosted by turbo charged radio jockeys, who also host interviews with celebrities and engage listeners in lively......

Words: 1697 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Democracy in India

...Democracy in India Content 1. Introduction 2. What is democracy 3. General History of India 4. State system of India 1.1.1. President 1.1.2. Parliament 1.1.3. Judiciary 5. The Indian State Union and its territory 6. Citizenship 7. Fundamental Rights 8. Main duties Introduction Democracy Democracy it is a Greek word. From the Greek is translated as democratia, means – Demos= people and kratia = government. Democracy is political system of mass participation, competitive elections and human and civil rights. (Political science. Michael G. Rosin) India is called as most popular democracy in the world. Let’s consider some aspects and answer the question why is it a Democratic country? What kind of state it is? What kind of state system is there? In addition we want to discuss about human rights and their duties. We divided our research paper into part for better understanding and definition of each point of the country. In conclusion we want to summarise each point and answer to the main question: is India a really democratic country according its definition and characteristics of it? History of India The first known civilization in India was Harappan. It originated in the early third millennium BC on the banks of the Indus River. It was a highly urban culture which existed until the middle of the 2nd millennium BC . After there was a time of migration and settlement of the Aryan tribes in the......

Words: 1977 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Democracy in India

...Directory, some stop in 1799 with the creation of the Consulate, while many more stop in 1802 when Napoleon Bonaparte became Consul for Life or 1804 when he became Emperor. A rare few continue to the restoration of the monarchy in 1814. This site prefers 1802. The French Revolution in Brief: A medium term financial crisis, caused partly by French involvement in the American Revolutionary War, led to the French crown first calling an Assembly of Notables and then, in 1789, a meeting called the Estates General in order to gain assent for new tax laws. The Estates General was composed of three ‘Estates’: the clergy, the nobility and the rest of France. This 'Third Estate', informed by long term doubts over the constitution of France and the development of a new social order of bourgeoisie, declared itself a National Assembly and decreed the suspension of tax, taking French sovereignty into its own hands. After a power struggle which saw the National Assembly take the Tennis Court Oath not to disband, the king gave in and the Assembly began reforming France, scrapping the old system and drawing up a new constitution with a Legislative Assembly. This continued the reforms, but it created divisions in France by legislating against the church and declaring war on nations which supported the French king. In 1792 a second revolution took place, as Jacobins and sansculottes forced the Assembly to replace itself with a National Convention which abolished the monarchy, declared......

Words: 974 - Pages: 4

Cruiser Team Products | Sea Horse | Hankook 65Ah Batterie de Bateau 12V XV65 - Garantie de 4 Ans