Free Essay

Discuss the Arguments That Parliament Is an Effective Check on the Executive.

In: Other Topics

Submitted By oliveeebrown
Words 606
Pages 3
Discuss the arguments that Parliament is an effective check on the executive.

Parliament is an effective check on the executive as it has the process of ‘opposition days’ or ‘supply days’. This is when the majority opposition is given a specific 20 days out of the year to challenge the executive on specific issues. For example on the 29th of April 2009 the labour party government was defeated in an opposition day motion from the liberal democrats over whether Ghurkhas should have the rights to settle in the UK. This makes parliament effective as there is specific time set out for both the biggest opposition party (17/20 days) and the second biggest opposition party (3/20) days) to scrutinize the government on any particular issues that they feel the current government are not dealing with well.

Parliament is also an effective check on the executive as they allow both question time and prime ministers question time. Question time is a topical debate in which guests from the worlds of politics and the media answer questions posed by members of the public. Prime ministers question time is held in the House of Commons for 30 minuets every Wednesday where the opposition party and other members in office are allowed to question the prime minister on specific issues. This is an effective check on the executive as it weekly scrutiny. It is filmed and broadcasted publicly meaning that the government must present themselves and their policies correctly. They must show that they are acting in the interests of the public if they want to remain in office.

A major check that parliament has on the executive is the use of select committees. There are 19 departmental select committees with 11-14 members in each; committees are targeted on specific topics (e.g. culture, media and sport committee) they are in charge of examining expenditure, administration and policy. For example the 2014 the political and constitutional reform committee agreed to conduct an inquiry into voter registration and turnout in the UK. This is possibly the most effective strategy of scrutiny as committees are able to collect any evidence and report advice or recommendations to the government, who then have 60 days to act on it. This is a good form of scrutinising the executive as it can be done all year round and consistently. Government carries out 44% of recommendations. They also provide an alternative career for backbench MPs giving them more influence. In 2010 select committee chairs began to be elected by MPs across the House other than committee members who were voted for by MPs in their party, which gives them more independence from party whips.

Another way that Parliament is an effective check on the executive is via the Liaison committee. Often referred to as the ‘super committee’ as it contains the 32 chairs of each select committee in the House of Commons. They are in charge of investigating the effectiveness and overall powers of each select committee. Since 2002 the Liaison committee hold a prime ministers question time twice a year requesting evidence on the government’s current policies. Each round of questioning has a particular theme that the Prime Minister knows in advance, but not the exact questions. This is a good form of scrutiny as it helps show that there is both specific scrutiny and general scrutiny.
Currently, overall, Parliament does a good job in scrutinising the executive. They ensure that the government is being questioned and kept in check on a wide range of issues that may not have even been considered. It also provides more influential roles for unknown MPs.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

How and Why Should Parliament Be Made More Effective?

...How and why should parliament be made more effective? Parliament is the sovereign body in the United Kingdom and so it is vital, for the wellbeing of democracy, that parliament not only exists but is also effective. Parliament plays the role of the Legislative and, as a result, is required to be as effective as possible to assure that laws are well thought out, benefit the whole of society and most of all maintain democracy. However, many people feel that certain aspects within Parliament limit its effectiveness and they feel these features need to be reformed in order for Parliament to carry out its function correctly. Firstly, the most obvious way to make Parliament more effective would be to reform the electoral system. Currently, Westminster elections use the system of First-past-the-post where the candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins the seats. However, this system is highly disproportionate in both terms of the word as it exaggerates winning votes for example, the Conservatives received 36.1% of the vote and won 47.1% of the seats in the 2010 general election, whereas it penalises small parties such as the Liberal Democrats who won 23% of the vote but gained only 8.8% of the seats. Particularly as FPTP produces landslide majorities, it makes Parliament less effective as the party that wins the general election forms the government and therefore has a large majority in most cases. If MPs belonging to the party vote along party lines all the time,......

Words: 1983 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

The House of Lords Is Now More Effective Than the House of Commons in Checking Government Power. Discuss

...'The House of Lords is now more effective than the House of Commons in checking government power'. Discuss In theory the House of Commons is the dominant chamber as it is elected while the House of Lords plays more of a revising role, issues to be considered include the powers of each chambers, the fact the House of Lords is more independently minded and the impact of the whips. It will ultimately be argued that the House of Commons remains far more effective due to having greater powers in checking the government power. Firstly, the House of Commons has the ultimate check on government power via a vote of no confidence, this last happened in 1979 when Margaret Thatcher was able to be elected due to the Labour government's failure. The vote of no confidence allows the House of Commons to directly confront the government which creates a mutual respect between the government and the House of Commons as they can get rid of a government if they believe the government is failing to use its power correctly and effectively. Also, only the House of Commons has the power to reject legislation compared to the House of Lords which can only suspend the legislation for a maximum of 2 years. For example, in 2001 the House of Lords voted 317-68 against a fox hunting ban, and in 2004 they again threw out the plans for a complete ban, however in November 2004 the parliamentary act was invoked and the bill came into force in 2005. However, the fact the House of Lords is more......

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Effective Checks on President

...are many checks and balances put in place by Congress to limit the power of the president including: the power to override the president’s veto the power to amend budgetary requests through the power of the purse and impeach and try the president with possible removal from office if found guilty. However, it is an issue today that although Congress have these powers, there are not effective checks put on the president’s power today. The Supreme Court can declare the actions of any member of the executive branch, including the president, to be unconstitutional. For example, Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer (The Steel Seizure Case) was a United States Supreme Court decision that limited the power of the President of the United States to seize private property in the absence of either specifically enumerated authority under Article Two of the United States Constitution or statutory authority conferred on him by Congress. Also, in Rasul v Bush the Supreme Court ruled that the detainees at Guantanamo Bay did have access to the federal courts to challenge their detention, therefore striking down the Bush administration’s legal policy regarding the war on terror. These cases prove the constitutional limits on presidential power and that there are effective checks on presidential power. Public opinion is also a limitation. President Clinton survived many scandals, and an impeachment, because his public opinion ratings remained high, suggesting the lack of effective checks on......

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Separation of Powers Hinders Effective Government in the United States. Discuss

...separation of powers hinders effective government in the United States’. Discuss The ‘separation of powers’ is a theory – adopted from Montesquieu in 1748 – where political power is distributed over the 3 branches of government. This was put in place to create a limited government which would essentially help to avoid tyranny and protect the liberty of citizens. Neustradt stated that it was the institutions that are separate and not the powers. If the branches were totally separate, power would be difficult to exercise especially with the use of checks and balances. Instead there is a separation of personnel, where not one member of one branch can work within another branch. So all in all, the US government created a doctrine of ‘shared powers’, where checks and balances are needed. Madison agreed with this, and said: ‘you must first enable the government to control the governed, and in the next place oblige it to control itself’. Some of the checks and balances include: the president checking congress by presidential veto; the presidential veto is checked by congressional override; the supreme court uses judicial review to decide whether legislation or actions are unconstitutional; presidential appointments are confirmed, and treaties ratified by the Senate; and finally the president is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, but only congress can declare war. Checks and balances are needed alongside the separation of powers. Checks and balances are......

Words: 1064 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Inside the European Parliament

...Professional Training Year at THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Report submitted by Paul Preda Voicu URN: 6183487 In part fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of BSc (Honours) in International Hospitality and Tourism Management School of Hospitality and Tourism Management University of Surrey 2014 Table of Contents List of tables and figures 4 Acknowledgements 5 List of Abbreviations 6 Section A. Organisation evaluation 8 The Executive Summary 8 The Placement Overview 9 1. The Evaluation of the EP’s activities 10 1.1 The EP format 11 1.2 The History of the EP 11 1.3 Geographical Locations and Facilities 12 2. The People 16 2.1 Visions and Strategies 16 2.2 Institutional structure and management 16 2.2.1 External structure 16 2.2.2 Internal Structure 17 2.3 Management of the EP 21 2.3.1 EP’s Political management 21 2.3.2 EP’s Organisational management 22 2.3.3 EP’s Communication Management 23 2.4 Staffing, recruiting and training 24 2.4.1 Staffing 24 2.4.2 Recruiting 27 2.4.3 Training 27 3. The Numbers 27 3.1 Strict rules for efficient and transparent budget implementation 32 3.1.1 Separation of functions 32 3.1.2 Use of standard documents 32 3.2 Controls of the budgetary procedure 32 3.2.1 Internal controls 33 3.2.2 Internal audits 33 3.2.3 External controls 33 4. Evaluation and conclusion 34 4.1 SWOT analysis 34 4.2 Conclusions 35 Section B. Personal and professional......

Words: 12462 - Pages: 50

Premium Essay

To What Extent Does Parliament Control Executive Power?

...To what extent does parliament control executive power? Executive power is seen as the exclusive body or group of influential and powerful individuals within the government in power. They hold a substantial amount of authority and responsibility and have the ability to enforce legislation, formulate government policies and govern general maintenance. Alongside the PM, the cabinet and all the ministers form an alliance together to form this excusive body of executive power. The Parliament consists of the House of Lords and House of Commons -which include various party representatives. Lord Hailsham stated that the UK has an “elective dictatorship” implying that executive is able to dominate the legislature. It could be argued that parliament does control executive power because parliament has scrutiny features such as Prime Minister's Questions, Ministerial question time and select committees, which all make the government and its executive powers accountable for their decision making. However to some extent it could be argued that parliament does not control executive power effectively, due to the fact that the government naturally has an in built majority within the House of Commons, as well as that the whipping system and the ideology of ‘toeing the party line’ results in the executive powers having the ability to gain a majority of support from the House of Commons. Furthermore the increase in prime-ministerial or even ‘presidential’ government in the UK, with the leader......

Words: 250 - Pages: 1

Free Essay

How Effective Is Parliament

...How effective is parliament? Parliament in the UK is mainly made up of the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The ‘executive’ refers to the Government. The effectiveness of parliament is judged by how effectively the government is held to account by the Commons and Lords. One of parliament’s main functions is holding the government to account. One of the effective ways parliaments hold the government to account is it forces government ministers to justify their policies and explain why they were developed as well as explain the future effects of these policies. Debates are a perfect opportunity to hold the government to account they provide an open floor for Mps to speak and question members of the government, however this is usually unreliable seeing as PM’s get pre-prepared questions. The opposition party and everyone else within parliament have the duty to criticise and scrutinise government bills. This works to keep the government in check as it forces them to reconsider their decisions, make changes if necessary and defend their ideas from the oppositions criticism. This then works to ensure that policy is well thought out, and discussed before it is passed through the House of Lords. It is Parliaments ability to question that allows them to keep the power of government in check; this suggests that parliament is effective on government to a large extent. An example of a governments defeat would be the Hunting with dogs’ act 2001. However, Parliament is limited......

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Effectively Can the Judiciary Check Legislative and Executive Power in the Uk?

...How effectively can the judiciary check legislative and executive power in the UK? (40) Since the passage of the Human Rights Act in 1998 (HR Act) the judiciary in England and Wales have had wider scope for checking legislative and executive power. However, despite the increases in effectiveness of this function, there are still fundamental limitations that make the check on especially legislative power ineffective. First of all, the HR Act has given considerably more ability to the judges to check both legislative and executive power in Britain. This is because the HR Act requires that every bill ministers propose to be compatible with the Act. In the case of a breach, citizens or affected bodies can appeal to the judiciary that their rights under the Act have been breached. If the judiciary rule in their favour, the government is usually forced to amend the law to make it compatible with the HR Act. In this way, by notifying the government of a breach of the HR Act, the judiciary can prevent government and Parliament being too powerful. An example of this was in the case of A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2004), where the detention without trial of 9 foreign nationals in Belmarsh prison under the 2001 Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act was ruled as in breach of Articles 5 and 14 of the HR Act. The government were forced to change the law and release the suspects demonstrating the definite check on power provided. Secondly, the process of judicial......

Words: 1089 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

To What Extent Will the Coalition Governments Proposals Bring About an Effective Reform of Parliament?

...To a certain extent, the coalition government’s proposals will bring about an effective reform of parliament. However, some people have questioned the effectiveness of the reform of parliament under this coalition, for example suggesting that The referendum on AV may have lead to an even more hung parliament. On the one hand, Primeministers, known as the incumbent, can no longer call elections to suit their own interests. This was due to the establishment of fixed term elections introduced by Cameron in 2011. The reform reduces media speculation, which makes parliament more stable and fairer for parties not in government. This is also a fairer system as Primeministers would usually call an election when their party was significantly higher in the opinion polls than all other political parties, making the chances of them re-gaining power much stronger than they may have been 5 years down the line at a set date. On the other hand, some people have suggested that 5 years is too long, noteabely Nick Clegg who wanted 4 years between elections. There have also been concerns about whether campaigns will become dragged out and leborious like America’s 18 month season. Also the fixed term elections don’t necessarily make for a better government and shown by the USA, for example. The flexibility of non-fixed term election system allows for a dissolution and new election if the Government has an inadequate majority. The value of this has been shown in 1951, 1964 and the second......

Words: 690 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Parliament

...Parliament: Parliament: Parliament = the legislature. It is main way in which citizens are represented. It controls the power of the government, forcing it to be accountable. Above all, Parliament exists to grant formal consent to legislation even though it is dominated by the government. Features of a Parliamentary Government: * Parliament is the highest source of political authority – political power has to be authorised by Parliament * Government has to be drawn from Parliament * No strict separation of powers between legislative and executive – fusion of powers * Government must be accountable to Parliament Features of a Presidential Government: * Legislature and executive have separate sources of power – separately elected * President is not part of the legislature * The President (and therefore executive) is accountable directly to the people, not the legislature * Clear separation of powers between executive and legislature – there is therefore codified constitutional arrangements that separates those powers What is parliamentary sovereignty? * Parliament in the UK is legally sovereign * It is the source of all political power * It may restore to itself any powers that have been delegated to others * It may make any laws it wishes and they shall be enforced by the courts and any other authorities * It is not bound by its predecessors – laws passed by parliaments in the past are not binding on the current......

Words: 2558 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

“Identify and Discuss the Skills and Strategies Needed for Effective Learning”

...“Identify and discuss the skills and strategies needed for effective learning” Word Count: 858 Effective learning involves students learning a broad range of core skills and strategies that can be learnt and developed throughout the Higher Education (HE) life span. Throughout this essay discussion will explore the core tasks and strategies of effective learning, including the importance of “self” within the context of learning, the academic skills required and the scholarly expertise required to understand, research and produce academic essays or reports. Finally, a summary of the approach to effective learning will be detailed within the conclusion Studying at HE differs from other types of studying as students are expected to manage and their learning. Cottrell (2013, p. 10) reaffirms this, stating “that in HE, success lies largely in your own hands.” Generic literature (Payne and Whittaker, 2006; Price and Maier, 2006; Moore et al, 2010; Burns and Sinfield, 2012; McMillan and Weyers, 2012; Bedford and Wilson, 2013; Cottrell, 2013) is published on study skills and provides broad based overviews (skills, tasks and strategies) of the prerequisites required for learning at HE level. More task focused texts Godfrey (2011) on writing for university, Godwin (2014) on writing an essay, Cottrell (2011) on critical thinking, McMillan and Weyers (2012) on referencing and plagiarism and Williams et al. (2012) on reflective writing run parallel to the generic texts. Both......

Words: 1196 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Discuss the Extent to Which Government Control Limits the Effectiveness of Parliament in Performing Its Main Functions (25)

...Discuss the extent to which Government control limits the effectiveness of Parliament in performing its main functions (25) Within British politics, it is generally accepted that the executive branch, dominates the legislative. Some have often argued that especially since 1997, this trend has developed into an ‘elected dictatorship’, so it can therefore often be questioned whether the Government has too much power over Parliament. The system of party whips, Government Majorities, weaknesses and strengths of the lords, free votes/rebellions, and Private Members Bills are all factors that can be used to discuss the extent of the control Government has over Parliament. Firstly, the whipping system within parties can be used to demand loyalty from MPs under a certain party. Whips control membership of committees and the Business of the house, having the power to ‘withdraw the whip’ from Rebel MPs, meaning party membership and privileges are suspended. This means the party in control of the legislation and with a majority can ensure votes from almost every member of their party, through the whip system, therefore, if they have a strong majority, always being able to pass their bills and reject opposition bills. This limits the effectiveness of Parliament in democratically delivering law, as it allows the party in majority to disregard other parties, and their own member’s opinions, and force them to vote one way, the way that they agree with. This can cause major consequences,......

Words: 997 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Executive Power

...what extent does parliament control executive power? Parliament remains the center of debate for MP's and parties, however it's the executive government that has overhauling power of formulating and executing policies. As head of the executive branch of government the Prime enjoys considerable power. The executive would be commonly known to have considerable power but you could argue that parliament places restraints and controls certain aspects of it. Parliament can be considered weak in different ways. One of those is the presence of party loyalty in the commons. MP's are elected and will have a strong mandate to support the party's policies. Defying the party leadership would prove too difficult and could be seen as a betrayal of the mandate. In turn, MP's will feel bound to the mandate made, encouraging them not to challenge the executive and support it's decisions. Another party factor is the overall majority the government has in parliament. The first past the post system guarantees this majority . The conservative party in the current House of Commons has 101 more seats than Labour. This demonstrates the vast majority of Conservative MP's from the 2015 general election. More importantly, for parliament to build momentum against the executive it would be difficult as roughly half the chamber are in the Prime Ministers party. In summary, party loyalty and is a beneficial to the executive's hold of power. However, Parliament does remain effective in......

Words: 844 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Separation of Powers Hinders Effective Government in the Usa. Discuss.

...The separation of powers hinders effective government in the USA. Discuss. (30 marks) The ‘separation of powers’ is a theory where political power is distributed over the 3 branches of government. This was put in place to create a limited government which would essentially help to avoid tyranny and protect the liberty of citizens. Some of the checks and balances include: the president checking congress by presidential veto; the presidential veto is checked by congressional override; the supreme court uses judicial review to decide whether legislation or actions are unconstitutional; presidential appointments are confirmed, and treaties ratified by the Senate; and finally the president is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, but only congress can declare war. Checks and balances are needed alongside the separation of powers. Checks and balances are essential for the scrutiny of the three branches of government, however they come with some disadvantages. One reason as to why the separation of powers hinders effective government in the USA is because there is often a divided house within government which subsequently results in gridlock when passing legislation or when each branch exercises their powers. It is not uncommon that the majority party in congress is the opposite of the party that the President belongs to. This usually means that the legislative and executive have contrasting views. Most recent presidents have accused the Senate of either rejecting or......

Words: 920 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

There Are No Effective Checks on Presidential Power

...There are no effective checks on Presidential power. Discuss There are a number of ways the President has got a number of powers that make the executive more powerful than Congress and the Judiciary. Through the President’s power to announce legislation, appoint federal jobs, be Commander in Chief, negotiate treaties and veto legislation; hold the Executive as a more powerful body than the other two. However, there are a number of checks and balances that the Legislature and the Judiciary hold over the Executive that limit the President’s power. The extent of the limitations on the President’s power will be examined in this essay. The President’s ability to announce legislation during his annual State of Union address gives the President an opportunity to highlight the legislative agenda that he wants to get passed in the forthcoming year. This is an important power to the President because if Congress adjourns without acting on his proposals, the President has the power to call Congress into a unique session at his discretion. Also, the President can force adjournment in Congress if both houses cannot agree on a piece of legislation, therefore the president has a deciding vote in theory over some legislation. The President, as he is a powerful influence on public opinion he is a powerful influence over Congress. However, the President does not sit within the Legislature and therefore does not have the power to propose direct legislation. Congress can also adjourn his......

Words: 1032 - Pages: 5

ゴルフ&設備 | La Naissance du dragon FRENCH DVDRIP 2018 | 1x911 Acacias 38