Free Essay

Discuss the Idea That There Is Little Difference Between the Conservatives and Labour Party

In: Social Issues

Submitted By moss1233
Words 1020
Pages 5
Discuss the idea that there is little difference between the conservatives and labour party.
The largest two parties in British politics; the Conservatives and Labour, are often considered the polar opposite to each other, however with a limited understanding, it can be seen that there is little difference in the ideology of modern day "Cameron's Compassionate Conservatism" and Miliband's "One Nation Labour", despite their aims to appeal to different classes and sectors. However they are considered now extremely similar due to their ideologies that can be taken from their manifestos in the 2005 General Election. A party's ideology is a set of promises or regulations that the party follows, this results in bills and policies being made that follow the party ideology to make the nation suit the electorate. Currently, the nation is run by the Conservatives under David Cameron, this involves uniting the people to lessen the amount of government influence over the people which is a departure from the original Thatcherism and One Nation Conservatism.
A similarity between the Labour party and the Conservatives is their intentions to spread the wealth across the nation. The Labour party make it clear in Milliband’s 2010 manifesto that they would reform the system of how wages and wage brackets are organised and paid, the tax levels are also to be changed through reforms across different levels of income to accurately redistribute the levels of wealth for a more equal society. The conservatives intend to redistribute finances to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor which has been known to be huge. Although these methods used by the parties favour different measures to achieve the end result, showing the similarities in the ideologies of the parties that they are aiming for the same outcome but their ways and means are very dissimilar. However for the conservatives the entire system is an enormous skew from Thatcherism of the 1970s onward, which believed if someone has earned their money through work then the government should not be a part of an intervention to take it away from them, this displays how the conservative party have altered their ideology to keep up to date with the requirements, wants and current mind set of the electorate.
Also, the way the conservatives have changed their view on the distribution of wealth, the labour party altered their outlook and their views on the free market. In the 2005 general election, Labour changed their views as to how the free market should be managed and regulated, this lead them away from their basic views of preparing the economy to a reformed and more capitalist view of the reduction of regulation of the markets to permit companies to compete and grow as they wish and not to expand to the limits set out by the central government which can be restricting for large companies. This ensured the Labour's economic policy would be competing to the same degree as the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats whom all believe in the free and unregulated market, this was popular at the time as it was a period of economic increase and industrial output and the policy was popular with the electorate who would vote for a more capitalist government.
Currently both Conservatives and Labour alike have very similar ideologies on how regions and society itself should function in order to adequately provide support each other. Both the Conservatives and the Labour Party describe their outlook being that regions can thrive only when working together, the Labour party described their views towards regional councils in their 2010 General Election campaign, the conservatives also provided a very similar view. Regarding previous points, this was an ideological change for the conservatives, as they disregarded the calls for another Thatcherism who's main ideals believed that it was the job of the individual to help themselves and their families achieve what was required and not to be concerned by matters of anyone else as they shouldn't need to be troubled by such matters. The Labour party is still mostly sympathetic with traditions, however the party advises that communities ought to be more as a unit so the government doesn't need to be involved to the same extent as the Conservatives propose, this is far different from socialist views of the party. This is another reason that indicated the Conservatives and the Labour party aren't far from each other in terms of political values and shows that the only really ground breaking difference is the ways in which each party moves forward to achieve the goals set in their manifesto.
It is clear that history the two parties has shown them to be at odds with each other throughout their history together which lead to them occupying the polar opposite ends of the political spectrum from one another other with the conservatives on the right and labour on the left, with labours radical views of complete nationalism and the conservative’s policy of rugged individualism has diminished over the last few decades with each tier of the political history of each party and their main groups; One Nation Conservatism, Thatcherism and Compassionate Conservatism, Old Labour, New Labour and One Nation Labour. However in order to adapt to modern society each party had to appeal to a larger demographic in which the classes were merged over time especially through recent years of economic crises, it is more important that each party appeals to as much of the electorate as possible. For example, the labour party adapting their policy toward the free market to become more on par with the conservatives partnered with the conservatives altering their view on the distribution of wealth to become more in line with labour. To conclude, it is my opinion that both political parties are now attempting to appeal to the same voters which is why they dominate the political spectrum of Britain, there are clear shifts in party ideology towards the centre which is why the Labour and Conservatives always seem to be neck and neck in recent by elections and the general elections themselves from both the left and the right wings.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Similarities Between Classical and Modern Liberals Are Greater Than the Differences. Discuss

...Similarities between classical and modern liberalism are greater than the differences. Discuss. (45 marks) Typically, liberalism is categorised into two separate components; classical liberalism, which was fashioned during the 19th century as a result of the industrial revolution, and the more recent Modern Liberalism which emerged as industrialisation continued within the UK. Although both divisions of Liberalism unavoidably overlap in attitudes and approaches regarding the theory behind the ideology, I believe, fundamentally, that clear tensions between these aspects of Liberalism are more evident when analysing this ideology. Some will say that both classical and modern liberalists possess a number of parallel approaches towards this political theory and its key concepts. Firstly, both strands of Liberalism believe in the necessity of some kind of a state, since life without a state, as Thomas Hobbes stated, would be ‘solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short’. Both views consider the existence of a state to be essential in order to protect individual rights. Since liberals generally considered humanity to be self-interested and egoistical, a state was needed to ensure that individuals did not exploit other individuals’ rights, through acts of stealing, harming, or even slavery, and was therefore the only thing that was capable of restraining all individuals and groups within society. Hobbes and Locke particularly stressed the importance of creating a ‘social contract’...

Words: 1729 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

To What Extent Is the Labour Party Still Socialist?

...To What Extent Is Labour Still A Socialist Party? Socialism, as it is understood in Britain, is a political ideology whereby all people are considered fundamentally equal, the means of production are nationalised, and a mass redistribution of wealth is desired in order to uphold social justice and prevent monopoly by the upper class. It effectively supports a view of collectivism – the idea that society, as a whole, should be treated as one economic unit, and that ‘the economy’ should therefore be in its hands. During the 1980s, Labour was arguably the farthest left that it has ever been. During this period, Labour was of an ideology of Social Democracy. Social democracy is a form of socialism which aims to reform the capitalist system to reduce social inequality and promote social justice. The core values of the social democracy can be seen in the old Clause IV which supported equality, redistribution of wealth, social justice, nationalisation, full employment and welfare for all, which were heavily socialist leanings. Its main means of upholding these values were through a mixed economy, Keynesian demand management to support employment and the redistribution of wealth via the welfare system. By the 1970's this system of running the country had led to stagflation, and Keynesianism had failed in the eyes of many. The Conservative Party was later elected with a New Right agenda under Thatcher, and the electorate consensus following their periods in office was that her......

Words: 981 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Page 1 ‘Winning the Vote Made Little Difference to Women’s Status in Political Life.’ Discuss. made little difference to women’s status in political life.’ Discuss. It is true that the mere winning of the vote for women made little immediate difference to their status in political life, and yet, it was a necessary beginning to establishing and later asserting their power. As the great suffragist Millicent Garrett Fawcett stated, women’s suffrage did ‘not in itself represent any extensive change for it would come as a necessary corollary of other changes’. From 1918 onwards, while the limited suffrage opened by the Representation of the People Act provided the vehicle for the changes British women desired to see in their society, feminists and people with an interest in women’s issues were well aware that much work had to be done in order to contribute to their progression in political life. This essay will begin with a brief summary of the state of women prior to 1918, as well as the aspirations and expectations of suffragists and anti-suffragists. Following this, it will describe how women were subsequently viewed as voters and political leaders by others of their sex, men, and the various political parties. The essay will assess how women sought to secure their interests, both politically and socially, and which methods were most effective. While significant changes for women did not happen quickly or immediately, this essay seeks to communicate the optimistic view that with time and the on-going determined efforts of feminists and other interested parties,......

Words: 2097 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

To What Extent Has the Conservative Party Changed Since Thatcher and What Challenges Does It Still Face?

...Thatcher revolutionised the Conservative party, bringing life back into what many felt was a tired Tory party. She was dogmatic rather than pragmatic, she believed in the value of the individual and she was a strong advocate of the free market economy. She irrevocably changed the Conservative party and politics. Leaders since her may have felt they were living in her shadow – none of them would dare publically question her, and many of her ideals have stuck. Even Labour accepted some of her policies, such as anti-trade union laws and privatisation. However, she also bred bitterness, so Cameronist politics cautiously echo Thatcherism, whilst trying to appeal to a wider audience. Cameron respected Thatcher rather than worshipped her – he set about what the media called “detoxifying” the Tories, but he still shared many core values with Thatcher. Cameron faces a different backdrop to Thatcher and his challenge has been to adapt rather than revolutionise – he admired Thatcher but is pragmatic enough to change rather than blindly follow her unshaking beliefs. Cameron’s Conservatism is different to Thatcherism – and although much of it can be put down to the coalition diluting the more hard-line Tory policies, there are many decisions Thatcher would never have taken – again highlighting the difference between Thatcher’s dogmatism and Cameron’s pragmatism. Cameron had also planned to match Labour’s public spending increases from 2010-11 - whilst abandoned the idea shows he is much......

Words: 1774 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Discuss the Differences Between Churches, Sects and Cults

...Discuss the differences between churches, sects and cults. A church: is a religious group that accepts the social environment in which it exists. In more plain language, a church is widely accepted by the host culture in which it resides. In America, Protestantism would be a church. It is generally accepted by the whole and is consistent with the culture's values (maybe not traditional Protestantism, but what forms we have of it today). Church may have denominations which are small changes made in the church that are still accepted by the host culture. A sect: is a religious group the rejects the social environment in which it exists. Now, it's not as extreme as that definition makes it seem. A sect doesn't necessarily share the same values as the host culture. This causes some friction between the religious group and the host culture, but we accept the group as a society because we're more tolerant to differing religions in this day and age. Many churches started as sects. One well-known example was the Nazarenes. This was an reform movement within Judaism formed by Jesus' apostles after the execution of Jesus circa 30 CE They were largely dispersed or killed some four decades later when the Romans attacked Jerusalem and destroyed the temple. Again the most obvious North American example of a sect that evolved into a denomination is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), the Mormons. Their founder, Joseph Smith, had a revelation from God that......

Words: 1207 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

How Influential Are Conservatives in the Democratics Party?

...How influential are conservatives in Democratic part? A way that the conservatives are still influential in the Democratic Party is through foreign affairs. Through foreign policy they take a conservative approach in which they intervene in other countries. For example Obama initiated a military surge in Afghanistan, showing that conservative ideologies are still influential in the Democratic Party. However this may be because through foreign policy the president can express more of his powers and position in the party. So actions in foreign policy may not show an influence of conservatism but rather a way in which the president can take more leadership in. Another example of how the Democratic Party holds some conservative values is that some pro-life democrats influence Obama not to allow Federal money to be used to support abortion. Demonstrating that the Democratic Party can be traditional in their views i.e. being pro-life – believing that all life is sacred. Also some democratic supporters hold some traditional conservative views. For example Latinos, who supported Obama in 2008, are not generally pro-choice. Showing that those that support the Democratic Party may not necessarily support some of their policies as they may contradict with their conservative views. Thus conservatism is still influenced in the Democratic Party. However the Democratic Party still hold their liberal values. This is illustrated in the history of Obama’s presidency and Clinton’s......

Words: 366 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How Far Do Sources 1, 2 and 3 Suggest That in the Years 1945-59, the Conservative and Labour Parties Held Radically Different Views on the Nationalisation of British Industry? (20 Marks)

...that in the years 1945-59, the Conservative and Labour parties held radically different views on the nationalisation of British industry? (20 marks) Between the years of 1945 and 1959, there was much speculation as to whether or not there was a consensus or conflict between the Labour and Conservative parties in regards to their views on Nationalisation. Sources 1 and 3 completely disagree with each other. On the one hand, the first source is Clement Attlee, the leader of the Labour party in 1945, saying that something has to be done and that nationalisation is the way. Contrastingly, source 3 is from the Conservative party manifesto. It chooses privation over nationalisation, and therefore presents both parties as holding radically different views on the British industry, each with their own ideas. However, source 2 offers a variegated approach, with Hugh Gaitskell, the leader of the Labour party in 1959, showing the parties as having less radically different views, as he talks about a mixed economy, private and national, being perhaps a wise move on behalf of the government. Sources 1 and 3 agree, overall, that both the Labour and Conservative parties held radically different views on the nationalisation of British industry. Source 1 was taken from a speech by Clement Attlee, the leader of the labour party at the time. In 1945, the country was in economic ruin and a social divide was severely evident. Clement Attlee, alongside the Labour party, believed that......

Words: 1136 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

To What Extent Is the Conservative Party Still Committed to Its Traditional Principles?

...TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY STILL COMMITTED TO ITS TRADITIONAL PRINCIPLES? Since 1979 the conservative party has undergone significant changes from the traditional conservative party which focused on ideas about human nature, order and pragmatism, first with new right conservatism under Thatcher then with the current conservative party. The current conservative party however, can be seen to still be committed to its traditional conservative principles such as Euro-scepticism and that they remain largely traditionalist. However there are many ways in which the conservative party has changed such as taxation, education and the welfare state. One way the conservative party has changed is through taxation. Traditionally, the conservative party was known as believing in low tax however the current conservative party, seems to have changed certain parts of their policies about this perhaps shifting to a more central position on taxation proposing a new tax scheme where people earning under ten thousand pounds a year pay no tax and there would be bigger and more severe crack downs on top earners in offshore bank accounts. This signifies a deviation from traditional conservative principles, perhaps due to the modernisation of the party since Cameron became leader. One way the party has stayed committed to its conservative principles is through continued euro-scepticism. Traditionally the party has been very euro-sceptic initially not wanting to join the EU and......

Words: 661 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Discuss the Key Difference Between the Supply Chain for a Service and Manufacturing Organizations.

...Discuss the key difference between the supply chain for a service and manufacturing organizations. “Service organizations are those that produce intangible products that cannot be produced ahead of time. Manufacturing operations produce physical tangible goods that can be stored in inventory before they are needed.” (Reid & Sanders, 2011, p.5) “Supply chain management is the vital business function that coordinates and manages all the activities of the supply chain linking suppliers, transporters, internal departments, third-party companies, and information systems.” (Reid & Sanders, 2011, p. 100). Manufacturing organizations entails the production of goods that have value in the market. Service organizations provide services. “The significant difference between the various types of industries is observed when we analyze the manufacturing or service environment in which they operate. Elements of the manufacturing environment include external environmental forces, corporate strategy, business unit strategy, product selection, product/process design, product/process technology and management of competencies.” (ErpPandit, 2011) Discuss ways globalization frustrates or interrupts the supply chain process. Ways in which globalization frustrates or interrupts the supply chain process include the impact it has on quality and transportation. “Ocean carriers have predicted that the volume of goods shipped from Asia to the United States will continue to have double-digit annual......

Words: 419 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Labour Party Today

...|All Sociology Modules |Sociology Links |Government and Politics Home page |AS Government and Politics |A2 Government and Politics |Government and Politics Links | | Labour and Its Ideology 1945- 1979 Core Principles of Socialism: Positive attitudes to human nature; critical analysis of capitalism; class inequality and poverty, equality, justice, liberty, community, cooperation, internationalism, collectivism public ownership . Variants of Socialism: Marxism, Anarchist Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Social Democracy, New Labour? Revolutionary Socialism and Evolutionary Socialism Fundamentalist Socialism and Revisionism Democratic Socialism and Social Democracy Old Labour and New Labour Similarities and differences between Socialism and other ideologies 1945-51 Labour in Power The Labour Manifesto for the 1945 General election stated that “The Labour Party is a Socialist party and proud of it." In practice, however, numerous theoretical problems are involved in the definition of socialism and although the Labour Party has always contained socialists both in the Parliamentary Labour party and the extra-parliamentary party, it has been convincingly argued, despite the above pronouncement of the 1945 manifesto that the Labour party is described more accurately as a social democratic party where social democracy implies support for a relatively strong, interventionist and reformist state dedicated to the improvement of the life chances of disadvantaged......

Words: 2614 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Explain the Divisions That Exist Within the Conservative Party over Ideas and Policies (10)

...Explain the divisions that exist within the conservative party over ideas and policies (10) One of the most notable divisions that exists within the Conservative party today is over the European Union. Many Conservative MPs and party members do not like the UK’s involvement with the EU to the extent that they wish to remove the UK from it altogether, or at least decrease Britain’s involvement. The main arguments against staying in the EU include the high cost of membership and worries about the volume of immigration into the UK from EU countries, more recently Romania and Bulgaria. There are, however, a significant number of Conservative MPs who wish to stay within the EU, with arguments such as around 50% of our trade is within the EU, and the single market brings between £30bn and £90bn a year into the UK economy, which is far more than the cost of membership. These differing opinions within the party have caused splits and divisions within the party. Another division which has occurred within the Conservative party is the argument over gay marriage. There is a clear difference of opinion within the party as some believe that homosexual couples should have the same marriage rights as heterosexual couples, whilst some disagree. David Cameron, leader of the party, has publicly voiced his support for gay marriage, however many Conservative MPs, for example David Burrowes, disagree with his opinion. The clash within the party came as traditionalists (opposed to same sex......

Words: 333 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Labour Parties Reforms in 1997

...After the Labour party’s strong victory in the 1997 general election, winning 179 seats, they have made moves and provisions towards constitutional reform. Indeed, the two prime ministers; Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have done much for reform over the years, as illustrated by devolution and the human rights act. Indeed, they made provision for reform in 4 key areas, modernisation, and greater protection of rights, democratisation and decentralisation. However, it can be argued that their reform has been limited, and much more can be done for constitutional reform.  Firstly, it is clear that the modernisation aspects of the reform have been severely limited. Indeed, this can be illustrated by the reform of the House of Lords. Over the past 10 years, only part 1 of the reform process has taken place. This has included the removal of over 600 hereditary peers to only 92. However, no reform for a partially or fully elected second chamber has taken place. Until this happens it is argued that the Lords is not democratically legitimate as all policy making institutions must have legitimacy. By merely appointing the members of the Lords means that whilst they may have expertise, they are not representing the public which means they are not socially accountable. Also, the Wright report, which includes provisions towards electing members of select committee chairs by secret ballot, and to end the Winterton rule on public bill committees is still stuck within the legislative process....

Words: 1068 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Conservative Party, Traditional Policies

...To what extent have the modern Conservative Party abandoned their traditional policies? Conservatism is a state of mind or political movement which is natural adverse to excessive change and reform and generally supports the retention of traditional values and institutes. The current Conservative government however is more in the centre rather than further to the right, due to the new tradition that emerged in the 1790’s, under Margaret Thatcher called New Right conservatism, or Thatcherism. There is great debate as to whether the modern conservative party have retained any of their traditional, original policies. One way in which the modern Conservative party has abandoned its traditional policies is the role the state takes in the country. Traditionally the role of the state was limited, with little economic or social intervention, linking directly with the Conservative idea of change should be avoided, however the modern Conservative party has taken the view that the state places a key part in increasing opportunities and reducing poverty, with less regulation at a local level. This directly abandons the traditional policies as this policy aims for the state to help socially - through reducing poverty and economically - through acting more quickly on things. This can be seen as a good thing however, as people prefer to see the government taking a more involved effort, which is not what the traditional policies of the Conservative party believed the role of state......

Words: 652 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Were the Conservatives the Natural Party of Government Between 1951-2007?

...Were the Conservatives the natural party of government between 1951-2007? (45) There is abundant evidence to suggest the Conservatives were seen as the natural party throughout the initial era of 1951 to 1997. However, after Blair’s New Labour huge and resounding landslide victory in 1997, definitions of a “natural party” have become more complicated; and it being ascribed to the Conservatives far from being accurate. Agree: * Throughout 1951 to 1997, the Conservatives were in power for 35/46 years. No Labour government ever won two successive elections. * Conservatives dominated for long periods between 1951 to 1997, with 3 consecutive victories during 1951 to 1964, and 4 consecutive victories during 1979 to 1992. * The only landslides came from the Conservatives during 1951 to 1997, in the general elections of 1959, 1983 and 1987; they had a majority of over 100 seats during these administrations * Many commentators and books have described the 20th century as the “Conservative century/age”. * Conservatives certainly had the “appetite for power” during 1951 to 1997; their energy and direction was focused on winning general elections * Conservatives have never really been tied to a single ideology, Labour before 1997 focused wholly on socialism and derivatives of it. This meant the Conservatives were able to adapt more easily: Churchill accepted the welfare state, whilst Thatcher was able to reposition the Conservatives towards the right wing......

Words: 954 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Cultural Differences Between China and Italy

...AMITY GLOBAL BUSINESS SCHOOL Cultural Differences between China And Italy SUBMITTED BY KUSHAGRA MEHROTRA GROUP –B A0102314029 MBA HR ABSTRACT International management studies have been based primarily on the comparison of managerial behavior in countries around the world. Often, these studies have implied that businesspeople behave similarly with their domestic colleagues as with their foreign counterparts which indeed sums up to conflicting results. Context of the negotiations at the international level are faced with the differences between various cultures: a longterm attitude towards communication, the power placement, the uncertainties avoiding, emotional differences between the negotiating parties and others. These and other differences in cross-cultural dimensions can influence the process of negotiations between the representatives of different cultures in the negotiations. There may happen in a variety of misunderstandings in negotiations and between the two parties of the same culture, while the process of preparing for the talks with different cultures requires empirical studies in Intercultural Communication. The article discusses cultural dimensions of two contrasting cultures and their effect on negotiations. The Article includes cross cultural studies between an Asian and a European nation’s cultural strengths and weaknesses to anticipate an opposing nation’s possible behaviors in the negotiation process, and to understand the......

Words: 4259 - Pages: 18

malayalam | Baixar toque para celular | Calde da Donna Maglia Maniche Lunghe Felpa da Donna Maglioncino Maglia Maglia