Free Essay

Financial Reporting and Standard Setting by the Sec, Fasb, Iasb, and, Gasb

In: Other Topics

Submitted By ilove2cache
Words 1963
Pages 8
Financial Reporting and Standard Setting by the SEC, FASB, IASB, and, GASB

Abstract
In the accounting industry there are different organizations that have been established to design, implement, and oversee accounting standards and financial presentation processes. Such organizations include the Securities Exchange Commission, SEC, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, FASB, the International Accounting Standards Board, IASB, and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, GASB. Each of these organizations works closely with the others to attempt to provide the accounting industry with a similar, if not identical, set of accounting standards that align with those of the U.S. GAAP – Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and IFRS – International Financial Reporting Standards. The strengths and weaknesses of these organizations identify their similarities and differences and enable the organizations to continue to grow with the finance and accounting industries.

In the accounting industry there are several different organizations specifically designed to set, maintain, and regulate accounting standards and financial statement presentation. Among these organizations are the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB, and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, or GASB. Each organization was established to carry out specific purposes, and handles the accounting standard setting and financial statement presentation in separate manners. Additionally, each organization provides strengths and weaknesses to the accounting community due to their standard setting and financial statement presentation methods. The creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, followed the Great Crash of the market of 1929 and the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. After the crash of the stock market, the morale of investors, creditors, and the general public plummeted significantly and U.S. Congress created the SEC in effort to raise the overall economic morale of the country. Prior to the crash in 1929, there were very few restrictions and regulations in the finance industries, and those that did exist were not always enforced as they should have been. The SEC was created and appointed tasks such as establishing, adopting, and maintaining finance regulations such as accounting standards and financial statement presentation. Congress established specific requirements for those who served in the SEC such as, “By law, no more than three of the Commissioners may belong to the same political party, ensuring non-partisanship. The agency's functional responsibilities are organized into five Divisions and 23 Offices, each of which is headquartered in Washington, DC. The Commission's approximately 3,500 staff are located in Washington and in 11 Regional Offices throughout the country.”(SEC.gov.2013). Further, the SEC oversees accounting standard and regulation maintenance such as the oversight of other organizations created to help enforce and maintain financial regulations, like the FASB and the IASB. There are several financial Acts in place in order to provide the framework for the SEC’s regulations and standard setting processes, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934. The rulemaking process of the SEC includes, “…several steps: concept release, rule proposal, and rule adoption.”(SEC.gov.2013). By maintaining financial securities matters, the SEC serves as a law enforcement agency. Other private sector organizations have been appointed to help the SEC by maintaining and regulating standards before they are brought before the SEC. Although it is beneficial to have additional organizations that are appointed to help provide the SEC with regulation and standard setting instances, this forces the SEC to not only have oversight of the financial regulations and standard maintenance of the general public but also of those they have appointed to help in this process such as the FASB. “In the U.S., the SEC is legally responsible for accounting standard setting.” (Palmon, Peytcheva, & Yezegel.2011). While the SEC presents financial statements and maintains the standard setting process by delegating and overseeing those tasks to those financial organizations, such as the FASB which were created for this purpose, the other organizations function differently. This allows the SEC the ability to maintain the accounting standard setting processes over a wide range of the country without having to operate with substantial employees within the organization. By delegating these standard setting tasks to other organizations, the SEC is able to appoint the oversight of certain types of standards in certain settings to these organizations and simply intervene when the tasks exceed the scope of the organizations responsibilities. Being able to provide so much guidance and oversight of the accounting standards also provides uniform standards that must be maintained by all businesses and organizations and less of a chance of different standards for different entities due to having the standards being assigned by many different governmental bodies. The downfall to delegating out such tasks is that the SEC is not vulnerable to criticisms in the same manner as organizations such as the FASB and may be viewed as hiding behind the views of those organizations. The FASB operates as a separate organization with different processes, procedures, and requirements than those of the SEC, but is still ultimately overseen by the SEC. The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, was created by the SEC in 1973. The primary purpose for the creation of the FASB by the SEC, “…has been the designated organization in the private sector for establishing standards of financial accounting that govern the preparation of financial reports by nongovernmental entities.”(FASB.org). The FASB is part of an entity which includes the Financial Accounting Foundation, Foundation; the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council, FASAC; the FASB; the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, GASB; and the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council, GASAC, and is independent of all other business and professional organizations. The FASB standard setting procedure includes placing the item in question before the board, the board appointing a task force in charge of researching the problem and providing a formal statement of the problem and their suggested solutions for a discussion memorandum, the memorandum being presented in a public hearing within a few months, and then a final draft of the standard being issued after the closing of the comment period. Seidman, Chair of the FASB in 2011, stated that his opinion of the role of the FASB was to help, “…our country to understand what changes were being proposed… and be a strong voice in the process to make sure we end up with standards that benefit U.S. investors and other users of financial statements.”(Kranacher.2011). Research found by several economists and those is social psychology suggests that organizations that are required to answer to other entities such as the relationship of the FASB and the SEC, “…leads decision makers to align their views of the evaluative audience to whom they are accountable.” (Palmon, et al.2011). This type of relationship is a weakness for the FASB as they are seen to have specific interests in their standard setting processes that align with those special interests of the SEC, which may appear to advocate more for the private sector than the public sector. The International Accounting Standards Board, IASB, formerly known as the IASC, was established by the accountancy bodies of nine countries including Canada, France, Germany, Australia, Japan, Mexico, the United Kingdom and Ireland (UK), the United States (US), and the Netherlands. Initially, upon the creation of the IASB, the organization utilized accounting standard setting policies based on their initial fourteen standards which they intended to dissect and restate a new state of core standards in 2002. Together with the FASB, the IASB issued the Norwalk Agreement in which “…they pledged their best efforts to make their existing reporting financial standards fully compatible as soon as practicable and to coordinate their work programs to ensure that compatibility was maintained…”. (Kirsch.2012). The Norwalk Agreement outlined the plan to maintain these standards stating that they would do so by, “…(a) aiming the short-term project at removing a variety of individual differences between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), (b) removing other differences between GAAP and IFRSs by addressing concurrently new, discrete, substantial projects (mutual undertakings)…” (Kirsch. 2012). Like the FASB, the IASB is monitored by an additional entity, the FASB. Unlike the SEC’s monitoring of the FASB however, the FASB’s monitoring of the IASB is to gain a better insight into the standard setting processes of the IASB. Further, this relationship allows the FASB to provide insight into their standard setting and financial statement presentation processes for the IASB as well as the IASB providing insight of their inner-workings to the FASB. As of 2010, the FASB and IASB were working jointly to present financial statements in a manner that allowed for a smooth transition to the IFRS requirements while still complying with U.S. GAAP. Examples include the display of gains and losses on financial statements being presented differently to better facilitate the transition. While this will allow for a smoother transition to IFRS, such financial statement presentation costs will be substantial. Although there may be significant changes that occur when the IFRS convergence occurs, the FASB and IASB intend to present financial statements in a manner that provides, “…aligning line items, their descriptions, and their order across financial statements.”(Moehrle, Stober, Jamal, Bloomfield, Christensen, Colson, Watts.2010). The Governmental Accounting Standards Board, or GASB, serves to “…improve state and local governmental accounting and financial reporting standards…”(GASB.org.2013) that provide financial statement users with useful, understandable information that is beneficial. The GASB is overseen by the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) Board of Trustees, much like the relationship between the SEC and the FASB. Although the GASB works avidly to provide financial statements that accomplish their intended goal, a study conducted by the FAF in 2012 suggested that it was clear what was within the GASB’s scope of issuing accounting standards and what was not, the limits within the range of what could or could not be done by the GASB when issuing accounting standards, were not clearly established. This posed as a strength and weakness both for the GASB and the FAF in their oversight of the organization. Each organization operates separately but has generally the same standard setting processes and financial reporting presentations. The strengths and weaknesses of these organizations provide the framework for the accounting standard setting processes worldwide.
References

Facts About FASB. (2015). Retrieved September 12, 2015, from http://www.fasb.org/facts/

Final Policy on GASB Scope of Authority. (2013, November 1). Retrieved September 14, 2015, from http://www.accountingfoundation.org/jsp/Foundation/Page/FAFSectionPage&cid=1176162236146

Kirsch, R. J. (2012). THE EVOLUTION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE US FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD AND THE INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD SETTERS: 1973-2008. The Accounting Historians Journal, 39(1), 1-51. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1282583590?accountid=35796

Kranacher, M. (2011). FASB looks to the future: Standards setting in the post-convergence world. The CPA Journal, 81(12), 17-24. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/922421683?accountid=35796

Moehrle, S., Stober, T., Jamal, K., Bloomfield, R., Christensen, T. E., Colson, R. H., . . . Watts, R. L. (2010). Response to the financial accounting standards board's and the international accounting standard board's joint discussion paper entitled preliminary views on financial statement presentation. Accounting Horizons, 24(1), 149-158. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/208923131?accountid=35796

Palmon, D., Peytcheva, M., & Yezegel, A. (2011). The accounting standards setting process in the U.S.: Examination of the SEC-FASB relationship. Group Decision and Negotiation, 20(2), 165-183. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9166-x

"The Investor's Advocate: How the SEC Protects Investors, Maintains Market Integrity, and Facilitates Capital Formation." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. USA.gov, 10 June 2013. Web. 8 Sept. 2015. .…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Impact of the Fasb/Iasb - “Financial Statement Presentation Project”

...the FASB/IASB - “Financial Statement Presentation Project” The objective of project– The objective of the financial statement presentation project is to establish a global standard that will guide the organization and presentation of information in the financial statements. Nowadays, the globalization of financial markets is increasing dramatically. In order to assist investors, creditors, and other financial statement users to better understand the entity’s financial situation and to help users in their decision-making , it is necessary for the financial statements to be state on a common accounting framework. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are working on converging U.S. Generally Accepted Principles (US GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The goal of the “Financial Statement Presentation Project” is to consolidate the presentation of basic financial statements and format presented by a business entity, including the classification and display of line items and the aggregation of line items into subtotals. The following sections will outline the important changes in the new presentation for four major statements and finally arrive at a conclusion of the establishing of a new, common and high-quality standard presentation. structure of financial statement The complete set of financial statement in the project includes following statement: statement of financial......

Words: 1238 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Fasb & Iasb Relationship

... The IASB and FASB have collaborated for the past 10 years. This collaboration was a goal toward convergence of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The convergence project began with the two organizations conducting a joint meeting in Norwalk, Connecticut, on September 18, 2002. The goal for creating the convergence project was for the “development of high-quality compatible accounting standards that can be used for both domestic and cross-border financial reporting. They also promised to use their best efforts to make their existing financial reporting standards compatible as soon as practicable and to coordinate their future work programs to maintain compatibility” (Schroeder, Clark & Cathey, p. 95). Since 2002, the two boards have described what convergence means and their tactics to achieve it in fulfilling those goals through the Memorandum of Understanding between the IASB and the FASB. The main way the FASB and IASB collaborate is through joint projects to develop common standards (FASB, 2013) Besides the collaboration from the two boards, both organizations have had involvement with the SEC. The SEC has directed the FASB to consider international convergence as it develops new accounting standards. In its 2003 policy statement reaffirming the FASB as the designated private-sector standard setter for the United States. The SEC said that it expects the FASB to consider, in adopting accounting......

Words: 1423 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Governmental Accounting Standards Board (Gasb) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (Fasb( Analysis Paper

...Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Analysis Paper Accountants or individuals, who put the financial statements together, need the knowledge of the two different accounting standards board. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) differ from each other and are similar in different ways and individuals need knowledge of the differences and similarities. GASB and FASB allow use of the modified accrual basis of accounting or the full accrual accounting for government and not-for-profit organizations. Knowing the differences between the two methods and the meaning are important. GASB and FASB Similarities GASB and FASB accounting are sets of objectives that proprietorship, government, and not-for-profit organizations follow in preparing financial statements. According to Weygandt (2008, p. 17) “both the GASB and the FASB have established objectives that circumscribe the functions of financial reports.” GASB and FASB objectives show whether a company is making enough profit to pay for expenses throughout the year, allows investors information to decide whether to invest or not, and how well the company budget complied throughout the year. Also, the two accounting standard boards show whether management is complying with all aspects of the objectives. GASB and FASB accounting have differences that individuals need knowledge about to prepare financial......

Words: 642 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gasb and Fasb Analysis

...GASB and FASB Analysis The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) each contain an imperative position in the domain of accounting. Persons who desire to retain a career in accounting are compel to acquire a profound understanding of both standards boards. Accordingly, the pursuing analysis will elucidate the objectives for the GASB and FASB as well as illuminate the similarities and differences among the two standards boards. In addition, the assessment will depict by which the modified accrual basis of accounting divaricates from full accrual accounting. The GASB aims to formulate and enhance principles of state and local governmental accounting and monetary reporting. Thus will bring about beneficial information of financial documents for users as well as lead and teach the civic, which comprises issuers, auditors, and users of financial reports (Governmental Accounting Standards Board [GASB], n.d.). GASB goals of responsibility are interperiod equity, spending and financial submission, and service endeavors and achievements through evaluating financial system (economy), productiveness, and efficacy. The FASB’s ambition is to formulate and enhance guidelines of financial accounting and reporting, which promote financial reporting by nongovernmental (private sector and not-for-profits) establishments that supplies ruling-constructive information to shareholders and additional persons making use of financial......

Words: 653 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gasb & Fasb

...GASB and FASB Analysis Paper ACC/460 The Governmental Accounting Standards Board and the Financial Accounting Standards Boards were put in place to assist in regulating the private sector, federal, and state and local governments. These regulations that are in place are to hold he sector accountable for its accurate financial reporting and documentation. I ask how these two divisions differ in its objectives and how to they regulate each party it governs. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board oversees the federal, state, and local governments with the basis of accountability. With that the GASB holds the government accountable to the citizens it represents. This means the government entities must show its constituents the money being raised is going to exactly what it was claimed for. An example of this would be a raise in taxes to assist in making gasoline safer for the environment. The GASB has broken down this accountability into three sub-objectives, the first is interperiod equity. Interperiod equity is a means of financial reporting that determines if there is enough current year money to pay for the current year needs. It also explains whether or not individuals in need of certain governmental services were pushed to the taxpayers. The second sub-objective is budgetary and fiscal compliance meaning that this reporting explains where funds came from to take care of services needed by the citizens. The third and final us service effort costs and......

Words: 675 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Relationship Between the Iasb and the Fasb

...Relationship between the IASB and the FASB ACC 541 Relationship between the IASB and the FASB The United States plays an enormous influence on the accounting standards set forth throughout the world in the global economy. The United States follows the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) which has created a large number of accounting standards that are interpreted and accepted by international companies and by the International Accounting Board (IASB). The IASB plays a similar role like the FASB for the rest of the global economy. The IASB is located in London, England and is an independent, privately funded accounting standard-setter. The IASB board consists of members from nine different countries with the IASB’s sole purpose to ‘achieve convergence in accounting standards throughout the world’ (Cellucci, 2011). The IASB and FASB have been collaborating since 2002. This collaboration was derived to create a convergence of the United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The convergence project started when the two organizations met during a joint meeting in Norwalk, Connecticut on September 18, 2002. The two board’s goal for the convergence project was for developing a high-quality compatible accounting standards that can be used for both domestic and cross-border financial reporting. They also promised to use their best efforts to make their existing financial reporting standards compatible as soon as practicable and to coordinate their...

Words: 1324 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Iasb and Fasb

...Running head: THE IASB AND FASB The IASB and FASB Amber Lynch ACC/541 Week 1 Paper March 10, 2014 The IASB and FASB Although the concept of the convergence of accounting standards is a new concept to some the idea has existed since the 1950’s. This idea came about as a solution for economic integration and the uptick in international business operations. When the project was first constructed it focused mainly on harmonizing the differences in principles that existed across many different capital markets throughout the world. The idea of harmonization remained in place until the 1990’s when the concept of convergence became the new priority. The concept of convergence centers on the concept of creating one set of accounting standards that would be used across all of the major financial markets in the world (FASB, n.d.). In order for this set of accounting standards to be uniform it requires the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to work together towards the creation and implementation of the standards. The FASB has been the organization in charge of establishing the standards for financial accounting in the private sector within the United States since 1973 (FASB, n.d.). These standards are formally recognized by both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (FASB, n.d.). They are more commonly known as Generally Accepted Accounting......

Words: 1122 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

An Analysis of Single Set of Financial Reporting Standard

...opportunities. This, in turn, made the need of financial information essential in international capital market. Relevant and reliable financial information aids in making economic decisions relating to the reporting entity. Also enables its users to measure and quantify the economic and financial aspects of an enterprise. Kothari and Barone (2006:23) believe that 'accounting is becoming increasingly globalized'. However, ‘current accounting practice does not meet the information needs of capital market in the 21st century ’(View Point, 2007:1). To meet the diversified needs and expectations of the users a single framework of financial reporting is essential. Payne and Raagan (2008:15) also consider that 'A universal financial reporting standard would help participants in the world's capital markets and other users make economic decisions'. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ACCOUNTING STANDARDS Barth (2006) explains that the definitions of financial statement elements along with the objective and the qualitative characteristics of financial reporting are set by the conceptual framework. It is aimed at the current and prospective equity and debt capital providers to help them in their capital allocation decision. Consequently, the conceptual framework ensures relevant and reliable financial reporting and thus meets the need of shareholders and other users. It is an important element, which forms the frame of reference for financial reporting. It also establishes a theoretical......

Words: 2766 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

A Framework for Financial Reporting Standards: Issues and a Suggested Model

...A Framework for Financial Reporting Standards: Issues and a Suggested Model American Accounting Association’s Financial Accounting Standards Committee (AAA FASC) James A. Ohlson, Stephen Penman, Robert Bloomfield, Theodore E. Christensen, Robert Colson, Karim Jamal, Stephen Moehrle, Gary Previts, Thomas Stober, Shyam Sunder, and Ross L. Watts SYNOPSIS: This paper addresses the issues that confront the FASB and IASB in developing a new conceptual framework document. First, we suggest characteristics that a conceptual framework ought to exhibit. Most of these suggestions are based on our critique of the existing framework and the FASB-IASB work in progress. Second, we present a model framework that exhibits these characteristics. We emphasize up front that this framework is quite explicit. It goes to the heart of what a framework document should do: it places specific restrictions on what constitutes admissible accounting standards. The purpose of our effort is to stimulate broad discussion of alternative approaches to foundational documents and to offer a specific example of such an alternative approach. Keywords: FASB; IASB; conceptual framework; accounting standards; financial reporting. JEL Classifications: M40. In 2008, the American Accounting Association’s Executive Committee asked the Financial Accounting Standards Committee ͑hereafter, the Committee͒ to develop alternative approaches to conceptual frameworks for financial reporting standards. The Committee......

Words: 9116 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

Comparison of Fasb &Iasb

...Mr. James Leisenring, who is a FASB Senior Advisor, makes a presentation about the conceptual framework on Thursday. He expressed some views in this presentation are on his own and do not necessarily represent official position of the financial accounting standard board. Official position of the FASB Board is arrived at only after extensive due process and deliberations. In class, we learned that the conceptual framework is making up with objective, qualitative characteristics, constraints; elements, recognition measurement and disclosure concepts, and financial statement elements which are provide guidance to standard setting. In our text book, the conceptual framework has been described as an “accounting constitution” because it provides the underlying foundation for US accounting standard. And more formally, it is a coherent system of interrelated objectives and fundamental that is intended to lead to consistent standard and that prescribes the nature, function, and limits of financial accounting and reporting. Mr. Leisenring comes up with some different views and concerns of some aspect of the concept framework in his presentation. For example, he talks about the definition of assets liabilities and revenue and expenses, on his view, Mr. leisenring concerns the definition of those concept are kind of vogue and uncertainty. There is no discussion of what items that are not resources or obligations should be recognized or what would be the basis for recognition. He talks......

Words: 564 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Effect of Culture on the Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards

...Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2011 The Effect of Culture on the Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards Mitchell A. Skotarczyk Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Skotarczyk, Mitchell A., "The Effect of Culture on the Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards" (2011). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 165. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/165 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact scholarship@cuc.claremont.edu. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE THE EFFECT OF CULTURE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR MARC MASSOUD AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY MITCHELL SKOTARCZYK FOR SENIOR THESIS SPRING 2011 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction…………………….……………………………………………………………….4 II. Literature Summary………………………………………...………………...….……………..5 III. IFRS……………………...……………………………………………………..……………11 IV. Carve-outs…………………………………………………………………………………....18 V. Culture and Accounting………………………………………………………………………25 VI. Conclusion………………………………………………………………...…………………30 Appendix………………………………………………………………………………………...32 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..37 3 I. Introduction As globalization increases at a blistering pace,......

Words: 9884 - Pages: 40

Premium Essay

The Relationship Between Iasb and Fasb

...between IASB and FASB Doris Edwards ACC/541 – Accounting Theory and Research Instructor - Leslie Crews, JD, MBT March 28, 2011 Financial Accounting Standards Board History The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is a private sector organization that was established in 1973. The FASB is governed by the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF). The FAF appoints the members of the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (FASAC), the council is the entity that informs the FASB of pressing issues or topics to be reviewed (2003, Webster’s). The goal of the FASB is to set standards for financial accounting practices and the production of financial reports. The FASB works to ensure that financial reporting is; transparent, reliable, relevant, comparable, and consistent. It is the responsibility of the FASB to regularly review standards, to check for deficiencies within the current standards, and to also look for methods to improve reporting based on current day needs. As set by Section 108 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act any standard set by the FASB is recognized to be “generally accepted” for the purpose of the federal securities laws (Schroeder, 2011). The FASB initially issued standards through two different types of pronouncements, these are more commonly known as Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS’s)...

Words: 1173 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Fasb vs Iasb

...between FASB and IASB Carolina Camacho-Collier ACC/541 June 6, 2011 Heber W. Howard Abstract This report has been made to explain the direct relationship that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) have and how crucial the unification of these two setting standards entities are in these current days, where financial transactions are expected to perform globally. In addition, it is important to have a Master of Science in accountancy in order to prepare professionals in accounting to provide reliable information for this new environment of economic and financial transactions. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), a non-governmental entity, was created in 1973, after the wheat committee decided to abolish the Accounting Principles Board (APB) as a result of criticism against the objectivity of members. The FASB consists of seven members, which are selected for renewable periods of five year terms with well-paid full time positions. This entity receives funding from the Securities of Exchange Committee (SEC). According with Kieso, Weigandt and Warfield (2007), the purpose of FASB is “to establish and improve standards of financial accounting and reporting for the guidance and education of the public, which includes issuers, auditors, and users of financial information.” The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is a private entity formed in 1973, based in London, England. The IASB......

Words: 1134 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Fasb and Gasb

...FASB and GASB Analysis Paper ACC/460 Carolyn S. Lundy 5/14/2012 Victoria Holmes The FASB and GASB share something’s in common but they function very differently. Their similarities include both operating as a component of the FAF. The Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) is the organization that has over sight over the FASB, GASB, FASAC and GASAC. Under each of their standards, they both have to look over all letters, comments and concerns before making any decisions and in some cases can be made available to the public. Here is where they differ, the FASB has the authority to make and set any new accounting standards to be put in place, which will be recognized by the Securities and Exchange Committee (SEC). The GASB standards are not recognized to be any formal law or ruling, but its standards can be enforced by the individual states that choose the right to. The GASB is solely public and there is unlimited access. In fact, the GASB encourages the public to become heavily involved in their meetings. You can find some records of what will be discussed through the GASB website on the say the meeting will take place. The FASB reports all nongovernment information that will help private entities make the correct accounting decisions. Under the respective standard process, the FASB houses 7 rules that must be in place, the most important seemingly to be that the Board cares and puts the issues of the stakeholders/shareholders first. As with the GASB, they send those......

Words: 393 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

International Financial Reporting Standards

...International Financial Reporting Standards The application of IFRS is spreading all over the world as a result of the development of world economy and increasing transactions among countries and nations. For many years, even now, different countries have different account standards, such as U.S. GAAP, Japan GAAP, and IFRS are mainly adopted by European countries. In recent years, many countries accepted or acknowledged standards used in other countries. In America, for example, the SEC issued that it is possible to adopt IFRS in November 2008 and SEC stated that IFRS is the high quality global accounting standards in February 2010. IFRS, short for International Financial Reporting Standards, are the principles developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Nowadays, “it is becoming the global standard for the preparation of public company financial statements.”(Ervin Black) Parts of standards of IFRS are based on International Accounting Standards published by the Board of the International Accounting Standards Committee between 1973 and 2003. “On April 1st, 2001, the new IASB took over from the IASC the responsibility for setting International Accounting Standards. During its first meeting the new Board adopted existing IAS and SICs. The IASB has continued to develop standards calling the new standards IFRS.”(Geoffrey Whittington) U.S. GAAP, short for the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, is more widely accepted in United......

Words: 1263 - Pages: 6

Running Man Episode 351 | * CUSTOM primitive raggedy doll BUNNY rabbit VALENTINE ornie ornament GIRL | Fashion Automatic Belt Buckle Leather Belts Waist Strap Mens Business Waistband