Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Main Reason for the Fall of the Provisional Government Was the Skill and Determination of Lenin in 1917?

In: Historical Events

Submitted By EmilyAnnTurner
Words 2202
Pages 9
To an extent it is valid to say that Lenin's skill and determination as leader of the Bolsheviks was the main reason for the overthrow of the Provisional government. Although, there are significant other factors that contributed to the downfall of the government, such as the weakness the government it in itself possessed, the misjudgment and mistakes it made, and other contributing factors, such as the influential role of Trotsky, which helped impact on the eventual overthrow of the government. Evidence suggests that one of the main reasons for the fall of the Provisional government, was the weaknesses it in itself possessed. For example, the dual authority government can be seen as a weakness because it was not an elected body, and came into being as a rebellious committee of the old duma, refusing to disband at the Tsar's order. This meant it consequently lacked legitimate authority as a result. It had no constitutional claim upon the loyalty of Russian people and no natural fund of good will to rely on, meaning it was judged entirely on how it dealt with the nations problems, making it vulnerable from the start. Its second major weakness was that its authority was limited by its unofficial partnership with the Petrograd Soviet. To begin with there was considerable co-operation between the two, with some people (e.g.- Kerensky) being members of both bodies. The soviet did not set out to be an alternative government, and regarded its role as supervisory, checking that the interests of the people were fully understood by the new government. However, things changed when the Provisional Government seemed unsure of its own authority after the February revolution, resulting in the Petrograd Soviet gaining greater prominence. Soviets played an increasing important role in the development of the revolution, but the Bolsheviks- at this stage- did not dominate them. This importance and ability of the Petrograd Soviet in restricting the Provisional Governments authority was clearly revealed in its issuing of 'Soviet order number 1', meant that decrees of the Provisional Government in regard to military affair were binding only if they were approved by the Petrograd Soviet. This order gave the Soviet an effective veto over the government, and highlighted the Provisional Governments lack of control. The weaknesses that the dual authority government faced appeared to be direct results from the strain of the war. After the February revolution, the government had no choice but to fight on, for financial, not realistic reasons, because if it did not fight then Russia wouldn't receive supplies and war credits from its western allies, on which it relied. Tsardom had left Russia virtually bankrupt, putting huge strains on the provisional government, and making them solely dependant on its large injections from abroad. In the end, the huge strain proved unsustainable, with the preoccupation with war preventing the government from dealing with major social and economic problems. The government was now in a paradoxical situation, and needed Russian in war to survive, but doing so meant it was destroying its own chances of survival. This caused the first serious rift between the Petrograd Soviet and the Provisional Government and makes clear the increasingly difficult circumstances the government had to deal with. Contrastingly, the Provisional Government did have successes in that it was able to resist the challenge of July days, despite the direct challenge upon them, and led to the near extinction of the Bolsheviks. Also, the failure of the rising meant that the disunity of the opposition was highlighted. For instance, the demonstration was confused and disorderly, with demonstrators even falling out amongst themselves! This disunity made it reasonably easy for the provisional Government to crush the rising, bringing troops over from the front, who were still loyal to the government to help disperse the demonstrators. In conjunction with the rising failing, this also highlighted a failure of the Bolsheviks as well, because although they wanted to take power and had the intention to do it, they had no real plan, and so were behind from the beginning. This made it clear that the Bolsheviks were far from being the dominant party and also showed that the Provisional Government still had enough strength to deal with and put down an armed rebellion. Linking into this, it's also evident that it wasn't just the weaknesses of the Provisional Government that led to its fall in 1917, but also, the 2 main mistakes it made, which made it easier for the Bolsheviks to survive. These mistake were: the land question and the Kornilov affair. Land shortage was a chronic problem in Russia and the chief cause of peasant unrest since serf emancipation in 1861. After the February revolution, the peasants were led to believe they would benefit from major land distribution, but the government did no such thing, resulting in peasants taking the law into their own hands and seizing property from local landlords, and the 1917 national peasant revolt showed the increasing unpopularity of the Provisional government, who had no real answer to the land problem. The government did however, set up land commission to redistribute land, but little progress was made where massive tasks were concerned, and it is often questioned whether the government had the true desire and drive to achieve land reforms. This is because, the majority of its members were from the landed and properties classes and so reforms would of perhaps threatened their own positions- a risk they weren't willing to take- and so had no intention of achieving successful land reforms, if it meant they would lose their own possessions in a state land grab as a result. The land issue was equally difficult for the Bolsheviks however, who did not have a land policy, and as a Marxist party dismissed the peasantry and lacked revolutionary initiative. Despite saying it was 'pointless for the Bolsheviks to make an alliance with the peasantry in April', Lenin made a tactical adjustment and adopted the Social Revolutionaries 'Land to the peasants' policy, which became the Bolsheviks new slogan. In mid 1917, the Bolsheviks recognised the peasants land seizures as 'legitimate', providing considerable swing of support towards the Bolsheviks in the countryside, which massively increased their popularity, considering that the peasantry dominated a huge percentage of the population. This consequently meant that the support for the Provisional government lessened, as their weakness were greatly exposed by the Bolsheviks who cleverly noted this flaw and fully exposed it by seizing the opportunity to gain peasant support. Another mistake the government made was Kernsky's involvement in the Kornilov affair crisis, which completely undermined the success the government had in the July days, and allowed the Bolsheviks to redeem themselves from their humiliation. General Kornilov- right wing army officer- did not accept the February revolution and believed that Russia had a duty to first destroy its socialist enemies before it could fulfill its patriotic duty of defeating Germany. With German forces becoming a heavy threat to the Petrograd, Kornilov declared that Russia was about to topple into anarchy and that the government was in great danger of a socialist inspired insurrection. On this matter, he informed Kerensky that he intended to bring over his loyal troops to save the Petrograd Soviet from being overthrown, however Kerensky massively misjudged the intentions of Kornilov who actually intended to remove the Provisional government and impose military rule. On discovery Kerensky immediately ordered Kornilov to surrender his post and put him under martial law. Despite surviving, the Kornilov affair highlight a massive misjudgment from the provisional government leader and also emphasised their political weaknesses, revealing how vulnerable the government was to military attack. The Bolsheviks however, benefited from the affair because the were freed from prison to defend the government they pledged to overthrow, showing them as true successful defenders, and diverting attention away from their failure in the July Days. This could be seen as the beginning of their recovery and the turning point for the downfall of the provisional government. Despite some serious mistakes and misjudgments made by the Provisional government, and the weaknesses that it in itself possessed , the skill and determination of Lenin, did play a major role in the fall of the government in 1917. There is no doubting the great significance Lenin's return to Petrograd in April brought. He insisted that the Bolsheviks were the only true revolutionary party and issued the April theses, in which entailed the future policies of the Bolsheviks. He insisted that the party abandon all ties and co-operation with other parties, transfer power to the workers, and above all, overthrow the Provisional government in a second revolution. He also demanded that authority pass to the soviets, which meant that if the Bolsheviks could statistically dominate the Soviets, they would be in a strong position to take over the state. Lenin also adopted two slogans, 'Peace, bread and land' and 'All power to the Soviets', which were his way of presenting the problems that Russia faced and asserted that as long as the Provisional Government remained in power that these problems could not be solved, because the ministers were only interested in the interests of their own class. Lenin's analysis was perceptive and true, because the Provisional governments failure to deal with the three principal issues was ultimately a huge factor in its downfall. Also, Lenin was successful in creating a party with drive and conviction. For instance, there was a lack of a tradition of legitimate party policies in tsarists Russia, and with democracy not entering into it, power would go to the most flexible and ruthless party. The Bolsheviks, under the leadership of Lenin stepped up, and fulfilled this requirement by adjusting to circumstances if necessary, this is apparent through their changes in land policy to gain peasant control. Despite this, they never lost sight of their eventual goal- to seize power of the state. It's sometimes even claimed that Lenin's Bolsheviks were a 'new breed of politician', in that they were utterly self confident, disrespectful of all other parties and ideas, and totally devoted to their leader. This drive, determination and ruthlessness made them an unstoppable force of history and gave other parties very limited hope of gaining power for themselves. He used these political skills in conjunction with his ability to attract peasant support away from the Provisional government to contribute to its downfall. Also, building on his political skills, he used this judgment to pursue an urgent revolution in spite of the reservations of other leading Bolsheviks. Even though Lenin was an extremely determined leader, it's important to consider the contribution of other factors in relation to the downfall of the provisional government. For example there was an extreme influx in Bolshevik party members in 1917, increasing from 24,000 members in February to 340,000 in October of that year. This increase, is viewed by many as a general radicalisation of Russian politics that occurred when the Provisional government got into increasing difficulties. This meant that the Bolsheviks were successful in their land takeover because of the increasingly amount of Bolsheviks in factories and committees, who whilst not necessarily being pro- Bolshevik, were certainly not pro- government and so there was scope here for the Bolsheviks to gain more support. Finally, a major significant factor to contribute to the downfall of the provisional government was the work of Trotsky in organising the October rising. Trotsky was the man who actually organised the rising, despite Lenin being the influence behind it. Using his position as chairman of the Petrograd soviet, he helped set up the Military Revolutionary Committee to organise the defence of the Petrograd against another possible German attack, which proved crucial, because with the control of the MRC, brought with it the control of the Petrograd. With the control of the effective military force- the only one in Russia- he was able to call upon the help of the red guards, and within three days overthrow the Provisional government, under Lenin's orders. Overall, there are lots of different factors which contributed to the downfall of the provisional government in 1917. There is no doubt that Lenin was a superb man of drive and determination, the same as he was a great political leader. Which is seen through his 'land to the peasants' philosophy, which brought him much support. However, whilst this is the case, it's important to consider that the Provisional government had many weaknesses within itself, such as the problem of dual authority and the huge strain of the war, which allowed it to be exposed to the threats of the Lenin and the Bolsheviks, almost inviting them to expose their weaknesses and seize power. In conjunction with this, the role of Trotsky was vital in securing the downfall of the provisional government, because without him, the organisation and planning of the attack would of been hugely lacking. But as to whether the main reason for the fall of the provisional government was the skill and determination of Lenin in 1917, I would suggest is a true and valid statement, contributed to enormously via the work of Trotsky who helped lead the uprising that ultimately resulted in the governments overthrow in 1917.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Opposition Was the Main Problem Facing Alexander3. How Far Do You Agree with the Statement?

...moment when there was urge for changes. His legacy from his father was the inception of newly introduced liberal movements. Even though Alexander was reactionary, it was mainly because he did not want to follow his fathers footsteps who was assassinated by nihilist group “Peoples Will”, he couldn’t stop spread of so called “Westerners” and radicals. It was crucial for Alexander to preserve his power as an autocrat, which meant that there were no room for opposition that could jeopardise his reign. But at that point he could still hold his control over Russia and opposition was too weak and divided to challenge the Tsar, at that time Empire faced more economical and social problems that Tsar needed to solve. As a child Alexander had Pobedonoscev as his tutor who was Tsars chief minister and leading official of the State Church. He was remarkable by his conservative views, being part of Slavophiles movement. It was easy for him to influence Alexanders views far before he became Tsar and even after his influence kept pursuing the young Tsar. Because of Pobedonoscevs doctrines Alexander believed in order for Russia to modernise it needs to follow old traditions, so he will be safe from repeating his fathers fate. Pobedonoscev taught Alexander that basis of political stability, which was very important for the Tsar, lay upon autocracy, Russian nationalism and the Russian Orthodox Church. Russian Orthodox Church members supported Tsar because their position was highly......

Words: 1325 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years 1945-55?

...How far do you agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945-55? It is clear that the Second World War played a vital part in improving the lives of African Americans between 1945 and 1955. However, the impact of the war was lessened by other factors that brought about change such as the civil rights groups and President Truman. These factors were able to convert de jure change into de facto change; something the Second World Wars alone was unable to do. World War Two had a dramatic effect on civil rights for Black Americans. Over 1.2 million black men joined the U.S army during the war and the experience radicalised them. Northern blacks were often trained in rural military camps in the Southern states, this was their first experience of formal racial segregation. They were appalled to know they were fighting a racist opponent, yet being treated as a second class citizen and receiving prejudice treatment back home. Consequently, the black soldiers used the ‘Double V’ sign, which meant they were fighting for two victories: victory overseas and victory over racism at home. The war also began to change the racist attitudes of whites. The United States and her allies were fighting a racist opponent, Hitler, who passionately believed in a ‘Master race’. In the past, white supremacy groups such as the Ku Klux Klan had presented racism as something that was both natural and noble, however,......

Words: 1431 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That Stalin’s Position as General Secretary Was the Main Factor in His Emergence as Leader of Russia?

...How far do you agree that Stalin’s position as General Secretary was the main factor in his emergence as leader of Russia? After Lenin’s death in 1924, the Communist leadership of Russia was thrown into disarray. There were many different ideas for the future of the country, the strongest of which was socialism, which caused many various contenders for the party to emerge. There was a struggle of power between these contenders, but Stalin eventually emerged as the successful new leader of the USSR. Stalin’s position as General Secretary was the main factor in this emergence as leader. Stalin’s position of General Secretary allowed him to use and abuse Lenin’s systems to get to the top. Stalin had the power to control what was discussed and how politburo decisions were carried out, and he also had the significant influence of patronage. This allowed him to access most of the Communist party, his power of patronage allowed him to use his authority to place his most reliable supporters in key positions within the party. As a result, there people were extremely loyal to Stalin as they owed their place to him, and therefore he could count on their support. These people became known as his delegates as they could also be known to vote in Stalin’s favour. Stalin also had other key positions in the party, which allowed him to outmanoeuvre his rivals through a series of alliances. He was head of the Sovnarkom, which allowed him to expel any party members who disagreed with his......

Words: 1111 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Brutality of the Bolsheviks Was the Main Reason Why They Remained in Power in the Years 1917-24?

...believe that the brutality of the Bolsheviks was the main reason why they remained in power. However on the other hand it could be due to other factors such as the Sovnarkom and the weakness of the White’s. Firstly another reason why the Bolsheviks remained in power was because of their brutality using the CHEKA. This was established by Lenin on the 20th of December 1917. It was used as a secret police force to deal with opposition. The CHEKA used many methods all of which were brutal and included arrests, kidnapping, torture, sending of to labour camps and murder. This meant hat through the CHEKA Lenin could deal with any opposition that could affect his remaining in power. Secondly, One reason why the Bolsheviks remained in power was because of their brutality was due to Trotsky and the red army. For example Trotsky introduced the death penalty for any conscripts who deserted the army. He blackmailed them into doing this by holding their families hostage. This meant that not only did the army hold together but was also being trained by the best people there were around. Meaning this would enable them to have a much better chance of lacking opposition e.g. the white’s. This is a brutal and forceful tactic for the Bolsheviks and it worked. Not only did this lead them to win the civil war but in turn by doing that, the Bolsheviks remained in power. Lastly, another reason why the Bolsheviks remained in power because of their brutality was due to the murder of the royal......

Words: 817 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years 1945

...How far do you agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945–55? The impact of the Second World War was, without a doubt, crucial in improving the lives of black Americans over the years 1945-55, as it led to federal support of the cause. However, it wasn’t as important as the use of direct action which, for the first time, was able to convert de jure into de facto change. This, not the War, was therefore the most significant factor in the improvement; achieving something which federal support and the work of civil rights organisations which did not engage in direct action were alone unable to do. The impact of the Second World War was influential in improving the lives of Black Americans because it led to increased federal support of the Civil Rights movement. During the Second World War, approximately 1.2 million black joined the United States armed forces. Their experience in the army allowed understanding the extent to which they were being discriminated against. The hypocrisy of the USA was discovered, a country claiming to be fighting a war of freedom yet oppressed ethnic minorities in their own country. Being sent to Europe, where formal segregation did not exist, the soldiers were able to see what could be achieved from desegregation. African Americans were encouraged to. The War brought significant economic changes to the lives of black Americans. Initially munitions factories......

Words: 1438 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the March Revolution of 1917 Was Due to the Failures of Nicholas 2?

...How far do you agree that the March Revolution of 1917 was due to the failures of Nicholas 2? The March Revolution of 1917 brought autocracy in Russia to an end, when ministers of the last Duma forced the Tsar Nicholas 2 to abdicate. The Revolution happened due to the Nicholas's 2 failures due his reign, however there was a number of problems which appeared before Nicholas 2 or happened without the will of Nicholas 2. When Nicholas 2 came to power in 1894, his main objective was to keep all power in his hand, in another words, Nicholas wanted to remain as an autocrat and be the only ruler of Russia. On the other hand, Nicholas 2 wasn't as reactionary as his father, because Nicholas was not prepared to be extreme in dealing with the social and political unrest in the same manner as his father. His weak leadership led to the policies which after worked against the Tsar. The first social reform was done by Nicholas 2 in 1897. It was reform which limited the working to 11,5 hours from Monday to Friday and to 10 hours on Saturday. However, these policy didn't change the attitude of workers against the Tsarist regime, because people still wanted more liberal social system and a new government which Nicholas was not intend to change. This unhappiness caused by the lack of changes or reforms led to the strike in Saint Petersburg by factory workers who were led by Father Gapon in 1905. The strike finished really dramatically, because a lot demonstrators were killed......

Words: 1372 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years to 1945-55?

...How far do you agree the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years to 1945-55? I agree thoroughly that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason behind the improvement in the loves of African Americans. There are two other factors which help elevate the position of African Americans after the war these were the Federal Government and the NAACP. The Federal Government can be split into two parts the President and the Supreme Court. Before the Second World War most of the African Americans were working in the south of the country in agriculture. For many they had been born into that life and their parents and grandparents had been slaves. World War two had large impact on the lives of African Americans because it gave a chance for people to start anew. Many people had become tiered of doing hard manual labour every day in the farms. The 1920 and 30s had already seen an increase in the number of black people coming down from the south to the northern and western areas. These areas were considered to be industrial areas. After the war started new jobs were created this meant the demand for workers increased. More black people stated to migrate to the north and west for a job. For many of the black people this could have been a raise in there level of confidence. A crucial part of the employment was in the army, many men had signed up to protect their county. Figures show the migration of black......

Words: 1328 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Most Important Cause of the Revolution in February 1917 Was the Great War

...AS History How far do you agree that the most important cause of the revolution in February 1917 was the Great War? The February revolution which occurred in 1917 was the result of several causes, one of which being World War 1; in my opinion, it was the most important trigger. The Great War was the cause of Russia becoming financially dependent on Britain and France, decreasing the prestige the Tsar once held. Russia was unable to sustain its wealth due to the extreme costs the War brought: Anger rose within the people and with 85% of the army containing surfs that were losing their loyalty towards the Tsar, a revolution was inevitable. The war encouraged the breakdown of the autocratic way of ruling, but Tsar Nicholas was unqualified to lead the army anyhow, and was ill suited as Commander-In-Chief. This did not aid the Brusilov Offensive in any way; the result was the failure of the attack in August 1916: With the Russian forces deserting from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea, the loyalty towards the Tsar was largely affected and reduced. The morale further diminished as during December 1916, the railways were unable to commit to their desired function, which lead to a shortage of military equipment. These transportation failures halted vital supplies reaching the battle areas. The major shortage of military equipment led to the Russian artillery units limiting to firing 3 shells per day – which had an enormous impact on the Russian......

Words: 1320 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was the Main Reason for Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in 1917.

...How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness of the provisional government, the home front and most importantly Trotsky role all played a significant role to why the Bolsheviks were successful. Lenin’s leadership played a significant role to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917 due to his clear and persuading aims. Lenin was an influential figure in the eyes of the proletariat. Due to the April thesis clear aims resulted in that he was able to gain greater support and he succeeded in having 200,000 members. The vast amount of members meant that the Bolsheviks had greater support when it came to seizing power. The main aims of the April theses were, Peace, Land and Bread and power to the soviets. Many supported the idea of Peace, Land and bread as they were fed up with the affect the war was having on them and wanted to bring it to an end, people were also starving due to the war and therefore welcomed the idea of Peace, Land and bread. Lenin also promised the confiscation of landed estates from landowners and the aristocracy. The slogan all power to the soviets......

Words: 1325 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree That Trotsky’s Leadership of the Red Army Was Responsible for the Survival of the Bolshevik Government? (30 Marks)

...How far do you agree that Trotsky’s leadership of the Red Army was responsible for the survival of the Bolshevik government? (30 marks) There were many factors that contributed to the survival of the Bolshevik Government, ranging from Trotsky’s leadership of the Red Army to the failings of the Bolsheviks’ rivals for power. This essay shows that the main reason for the Bolsheviks’ continued survival through the period was not Trotsky’s great leadership of the Red Army, but the opposition’s mistakes and failings. This will be demonstrated by analysing the key factors leading to the survival of the Bolshevik Government: Trotsky’s leadership; Lenin’s leadership; The Bolsheviks’ geographical advantage; and finally the Bolsheviks’ enemies’ misunderstandings. The first key factor that contributed to the Bolshevik Governments’ survival was Trotsky’s great leadership of the Red Army. Trotsky created the Red Army from nothing and by 1919 it contained roughly 400,000 troops rising to 5 million troops by 1921. The Red Army outnumbered all opposition and when directed effectively by Trotsky they were easily able to crush any opposition. Furthermore, all enemy attacks came at different times and so could be put down individually and therefore more easily. Another way that Trotsky showed his good leadership qualities was through his forward thinking: for example, many of the troops in the Red Army were inexperienced and so Trotsky “recruited” officers from the Tsar’s army and kept them in...

Words: 1461 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Far Was the Provisional Government Responsible for Its Own Downfall?

...Although there are many reasons for the failure of the provisional government, such as the fact they had to share power with the soviets, Lenin’s return, the radicalisation of Russia and the land question. Their decision to continue fighting in the First World War was the most important because of this they lost support from the people and more importantly, from the armed forces, who they relied on to defend them. Therefore you could say that the Provisional Government was definitely responsible for its own downfall. The biggest problem facing the Provisional Government was the First World War, Russia had already lot Territory in Poland meaning the morale within the armed forces was very low. The continuation of the First World War meant that the Provisional Government lost support from many people. The Provisional Government felt that it was their duty to ensure that Russia continued to fight in the war, additionally Russia owed a large sum money in foreign loans, and the British and French were happy to carry on providing loans as long as Russia continued fighting. Therefore, this influenced the Provisional Governments decision to stay in the war. The continuation of the war brought the Provisional Government into conflict with the Soviet, who had issued n ‘Address to the people of the whole world’ declaring for peace about annexations and indemnities meaning that they would not support the continuation of the war for gaining land or money from opponents. In order to......

Words: 989 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

How Far Was the Provisional Government Responsible for Their Own Downfall?

...How far was the Provisional government responsible for its own downfall? The Provisional Government made many mistakes, such as their response to the Kornilov affair that ended in the Bolsheviks gaining arms and regard amongst the Russian people, which became disastrous for its popularity and effectiveness, and their decision to keep Russia in WW1 which had a domino effect of food shortages and unrest. The unrest and unsatisfaction theat the Provisional Government brought upon itself was the most influential factor for its downfall. However, let it not be forgotten that the task the Provisional Government had was a vast and difficult one, what with Russia being so large and diverse and the complications of theWar. Indeed, any organisation that attempted to recover Russia after the February revolution was almost doomed from the outset. Although, had the situation been handled more effectively by pertaining to the people’s desires: granting more land reforms, taking Russia out of the First World War, the Provisional Government may have been able to sidestep the challenges and pull Russia into a democracy. It was because of their lack of grasp on the situation that doomed them. Their lack of grasp was enhanced by their political situation and decisions; in particular the fact that they had a system of dual power with the Petrograd Soviet. This contributed to their downfall because although certain individuals acted as ‘bridges’ between the two governments, overall the two......

Words: 1567 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Main Reason for the Survival of Weimar Government 1919 – 1923 Was the Weakness of Its Opponents?

...How far do you agree that the main reason for the survival of Weimar government 1919 – 1923 was the weakness of its opponents? (30 Marks) The reason for the survival of the Weimar Republic can be shifted onto many factors such as the weakness of the opposition. The opposition can be said to be clearly shown through the the Munich Putsch in which there is clear evidence of movements against the government. However, this opposition never managed to over come the army and freikorps who through the Ebert-Groener pact pledged their commitment to support the Weimar Government. However, this may not be the main reason for the governments survival between 1919-1923 as other factors can be said to have influenced the survival of the government such as the accomplishments from Stresemann and Dawes who were the chancellor of Germany and the American budget director respectively. Their joint effort ensured the recovery of the German economy which was collapsing. This work can therefore be said to be a major factor for the survival of the government but to what extent it can be called the main reason must be explored. To an extent it can be argued that the main reason for the survival of the Weimar government in the year 1919-1923 was the weakness of its opponents due to the success the government had in eradicating the multiple attempts to overthrow them, that were attempted in the Munich putsch and the Kapp Putsch. Firstly, the Munich Putsch can be seen as a clear showing of the......

Words: 888 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Structure of the Prc Into 6 Regions Was the Main Reason Mao Was Able to Consolidate His Power over China, How Far Do You Agree?

...help him in the process. I do agree that the structure of the PRC in the 6 regions played a huge role in Mao’s consolidation of power but I don’t think it was the main reason. I believe that along with it, other factors were equally as important, such as training people who weren’t members of the CCP to join the government, terror with mass killings, imposed starvation and letting the national capitalists keep their job until he needed them to, so that the system was stable enough for him to control. He also made land reforms and introduced a registration system, which also helped consolidate his power. Mao also extended his political control with the “anti-movements” and the Politburo. The Anti-Movements was a movement against waste, bribery, and inefficiency. It was used as an excuse to getting rid of anybody standing in Mao’s was of ruling. He used to get rid of the people whom he had given jobs to in the beginning, those who weren’t past of the CCP, accusing them of inefficiency. He called these people “the bureaucratic capitalist class”. The Politburo was a circle of twenty leading members of the Communist Party, and the carried the government under the authority of Mao of course. So it was the party that ruled, and not the people. This helped Mao have a better control on the decisions taken for the country and therefore created a controllable system, which helped consolidation of power. In 1952 other political parties were banned. The CCP was structured into 6......

Words: 421 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Most Important Reason for Wolsey’s Fall from Power Was His Failure to Gain a Divorce for Henry Viii?

...The most important reason for Wolsey’s fall from power was his failure to gain a divorce for Henry VIII, how far do you agree? Wolsey’s dismissal from Henry’s court came in September 1529, though Wolsey had a plethora of failures before, his fall his failure to get a divorce for Henry VIII proved to be the most significant. This is because Wolsey’s strength of position depended on whether he got Henry what he wanted and the divorce was the most obvious case of Wolsey’s failure to do so. For this reason, this essay will argue that the most important reason for the fall of Wolsey was his failure to get a divorce for Henry VIII. Some argue that Wolsey’s failure was due to his alienation of common people. In his early days, Wolsey sought to ensure that common people got justice through his establishment of the Star Chamber. However, this egalitarian attitude faded during Wolsey’s later years and Wolsey’s own corruptness meant that he fell out of favour with the public. Within the area of the Church, Wolsey was guilty of absenteeism, pluralism and nepotism – appointing his illegitimate son (Thomas Wynter) to high positions in the Church. Furthermore, though his attempt to raise money for Henry’s foreign campaigns came in the form of the Amicable Grant 1525 (a heavy tax) failed, Wolsey was not dismissed on the grounds of this. From this we can see that Wolsey’s alienation from the ‘common’ people did not cause his fall, but something else. Henry did blame the Amicable Grant......

Words: 918 - Pages: 4

HUMOR / HOBBY | Adobe Photoshop | Procol Harum - Greatest Hits (1967-1977)[(320)