Free Essay

How Important Was James 1 Attempt to Obtain a Union Between England and Scotland in Causing Difficulties with His First Parliament in the Years 1604-1610?

In: Historical Events

Submitted By gH12345
Words 980
Pages 4
The union between England and Scotland did cause some difficulties to a fairly large extent, but other factors stained James relations with Parliament too. Finance was the biggest issue between both of them, as the Great contract was caused of parliaments dissolve in 1610 and religion to some extent caused some strain.
James's open-handed generosity, particularly towards his Scottish companions, won him few friends among the English. James would become unpopular for his choices of ministers based on personality – those who flattered him - rather than from talent. Robert Carr had been James’ pageboy in Scotland, was only 25 upon taking the position, and became corrupt and poorly skilled for the position. Both Carr and his wife were found guilty of the murder of Sir Thomas Overbury in 1615, this also proved unpopular with in parliament. This caused tension between both parts as there was a kind of hatred, which in return would cause problems with passing bills into laws.
Parliament rejected union of England and Scotland, preferring the monarch to be King of both whiles each maintaining their independence. After the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 James and Parliament again stood on a better footing – James commented that if he had died, he would have done so with the “most honourable and best company and in that most honourable and fittest place for a king to be in”. The parliamentary session in 1606 allowed James three direct taxes. However things had started to become sour again by 4th July 1607 when a union of England and Scotland was again rejected by Parliament which James believed firmly in. Parliament was xenophobia toward the Scottish, which itself made feeling sour between the two groups.
In 1610 James attempted to solve the issues with Parliament in what was to be a ‘Great Contract’. In return for receiving a regular income from Parliament James would give up feudal rights. However this failed, and by 1614 the so called ‘Addled Parliament’ which lasted only eight-weeks was passing no legislation due to the deadlock between King and Parliament. The parliament was dissolved on 7th June and James therefore ruled without parliament for much of his reign by raising funds from other sources – the sale of monopolies, sale of peerages including the new rank of baronet created in 1611, sales of which began in 1616 and numbered over 200, and using courts to impose customs duties, this also was a main factor why there was difficulties with the first parliament, it also shows that it is a main issue as it caused it parliament to be dissolved.
The rejection of the union highly annoyed James against his parliament, which on its part was little better satisfied with him. The multiplicity of proclamations to which the king, by the aid of the large and somewhat indefinite powers of the council, and of the unconstitutional judicature of the star-chamber, difficult to give the force of laws, strongly excited the jealousy of the house of commons; the boundless expenses of the court, especially the sums lavished on favourites and Scotchmen, incensed all classes; and, fearful of a gathering storm, James in July 1607 announced a prorogation of parliament till the November of the same year; which was afterwards extended till February 1610. During this extraordinary recess, the state of the country affords scarcely any materials , but the interval is somewhat more productive for record.
James' twenty-nine years of Scottish kingship did little to prepare him for the English monarchy: England and Scotland, rivals for superiority on the island and, virtually hated each other. This inherent mistrust, combined with Catholic-Protestant, severely limited James' prospects of a truly successful reign. His personality also caused problems: he was witty and well-read, fiercely believed in the divine right of kingship and his own importance, but found great difficulty in gaining acceptance from an English society that found his rough-hewn manners and natural paranoia quite unbecoming. James saw little use for Parliament. His extravagant spending habits and nonchalant ignoring of the nobility's grievances kept king and Parliament constantly at odds
His reign as James I was marked by unpopular policy decisions and uneasy relations with Parliament, who resented his assertion of the Divine Right of Kings and considered him self-indulgent and crass. He dissolved Parliament in 1611 and, excepting what was called the Addled Parliament (1614), ruled without one until 1621.I think the main reason causing difficulties with the first parliament was down to Finance, James attitudes then the Union . I think fincae is the most important as it was the main cause for the parliament being dissolved, after all the concepts combined it was the end point to knock the parliament down, after they were trying their hardest to carry on and aiming to make bills and pass them. James, brutally believed in the divine right of kingship and his own significance, this would have been hard for the MPS the have their say when the king was as above himself, and thought he was the word of God, whereas parliament believed that they had the right to be heard and have their say, this would have caused a conflict in power of the parliament and the king. I think the next most significant point was the union this would have only re-angered the MP’s and would have brought more thing up like the Scottish favours and that they have more money off the king then the English, which would link with the first most significant point in regards to finance (the reason why the king had such a large debt). All these points work together to help the difficulties with the first parliament, and combined cause the dissolve of parliament. Therefore I think the Union caused mild difficulties with the first parliament, but not as much as other factors which overshadows the union.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Assess the Significance of Religion as a Factor in Bringing About Change in the Nature of Royal Authority Between 1540 – 1642

...nature of royal authority between 1540 – 1642 Between 1540 and 1642 England saw six different rulers; an examination into the religious changes, personality and relationship with parliament will bring about an answer in to the change of nature of royal authority. During 1540-1642 religious change led to rebellions and conflict proved highly embarrassing and potentially fatal to the monarchy ‘The church acted as a bedrock of authority. It had been a source of authority in late medieval society’ says Nicholas Fellows. After the reformation of the church Edward VI had to deal with situation of confusion left from his father. Edward was a firm supporter of the religious reforms and by 1549 England had made a caution step towards Protestantism. The western rebellion 1547 illustrated a strong sense of religious conservatism. The complaints that caused the rebellion were the changes that were thought to have taken place in the baptism and confirmation and the rebels wanted the restoration of many of the old religious practices. Article two’s call for the restoration of the six articles undermined all the work of the Edwardian reformation, they also had a strong desire for the ceremony and ritual of catholism. The rebels attacks communion and both kinds of the new prayer book which were symbolic of the new religion, clearly most of the demands was an attack of Protestantism and furthermore an attack on Edward and his reformation. The western rebellion was able to......

Words: 2146 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Rise of Parliament in Xiii

...« THE RISE of PARLIAMENT in XIII ». Contents: 1. Introduction. 2. Magnum Cartum Liberatum. 3. Simon de Monfort and his “Parliamentum”. 4. King Edward’s Parliament. 5. Parliament nowadays. a). The Functions of Parliament. b). The Meeting of Parliament. c). The House of Lords. d). The House of Commons. e). Public Access to Parliamentary Proceedings. 6. Conclusion. INTRODUCTION I am always interested in the history of Great Britain and especially in the developing of the British Parliament. It plays the leading role in the political life of Great Britain. It passes laws, provides the means of carrying work of the government, scrutinizes government policy and administration, including proposals for expenditure; debates the major issues of the day. In my wok I try to look at the history of this undoubtedly important body of authority. The events that took place in England in the XIII century turned out to be the main influence on the formation and the rise of Parliament that exists to the very moment. THE GREAT CHARTER - MAGNA CARTA Richard I’s absence in the Holy Land and the expense of crusade the weakened power of the Crown in England. When his brother John became a king, he lacked the money to defend the English lands in France successfully. The meanness and cruelty of his character added to his unpopularity stimulated a......

Words: 2976 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

How Far Was the Collapse of the Liberal State Caused by the First World War?

...The Italian liberal state is believed by many, to have ended in the period following the First World War, in the year 1919. The first election after the First World War, under new electoral reforms, saw the Socialist PSI and the Catholic PPI receive over half of the national vote. As a result the liberals lost control of parliament, and from this point on any liberal government required Socialist or Catholic support to retain power. This undermined the traditional trasformismo system and led to mass politics in Italy, in which larger, permanent parties form and attempt to form a non-coalition government. The liberals were unable to adapt and unite to form a single party which would have allowed them to maintain power in the new system. This combined with the Socialist and Catholic refusal to join coalitions with the liberals resulted in discontent with the democratic parliamentary system in Italy, ‘paving the way’ for the rise of Fascism. However the problems with Italian politics were present long before the First World War, as the already mentioned trasformismo politics between different liberal factions made it very difficult for a government to last for an extended period of time. Furthermore a North-South divide existed in Italy and expanded as the North industrialised quicker than the more rural and agrarian south. This divide meant that many Italians felt as though Italy wasn’t truly united. The Vatican also created problems early on in Liberal Italy’s history, as......

Words: 1685 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

How Successfully Did James Deal with Parliament During the Period 1603 - 1616?

...How successfully did James deal with parliament during the period 1603 – 1616? * James faced many difficulties with Parliament during his reign in England. The king and parliament followed two mutually, extended exclusive views about the nature of their relationship. James believed that he owed his authority to God-given right, that the laws in his kingdom were only an extension of his royal prerogative, and that parliament was in essence a lower court to him, its laws and opinions always subject to his oversight and review; and that he was free to revise or overrule them completely whenever he wished. However, parliament believed that its rights were equal to those of the king. They also believed that in return for grants and subsidies to the crown, the king should take its views on policy formulation and execution into account. The end result of this fundamental disagreement was a series of difficult parliaments, two of which James dissolved in frustration. The first parliament brought in the idea of ‘The Great Contract’. This meant that they wanted James to give up the right to feudal dues, such as wardship and purveyance, in exchange for a fixed sum per annum to be raised in taxation. They offered him £200,000 after a lot of argument. They didn’t want to give him too much money because he wouldn’t need to call parliament. James didn’t like this idea as he thought that £200,000 wouldn’t be enough. The contract was finally sunk when James made a demand for another......

Words: 1178 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...has increased, while union membership has declined dramatically, along with the size of the traditional industrial working class. Most workers expect unemployment at some point in their careers, especially the unskilled and uneducated. In 1983, only 5 percent of non-manual workers were unemployed. In contrast, skilled manual workers experienced 12 percent and semi-skilled and unskilled manual workers 23 percent unemployment, and manual workers combined accounted for 84 percent of the unemployed. England is becoming a society of the included and the excluded. There has been a sharp rise in long-term unemployment. The nature of work in a fluid economy does not support long-term employment for low-skilled and moderately skilled workers, and this is reflected in the rise in part-time (24.7 percent of the 1999 workforce), and multiple-job workers. Homelessness has become a fact of English life, with 102,410 families in England accepted as homeless in 1997 alone. The richest class has increased its share of the national income and national assets. In 1995, the wealthiest 10 percent of the population owned half the assets controlled by households. In 1997 the income of the top 20 percent of households was four times that of the bottom 20 percent. Meanwhile, those earning less than half of the median doubled between 1979 and 1998, reaching 10 percent. Ethnic minorities have not fared well in the new economic environment. For all minority men, unemployment was 17 percent in the......

Words: 3480 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

How Important Was the Entry of the Usa to the Outcome of the First World War?

...How important was the entry of the USA to the outcome of the First World War? In 1918 over 1,600,000 American troops crossed the Atlantic over to Europe to help the Allies beat the Germans at the western front. The new fresh troops were well-fed and made a big difference at some of the last battles in the First World War. Many people would argue that the entry of the US was the most important factor to the end of the war. The Allies ‘outfought’ the Germans on the western front with help of the new soldiers to end the war of attrition. However, this traditional view might not have taken many other factors into account. Other factors such as Allied tactics and technology, Germany’s internal collapse or the success of the Allied blockade could be a more important factor to the end of the war. Some people argue that Germany lost it and the allies were just the last to be there. Germany’s internal collapse was very important for the allies. The lack of food, political and economical issues produced riots on the streets. The German public had had enough of the war and the control and discipline failed. On top of this the German Keizer, Wilhelm abdicated and fled to the Netherlands. Germany was drained from all its resources because of the two front war. Germany’s allies had failed her and were relying on Germany’s money, weapons etc. Austria-Hungry was useless and the Turkish empire collapsed. Italy, Germany’s other ally at the start of the war had changed sides. This meant......

Words: 1260 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

European Union

...Lyn Klein Economics for Global Managers Professor Victoria Vernon Module 3 Case Study: European Union 7/3/14 The EU is facing a banking crisis. There are insolvent banks in Ireland and Spain, as well as other nations. They lent out too much money, often against real estate. There were real estate bubbles then the value of real estate fell and borrowers could not always pay back the loans. The Greek banking crisis was caused by the government spending too much and borrowing too much money. The economy collapsed causing the banks to be insolvent. Before the collapse banking was conservative. When a nation has insolvent banks belonging to the Euro zone make that problem much worse. There were silent funs on Greek banks, with capital flight; people are pulling their money out of the Greek banks and sending it elsewhere, making the Greek economy worse. The common currency zone escalates the problems. There are also capital and trade imbalances. Germany is exporting a great deal more than it imports, causing capital flows into Germany. Spain and Greece import more than they export so capital flow is out of the country. They need to become more productive at exporting, which is not always easy. In the 2000’s money flowed into periphery countries, borrowing rates were low and capital inflow brought rising standards of living. By 2010’s money was flowing out of the periphery countries and back into Northern Europe. Periphery economies were starved for investment...

Words: 8065 - Pages: 33

Free Essay

Do You Agree That the Main Reason for Henry’s Failure to Obtain the Annulment of His Marriage in the Years 1525-29 Was the Determined Opposition of Katherine of Aragon?

...opposition of Katherine was no doubt a factor in delaying the process of annulment, but there were other factors that were even more crucial. Katherine’s role must be seen as central as if she had agreed to ‘go quietly’ then there would surely have been little controversy. However once the process had started there were other individuals, notably Wolsey, Charles, Clement and Henry himself who perhaps played a greater role in delaying the annulment. Overall I believe that the greatest role in the delay, and indeed the factor that had caused complete stagnation in the case, which had been recalled to Rome in the summer of 1529, was that Charles, the dominant force in Europe at the time, had used his leverage over Clement to make progress impossible. In source 4 Scarrisbrick highlights the role played by Katherine. She was offered a ‘way out’ by Campeggio, who tried to persuade her to “enter a convent.” Wolsey, in source 6, was able to foresee Katherine’s potential opposition, even at the very start of the process: “In case the Queen rejects my authority.” Scarrisbrick argues that it was her refusal to go to the convent which started the process which was in turn made worse by the actions of others, notably Henry. Indeed we know that when such an offer was made she replied that she would, but only when Henry entered a monastery. This does seem to back up the idea that she opposed in a determined fashion. She had good reason to do so. Declaring that her marriage was annulled,......

Words: 1689 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Asses the Significance of Religion in Causing Rebellion in England Between 1530 to 1660

...Asses the significance of Religion in causing Rebellion in England between 1530 to 1660 In the period between 1530 and 1660 Religion played a part in causing rebellion as well as other factors such as political, economic and class conflict issues.Religion begins with being a very significant factor in causing rebellion but becomes less important as time goes. In the pilgrimage of grace of 1536 first and foremost the rebels demanded that “the heresies of … anabaptist to be destroyed.”[1] This is when england was in the process of breaking from rome under Henry VIII and the shock of the country having its religion changed suddenly causes an immense amount of discontent It was popular opinion among the commoners that it was Henry's evil advisors the heretics Wolsey and Crammer that were behind the change and needed to be stopped.The westerner rebellion of 1549 that also had significant religious origin. The areas on Devon and Cornwall where very traditional and therefore strongly against reformation to a protestant england. They rose up in arms against the reintroduction of a new protestant prayer book that was in english as well as soughting to have Henry VII’s six articles that had been abolished by Edward VI since his crowning in 1547. On the other side of the country in the same year Kett’s rebellion had major religious causes behind it as they weren't as traditional as Cornwall and Devon had accepted the new protestant faith. They were only calling for a “more active......

Words: 2865 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Elizabeth 1 in English History

...the iconic Elizabeth 1 was a skilled politician and a force to be reckoned with throughout her lifetime in English royal politics. When she ascended to the throne of the nation she oversaw the development of a second tier country into a first tier nation on the forefront of political and economic world geopolitics and economics. She restored a floundering sense of national pride to the people of England and employed such an effective communication style throughout her endeavors that her influence is still studied as a core of MBA curriculum in the universities of today.[1] To properly respect the veneration surrounding the story of Elizabeth in English history, it is important to understand the tumultuous turn of events that eventually brought her to the throne. Recognized today as one of England's most effective, respected, and long-seated monarchs, her path to the throne was never assured, and certainly was not without conflict. It is partly because of her compelling leadership and partly because of her unlikely rise to power that her time on the throne is so impressive today. Elizabeth was born in 1533 to King Henry VIII and his second wife Anne Boleyn. A particularly unique and tumultuous time in the religious landscape of England, Anne was two months pregnant with Elizabeth when Henry split England from the Catholic Church over their unwillingness to grant a divorce from his first wife, Catharine of Aragon, whom had given birth to his first child, Mary.......

Words: 5521 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

How Accurate Is It to Say That One of the Reasons That Henry V Invaded France in 1415 Was to Strengthen His Position as King of England?

...It is accurate to say that one of the reasons that Henry V invaded France in 1415 was to strengthen his position as King of England, but it is not the only reason nor is it necessarily the main reason; France’s domestic situation, and Scotland’s lack of threats were also reasons why England invaded France at that time. One of the main reasons why Henry V invaded France was indeed that he wanted to strengthen his position as the King of England; Henry had inherited the throne from his father, Henry IV, who had had many troubles during his reign regarding his line to the throne: many thought that Henry IV had a weak claim to the Crown, and the line to the throne was weakened by the fact that he had usurped the role from Richard II and had not been Richard’s heir. Henry V wanted to strengthen his claim to the throne and secure his position as King of England by invading France in 1415; invading France would have shown that Henry was a traditional King and intended to win his support and honour on the battle field like many of the Medieval Kings before him, showing that he could be a strong and worthy King, which also counteracted his father’s abilities in later life: Henry IV had become ill during the later years of his life and could not campaign to places like Wales and Scotland in person, meaning that he had lost some support over the years, though his son, the future Henry V, had taken over the roles of business and government. Henry would have also invaded France in 1415......

Words: 1116 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Why & How Did England Lose the 100 Years War have all but secured English victory in the Hundred Years War. England was undefeated in open battle and decisive victories at Crecy (1346), Poitiers (1356) and Agincourt (1415) further reinforced their apparent invincibility in the field. Furthermore the victorious King Henry V had become both the heir and regent of France, a kingdom ruled by a crazed king and crippled by civil war. Yet ultimately the English were defeated and this essay shall explore how the emergence of Joan of Arc, fiscal crises in England and the defection of Burgundy contributed to such a dramatic change of fortunes within the Hundred Years War. From the outset of the war it was political turmoil within France which drove English success. King Edward III compensated for England’s comparatively small army by capitalising on ‘provincial grievances and provincial separatism’ to acquire the support of key nobles within both Brittany and Normandy by 1354. Faced with the superior military technology and tactics of the English, and occupied on too many fronts by both the English and her own subjects, France simply could not sustain the war effort. Consequently France was forced into ratifying the Treaty of Brétigny (1360) which saw provinces such as Ponthieu and Aquitaine ceded to England in full sovereignty. Within fifty years history was repeating itself, as the bouts of madness suffered by King Charles VI meant that the French government was all but completely controlled by the French princes of......

Words: 2709 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

The Fall of King Charles I of England

...Fall of King Charles I of England Idrees Kazi 500577940 HST 632 Dr. John Morgan Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Charles I remains one of the most debated monarchs of English history. His turbulent reign ended with a public execution. It seems as though the answer is simple, that he was a terrible king. And yet, historians argue many sides, some even favoring Charles. In fact, the reason behind Charles’ beheading is still kind of unclear. Of course he made mistakes, but then so does every monarch. Yet, Charles was the first king to be legally tried and executed. And in the 17th century, when the King was seen as God’s lieutenant on earth, executing one was unimaginable. This essay will explain why the regicides executed Charles. But first, it’s important to know a bit about Charles. Charles is known to be rigid and insensitive1 and the reason for this is partly because of his extreme belief in the Divine right of kings. He thought that God would always protect him. This can even be proven because of his inflexibility during the civil war, even while he was losing. “No matter how generous the terms or desperate his condition, the king refused to yield.”2 Charles’ personality and thinking caused more problems than they solved, and this will be proven in this essay. For now, it is important to know that the regicides believed it was necessary to kill Charles I because of his tyrannical rule, which can easily be proven by looking at his Personal Rule. The......

Words: 2659 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

James I and His Finance Policy

...King James I can certainly be blamed for the financial issues during his reign as ultimately he had the most power and the most control in the country. However the problematic nature of the financial structure in this period cannot be underestimated as corruption was rife and many aspects of the financial system were outdated. James didn’t inherit a very prosperous situation when he came to the English throne as the treasury was empty, the financial system was in dire need of reform and parliament were unwilling to contribute to major changes. The tax system was so outdated that people were paying four times under what they were supposed to be paying to the crown and only around 7% of the crowns income was generated by tax (4 times less than France). In addition to this, inflation was extortionate and the war with Spain and the Irish Rebellion conflict was costing the crown an unaffordable amount. For example, the Irish Rebellion had cost James £600,000 by the time it ended and money still had to be spent afterwards on maintaining border garrisons. James only made the situation worse with his extensive extravagance. A good illustration of is this is the £400,000 he gave to a Scottish favourite named James Hay (First Earl of Carlisle) throughout his reign. Although James had a lonely childhood and was keen to make close friends, he simply could not afford to spend as much as he did on his favourites; furthermore Hay dies penniless reflecting how James was not careful with......

Words: 1107 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

In the Context of the Years of 1847- 1947, How Far Was the Partition of India in 1947 Inevitable?

...Unit 4 Historical Enquiry “In the context of the years of 1847- 1947, how far was the Partition of India in 1947 inevitable? “ Pawanpreet Dhaliwal Candidate Number-3049 In the context of the years of 1847- 1947, to what extent was the Partition of India in 1947 inevitable? ------------------------------------------------- The countries India, Pakistan and Bangladesh were once united as a whole Sub-Continent mixed with Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs ruled under the British raj in 1857. Where these countries are now, what they have become and their relationships with each other have very much been forged by the events of 1947 with Independence from Britain and the subsequent partition of India. When assessing the extent to which partition was inevitable, it can be difficult as the action itself justifies the inevitability, “Partition happened therefore it was inevitable Khaswant Singh **historian**. This tends to suggest that all history is a predetermined narrative that cannot be changed and altered.  This would very much be consistent with Indian philosophy that ‘it has happened because it was written’ this suggests the inevitability of partition is considered to be seen inevitable even before looking at the contributing factors. However from a Western and particularly British perspective, 1947 heralded not only the beginning of the end of the British Empire; but as Lawrence describes, “The end of period of history which from 1492 had seen the domination of the globe by...

Words: 3899 - Pages: 16

Thám Tử Lừng Danh Conan chap 274 | Audiobooks | Night School 2018 EXTENDED CUT BDRip DD5 1 x264-playSD