Premium Essay

James vs Us Tax Court Case Brief

In: Business and Management

Submitted By samharris91
Words 534
Pages 3
JAMES V. U.S., 61-1 USTC 9449, 7 AFTR2D 1361, 366 U.S. 213 (USSC, 1961)
FACTS:
In this particular case, the defendant, Eugene C. James, embezzled money from both his union employer as well as an insurance company and failed to include these funds as gross income for tax purposes. The taxpayer disputed that the embezzled money should not qualify as taxable income as the funds were already required to be returned. James used a previous decision from Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox to show that the money was not taxable as he had “no claim of right” to the money because he no longer had possession of it. The court held that all income was to be taxed
The court ultimately overturned the Wilcox case and ruled that the money was to be included in gross income because both legal and illegal earnings that are) acquired without the consensual recognition of an obligation to repay, are fully taxable. James was required to face legal penalties of three years in jail for his attempt at evading taxes in addition to the tax penalties of the crime.
ISSUE:
The issue being litigated in this case is whether embezzled funds should be a part of the embezzler’s gross income regardless of a repayment obligation.
HOLDING:
The Supreme Court ruled in agreement with the lower court’s decision and held that the defendant’s embezzled earnings were to be included on his tax return as gross income.
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
This ruling was supported by §61 of the Internal Revenue Code which defines gross income. §61 states that gross income means all income from whatever source derived. By evading the taxes for the earnings, the taxpayer was in violation with the IRC of 1939 §145(b), Attempt to Evade or Defeat Tax, and §7201 of the IRC of 1954 which is a similar regulation.
The major case law that came into question was the Wilcox rule from, Commissioner of Internal…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Court Case Brief

...COURT CASE BRIEF Donald R. Schroerlucke, And Joyce D. Schroerlucke V United States 2011WL 4440599 (Fed.Cl) No. 09-772T FACTS Plaintiff Donald Schroerlucke is a former employee of WorldCom, Inc. His wife is Joyce D. Schroerlucke. In 1989, Mr. Schroerlucke was employed as Vice President of Operations at Long Distance Discount Services, Inc., the predecessor corporation to WorldCom. Pursuant to stock option agreements with Long Distance Discount Services, Inc., and then with WorldCom, Mr. Schroerlucke accumulated employee stock option grants between July 1991 and January 1998. His employment with WorldCom ended on January 4, 1999. According to the terms of the stock option agreements and an April 7, 1998 memorandum titled, “WorldCom Employee Stock Option Program,” Mr. Schroerlucke was required to immediately exercise all of his employee stock options at the end of his employment. On January 2, 1998, Mr. Schroerlucke had accumulated 172,492 WorldCom stock options. Mr. Schroerlucke exercised all of his existing stock options on February 12, 1999, at which time the market value of his 172,492 WorldCom shares was $13,702,333.25, based on the $79.4375 per share, February 12, 1999, closing price of WorldCom stock.1. According to the criminal Mr. Ebbers (CEO) and Mr. Sullivan (CFO Scott Sullivan) presented a “materially false and misleading picture of WorldCom’s operating performance and financial results” as part of a “scheme to deceive” and “inflate and maintain......

Words: 1055 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Burnham V. Superior Court Case Brief

...Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff Dennis Burnham, a New Jersey resident, was served with process for divorce by his wife in California, while he was visiting California on business. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Jurisdiction based on physical presence alone constitutes due process because it is one of the continuing traditions of our legal system that define the due process standard. Facts. Plaintiff a New Jersey resident, visited Southern California on business, after which he went to visit his children in the San Francisco Bay area, where his wife resided. Upon returning the children to his wife’s home, Plaintiff was served with a California court summons and a copy of his wife’s divorce petition. Plaintiff made a special appearance in California for the purpose of filing a motion to dismiss on the ground that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over him. The Superior Court denied the motion, and the California Court of Appeal denied mandamus relief. The Supreme Court of the United States then granted certiorari. Issue. Whether the Due Process clause denies a state court jurisdiction over a non-resident who was personally served with process while temporarily in that state, in a suit unrelated to his activities in that state. Held. No. The Supreme Court upheld the ruling of the California Superior Court. Jurisdiction based on physical presence alone constitutes due process because it is one of the continuing traditions of our legal system that define the due process......

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Case Briefs of U.S Supreme Court Cases Introductory

...Thomas v. Winchester (1852) Facts: Mrs. Thomas was prescribed dandelion extract, but the bottle was mislabeled and actually contained a poison. Mrs. Thomas's husband had purchased the extract from druggist Ford who purchased from druggist Aspinwall who purchased from Winchester. Thomas sued Winchester and the trial court ruled in Thomas’s favor. Winchester appealed, stating that because he was not the direct vendor of the item and there was no direct connection between he and Thomas, Thomas could not sue him. Issue: Despite there being no direct connection between Thomas and Winchester, can Thomas sue Winchester Decision: Yes Reasons: The Court decided to make an exception to the theory of privity, based on Winterbottom v. Wright, in this case because of the inherent danger of poison, and death or great bodily harm was the natural result of the mislabeling of poison. Winchester had a duty to Thomas because it was the nature of his business that there would be a lack of privity if poison was mislabeled. Sub brief: Winterbottom v. Wright (1842) Facts: Wright owned a coach business and contracted with the Postmaster-General to supply coaches to carry the mail. As part of the contract, Wright agreed to keep the coaches in good condition and personally assume the duty of all maintenance and repairs. Atkinson also contracted with the Postmaster to supply horses and drivers for all coaches. Winterbottom, the plaintiff, was employed by Atkinson as a driver. One day, he was......

Words: 929 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Tax Case Brief

...disagreement to the United States Court of Claims first, and the Court of Claims ruled in Mr. Davis’ favor. Then, the Commissioner appealed this case to the Court of Appeals which ruled in the Commissioner’s favor. Finally, the case reached the United States Supreme Court. ISSUE: Whether the transaction to fulfill the marital settlement is a taxable event, and if it is a taxable event, how to determine the taxable gain realized of the transaction. HOLDING: Yes, the transfer of the property to release the husband’s marital obligation is a taxable event. The amount realized in the transaction should be equal to the market value of the property at the time of transfer. LEGAL ANALYSIS: Both the Tax Court and the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stated that the appreciated property transferred to fulfill the divorce settlement had no tax effect on the transferor because the market value of marital rights which were the amount realized by husband is indeterminable. However, the Courts of Appeals of the Second and Third Circuits argued that by assuming that the value of marital rights had the same value as the transferred property, the amount realized is determinable.  SUMMARIZE THE TAXPAYER’S AND THE GOVERNMENT’S ARGUMENT: The taxpayer argued that the property transaction in this situation was a nontaxable, because the transaction was similar to the transfer of the property between the co-owners. He claimed that according to Helvering v. Hallock case, it is......

Words: 584 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Us Courts

...historical developments of the U.S. courts began in the colonial days. Since then the American courts have taken their own path, and have evolved in order to better suit the social needs of today’s America. Presently, there are two judicial systems. The first one is the state and local courts established under the authority of state governments. The second is the Federal courts system created by Congress under the authority of the U.S. Constitution. Development of the American Courts The origins and foundations of American courts like other social, legal and cultural habits in America descended from Great Britain. The court system in American colonies resolved civil and criminal disputes. However, the court systems within each colony were not exactly the same. The Massachusetts Bay Colony had a General Court that created laws, conducted trials and imposed sentences. Later, county courts were created and the General Court was used for appeal hearings and for some cases that involved serious crimes. The colony in Pennsylvania allowed offenders to be their own lawyers and to plead their cases to a justice of the peace. Ultimately all American colonies had functioning court systems but they were not uniform. After the American Revolution, colonial court systems became state courts; and like colonial court systems, state courts were not uniform. Appellate jurisdiction which is the lawful authority of a court to review a decision made by a lower court existed however, there......

Words: 1430 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Court Case

...Court Case Brief 1 Under US Code Sec 6013 married couples have the option to file a joint or state income tax return. In order to be eligible to file a joint return a couple must be legally married as of the last day of the tax year. There are many advantages and disadvantages to filing a joint income tax return. In the case of Larry and Sue, we know that they do not have enough expenses to itemize their deductions; therefore filing a joint return would be more advantageous. Sue would beable to take advantage of the higher standard deduction for a married couple, which is $12,400 in 2014. If Sue were to file a separate return she could only claim a standard deduction of $6,200. Sue will also save money by splitting the cost of a tax preparer. Filing a joint return could possibly make her eligible for more deductions and tax credits. Not to mention if the couple does owe additional income tax Sue could split the liability with Larry, resulting in a lower payment. The rewards of filing a joint return do not come without risk. When filing a joint return Sue can still be held liable for any fraud Larry might commit. Sue already suspects that Larry is understating his tips. This will cause a gross income which in turn will result in a lower tax liability. If the IRS were to audit the couple and determine that their income was understated they will be held liable for the additional tax and possibly charged penalties and interest. Regardless if Sue was privy to the fraud or......

Words: 396 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Appellant's Opening Brief to the Colorado Court of Appeal

...Ad: =Addendum (Orders attached to brief). II. STATEMENT OF ISSUES A. Whether the court erred in concluding that Brumfiel failed to state a claim under 12(b) (5); and concurrently that defendant lacked standing. B. Whether the Statute of Limitation of 1 year was tolled under the Continuing injury Doctrine in Brumfiel’s FDCPA claim. C. Whether the court erred in denying Brumfiel’s Motion to Dismiss on grounds that the Trust had standing to foreclose and denying her defenses including constitutional defense. D. Whether the Court erred Granting Plf’s Summary Judgment, where the Trustee’s status as holder was disputed as sufficient to foreclose. E. Whether the Court erred by holding that Brumfiel may not, as a non-party, challenge an assignment or agreement. F. Whether the court committed error by applying the Civil Access Pilot Program (CAPP) to Defendant’s foreclosure. G. Whether the court abused its discretion by making rulings on evidence that denied her a chance to tell her side, and withholding excess proceeds from the sale. H. Whether the plaintiff waived any deficiency judgment. 1 I. Whether the court erred by granting the CLG attorney’s fees from an Untimely, and Procedurally Defective Request. III. STATEMENT OF THE CASE The Trustee initially sought a Rule 120 which it ultimately withdrew fearing Judge Martinez in the federal case # 12cv02716, would allow a challenge to the constitutionality of the Rule 120. In the federal case Brumfiel charged the above......

Words: 10170 - Pages: 41

Free Essay

Vogt vs. Herron Construction Court Case

...VOGT v. HERRON CONSTRUCTION, INC Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two 200 Cal.App.4th 643 (2011) 132 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683 The heading above describes the title and citation of this case. The name of the case is Vogt v. Herron Construction, Inc. Vogt is the plaintiff and appellant while Herron Construction is the defendant and respondent. This case was decided in the court of appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two on November 1, 2011. The citation states that this case can be found in 200 Cal. App. 4th 643. FACTS Augustus Vogt worked for Performance Concrete which was the concrete subcontractor for a construction project in Riverside,Ca. The framing contractor for the same construction project was Herron Construction, Inc, for which Jesus Cruz worked. At the worksite, employees typically park near their assigned job for the day. There was no designated parking area for subcontractor employees. On October 31, 2007, Cruz parked his personal vehicle on the work site. No one told him where to park. When Vogt noticed Cruz’s truck in the way of the cement truck, he asked Cruz to move it. He explained to Cruz that Performance was about to start pouring cement nearby. Vogt later explained that workers being asked to move their cars and other vehicles on the job site “ happens all the time”... “We’re not going to pour if a car’s there because we don’t want the liability of splashing the paint.” When Cruz was moving his truck, he ran......

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Court Case

...UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION In re: } } Christina Blasco, } CASE NO. 06-40634-JJR-13 } Debtor. } CHAPTER: 13 } ______________________________________________________________________________ } Christina Blasco, } } Plaintiff, } ADV. P. NO.: 06-40087 } v. } } Money Services Center } d/b/a Cash Connection } } Defendant. } } MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The above case came before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed on August 1, 2006, in response to the debtor-plaintiff’s complaint alleging the creditor-defendant violated the automatic stay [i.e. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)] by cashing the plaintiff’s check after she filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The defendant avers it did not violate the automatic stay because of the exception provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(11). The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. The Court heard oral arguments on September 12, 2006 and directed the parties to file additional briefs dealing with whether the check at issue qualified as a negotiable instrument. For the reasons stated below, the 1 Case 06-40087-JJR Doc 31 Filed 10/26/06 Entered 10/26/06 08:56:27 Document Page 1 of 10 Desc Main Court finds the motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED. Background On April 15, 2006, the......

Words: 3439 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

The “Hosanna-Tabor” Case in the Us Supreme Court

...The “Hosanna-Tabor” Case in the US Supreme Court Introduction “Evangelical Lutheran Church and School Hosanna-Tabor v. Commission for Equal Employment Opportunities-CIOE” is a famous case decided in January 2012 by the United States Supreme Court. It addressed the right to religious freedom and the establishment clause, the "ministerial exception" and the limits of state intervention in the internal affairs of a church. Arguably, "Hosanna-Tabor" is the most important case on religious freedom to reach the Supreme Court in the last 20 years. A case in which the Supreme Court established a milestone in the understanding of cases involving labor relations and religions institutions. More specifically on the scope of the term "ministerial exception" as well as the "establishment clause and free exercise", brought by the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Analysis of the Decision The Supreme Court reviews, in this case, an argument between the interpretation of the constitutional provision in the Americans with Disabilities Act, which protects people with disabilities in hiring and against dismissal without cause. The issues raised are as follows: Can a disabled person to be fired from his or hers job, even if the employer is a religious organization? What is the limit and the scope of the "ministerial exception" and the "free exercise clause", especially when there is a conflict with other values? More specifically, what was discussed was whether...

Words: 2788 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Case Study on Us vs China Leadership

...1.0 Back ground of the study America and China are two major names in the business industry. Both of it have their own character and ways in handling the business. Understanding the cultural background of these two countries will help us understands the style of each countries in managing the leadership culture. Due to globalization, organizations face many changes. It is such as changes in behaviour and technology. Steffi Biester had said that “Value the differences but also discover the similarities and then learn from one another, start to understand each other and start to change perspectives.” Leaders need to change their style for a certain purpose. By investigating two different cultures, we can see the ways that the organizations adapt the culture in their organization. It is important for multinational companies (MNCs) to be knowledgeable and improve their working strategy to stay in the right side with the cultural changes. 2.0 Introduction to Leadership And Culture Leadership come from the word leader which means an individual who are the leaders in an organization. Leadership also is the process of influencing the members of the organization. It may involve goal setting and become the person who give information and guide the employees in achieving those goals. In the process of achieving goals, the leader must lead the employees to make sure they are in the right path in doing their task. A quote from John Maxwell, “Leader become great not because of......

Words: 4092 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Court Case

...McCulloch vs. Maryland [1819] is a landmark Supreme Court case because of its impact on the future court cases, passing of laws, and social conscience. The case is one of the most influential cases in Supreme Court history. Chief Justice John Marshall established the doctrine of National Supremacy. National government is supreme over state governments. McCulloch vs. Maryland created the doctrine of “Implied Powers” that has become the cornerstone of American constitutional law. “This decision became the legal safeguard not only for the Second Bank of the United States and its notes, but also for paper money later issued by Congress”. This case was the first test of the constitutionality of federally chartered banks and nationally issued paper currency. The Supreme Court case of McCulloch vs. Maryland set forth important principles in American government. The case itself dealt with whether or not the Congress had power from the Constitution to establish a National Bank; also, it dealt with whether or not a state could tax or interfere with the National Bank. “In 1818, the Maryland legislature imposed a tax on the operations of the Second National Bank in Maryland. This federal bank was not very popular because it competed with the state banks for customers and it set limits on state and private loans”. “The State of Maryland pushed by the state banks, imposed heavy taxes on the federal bank. The aim of these taxes was to shut down the federal bank”. James McCulloch, the...

Words: 773 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Case Brief Grandholm vs. Heald

...CASE BRIEF Grandholm v. Heald FACTS: The states of Michigan and New York both statutes and regulations which prohibit the out of state wine producers to make sale of their wine to consumers. In both states out of state wine producers are required to pay wholesaler fees and are little competition for instate wine producers. Several out of state wine produces and also consumers brought suit against both the states of Michigan and New York in their federal districts challenging that the laws prohibit direct shipment. DECISIONS BELOW: The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the out of state restrictions violated the Commerce clause. Michigan appealed. The 2nd circuit Court of Appeals upheld New York statute as constitutional. Michigan and the wine producers appealed. LEGAL ISSUE(s): Does the direct sale of wine to consumers by out of state producers violate the commerce clause, in light of the 21st amendment? HOLDING: No. Affirmed, as to the judgment of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals; reversed and remanded as to the judgment of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. REASONING: The regulations and statutes of both Michigan and New York are discriminatory to out of state wine producers. In both cases it offers in state wine producers an competitive advantage affecting interstate commerce which brings the Commerce clause into play. PERSONAL OPINION: I agree with the Supreme Court’s ruling in this regard. The 6th Circuit Court was correct in its......

Words: 286 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Us vs. Dominique Stephens Court Report

...US v. Dominique Stephens In the case of the US versus Dominique Stephens, I played the role of the court reporter. In a real case I would’ve documented every word that was spoken in that courtroom. During the mock trial however, I assisted in helping the defense and prosecution build their cases. The case was tough, but having a strong defense and prosecution really cleared up some foggy topics. On June 17, 2009, at 10:32 p.m, Dominique Stephens, had called the police letting them know that she had shot her husband, Donovan. The police arrived and found her husband’s dead body face down on the ground under a blanket that had 3 bullet holes and was covered in blood. Dominique was arrested after confessing to shooting her husband and pointing to the pistol near the bed. When she arrived at the police station, Dominique wavered her right to remain silent, until the detective wrote a statement. She signed the statement and the prosecution charged Mrs. Stephens with the First Degree Murder of her husband Donovan Stephens. After confessing, however, she asserts through her attorney that it was an act of self-defense and that she is suffering from Battered Woman Syndrome. She claims that the lives of her and her kids was in imminent danger. Statutory law claims that, “Whoever, being of sound memory and discretion, kills another purposely, either of deliberate and premeditated malice or by means of poison... is guilty of murder in the first degree.” Case......

Words: 759 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Case Brief New Jersey vs. T.L.O., 1985

...Case Citation: New Jersey v. T.L.O., 1985 Parties: The state of New Jersey, Plaintiffs/Appellants T.L.O., Defendant/Appellee Facts: A 14 years old female student identified as T.L.O was caught smoking in the school bathroom. During the investigation at school, the schools principal asked to see her purse and found incriminating evidence. That evidence was used against her in juvenile court to find her guilty of delinquency. Procedural History: T.L.O appealed the juvenile courts decision and the New Jersey Appellate Court affirmed that the evidence was legal and thus admissible. She appealed again, and the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed, saying the search was unreasonable and the evidence must be suppressed. The state of New Jersey then asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. Issue 1: Does a search of a student by a school official while on the school’s premises violate the students 4th amendment? Issue 2: Does the school official need a warrant to search student belongings while on the premises? Holdings: Issue 1: No. A search of a student by a school official while on the schools premises does not violate the students 4th amendment. Issue 2: No. The school official does not need a warrant to search student belongings while on the premises. Reasoning: Appellants advanced the following theories in support of their decision Issue 1: Students do have 4th Amendment rights at school, but they are balanced with the schools......

Words: 443 - Pages: 2

The New Adventures of Lucky Luke | Lace Panel Long Sleeve High Waist Dress | Senran Kagura OVA