Premium Essay

Kantian

In: Science

Submitted By jjj1
Words 295
Pages 2
Amber,
Great job on your definition of Kantian Deontologism, and your answer is very easy to understand. Your example is a great way to demonstrate the limitation of Kantian Deontologism because the world we live in is never “right and wrong, cut and dry” which Deontology is based on. Deontology, or duty-based ethics, doesn't deal well with the cases where duties are in conflict. Someone who follows Deontology should do the right thing, even if that produces more harm (or less good) than doing the wrong thing. In fact, Kant himself thought that it would be wrong to tell a lie in order to save a friend from a murderer.

http://askaphilosopher.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/utilitarianism-versus-deontology/
Key strength: For Kant, the only thing good in and of itself is a good will. This means that if your intentions are good (you are following the moral law), then you and your actions are good. This is a strength of Kant's position because whether or not you are a good person depends only on what you intend to do, not on what actually comes to be. Under this view, you cannot be blamed for things that you had no intention of doing.

Key weakness: Kant's view doesn't allow the consequences of an action to have moral significance. Imagine a situation where a murderer comes to your door and asks if your sister is home. According to Kant, you cannot lie to the murderer and tell him that she is not home. It doesn't matter if bad consequences will happens if you tell the truth. Since you are morally obligated not to lie, you must never lie, no matter the circumstances.

There are more, but these are the most commonly cited...…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ethical Printable

...Chapter 1, Scenario 9 Vampire Confession Ethical Theory: Kantian Disrespect is a major problem in today’s society. People lie more than they tell the truth; other’s are selfish and don’t care about individuals the way they should, and more people’s actions don’t meet the categorical imperative. Kantian states three major principles, which if everyone believed and followed the world we live in would be a better place. Kantian states; it is always wrong to lie, always treat people as ends, and an action is right when it satisfies the categorical imperative. Hal Crane, a patient of Dr. Wolfe is considered to be against Kantian theory. I believe that Crane is wrong according to a Kantian as he responds to questions. The relationship between a doctor and his or her patients should be based on trust, which is one of the principles of Kantian ethics in the medical field. Dr. Wolfe’s patient, Crane, lied to him when he said that he can control his urge to kill and drink women’s blood to avoid being institutionalized. On the other hand, Dr. Wolfe was honest with Crane from the beginning by suggesting to him the exact treatment that was needed for his situation. Kantian states that it is always wrong to lie no matter the consequences. Crane came to Dr. Wolfe for help to avoid harming anyone, but once he heard Dr. Wolfe’s suggestion Crane lied his way out of receiving the doctor’s help. If Crane did not lie and avoid being institutionalized he would show that he treats others lives......

Words: 676 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Kantian Morals, Utilitarianism, and Basic Human Rights

...Kantian Morals, Utilitarianism, and Basic Human Rights As we continue to study the origin of moral theory, we come across two very influential philosophers; Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. Both have very opposing ideologies concerning morality and basic human rights, but they have certainly contributed much to the way we work as a society today. In this paper, we will look at both theories more in depth. First we will look at Kant. According to Kantian Ethics, what gives an action it’s moral value is the agent’s respect for moral duty; In other words, the agent must be completely selfless in his action in order for it to be considered moral. Consequences do not matter, the “good will” of a person is the only thing with intrinsic value. A person must act out of only intention to do good; not for personal gain, but because they know it is the right thing to do.(Kant Slides). This theory is impartial to all, there are no exceptions. In order to establish whether an action is moral, the act must follow two categorical imperatives (universal commands): -Categorical Imperative I states: “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become universal law...”(Kant, 414). In accordance with this imperative, you must first state your maxim (the rule which states your action) and decide whether or not the rule can become a universal law. If it can, in fact, be a universal law by which all of humanity abides, then it is a moral act.......

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Describe the Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

...Describe the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarian and Kantian ethics. Utilitarianism is a consequence based ethics perspective which makes decisions that promote the greatest overall amount of good consequences over bad consequences for the greatest number of people in the world. An ethical tradition that directs us to decide based on overall consequences of our act. It is a cost-benefit analysis that fits with business decision making and into people’s intuitive criteria for deciding moral problem. It provides an objective and attractive way of resolving conflicts of self-interest. When most people feel that justice is done, it is easier to implement and defend based on the “common good”. Utilitarianism makes policies for the benefit of the majority of workers, suppliers and customers; think through a number of “frames” before making a decision and therefore the quality of the decision making should be higher. However the nature of the consequences is biased as too much focus on ethical ends can lead to ignoring moral consideration of the means. Eg, if an organization needs satisfy the shareholders hence they retrench 20% randomly so that 80% of staff are kept. But is the financial outcomes the best? It is difficult to evaluate all consequences. For example, through the stakeholder analysis, the rights and interests of minority is ignored (eg, suppliers) or those who are affected in the future. It is unfair to those who lack......

Words: 484 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Social Contract Theory &Kantian Theory

...good original intention, and it does not break any existing laws or principles in society. On the other side, biomechanics is a high technology which describes the application of engineering mechanics to biological and medical. This technic brings benefits on human medical treatment. Both of them are good. But when human treat biomechanics as a mean to the end of immortality, this activity would cause some potential issues, and has no moral worth. According to Kant’s theory, we should treat it as an end rather than means. Assume that immortality comes true, people who want to be immortal must combine his body with machine. In this condition, only wealthy people can become immortal, and it would increase economic benefits. In conclusion, Kantian theory is also not suitable for evaluating biomechanics immortality. UTILITARIAN THEORY In accordance with Utilitarianism, what people do should maximum happiness, which must relate to the total feeling of all individuals’ happiness and pain. Everybody would be treated equally during calculating, and happiness and pain is convertible, which means that pain is just minus happiness(Sandel 2010). Utilitarian theory is different from other theories. There is no need to consider individuals’motivation and means, it is only necessary to evaluate what effect an action will bring to maximum happiness. It is good if the result is positive, and it is bad if the result is negative. So from utilitarian theory point of view, human seek......

Words: 555 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Business and Management Kantian Ethics

...Kantian Ethical Analysis Kantian ethics are perhaps one of the world most loved branch of ethical philosophy. It is to some extent the Eden lost of moral philosophy, for it argues that moral requirements are based on established standards of rationality, reason and dignity embedded in Categorical Imperative and whereas, immorality is somewhat a violation of moral philosophy and is not embedded in Categorical Imperative, which is self governing reason that each and every individual possess as a guiding factor in practical affairs, business decisions such as the failed merger of AT&T and TMobile merger. Reason, declared Kant, is the source and ultimate basis for morality (Cavico & Mujtaba, 2013). Meaning, morality is not based on the animalistic side of man, but, rather on a God given conscience weaved in the moral laws which are the opposite of intuition or utility. This moral law is binding on human beings, simply because they are rational (Cavico & Mujtaba, 2013), however; what makes man rational? Does the rationality of man only apply to personal matter not business matter? Does that rationality prevent business controversies? Rationality is a most desirable quality of man, however; such rationality does not always apply to business matter. The merger of the second and fourth largest telecommunications companies, AT&T and T-Mobile is a prime example of how far man will go in order to ignore his God given conscience. However, the same man that is often...

Words: 1704 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Ethics

...Terrance Bennett Professor Kordas Business ethics June 20, 2015 Long Essay When comparing normative moral philosophies Utilitarian and Kantian ethics provide prospective on controversial policies such as mandatory arbitration and caps on damages. Utilitarian and Kantian philosophies both have their own unique principals that guide them on making ethical decisions. Cap on damages and mandatory arbitration have many aspects that can be looked at from moral philosophes to be deemed ethical or unethical. When a person is harmed by the negligence or transgression of a company, that person enacts a lawsuit in order to be compensated for damages inflicted to them. If a company is found guilty of doing harm to an individual by the court of law a system comes into play called caps on damages. A limit or ceiling is set in place as to how much an individual can be compensated for regardless of evidence or nominal harm done. Caps only appear if a lawsuit is of great enough value to reach whatever limit is set. Caps restrict the power of judges and juries to make decisions on the amount of compensation an individual can receive and puts the power into the hands of conglomerates and politicians. “Utilitarian holds that the maximization of happiness ultimately determines what is just and unjust” (Shaw 87). In the eyes of utilitarian caps on damages would be considered unethical because it is unjust to harm someone and not compensate them fully. A doctor preforms an amputation on......

Words: 1003 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ethics Right to a Child Essay

...Ethics Essay - Rights to a child. 20th January AO1: Explain how a follower of Kantian ethics might approach the issues surrounding the right to a child. Immanuel Kant was a respected ethicist of the 18th Century. He is known mostly for his works on the ‘Groundwork of metaphysics of morals’ and it is within this work Kant proposes the Categorical Imperative, an absolute, deontological, objective and secular approach to making moral decisions. Kant’s theory is based on the principal that the only thing which is truly good is a good will or duty. He continues to say that we must endeavour to use our reason to ensure we have done our duty. This essay will use the principles of Kant’s ‘Categorical Imperative’ in order to display how a follower of Kantian ethics might approach the issues surrounding the right to a child. A Kantian ethicist would believe that desiring a child does not make it a right as any moral decision should be made through reason and based on duty alone - not through overwhelming emotion or desire. However, this still means women have negative rights to a child as the removal of the ability to have children cannot be universalised. And so they may therefore not be seen as having natural, human or positive rights to a child. There are many methods of having children for baron or single women, these methods surrounding a baron or single woman’s right to a child are......

Words: 1338 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Explain Kantian Ethics.

...Immanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, Germany in 1724, and it is he who is the namesake of Kantian Ethics. In his early years Kant was a scientist, but later he became more of a philosopher when in 1770 he published the revolutionary Critique of Pure Reason, it showed Kant’s belief that we could have both sure and certain knowledge, but this said more about the way we think than the world itself. His most famous work however was published by him in 1785, called the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, it also looked at the presuppositions we make. For example, he said if there is morality there must also be free will, given to us by God, and as a result of this there must also be an afterlife, for without it morality wouldn’t make any sense. Kantian Ethics are then Kant’s own ethical theories and observations. This theory is synthetic a priori according to Kant, and this means that the substantive rules can be applied prior to experience. The first key part of Kantian Ethics are Good Will and Duty, as in the search for an intrinsic good Kant came to believe that no outcome was itself inherently good, his reasoning, both pleasure and happiness can result out of the most evil and heinous of acts, murder or rape for example could potentially cause the person committing the acts to become the recipient of some form of pleasure. Furthermore, Kant would also go on to say that there are also no good character specific traits, intelligence he would give as an example, or......

Words: 499 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

A Defence of Abortion

...Journal of Applied Philosophy,Suicide Intervention and Non-Ideal Kantian Theory Vol. 19, No. 3, 2002 245 Suicide Intervention and Non-Ideal Kantian Theory MICHAEL J. CHOLBI  Philosophical discussions of the morality of suicide have tended to focus on its justifiability from an agent’s point of view rather than on the justifiability of attempts by others to intervene so as to prevent it. This paper addresses questions of suicide intervention within a broadly Kantian perspective. In such a perspective, a chief task is to determine the motives underlying most suicidal behaviour. Kant wrongly characterizes this motive as one of self-love or the pursuit of happiness. Psychiatric and scientific evidence suggests that suicide is instead motivated by a nihilistic disenchantment with the possibility of happiness which, at its apex, results in the loss of the individual’s conception of her practical identity. Because of this, methods of intervention that appeal to agents’ happiness, while morally benign, will prove ineffective in forestalling suicide. At the same time, more aggressive methods violate the Kantian concern for autonomy. This apparent dilemma can be resolved by seeing suicide intervention as an action undertaken in non-ideal circumstances, where otherwise unjustified manipulation, coercion, or paternalism are morally permitted. 1. The chances are good that each of us will some day confront a person close to us contemplating suicide. Every......

Words: 8969 - Pages: 36

Premium Essay

Strengths and Weakness of Kantian

...Basic Strengths and Weaknesses of Kantian Ethics Main strengths of Kantian ethics: * Clarity - Kantian ethics is clear and easy to follow. Its absolutist, deontologicalnature is arguably the most easy to apply * this is good for environmental, business and sexual ethics. Any theory which is easy to apply is helpful/useful/reliable * Egalitarian - Kant states we should treat people as "an end in themselves" and so Kantian ethics puts everyone on equal ground * this is also good for all three, for obvious reasons * Consistent - the absolutist nature of the ethic means that what it says will never change - nobody is an exception * this is good for business - all customers are treated exactly the same and none are favoured * Honours respect and dignity Main weaknesses of Kantian ethics: * Maxim scope - anyone could universalise a maxim to allow anything, so long as it is universalisable * sexually, the maxim 'women should always be sexually passive' could be put forward, as could several others. Is this fair? * corrupt businesses could employ any maxim they wish to justify doing something which many of us may see as immoral * Inflexible - because of its absolutist nature, Kantian ethics offers no flexibility. Itdoesn't regard the situation of an action, which is arguably not helpful or useful in the modern world * this is a weakness for all three - environmental, sexual and business issues are all specific......

Words: 756 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Explain Kantian Ethics

...Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth century German philosopher whose moral views continue to be influential. His ethical theory is based on a deontological point of view, where the act itself has moral value regardless of the consequences. Kant dismisses emotions such as pity and compassion as irrelevant to morality and thought that making a choice based on feelings or fulfilling our desires is irrelevant when making a morally correct decision. His beliefs oppose that of moral relativism, in which a morally good act is entirely dependant on the circumstances or culture in which it takes place, instead believing in the necessity of a perfectly universalisable moral law. A significant area of ethical study for Kant was the investigation into human reasoning. His views were in response to that of the empiricists and rationalists. The rationalists attempted to prove that we can understand the world purely be using our reasoning, on the other hand empiricists argued that all of our knowledge originates from experience. Although he thought that neither approach was entirely successful, his beliefs were more closely linked with those of the rationalists. He explained that we only have knowledge of the world as it appears to us through our senses, and that humans never know the true reality of the world as we experience it through our own minds, of which various categories of thought have been built into. Therefore our scientific knowledge is only of our own experiences and......

Words: 862 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Briefly Explain the Role of Autonomy in Kantian Ethics. Then Argue Either That Kant Is Correct or Incorrect in Claiming That Morality Requires Autonomy.

...Autonomy provides self-identification and placement in a person culture. Immanuel Kant believes that autonomy plays a big role in making ethical decisions. I believe that is correct and this is because morals vary from culture to culture and universalizability does not exist. Morals are supposed to bring good but there are circumstances where a moral action might bring damage. Due to this premise I feel as though it is not always right to do the duty that is expected. I also believe that if a duty is imposed on us, the fulfillment of that duty will not make us any more ethical. To explain my universalizability statement, Immanuel Kant believes that acting immorally is unreasonable because it is inconsistently unfair and unjust towards whomever it may have a negative impact on, even though that person may not know. According to Kant, an action is morally right if its maxim is universalizable. In which a maxim is a “principle of action you give yourself when you are about to do something” (162), and universalizable means that your acts of your maxim would be supported by everyone. According to Russ Shafer-Landau in The Fundamentals of Ethics, Kant believes that, “the morality of our actions has nothing to do with results. It has everything to do with our intentions and reasons for action, those are contained in the principle we live by” (163). Morality relies on people acting out with a good intention, but the action has to be universalizable, and if it is not, we are being......

Words: 963 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Euthniasia Kantian

...relieve unbearable suffering, and if a mentally competent patient continues to request assistance in dying. Then, with outside opinion concurring, a physician would be permitted to prescribe medication that the patient could use to hasten death at a time of the patient’s choice (White 1-2). While Kantian theorist could take several different positions on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide there are theories that support this end of life decision. Nonconsequentialist moral theorist say that the rightness of an action . . . depends primarily, or completely, on the nature of the action itself. To a nonconsequentialist, the balance of good over bad that results from an action may matter little or not at all. What is of primary concern is the kind of action in question (Russ 4-2). Kantian theorist believe that we have absolute moral duties that are determined by reason and should be fulfilled regardless of the potential consequences on either the individual or the society (Russ 1-1). These theories on mortality are derived from the Greek “deontology”, which means obligation. According to Kant’s ethics, “the more difficult the duty, the greater the moral value.” Kantian Ethics also state that the intentions of an act are more important that the act itself (Conley). One can argue that with the onset of a critical terminal illness some rationality may be lost, and according to Kant humanity. The biological life is what’s physically living. However, the moral life......

Words: 1159 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Uttilitarianism and Kantian Ethics

...as a mere mean. * In this case, Jodi uses the prostitutes as a mere mean to increase the number of customers to the hotel. To attract extra guests, she capitalized on the mentality of prospective guests, in the ease of accessing of a red light district, which indirectly promotes sexual activities. * Also, to put the CEO through the test of reciprocity, a normal person will not want to be associated with staying in a hotel with shady activities. * And under the Principle Of Humanity, it seems as though the services from the hotel do not benefit the prostitutes but only to use them as a mere mean to increase the hotel’s profits. Hence, we can conclude that it violates Kantian’s principle of humanity. Also, according to the Kantian ethics theory it is explained that you have to revolve around duty and not the end goals. Even though Jodi is suggesting such an idea to increase the bookings in the hotel, she is assuming that all adults know what they are doing and should be aware of the Geylang reputation. But all adults don’t have the maturity to know what is right and it might unintentionally tempt some of them. Even if a tourist comes to the hotel to stay for a business purpose, due to such services provide by the hotel, it may urge him to try/find out what is this district all about. In this case, why would you want a positive person to be involved in such an activity? If an individual wishes to be involved in such an activity, let him do at his own cost but not......

Words: 756 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Kantian Resolution

...2, I will treat someone as a means merely because I’m being deceitful or dishonest to my professors and my parents. Most importantly I’m cheating myself as a student out of an education which then makes Option 2 morally impermissible. If I were to choose the course of action I found morally permissible by correctly operating the Abstract Kantian Moral Decision-Procedure and the Concrete Kantian Moral Decision-Procedure, I would be doing for duty’s sake but because my course of action relates to case 2, I must first reflect if I’m motivated by duty or by inclination. If I’m motivated by duty, I am a person of good will but if I’m motivated by inclination, I fall short of being a person of good will but just because I fall short of goodwill, it doesn’t make being motivated by inclination wrong. The course of action I found morally permissible in my Kantian Resolution is the same action as the one I found virtuous in my Aristotelian Resolution. The reason for this is because the virtuous action in the Aristotelian Resolution turned out to be morally permissible in the Kantian Resolution and the morally permissible course of action in Kantian Resolution turned out to be the virtuous action in the Aristotelian Resolution....

Words: 1383 - Pages: 6

Light Digital DSLR SLR Camera Bag Shoulder Case Handbag For EOS Nikon Canon Sony | 1x64 Isla Paraiso | Hunter X Hunter 268