Free Essay

Moral Arguments for the Existence of God

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By Kevesh
Words 1511
Pages 7
Moral Arguments for the Existence of God
Name
Institution
Date

Introduction
Moral arguments around the existence of God constitute a diverse group of arguments that reason from a certain angle of moral life or morality to God’s existence, with the general understanding of God as a morally good creator. It is important to note that moral arguments are interesting considering the fact that one has to give attention to all the philosophical issues that are handled under Metaethics in order to effectively evaluate the soundness of such arguments. On the other hand, they are important considering their dominance in famous apologetic arguments in support of religious belief. The connection that apparently exists between religion and morality tends to uphold the claim that there is need for a religious foundation that can define moral truths, or that such truths can be best elaborated by the existence of God, or some actions or qualities of God. This essay focuses on the various types of moral arguments, with the intention of drawing on the distinction between practical and theoretical or pragmatic moral arguments. As such, this paper asserts that from the moral perspective, mortal obligations constitute of rules that are imposed by a supreme being that can only be explained by a Godly figure.
Moral Arguments for the Existence of God
There are various moral arguments that have been established in support of the existence of God, some of which will be discussed in this section. One of the theistic moral argument versions that is easily understandable relies on the analogy between moral laws and the human laws that are developed and enforced by nation-states. Sovereign laws develop and enforce laws that forbid or permit certain acts. Case in point, if one is a citizen of the United States and they earn a limited amount of tax income, they are obligated to file for income tax returns on an annual basis. Most countries have also established laws that forbid employers from discriminating people on the basis of race, age, or gender during the hiring process. On the other hand, just like political laws, most of the moral laws bind individuals (Kwan, 2011). Case in point, the moral principle obligates individuals to remain truthful in everything they say to others, and to keep many promises that they make to other parties. Stephen Evans argues that just like political laws are developed and enacted by legislators, who have been given the ultimate authority to pass such laws, moral laws are enacted by an entity that wields moral authority, with God standing out as the only candidate that is plausible enough to fit such a role (Kwan, 2011). This argument has encountered various criticisms form some of the philosophers, who believe that it is crude considering the obviousness of its force, such that an individual does not require any special philosophical training for one to see its appeal and understand it.
J. L. Schellenberg strongly argued against this take in his book titled, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason (1993). Schellenberg maintains that considering the unobvious nature of God’s reality to those who want to believe in him, then it is problematic to believe that God really exists (Cuneo, 2013). As such, he added that a God who is construed as being perfect in nature, is nothing less than perfectly loving, and hence he would always be in support of a conscious relationship with individuals who are hold the capability of taking part in such a relationship. According to Schellenberg, if a God really exists, he would allow any finite individual to be part of such a relationship. Nevertheless, such a case cannot be unless all the persons who fit the description of being finite believe in the existence of God. For one to engage in a conscious relationship with another individual, they have to start by believing that the latter actually exists. With such a take, Schellenberg argues that if God exists, then there is no person that fits the finite description and does not believe in God’s existence, meaning that there are no nonbelievers who are nonresistant (Cuneo, 2013). Considering the fact that such individuals exist, then there is no God. Steve Evans’ argument on moral obligations counters Schellenberg’s argument. According to Evans, if being aware of moral obligations means that one is aware of divine laws or God’s commands, then any individual who holds any sort of awareness of moral obligations is aware of God. This argument postulates that such persons may hold awareness of God’s laws without recognizing that such laws are from God. Such an individual may be defined by religious apologists as having de re know-how of God, given that moral obligation is an expression of the will of God (Kwan, 2011).
The question of conversion of such awareness into the full belief in the existence of God is one that has also formed a major source of argument. One of the approach that can be adopted in this case involved helping such individuals to develop the skills that they need to properly recognize moral laws and what they constitute, as divine laws, or divine commands (Kwan, 2011). In a case where one experiences moral laws, then they could view moral experience as a form of religious experience. In this case, an individual who has experienced God in such a way does not necessarily require a moral argument to believe in God’s existence. This forms the foundation based on which Alvin Plantinga (2000), together with the ‘Reformed epistemologists’ argue that the belief that individual have in God could be “properly basic” (Meister, 2009). In such a case, it is then worth noting that one could have knowledge of God embedded in moral experience yet such knowledge is not consequence of a moral argument. However, even in such a case, Plantinga argues that a moral argument may still be valuable. Such an argument may be important in helping individuals understand that divine laws and commands and moral obligations (Meister, 2009). Even in the cases where it is considered true that ordinary persons are aware of the existence of God without the need for arguments, such arguments remain important in supporting such a claim. Metaethical theorists offer content that can be used to develop such an argument.
Robert Adams (1999) and Philip Quinn (1979) developed the divine command theories (DCT) in view of defining the divine nature of moral obligations (Meister, 2009). The moral obligations developed upon by Adam’s argument are highly distinctive from other social obligations including financial obligations, legal obligations, etiquette obligations, and obligations that associate individuals with a certain club by virtue. Adams aimed at distinguishing his view from the popular “voluntarist” views concerning ethics, which seem to consider other moral properties as relying on the will of God. Adam limits his theory to obligations to evade the “Euthyphro” objection that holds that ethics are reduced to arbitrariness by divine command views. It is important to note that obligations cannot be simply reduced to normative claims concerning what one is justified to do. John S. Mill (1874) postulated that normative principles can be explained without referring to God (Meister, 2009). Mill argues that when one feels obligated, it originates from something that is born witness by the conscience to its nature. As such, Mill emphasized that unlike human laws, moral law does not stem from the legislator’s will or pieces of legislation that are external to the mind. In this case, Mill referred to the normative logical principles including one that considers it wrong for one to both in “m” and “not-m”. According to Mill, such normative principles do not require any form of authority for them to hold (Kwan, 2011). Nevertheless, even if what Mill suggest about normativity is correct, it does not mean that his perception of the obligations is the same as the obligations have a unique character. According to Adams, obligations bear a unique and special form of force that individual out to be careful to comply with and blame is appropriately incurred if obligations are violated.
Conclusion
It is evident that proponents of the existence of God have gone to greater lengths to establish the link between moral obligation and divine command. It is clearly represented in the various arguments presented in the essay that moral laws constitute a form of Godly commands, which wish to impose the laws and moral principles that the entity of God as a figure of perfect love stands for. In as much as opponents of the existence of God have attempted to discredit the divinity of mortal obligations, proponents of God’s existence have been keen to establish the lack of awareness that individuals may have that they are aware of God, but remain practically aware of God through their interactions with the various moral obligations that define Godliness. As such, the findings of the paper reflect the pre-established thesis that from the moral perspective, mortal obligations constitute of rules that are imposed by a supreme being that can only be explained by a Godly figure.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Existence of God

...provide evidence for the existence of God. Descartes gives this evidence through reasoning, starting out by describing how he comes to this conclusion of the existence of God. He does this by closing himself off mentally from the outside world, ignoring sight, hearing, and his other senses and looking deeply in himself (Cahn 496). This allows him to make an introspective look at God’s existence without the influences of another person. From this state, he organizes his thoughts and from his collective thoughts and reasoning, he deduces that God does exist due to his finite existence, a mere substance that is “not sufficient to explain my [Descartes] having the idea of an infinite substance, since I am finite, unless this idea proceeded from some substance which really was infinite” (Cahn 500) and the understanding that God is a substance that “is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent and supremely powerful” (Cahn 500). This basically means that since he should not be able to have the ability to think the way he does without either being an infinite being or having an infinite being put the thoughts into his head. This explanation appears to be extremely logical, but once it is analyzed several flaws in reasoning are picked up from the reading. I agree with most of Descartes reasoning on the existence of God, which I will clarify further, along with an explanation of the biggest flaw in Descartes’ argument. Descartes......

Words: 789 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Existence of God

... Final Paper The Proof that God Exists The greatest question that man has ever asked is “Why”, as philosophers it is the only question that one asks. Since the birth of man kind, the question has been asked “where do we come from”; and since the birth of man kind the answer was simple, someone put us here, a person of higher being, a person often referred to as God. As a philosopher and thinker one can not simply believe in the existence of God, but ask the question why; why does God exist. There are many philosophers who dare to answer the “Why” including Rene Descartes, Immanuel Kant, and Thomas Aquinas. In answering this question there has developed three main arguments that focus on the proof for the existence of God; the Teleological, Cosmological, and Ontological arguments. The most difficult of the three arguments to understand is the Ontological argument, for it is purely logical proof; it attempts to argue from the idea of God to His necessary existence. Simply put the ontological argument attempts to prove the existence of God by stating God exists because he must. “While from the fact that I cannot conceive God without existence, it follows that existence is inseparable from Him, and hence that He really exists. For it is not within my power to think of God without existence.”(Descartes 135) Simply put, in the entire world there is a greatest, a number one, in every aspect of competition there is someone in which never loses. God must exist because there has......

Words: 1750 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Examine How the Teleological Argument for the Existence of God Has Developed

...Examine how the Teleological Argument for the existence of God has developed. The teleological argument is the design argument for the existence of God. The name is derived from the Greek word ‘telos’ which means “end” or “purpose”. This theory speaks about things in the universe that appear to fulfil a purpose. Such design could not have occurred by chance, the only explanation has to do with references to an intelligent, personal being. This makes it an ‘a posteriori’ argument. The origin of the teleological argument dates back to the ancient Greek philosopher Plato (424-348 BCE) who believed in a pre-existent universe. He believed that the universe wasn’t created by an intelligent being which he referred to as the ‘demi-urge’. Instead his theory stated that the demi-urge did not create the universe ex nihilo, he simply developed a universe which he already existed in. For Plato, this was a rational explanation as to why there’s order in the world rather than chaos. Aristotle (384-322 BCE) who was a student of Plato also contributed to this theory. He considered that based on all that can be observed in the world and the stars above, the only explanation for all the complexity and beauty that the world contains was a divine intelligence. He believed that there was a first unmoved mover who is responsible for all order that exists. Such a God was also viewed as possessing intelligence, goodness, eternity yet remained incorporeal. St. Thomas Aquinas (13th century)......

Words: 926 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Explain Paley's Argument for the Existence of God

...4a. Explain Paley's argument for the existence of God (25) William Paley's argument for the existence of God is an important aspect of the Design argument, which argues that the universe is being directed towards an end purpose due to the a posteriori (subject to experience) evidence of an intelligent designer, who is God. This is because it is perhaps arguably the most famous version, and the theory which modern-day theories for the Design argument are built upon. The first version of the Design argument came from Plato, a Greek philosopher, who developed it to address the universe's apparent order. Plato proposed in his book Timaeus that a “demiurge”, a divine being of supreme wisdom and intelligence, was the creator of the cosmos. In Roman times, this was built upon by Cicero, a Roman jurist, who put forward an early version of what Paley would use for his design argument. In his book On the Nature of Gods, he put forward an analogy of a sundial being designed to tell the time, and that this could be attributed to nature, so therefore like something must of made the sundial, something must of made nature, and this something is an artificer, or God. These key ideas were later developed in the Dominican priest St.Thomas Aquinas' Five ways in his work the Summa Theologica. Each of his ways were in essence proving the existence of God, but the 5th way in particular, which states that common sense tells us the universe acts in such a way so therefore we conclude an......

Words: 1041 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Existence of God

...Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary The Existence of God; Science As Justification Submitted to Dr. michael chiavone Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For THEO 626 D02 By Daniel Martin Student ID: L25178504 New Orleans, LA December 12, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 1 a. Thesis and introductory explanation b. Historical development of doctrine II. Arguments for the Existence of God 3 c. Cosmological Argument d. Teleological Argument e. Anthropological III. Atheism Versus Existence of God 11 f. Evidence used to disprove God’s existence g. The believers evidence to counter IV. Conclusion 13 h. Summary of the arguments i. Applications in the church today V. Introduction The existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, immutable, monotheistic God has come up against enormous resistance from the beginning of time. Early believers such as Moses, Elijah, Paul, and Peter all had to demonstrate that their God is the one true God at times. These believers even encountered persecution and ridicule for holding on to these beliefs at times. Nevertheless the challenges to these early believers tended to be demonstrating that their God was greater than their accuser’s god or gods. At times, it was through the words of men that the God of the Bible was shown to be greater, and......

Words: 5137 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Existence of God

...Is it Possible to Prove the Existence of God? Name Institution Is it Possible to Prove the Existence of God? Several theories have been put forward to explain how the universe came into being. While most religious groups maintain that, the universe is as a result of an act or acts of a Supreme Being, scientists proposes other theories to counter or agree with this argument. For example, the Big Bang theory tries to explain the origin of the universe because studies in astrophysics have clearly shown that indeed the universe had a beginning (Hatcher, 1994). In addition, the Charles Darwin’s theory also tries to explain the origin of man by suggesting that the human race as it exists today originated from a single cell to a complex being (Hatcher, 1994). However, some of these theories contain inconsistencies that may explain the existence of God. To prove the existence of God, one has to look at the observable phenomena such as the complexity of the universe, laws of nature and inconsistencies in proposed theories. The complexity of the universe suggests the presence of a Supreme Being. While the evolution theory tried to explain the origin of man, it failed to provide substantial evidence on the complexity of the human being (Hatcher, 1994). In fact, the theory suggests that a human being evolved from a single cell organism. However, the complexity of the human brain and the nervous system may suggest otherwise due to its structure.......

Words: 646 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Existence of God

...into questioning the existence of God. The main question being “If God truly does exist why does he allow evil to occur, why doesn’t he protect the innocent”. In the dialogue between Athea, Bea and Agnos, Bruce Russell uses the characters to tackle that exact question by focusing on the argument of the problem of Evil. Athea in this dialogue is used as the protagonist in the attack of theism, he lays the foundation of the dialogue by providing the premises on which he believes that God must not exist due to the presence of evil. Bea in this dialogue is considered the protagonist in the defense of theism, he role is to highlight the weakness in the problem of evil argument and furthermore suggesting alternative reasons for the presence of evil despite God’s existence. In this essay I shall summarize the setting of the dialogue between the two main characters, then delve into the arguments that are presented. I shall first highlight Athea’s argument against the presence of God, explaining the structure and conclusion of the problem of evil argument, as this lays the foundation for the whole dialogue. I shall then focus on Bea’s reaction to Athea’s argument, clarifying her perceived weakness of the argument and furthermore pointing out her theories on why the presence of evil exists despite Gods existence. Finally I shall present my opinion on the Problem of evil, illustrating the weakness in the premises and its inadequate consideration of the ways in which God might......

Words: 2222 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Moral Argument

...TWO KINDS OF MORAL ARGUMENTS CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF GOD (1) Theoretical moral arguments: Arguments that conclude that it is reasonable to believe that God exists because His existence is the best explanation for the existence, nature, and our knowledge of objective moral truths. Such arguments assume or try to defend the view that there are objective moral truths. (2) Practical moral arguments: Arguments that conclude that one ought to believe because of the moral value (intrinsic value, value to the believer and/or value to others) of believing that there is a God. We have already encountered this distinction in the readings by Lois Hope Walker and G.E. Moore. C. S. Lewis’s moral arguments are mostly of the theoretical kind. C. S. Lewis’s Main Argument Lewis’s Premise (1): Everyone knows, and so believes, that there are objective moral truths. Lewis: People blame, praise, and try influence things on the basis of the belief that certain things are really right and wrong – in some objective sense. And it really is obvious that, e.g., cruelty is wrong. Objection 1: Many people deny that there is any objective right or wrong. Lewis: They are always inconsistent in that they go on believing and asserting such that, e.g. some actions are unfair and that there is sometimes such a thing as the “objectively right side” in a war. Objection 2: Our sense of morality is just a “herd instinct” that has developed (perhaps by......

Words: 1167 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Existence of God

...The existence of god has been a question that has plagued mankind since it began to think logically. Many philosophers argue that there may or may not be a god, or that there may even be different types of gods. It is difficult to say whether or not god can exist because there is a lack of knowledge or limited knowledge regarding the issue. Mankind has only been around for so long and only has little pieces of history left to study. So who knows what we could be possibly be missing in this quest to find the ultimate answer. Yet our way of thinking has evolved enough to allow us to grasp more complex ideas to make up for lost history. And maybe just maybe, be able to come to the conclusion of whether or not god can or cannot exist. The Big Bang generally refers to the idea that the universe has expanded from a hot and dense condition at some time in the past, and continues to expand to this day. My question is what put it there? Time could have not decided to one day say, “I think I’m going to create life in a thing called a universe.” And magically particles come out of nowhere, more and more build up until it’s screaming hot, and then BANG! Time begins and so does everything as we know it today. Something had to place it there. Something had to have planned out the whole process involving the beginning of time. Everything is too complex and precise to not have been created by an intelligent being. I do believe in “God” but not the god referred to in the bible. I believe...

Words: 1092 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Question a - What Are the Main Strengths and Weaknesses of the Teleological Argument, for the Existence of God?

...Philosophy essay – the teleological argument Question A - What are the main strengths and weaknesses of the teleological argument, for the existence of god? The teleological argument is a posteriori, this means that it is able to support its argument based of the empirical evidence that we can see around us. It states that we can easily observe that there is order and complexity in the universe around us, such as the changing of seasons or the human eye, therefore as things that have order and complexity have designers such as a watch or a computer the world must too have a designer as it is infinitely more complex than many human designs that have designers. This means that the universe must too have a designer (God), yet there are many strengths and weaknesses to this argument. On the one hand this could be perceived as a strong argument for the existence of god as it is backed up by inductive reasoning, meaning that the whole argument is started by something that we can observe, this means that it is difficult to deny that there is order and complexity within our universe. This argument has been backed up by sir Thomas Aquinas in his book ‘summa theologica’ when he talks about qua purpose and qua regularity. Qua purpose can prove the existence of god by looking at things within nature and realizing that everything has a purpose, for example there are species of bird that’s life solely depends on the fruit from a single species of tree, yet the tree depends on the...

Words: 1926 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Argument for Existence of God

...C. S. Lewis once said, “God is not the sort of thing that one can be moderately interested in.” This implies that if God exists humanity ought to find the best way to relate with Him and if God does not exist then there is no need to be interested in God at all. Most theist and atheist philosopher like Camus and Sartre agree that the answer to the question of whether God exists makes a huge difference for man. For example, if there is no God then life ends in death, and therefore our existence is inconsequential. On the other hand, if there is a God, then there a chance/possibility of knowing and relating with Him as part of His creation. This paper therefore seeks to provide reasons that assert the claim that God exists in addition to responding to the popular atheistic theory of theodicy which claims that the problem of evil proves that God does not exist and if He does then He is not good and omnipotent. One of the arguments that theists use to prove the existence of God is the one of the origin of the universe. It relies on the widely popular assertion that the there was a time when the earth was not there. For centuries, human beings have seen themselves faced with the question of why we have everything instead of nothing. Atheists claim that the universe we live in is eternal with no beginning or end and that is all. Surely, that claim is not reasonable. If there is beginning point for the universe then the actual number of events that occurred in the past is......

Words: 1709 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

‘Explain How the Teleological Argument Attempts to Prove the Existence of God’

...The teleological argument also known as the design argument is a posteriori basing stuff primarily on knowledge gained from external experience. The idea being that basically due to the intricacies of the world there must be a designer. The word telos from teleological means purpose and purpose links in with Aristotle’s ideas of causality. The argument has two sides one being Aquinas’s on an argument to design and Paley’s being an argument from design. Aquinas 1224-1274 argument comes from the fifth of his five ways which is him pointing out the fact that there is evidence in the world around us of the existence of God therefore showing his Empirical knowledge. Furthermore Aquinas holds the belief that humans are always working towards something, such as knowledge (act for an end), as we strive to achieve the best outcome; meaning we do not achieve that end or outcome intentionally, instead it is for a reason. Aquinas reinforced the view that something which lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless guided by a being ‘endowed with knowledge and intelligence’, therefore, this shows that there must be some intelligent being that exists, pushing humans towards a goal or an end. Aquinas concluded that this being is God. Much like Aquinas William Paley made the argument about the existence of God through an argument from design. Paley, a theologian thought of the analogy through the use of a stone and a watch. He said that if you came across a stone never having seen......

Words: 449 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

What Is the Teleological Argument for the Existence of God?

...Got Questions What is the Teleological argument for the existence of God? Subscribe to our Question of the Week: Teleological argument Question: "What is the Teleological argument for the existence of God?" Answer: The word teleology comes from telos, which means "purpose" or "goal." The idea is that it takes a "purposer" to have purpose, and so, where we see things obviously intended for a purpose, we can assume that those things were made for a reason. In other words, a design implies a designer. We instinctively make these connections all the time. The difference between the Grand Canyon and Mount Rushmore is obvious—one is designed, one is not. The Grand Canyon was clearly formed by non-rational, natural processes, whereas Mount Rushmore was clearly created by an intelligent being—a designer. When we are walking on a beach and find a wristwatch, we do not assume that time and random chance produced the watch from blowing sand. Why? Because it has the clear marks of design—it has a purpose, it conveys information, it is specifically complex, etc. In no scientific field is design considered to be spontaneous; it always implies a designer, and the greater the design, the greater the designer. Thus, taking the assumptions of science, the universe would require a designer beyond itself (i.e., a supernatural designer). The teleological argument applies this principle to the whole universe. If designs imply a......

Words: 532 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Outline the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God (21 Marks)

...Outline the cosmological argument for the existence of God (21 marks) The cosmological argument aims to prove the existence of God whilst also providing an explanation for the beginning of the universe, with different views coming from various scholars. It is an a posteriori argument, meaning we can draw conclusions from experiences based on what we see around us, although it is not a fact. Despite the separate interpretations, the cosmological argument revolves around a first cause which started the universe. This cause is what we come to know as God, and the scholars mainly focus on different ways of proving his existence by looking at the world around us. When looking at the argument, Thomas Aquinas is the driving force behind most of its foundations and ideas. His first way from five in his book ‘Summa Theologica’, he outlines the need for a first cause because of the motion we see in the world. Nothing inanimate can move itself, and requires another force in order for it to go from potentiality to actuality. But everything has to be moved by something else which would go on infinitely, so something must have been the first mover. This first mover is understood to be God, who set the world in motion when he created it. This mirrors Aristotle’s ideas about planetary motion, and Aquinas believed God continues to keep the world functioning and moving. Furthermore, Aquinas’ second way also represents the cosmological argument as the way of causation. When you look at......

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Examine the Argument for the Existence of God from Religious Experience

...The argument from religious experience is the argument from experiences of God to the existence of God. In its stronger form, this argument asserts that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and so that the ‘God’ therefore must be a God; case closed. In its weaker form (logically) the argument asserts only that religious experiences constitute evidence for God’s existence. Richard Swinburne has defended this form of argument with an appeal to the principle of credulity. The principle of credulity claims that rationally we should believe a person’s claim about what they have experienced. Generally, says Swinburne ‘it is reasonable to believe that the world is probably as we experience it to be. Unless we have an obvious objection to question a religious experience, therefore we should accept it as prima facie evidence from the existence of God at least. Although, the atheist Michael Martin criticised Swinburne’s use of the principle of credulity, If as Swinburne suggests that experiences are generally to be treated as veridical, an Atheist could logically argue that as he experiences the absence of God using the principle of credulity, that the world is then as this experience represents it as being Godless. Arguments therefore for the existence of God through credulity can be met with arguments from atheist experiences (fire with fire) which brings the two equal. Swinburne in defence argues that you can’t have a negative principle of......

Words: 1062 - Pages: 5

unhackme is it safe | Thám Tử Lừng Danh Conan chap 612 | Instrumentos de cuerda