Free Essay

Murder or Manslaughter

In: Other Topics

Submitted By krausser25
Words 1154
Pages 5
Murder or Manslaughter
Suzanne Feins
Saint Leo University

Murder or Manslaughter
Death is a pretty routine part of life. How we die, however can play a role in how it may impact others lives. Some people die of old age, whereas other people will die from medical issues. When a person is taken from us by accident or on purpose, the court system(s) will seek justice for the victim. There are different levels of punishment for the people who take another person's life.
One level of punishment in our court system is called first degree murder. First degree murder is considered the most heinous of acts. In order to convict the accused of first degree murder, the court must prove it was pre-mediated. This means the "murderers" are considered to have planned the event (Blinn, 1950). This is considered when someone is waiting on another person to arrive home to kill them or if someone was to poison the victim. Another way a person may be guilty of first degree murder is if a person dies a result of a violent act that was commit such as rape, robbery arson or burglary. Most cases are trial by a jury and depending on the states, it could sentence a person to spend life in prison or it could mean the death penalty. People who are convicted of first degree murder are sent to a maximum prison due to the nature of their crime. The next level of punishment we have is called second degree murder. Second degree murder is slightly different. Granted there still was a murder, but there was no plan to go by. These murders are known as the "crime of passion" (Schmalleger, 2012). This means the person had no plan to kill somebody until they heard or seen something and acted out a murder right then and there due to emotional distress. One way a person can be charged with second degree murder is if it was provoked. For example, Joe walks into his son's room and finds Billy, his brother-in-law molesting his son; Joe snaps and wants to kill Billy therefore beats Billy to death. Joe can be charged with second degree murder due to the fact the murder took place immediately after discovering his son being molested and he was acting out of pure emotion. Joe did not plan to kill Billy, but due to extensive circumstances he can still be charged with second degree murder even if the situation seemed right for what the father had done to protect his son. Another common way second degree murder is addressed, is when a felony is being committed and a death happens as a result of it. A person who is charged with second degree murder can be sent to a maximum or minimum prison depending on the crime. Every states has its own sentencing. Most people who are charged with second degree murder will end up on parole after their jail time sentence is up.
Third degree murder is also known as manslaughter in some states. The main difference between murder and manslaughter is "malice aforethought", which means the intent to kill (Cole, Smith, & Dejong, 2013). Murder requires malice aforethought but manslaughter doesn't. There are two different types of manslaughter, voluntary and involuntary. The most commonly used example for voluntary man slaughter would be a husband finding his wife in bed with another man. The husbands now wants to hurt the man in bed with his wife. The husband kills his wife's lover, but it was due to the event of finding her in bed with another man. The emotional distress in that situation is blamed for the homicide. It was not planned therefore, murder wouldn't be a correct term to use. Involuntary manslaughter would be a homicide in where someone died at the hands of another person but there isn't a intent or reason. For example, an intoxicated Kevin decides to get behind the wheel of a car and drive. While driving under the influences, he runs over a child crossing the street and the child dies. Kevin had no intention to kill or harm this child. This tragically is a result of Kevin careless disregard for the law. Kevin can be held accountable for his negligence and could be charged with involuntary manslaughter. The states have their own laws when it comes to sentencing a person charged with voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. Justifiable homicide is a category all its own. Justifiable homicide is also known as a killing done in self defense (Cole et al., 2013). This type of homicide is legal. It just means that a person is in direct danger and the only way to survive this situation is with deadly force. If someone breaks into your home and puts a knife to your neck, and you can use deadly force to protect yourself. You must be in harm's way in order for the courts to see this as a justifiable homicide. There is no jail time for this type of homicide, but there will be a investigation to rule out murder and manslaughter.
As normal as death is, it is never easy on family or friends. When a family member or friend is taken by the hands of another person, they will seek to the courts to serve them justice. Whether it's first degree, second degree murder or manslaughter, whoever is responsible will pay for the crime they committed.

Effects on the criminal justice system Classifying the different types of homicides plays a huge role in the criminal justice system. It is only fair that the court system has different degree of murder and voluntary/involuntary manslaughter. The different classes can affect on which jail the convicted would go to. The more violent crimes would go to a more secure prison than those who crimes were less violent. The different classes also have different sentencing. The more heinous the crime the longer the sentence. It has a huge affect on society as a whole. Was justice served? Society does not need a person who can cold heartily plan a homicide out walking the streets. Another effect it has on the criminal justice system would be the courts. Depending on how the crime was committed it may take a long time to go to court. This can be very costly to everyone involved in the case. A expert witness could cost a person a couple of thousand dollars and could mean the difference between a manslaughter or a Justifiable homicide.

Blinn, K. W. (1950). FIRST DEGREE MURDER--A WORKABLE DEFINITION. Journal Of Criminal Law & Criminology (08852731), 40(6), 729-735
Cole, G. F., Smith, C. E., & Dejong, C. (2013). The American System of Criminal Justice (13 ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
Schmalleger, F. (2012). Criminology today An integrative introduction (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education .…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Criminal Law Assessment - Murder, Manslaughter and Gbh

...which both murder and manslaughter charges will be considered. The AR for both of these offences is the same and can be defined as “The unlawful killing of a human being under the Queen’s peace.”[1] Assuming the victim was alive that this scenario was not during a war, it remains to establish that this was an unlawful killing. In the case of R v Freya we will focus on the AR of omission and determine whether the defendant Nurse Freya did the act or omitted to do a legally recognised duty which resulted in the death of Rachel. We will also decide whether the act was deliberate, unlawful, and a significant cause of death. In the case of R v Freya only a charge of manslaughter will be considered as Nurse Freya had neither the direct or oblique intent to be charged with murder. R v Tom In the case of R v Tom the defendant Tom (D) swung a metal poker into the head of his wife V (V). V was sent to hospital and diagnosed with a fractured skull but regained consciousness. Upon waking V found painkillers by her bed and took an overdose resulting in her death. There are several elements that constitute the AR of murder or manslaughter. It must be proved that the defendant did the act or omitted to do a legally recognised duty, the act was deliberate, the act was unlawful. (As opposed to killing in self defence), the act was a significant cause of death and the death was of a person in being. Difficulties may arise when discussing the AR for murder and manslaughter is......

Words: 2454 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Critically Evaluate the Law in the Areas of Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter and Include the Consideration of Possible Reforms.

...Critically Evaluate the Law in the areas of Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter and include the consideration of possible reforms. Homicide, in English criminal law is a generic term covering offences such as murder, manslaughter and death by dangerous driving. What they all have in common is the unlawful killing of a human being, and what distinguishes them is the state of mind of the defendant who has caused the death or the defences available to them. According to Coke's classic definition, Murder is when a man of sound memory and of an age of discretion unlawfully killed within the any country of the realm any reasonable creature in rerum natura (the person) under the King's peace with malice afore thought either expressed by the party or implied by law. [So as the party wounded etc die of the wound or hurt, etc within a year and a day of the same]. Coke's definition should not be read literally and it is neither accurate or helpful. For instance, any person can be found guilty of murder and the year and a day rule was abolished by S1 law Reform Act 1996. The reference to 'malice afore thought' this suggests some element of planning and ill will on the part of the murder when in truth it can be spontaneous and the law requires no evidence of ill will. From the outset it should be started that a few centuries of Jurisprudence and the odd statutory intervention such fundamental terms as causation & intention let alone when does life begin and end should have been well......

Words: 3343 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

The Abc Murders

...The ABC Murders - Summary and analysis Summary (Spoiler Alert): Hastings, Hercule Poirot's partner and assistant, returns to Britain, just as Poirot receives a sinister letter from an unknown person under the alias ABC. The letter says, that he should look out for Andover, on the 21st of the month. Just as stated in the letter, something happens on the 21st. A woman in Andover, named Alice Asher, turns up dead. On the crime scene an ABC railway guide is found, and Andover is marked. The police believes that this is just a coincidence, and that the letter and the murder are not connected. On the very same day, Poirot receives another letter. This time it tells Poirot, to look out for Bexhill on the 25th. On the 25th another woman is found dead. This time it is Elisabeth Bernard. Once again, an ABC railway guide is found on the body, and it is opened on Bexhill. The Police slowly starts believing that this is not just a coincidence. He receives the third letter three days late due to an error in the address, written on the letter. The next morning, a Sir Carmichael Clarke is found dead in his estate in Churston. The fourth and final killing happens in a cinema in Doncaster, where a guy named George Earlsfield is stabbed to death. ABC has erred, since Earlsfield does not start with a D. The police believes that the killer is a mad man, who has failed, and that the killings might be over. Poirot on the other hand, does not believe in coincidences. Therefore he believes,......

Words: 1030 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Corporate Manslaughter

...Corporate manslaughter * Homicide – this is when any act which results in unlawful killing of a person. The main criminal charges for homicide would be murder, voluntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter. However all homicides require the killing of a living person. * Murder – this is when a person unlawful kills another person under the queens peace, with malice aforethought, either expressed or implied by the law so as the victim wounded or hurt etc, if they die due to the wound within a year and a day the defendant would be charged with murder. * Actus Reus of murder would be if the defendant did the act or omitted to do a legally recognised duty. (An act or omission), the act was deliberate, the act was unlawful. (As opposed to killing in self defence), the defendants act was the significant cause of the death, the death was of a human being. * Mens Reus of murder would be having the clear intention to kill another human being. * Voluntary manslaughter – * Provocation - This is when a person is provoked by things done or said or sometimes both which may lead to a sudden and temporary loss of self control which leads the defendant into committing the crime. Provocation is such that a reasonable person would lose self control. * Dimished responsibility – This is when a person is suffering from abnormality of mind (whether arising from arrested or retarded development of mind or any inherent causes or induced by......

Words: 886 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Serial Murders

...Serial Murders and the People Who Commit Them Written assignment for Criminology, Module 9, Serial Murders and the People Who Commit Them, December 8, 2013. Abstract Ronald Dominique was labeled as "The Bayou Serial Killer". He murdered at least 23 victims between 1997 and 2006. His victims ranged in age between 16 and 46 years of age. He murdered his victims by suffocation or strangulation. He pleaded guilty to only eight murders and was sentenced to eight life sentences (Blanco) Ronald Dominique spent most of his youth in the small bayou community of Thibodaux, LA. Thibodaux sits between New Orleans and Baton Rouge and is the type of community where everyone knows very little about each other. He attended Thibodaux High School where he was in the glee club and sang in the course. Classmates say he was ridiculed about being a homosexual during is teen years, but at the time he never admitted he was. As he got older he seemed to live in two worlds. There was the Dominique who was helpful to his neighbors in the small trailer parks where he lived. Then there was the Dominique who cross-dressed and did bad impersonations of Patti LaBelle at the local gay club. Neither world embrace him and among the gay community, many remember him as someone who was not particularly well liked. Through most of his adulthood, Dominique struggled financially and would end up living with his mother or other relatives. In the weeks before his arrest, he was......

Words: 829 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Capital Murder

...Capital Murder I think capital punishment has its ups and downs. I deem some instances you should use it and some you shouldn’t. I’m going to give you both sides and my opinions on capital punishment also facts on this controversial punishment. The first side I’m going to give you is that capital punishment is ultimate denial of human rights and that two wrongs don’t make a right. What this means is that by killing the person doesn’t change what he did and by killing him goes against everything we live for. Giving him the death penalty essentially says he is not a human and doesn’t not have right to live on this Earth. In my opinion this quote shows how amiss capital punishment is. The U.S hasn’t always practiced capital punishment but since it became recognized by the Constitution in 1776 there have been a total of 1281 executions. That is 1281 more people that have had their life decided on by fate and not by a group of jurors. Our justice system isn’t one hundred percent, which means we have no idea how many innocent people our justice system has murdered from capital punishment? Study’s say that thousands of people are falsely convicted each year even with our technology. I asked myself after I read that, why do we keep capital punishment then? If we are convicting that many innocent people and we know, what is the point to keep it? It makes our government look inhumane and like a half breed of Hitler and Ed Gein. Another sickening thought is what if the convict is......

Words: 811 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

A2 Murder Answer

...hammer. However, Steve stumbled, took the full force of the blow on his head, and died shortly afterwards. Discuss the possible criminal liability of Niccy for the murder of Owen, and the possible criminal liability of Paul for the murder of Steve. (25 marks) Murder, as defined by Sir Edward Coke, is the unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being under the Queens peace with malice aforethought, either expressed or implied. The Actus Reus (AR) of murder can be found within this definition where it says ‘unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being under the queen’s peace’. In the case of Niccy AR is evident as she stabbed Owen unlawfully as there is no evidence to suggest that the messages received where from a legitimate governmental department – therefore eliminating it to be claimed an authorised killing. To further support this Owen is a ‘reasonable person in being’ as he is not a foetus in his mother’s womb and has been fully expelled from it – as decided in Attorney Generals Reference [No. 3 of 1994] (1997). In addition to this unlawful homicide can only be carried out under the queen’s peace- which it was i.e. if Niccy was to perform this murder at war then it won’t be murder as there was no peace. The principles of causation also apply if Niccy is to be prosecuted to be for murder. It has to be proved that there is a direct and unbroken link between the defendant’s actions and the end consequence. The death of Owen has to be the result of......

Words: 1409 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Murder and Wrongful Death

...Murder and Wrongful Death Michael Missildine Law and Society CRJU-3313 Midwestern State University Abstract Murder is a crime in which one human being kills another human being. Murder is the most damaging of crimes to society. Murder goes against all morals and values in both historical and modern society. Social Scientists argue that legally authorized executions and abortions of unborn children can also be classified as murder. There are a number of cases where murder has gone from being a criminal case to a civil case of wrongful death. Many murder cases where a Jury did not convict a suspect of murder went further to become a wrongful death law suit in which the family sued the Defendant. Such cases have made major headlines such as the case in which OJ Simpson was acquitted of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. The families of Goldman and Nicole Simpson then sued OJ Simpson in civil court and received a judgment against Simpson for approximately $30 million dollars. This case was appealed and the judgments were affirmed by the Appellate Court in California. Cases of this nature set the stage for these actions and the types of remedies that are available to victim’s families. Should families of victims have the ability to sue a Defendant for the murder of another? Should the murder suspect be sued for wrongful death even if they are not convicted in criminal court? Murder cases in criminal court must have evidence proving that the......

Words: 3583 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Is Abortion Murder

...Is Abortion Murder? people have debated whether or not abortion is murder. People from both sides have very valid points to back up their side. So who is truly right? I believe that how you were raised as well as your religious beliefs, ways a lot on your side of the ongoing debate. As for me, I believe that abortion is in fact murder. If you kill a newborn baby or a young baby you will be charged with murder and sentenced to serve time in jail. If a pregnant woman is killed, the murderer will be charged with two counts of murder (both the mother and the unborn baby). Yet, if that same pregnant woman chooses that she, for whatever reason, does not want to carry and give birth to the baby, she has the choice to kill that baby according to the laws passed in 1973. One should know before engaging into sexual intercourse, the many things that can be the outcome of sex. Even if you don’t know about every disease that you could catch, you definitely know that babies are made by having unprotected sex. Moreover, many doctors and anti-abortion advocates as well as I believe that life begins at conception; therefore terminating the pregnancy is in fact murder. Furthermore, there are an unlimited supply if contraceptives and condoms to prevent a pregnancy. Also there are always other options like adoption. There are thousands of people who would love to have a baby yet they’re unable to have a child of their own....

Words: 259 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Euthanasia, Murder or a Blessing?

...Euthanasia has raised controversy in the United States because of different views on societal, cultural, and religious ethics. Euthanasia is the killing of a person to end either horrible pain, slow death, or even some coma victims that have been in a vegetative state of a considerable amount of time. Even though I believe that euthanasia is murder, it should not be looked down upon because death should be a right for the victims and their families. The other side of the argument claims that it is immoral to kill even those who are suffering because it is God's decision who lives and who dies. Both sides of this ongoing debate have some compelling arguments. In order to understand why I am defending an action that I admit is murder requires the use of an example. If a pregnant woman is murdered and had planned on keeping her baby the murderer would be charged on a count of murder and a count of manslaughter. Now in a different scenario, If that same woman was killed on the way to an abortion clinic it would only be a count for murder, because the life dwelling inside of her was unwanted. Women are legally allowed to choose whether or not a fetus lives. Therefore, why would we allow someone to suffer when they have declare no will to live. Euthanasia and assisted suicide go together hand-in-hand. The difference between the two is that with assisted suicide the patient is guided through the process of killing themselves, but with euthanasia the physicians take a......

Words: 1246 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Murder in All Its Forms

...Murder: And all its forms Throughout the criminal justice system, news, and in many other situations the term “murder” is used quite frequently however usually incorrectly. Some people say animals or even trees get murdered, but under the law it is not murder unless a human takes the life of another human. Homicide is a lawful term for any killing of a human being by another human being. Homicide itself is not automatically a crime, some homicides are legal, such as the justifiable killing of a suspect by the police or a killing in self-defense. Unlawful homicides are classified as crimes like murder and manslaughter. This paper will explain the important but often overlooked distinctions between murder and manslaughter, and the different variations of both crimes. When we look at “murder” we must also look at the different degrees of murder which are a reflection of the intent or severity of a certain murder charge. The most common degrees of murder are 1st degree murder and 2nd degree murder and in some cases what we call “capital murder”. Regardless of the label on the degree of the murder committed, the general idea is to increase the punishment with the degree. The more inhumane the killing is, or the motive associated behind the killing, then the greater the punishment and degree is for the murder. We must first understand what murder is: Murder is the killing of one human by another that is intentional, unlawful, and done with “malice aforethought” or in other......

Words: 1650 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Voluntary and Involuntary Manslaughter

...Ch. 3 Homicide Manslaughter= killings which lack malice aforethought; or where malice is mitigated -In some cases, a killing is manslaughter because there is simply no intention on the part of the killer to cause the death of another but death results from a reckless act. -In other cases, killing is intentional but is mitigated, or reduced, from murder to manslaughter because of the surrounding circumstances. Malice Aforethought= the conscious intent to cause death or great bodily harm to another person before a person commits the crime. Such malice is a required element to prove first degree murder. Voluntary Manslaughter Voluntary Manslaughter= killings that are the natural and probable result of the defendant’s recklessness, or conscious disregard for human life or safety. *An unlawful killing caused by a willful act done with full knowledge and awareness that the person is endangering the life of another, and done in conscious disregards of that risk is voluntary manslaughter or murder. -California Penal Code 192(a) defines voluntary manslaughter as the “unlawful killing of a human being without malice.” * Heat of Passion Killings: killing in response to legally adequate provocation (malice is mitigated) * Imperfect Self-Defense : killing with an honest but unreasonable belief in the right to use deadly force (malice is mitigated) Elements of Voluntary Manslaughter: * Actus reus- the intentional killing of another * Mans rea- the killer acted......

Words: 832 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Murder in the Cathedral

...A True Hero Portrayed: Thomas Becket Edward Grim was a good friend of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket. Around his neck, Grim even bore the cross necklace of Becket. On December 29, 1170, Grim witnessed the horrific murder of his good friend where he was delivering mass in his own cathedral. This was the day that Thomas Becket was martyred for his faith. Grim remained loyal to Becket, writing down the details of the brutality he had seen that day; He called it Martyrdom. Martyrdom is now known as a historically accurate text depicting the murder of St. Thomas Becket. Using Grim’s text as reference, the prestigious playwright, T.S. Eliot, wrote Murder in the Cathedral, with Becket as the central character. Historical accuracies assisted Eliot in creating a character with valor and strength and telling the story of his road to martyrdom. Firstly, Eliot depicts Becket as a bold man who has no fear. This is clearly exemplified right away by Thomas’ return to England from France. He knows his death is coming and he does not run and hide from it. In his last moments, Becket stands strong for his beliefs, revealing himself to the Knights who have come to bring him to his death. Even as all the monks beside him tremble with fright, Becket remains composed. In his obvious repetition of the word “fear,” Grim depicts Becket’s attitude. He writes: ‘The righteous will be like a bold lion and free from fear,’ he descended from the steps to which he had been......

Words: 937 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Elements of Murder

...Murder assignment Offence The offence in question is murder, stated in the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s 11 that any person who commits murder shall be guilty of an offence and shall be imprisoned for life . Conduct elements Conduct Element (Actus Rea) Voluntariness Voluntariness of the accused is the fundamental element that forms the Actus Rea of a crime. In order to determine whether A was in control of his physical actions, the death-causing Act must be recognised. As shown in Ryan v R the death causing action can consist of multiple acts . There was a series of death causing acts in this case – the relevant acts performed by A are the initial arrow wound to the shoulder and then the main death-causing act (according to medical evidence) the head collision with the concrete curb. My opinion is that of all the actions together showed the voluntariness was the “complex of acts” all performed by the accused. I do not have enough information relating to A’s sobriety however it does not indicate that he was under the influence of any alcohol or drugs. In this situation the defence would be arguing his actions were a response of automatism. Due to the fact that A claimed in the police statement that ‘when pulling back the bowstring I lost my balance, the dirt just gave out and I slipped and in doing so reached out reflexively to brace the fall. To rebut I would be more incline to follow the judgment of Murry v R, similar to this case the defendant......

Words: 1124 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...Kaplan University | Serial Killer | Deviance and Violence | | Tasiana Thompson | 3/26/2012 | Atlanta’s local serial killer The Atlanta Child Murders also known as the "missing and murdered children case". A series of children and teen African American youth where murder in Atlanta, Georgia 1979 to 1981. A minimum of 28 people were killed within the short time of about two years. Atlanta local Wayne Williams also African American and 23-years-old at the time of the last murders, now 52 years old, Wayne Williams continues to maintain his innocence. Wayne Williams is currently serving a consecutive life sentence for just two of the murders, but there where more than a half of dozen African American children and young men that was killed. In this case media divulged the physical evidence, but the FBI privately profiled the killer(s). Assumptions of the killer dropping the next body in a river to deplete evidence, the police and FBI officials staked out the James Jackson Parkway/ South Cobb Drive Bridge over the Chattahoochee River. May 22 1981 the last night of the stake out an FBI agent heard a splash in the water under the bridge. He saw a white 1970 Chevrolet station wagon slowly driving away, the same station wagon Eula Birdsong seen victim Yusuf Bell (14) get into a few years before in October 21 1979. When police pulled the car over that night a 23 year old Wayne Williams was the driver. The......

Words: 780 - Pages: 4

Vention (437) | Manny Streaming | LED ZEPPELIN-ICARUS 1975-TIE DYE LONG SLEEVE SHIRT S-M-L-XL-XXL Page, Plant