Free Essay

Revised Phil Paper

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By MichaelHafner42
Words 1316
Pages 6
Michael Hafner
Dr. Samantha Langsdale
PHIL 1800
December 2nd, 2015
The Delusion Dilemma Rene Descartes once proposed a tedious accusation about dreaming, and how our senses that we use to perceive what is considered reality should not be trusted fully. In the Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes attempts to convey the fascinating illusion of always being in a dream without a certain ability to distinguish what is actually reality or what is a dream, or at bare minimum prove that there are no certain marks to prove otherwise. He states, “…as I think about this more carefully, I see plainly that there are never any sure signs by means of which being awake can be distinguished from being asleep. The result is that I begin to feel dazed, and this very feeling only reinforces the notion that I may be asleep” (First Meditation). In my attempts to contrast what Descartes argument was comprised of and what certain illusions made him feel this way about our perception of physical existence. I turned my attention to his famous dream argument originally brought forth in his Mediation on First Philosophy, and will be using different ideologies between a John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, two famous English philosophers who have attempted to refute Rene Descartes’s dream argument by providing useful and insightful situations to further explain against the idea, as well as provide my own insight in concluding that we are not dreaming right now. It should be noted that within the context of Meditations, which is atypical from traditional philosophical text, the narrator is considered ‘I’ and is intended to be a fictional character by Descartes. This invites any thinker in a search for inevitability to be able to relate. It should also be noted that what set the argument in motion, and what was seemingly the cornerstone of the idea itself, was in the deficiency of comprehending the state of mind whilst in a dream. Descartes treats the absence of understanding as the result of our perception and that dreams are potentially made of the same content. “…Every thought I was having while awake I can also think of myself as sometimes having while asleep; and since I do not believe that what I seem to perceive in sleep comes from things located outside me, I did not see why I should be any more inclined to believe this of what I think I perceive while awake.” (The Philosophical Writings of Descartes).
John Locke, an English philosopher who is considered the “Father of Classical Liberalism”, hassles Rene Descartes argument by asking the presence of physical pain experienced in reality versus pain experienced within a dream. “I believe he [Descartes] will allow a very manifest difference between dreaming of being in the Fire, and being actually in it.” (An Essay concerning Human Understanding). John Locke’s claim is that we cannot have the same physical presence of pain in dreams as we seemingly have in real life. His claim, if proved true, could sabotage Descartes’s argument by providing evidence that there is an indeed certain distinction between reality within waking life and dreams.
Yet, Locke’s assumption has seemed have been proved otherwise as science and technology advance. During a study in 1998, conducted by the Medical Research Council of Canada and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada titled, the Nature and Prevalence of Pain in Dreams, one hundred and eighty-five participants completed a series of questions while logging their dreams for two consecutive weeks and shocking results were brought to attention. Eighteen of the dreams recorded showed the presence of experiencing pain while three of the eighteen subjects were victims to “excruciating” symptoms. While John Locke’s assertion is logical, the conclusion of the study in 1998 was as follows. “Cognitive systems that contribute to the representation of pain imagery are sometimes functional during dreaming.” (Pain in Dreams).
Another insightful viewpoint attempting to rebuttal this argument comes from the work of another famous English philosopher named Thomas Hobbes, who was best known for his work in political philosophy. Thomas Hobbes wrote Leviathan and later established the “social contract theory”, which seemingly provides the foundation for western philosophy. Hobbes’ provides an interesting differentiation on this situation by stating the lack of identifying illogical absurdities within dreams. He claimed that if you were able to recall a dream, you could remember that you would allow for all different types of extreme and bizarre happenings without you even battling from what is considered normal or what is deemed obscure. For example, occurrences much like in the scene from the recent movie Inception written by Christopher Nolan, where the characters in a dream allow for such extreme happenings in which the buildings literally folded on top of one another as they strolled down main street in a very beautiful, science-fiction manner. Hobbes believes that it does not occur to us that whatever obscurities we seem to experience within a dream are that of only an illusion.
To reinstate, the dream argument is a suggestion that in the bare minimum, our senses that we trust to perceive reality should not be taken truthfully. Knowing the premise of the argument Hobbes stated, “…because in waking, I often observe the absurdity of Dreams, but never dream of the absurdities of my waking Thoughts; I am well satisfied, that being awake, I know I dream not; though when I dream, I think my self awake.” (Leviathan). In conclusion to Thomas Hobbes compelling insight, I would agree with his view that even if we cannot truly know during a dream that we are in fact dreaming, one can still have the ability to understand that when an individual is awake, they are in fact awake.
In having two useful insights from two separate philosophers, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, I can support my argument against the idea and conclude that one cannot be so sure as to if they are in a dream. First, with John Locke’s remark of the cognitive ability to distinguish physical pain from reality, to the physical sensation of pain in dreams, I gave credit to science of the modern age to further disprove his accusation towards Rene Descartes. Disproving Locke has allowed for Descartes dream argument to continue puzzling many who attempt to disprove it. Though, using Thomas Hobbes’ claim to the lack of the sense of absurdity within dreams has allowed me, as the reader, to understand truly that we can know when we are truly awake versus when we are asleep. His viewpoint is that of a simple yet powerful mediator in the dispute. Stating that our brains do not seem to even attempt to defuse what is absurd within a dream, rather it simply lets us continue with said dream. Yet, in what is considered waking life, if you were to see main street fold on top of one another, clearly you would have some indication to call in sick at work that day. Rene Descartes argument is indeed pleasant to read, and many have attempted to disprove this claim, and I invite any and all to read. In conclusion, using two different claims, one for the argument and one against, I have presumed that as I am writing this currently, I am not in a dream.

Works Cited

Descartes, René, and George Heffernan. "First Meditation." Meditationes De Prima Philosophia = Meditations on First Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame, 1990. 12-14. Print.

Leviathan, ed. C.B. MacPherson, Penguin, 1968 (1651), Part I, chap. ii, p. 90.

Locke, An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon, 1975, IV.ii.14.

"Pain in Dreams." ResearchGate. Research Gate, 8 Oct. 1998. Web. 28 July 2014. <>.

The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, translated by Cottingham, Stoothoff and Murdoch, Cambridge University Press, 1984, vol. II, p. 13. (CSM II 13)…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Phil 201 Response Paper Mccloskey Article

...Response Paper Mccloskey Article Clark Hernanser PHIL 201 February 24, 2013 Ramon Graces Response Paper Mccloskey Article In his article, On Being an Atheist, H.J. McCloskey tried to show that atheism is a more reasonable and comfortable belief than that of Christianity.   McCloskey argued against the three theistic proofs, which are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument and the argument from design.   He pointed out the existence of evil in the world that God made.   He also pointed out that it is irrational to live by faith. According to McCloskey, proofs do not necessarily play a vital role in the belief of God.  Page 62 of the article states that "most theists do not come to believe in God as a basis for religious belief, but come to religion as a result of other reasons and factors."  However, he feels that as far as proofs serve theists, the three most commonly accepted are the cosmological, the teleological, and the argument from design.  It is important to note that he considers these arguments as reasons to "move ordinary theists to their theism." (McCloskey 1968) This is not necessary the case and contradicts the former statement that most theists do not hold to these proofs.  As such, the attempt to dispute these arguments as a reason not to believe in God is almost not worth attempting.  If theists do not generally hold to these proofs as reasons for faith, then why bother trying to......

Words: 2073 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Response Paper Phil 201

...A Response to the Article: "On Being An Atheist" by H. J. McCloskey Joshua Cottrell PHIL 201-D32 Professor Pensgard August 12, 2013 The belief in a Creator and a literal God has been a subject of many arguments down through the centuries. Despite a written record and a large contingency of believers, there has arose a strong group of people who believe there is no God and that man just happens to exist and that there is nothing beyond this life. In 1968 H.J. McCloskey published an article entitled "On Being an Atheist". He argued that theories such as the Cosmological or Teleological arguments did nothing to prove in his mind the presence of God. He strongly believed that evil further cemented the idea that a righteous God did not exist. With his writing he attempted to empower the atheist and once and for all prove that God did not exist. I. "Proofs" McCloskey indentified theistic arguments for God as "proofs", and in so doing opened himself up to much scrutiny. He quotes a colleague as saying "...most theists do not come to believe in God by reflecting on the proofs, but to come to religion as a result of other reasons and factors." I do not believe that his colleague was referring necessarily to Cosmological or Teleological arguments as "proofs", as McCloskey ends of doing. I believe his associate was merely stating that most people do not come to religion because they see the sky and think there must be a Creator. There are a number of......

Words: 2242 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Phil 201

...Stacy Mottola PHIL 201-D05 25NOV2013 Essay 1 Many question whether or not what we are seeing and are experiencing is real or just part of our imagination. This question is one that has been proposed for hundreds of years by philosophers like Descartes and Plato. How is it possible that a Greek philosopher, a philosopher from the seventeenth century and the movie The Matrix can be so similar? It is the intent of this paper to compare and contrast these questions in relation to the movie The Matrix. The main thing that stands out for each one of these is the question of the reality of the world in which we live. Our sense of being is called into question in each of these examples. Are our senses correct or are we simply living in a dream world that is made up? The Matrix is a computer system that has taken control of peoples everyday lives. Each individual is hooked up to this computer that generates a dream world where everyone believes that they are actually living a realistic life. In the Matrix Morpheus a leader of a group of people who have rebelled against this system come to the knowledge that they are not living real lives. In his recruitment Morpheus meets with Neo and attempts to show him the truth. Learning this Neo sees that what you can see, touch and feel are not exactly real, their senses have betrayed them. In the excerpt from Descartes he makes several statements which also question the reality in which our perceptions believe we are......

Words: 755 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Phil 235 Term Paper

...Term Paper: The Right to Have Children The right to have children is understood in very different ways and people’s ethics and values are put to the test each and everyday when they find out they not only must take care of themselves but the lives of another human being. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted this statement regarding the right to bear children “men and women of full age, without any limitations to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and found a family”[1]. This concept has been viewed in multiple ways and according to ethical theorists; they agree that no rights are absolute. However, it is said that for women at least, there is a fundamental privilege to have children. The right to life is a universally recognized right for all human beings. It is a fundamental right in which governs all other existing rights. For children, the right to life is the chance to be able to live and have the possibility to grow, to develop and become adults[2]. This right comprises two essential aspects: the right to have one’s life protected from birth and the right to be able to survive and develop appropriately[3]. The right to parenthood can be a very delicate matter. Many people have different views when it comes to procreate and parent children. An example of this was a case about a man from Wisconsin who was placed on probation because he was unable to pay child support for all nine of his children. During his probation, he was......

Words: 1348 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Phil 201

...COURSE SCHEDULE PHIL 201 Textbooks: Dew & Foreman, How Do You Know? A Short Introduction to the Issues of Knowledge (unpubl.) Evans, Philosophy of Religion: Thinking About Faith (2009). Foreman, Prelude to Philosophy: Critically Thinking about Foundational Beliefs Hasker, Metaphysics: Constructing a World View (1983). Holmes, Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions (2008). Wood, Epistemology: Becoming Intellectually Virtuous (1998). WEEK/ MODULE READING & STUDY ASSIGNMENTS POINTS DUE DATE 1 3/17-3/24 Foreman: chs. 1-3 3 presentations 3 study guides Course Requirements Checklist Class Introductions Quiz 1 0 0 60 Wed,3/19 Mon,3/24 Mon, 3/24 2 3/25-3/31 Foreman: chs. 5-7 2 presentations 3 study guides Quiz 2 60 Mon, 3/31 3 4/1-4/7 Hasker: chs. 1-3 1 Word document 4 presentations 3 study guides Group DB Forum 1 Quiz 3 100 60 IP Fri, 4/4 R Mon, 4/7 Mon 4/7 4 4/8-4/14 Dew & Foreman: ch. 3 Wood: chs. 1-2 3 presentations 3 study guides Quiz 4 60 Mon, 4/14 5 4/15-4/21 Dew & Foreman: chs. 7, 10 Wood: ch. 4 1 Word document 2 excerpts 3 presentations 3 study guides Essay Quiz 5 120 60 Mon, 4/21 Mon, 4/21 6 4/22-4/28 Evans: chs. 1-3 1 book excerpt 2 presentations 3 study guides Quiz 6 60 Mon, 4/28 7 4/29-5/5 Evans: ch. 7 Holmes: chs. 1-3 1 article 2 presentations 3 study guides Response Paper Quiz 7 200 60 Mon, 5/5 Mon, 5/5 8 5/6-5/12 Holmes: chs. 4-7, 14 1 presentation 3 study guides Group DB Forum 2 Quiz......

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay


... This paper after thorough analysis will explain the purpose of a team charter and show how it is used to improve performance. To explain the purpose of the team charter the author of this paper will consider individual personalities, listening skills, and trust levels, of each of its group members. After consideration of the individual differences as well as the members’ strengths and weaknesses, it will show how the uniqueness of each individual is used in a positive and meaningful way. The first analysis begins with Michael Duensing. According to the Jungian 16-type personality assessment, Michael has the characteristics and traits of an independent, determined, and critical thinker. Michael shows through his excellent written communication abilities, organizational skills and his ability to think outside the box; that he will be an effective leader for this team. He is known as trustworthy and listens to others well. Michael is understanding of other people’s needs, and is receptive to new ideas given. Michael’s characteristics are indicative of a project leader; his position as the leader of the learning team will serve the group well. Through this team charter Michael developed specific guidelines and defined expectations, for each member of the team. He is determined, dedicated, and devoted to the success of everyone involved (University of Phoenix, 2011). The second analysis in this paper begins with Lisa......

Words: 715 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Revised Fairytales

...always portrayed as a higher-class being than the female. The main issue has to do with feminism. While De Beaumont was busy creating the perfect girl to obligingly marry her beast and break the curse, Carter was fixated on going against the stereotypical roles placed on the female gender. Not many writers wished to go against female gender roles until feminist literature gained popularity, yet, even to this day, society does not hear many feminist fairytales. Fairytales play greatly into our perception of the single story. No parent wants to tell their daughter about exploiting her sexuality, which is how we came up with the unachievable dream of becoming well-mannered princesses. I simply found it shocking that the story could actually be revised with that moral....

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Phil serve the interests of stakeholders, including employees. How can managing for shareholders best serve other (non-shareholding) stakeholders? After all, one course of action that managing for shareholders suggests (as understood by Friedman), that managing for stakeholders (as understood by Freeman) generally speaks against, is trading the interests of employees off for the sake of shareholders.  For example, firing employees if it will maximize shareholder value.  How does he defend this seemingly paradoxical claim?  You need to consider this issue (it is the heart of Boatright’s argument). In general, you need to do more to defend your positions.  Obviously, you don’t have the same space to defend your view as you will in the term paper.  Nonetheless, give someone who doesn't already agree with you reason to think twice about their view. Grade: B...

Words: 348 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Phil Essay

...PHIL 1F90: Spring 2011. Second Essay Question ONE (to be answered as a straight-forward philosophical essay): Silenus, the satyr, is, or perhaps pretends to be, a determinist. After all, everything about the satyr, both his nature and nurture, come directly from his creator, Hench. And certainly, at the beginning of the story, Hench accepts full responsibility for the satyr’s actions. But he eventually changes his mind. How can the satyr, all of a sudden, become morally responsible for his actions? What exactly changed in Hench’s thinking? Michael Gorr is a compatibilist. Does his position make better sense than either the determinist or the libertarian? Explain. Question TWO (to be answered as a philosophical essay but with your auto-biography as illustation): “There is little wonder that Silenus, the satyr, is a determinist because everything about him, that is, both his nature as well as his nurture, were outside his control. He had absolutely no say in the matter. But, when I think about it, this is equally true of me as well. How do I, as a human being, differ from the satyr (except for the half-goat, half-man part)? After all, I am nothing more than the causal result of my nature in combination with my nurture and therefore, just like the satyr, I too am not responsible for who I am, what I do, or even what I think. If everything about me is caused and outside my control, then I cannot really be free or morally responsible. I could not have done...

Words: 699 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Phil Paper

...that gold is a metal, but we may have somewhat different understandings of what gold is – we may have different beliefs about how well it conducts electricity, or how precious it is, and so on, but it is still gold we are thinking about because of our causal connections to it. Externalism maintain that in order for an agent to be justified in holding a particular belief, the agent need not have any sort of introspective or cognitive awareness of the grounds that evidentially support her belief. In other word, externalism argues that a belief is justified provided that that belief is the product of a reliable belief-forming process and this process is simply something that takes in certain inputs, and produces beliefs as outputs. In this paper, I will argue that Externalism is a relatively correct theory comparing to internalism. Internalist argues that in order for an agent S to be justified in believing that p at a time t only if S is aware of the J-factos for p at t. Internalism lays down a cognitive awareness component for justified belief; in order for S to be justified in believing that p, S must have some sort of direct introspective or cognitive awareness of the J-factors or grounds that support p. In other words, S must hold the J-factors for p before her mind, as it were. In Internalist theory, all of the factors that determine whether a belief is justified must be factors of which an agent can become aware. That is, for any agent S and belief p, p’s justificatory......

Words: 878 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Phil 201 Paper

...While the question, “to torture or not to torture?” is a valid question; I feel that it is important for man to understand why he is torturing the other. What justifies physically or mentally abusing someone to get information? At what point do we decide for another man that he is or is not worthy of this abuse? Each viewpoint would suggest its own justification for the prisoner. Kant said you should never treat people merely as instruments; never just as means to your own goals.  Humans, he says, are autonomous beings with their own goals. (Perry) Utilitarianism would allow the torture if it meant better for society as a whole and was to their benefit. Kantian duty-based ethics would, “just be following orders” and not stop to think about the impact they are making on the prisoner or even for queen and country” or to “protect my children”. Virtue ethics would find themselves asking if it was morally appropriate to cause the prisoner to suffer and what the justification would be in said situation. Christian-principle based ethics would choose to follow the Bible and God’s call to love and show forgiveness to those who have wronged us as to whether the prisoner should be tortured or not. From a Christian-principle based ethic standpoint, it would be very situational as to whether they were to torture the prisoner. While the stereotypical Liberty students view would be to base my decision upon my Christian beliefs, I actually would decide upon a mix of these views. Hopefully,......

Words: 405 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay


...Tianna Dockett PHIL 101 Final Exam 1. Retributive justice is a legal principal that dictates that punishment for a crime is acceptable as long as it is a proportionate response to the crime committed. In this type of justice system, a crime is typically seen as being done against the state or government, rather than against an individual or community. The standard of fairness is likewise found in the thought of reasonable play. On the off chance that individuals accept that a reasonable procedure was utilized as a part of choosing what it to be dispersed, then they may well acknowledge an irregularity in what they get in correlation to others. 2.3. As a record of political association on the bigger scale, Plato's protection of a aristocratic government was unrealistic to win wide endorsement in fair Athens. He utilized the characters Glaucon and Adeimantus to voice pragmatic complaints against the arrangement. They are particularly concerned (as Plato's Athenian counterparts may well have been) with some of its procurements for the gatekeeper class, including the support of both men and ladies, the disposal of families, and the instruction of youngsters. Likewise, Plato accepted that the hobbies of the state are best saved if kids are raised and taught by the general public overall, instead of by their natural folks. So he proposed a basic (if startlingly new) plot for the reproducing, sustaining, and preparing of youngsters in the gatekeeper class.4. Using a...

Words: 1277 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Islamic Phil

...Muna Mohamed David G. Phil 1125 April 6, 2016 Any verbal denial of any principle of Muslim belief is considered apostasy. If one denies the unity of God or declares to a belief in reincarnation, then that person is guilty of apostasy. Apostasy means, to abandon the religion or a religious principle after accepting it. Moreover, Al-Ghazali was known as one the most influential thinkers in the history of Islam and his aim was to bring humanity closer to God. He was viewed as a faithful Asharite theologian in which one who believes that God is the only direct and indirect cause of actions. In this paper, we will examine Al-Ghazali’s reasons of the three teachings on which the philosophers are guilty of apostasy, and review ibn-Rushd’s defense of philosophy in the Decisive treatise, and decided whether ibn-Sina should be considered an apostate. Al-Ghazali illustrates three philosophical teachings that were apostasy and unorthodoxy. One of the first point is the philosopher’s belief in the eternity of the world. In other words, philosophers claim that the world is eternal and that the emanation of the first intellect and other beings happens because of the necessary causation of God’s essence, therefore the world as a whole is coexistent and coeternal with God. Ibn Sina believed that God does not have knowledge of the specifics of everything that takes place, rather he is is only aware of what takes place in the general sense. Ghazali replies to this saying that God’s......

Words: 790 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Phil 315 Paper

...In Marcia Baron’s article, “The Moral Status of Loyalty,” she proposes many ideas concerning loyalty. Loyalty is definitely an essential quality in almost all relationships, including an engineer’s relationship with their employer and society. Baron argues that we can really only show loyalty to specific people, and not to ideals, causes, or people in general, agreeing overall with the opinions and views of John Ladd and Andrew Oldenquist. In this paper, I will argue against Baron’s view. I think that we can be loyal to ideals, causes and the general public, not only singularly, but to them all at the same time. Loyalty is always going to be a problem or issue for engineers. Being loyal to your beliefs, the company you work for, and society is always going to come as a challenge because you really cannot make everyone happy all of the time. Baron states, “The NSPE Code begins, ‘The Engineer, to uphold and advance the honor and dignity of the engineering profession and in keeping with the high standards of ethical conduct. . . will be honest and impartial, and will serve with devotion his employer, his clients, and the public. . . .’ Can an engineer, no matter how heroic, always serve each of these parties with devotion? Can he or she, in other words, always be loyal to all three? The answer is clearly, ‘No.’“ (Baron 227) Baron says that the answer to this question is clearly “No.” She follows this by giving two conditional examples, the B.F. Goodrich and Ford Pinto engineers...

Words: 1791 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Critical Thinking Paper: Revised

...Critical Thinking Paper: Revised Shaun M White Renee Pistone PHI 210 – Critical Thinking June 10, 2012 Critical Thinking Paper: Revised “God bless America, land that I love. Stand beside her, and guide her through the night with a light from above. From the mountains, to the prairies, to the oceans, white with foam God bless America, my home sweet home…” If you were raised anywhere within the borders of the United States of America, you have heard these lyrics of “God Bless America” multiple times throughout your years. Just as the lyrics suggest, we should stand by our country, but we are also charged to guide our country. There would be no need to guide, if there wasn’t an area in which the country is lacking. The area in which America needs some guidance is in the area of employment benefits, specifically vacation mandates by the great America herself. America is the greatest place to live, don’t get that wrong, but there are some changes that need to be made to reward the people who contribute to making America the greatest country there is. The biggest change that needs to be made is to incorporate more time away from work. According to The Everything HR Kit, a person should be rewarded for their continuous hard work. The text believes that after 25 years of service, an employee should receive a total of five weeks paid vacation. Coming from an individual who is but 25 years old, five weeks does sound pretty nice, which is until statistics of what other......

Words: 1271 - Pages: 6

The Four | Bodysuits & un pezzo | Mug WEBRip (240p, 360p)