Free Essay

Route Redistriution

In: Computers and Technology

Submitted By Pan111
Words 5394
Pages 22
Redistributing Routing Protocols
Document ID: 8606

Contents
Introduction
Prerequisites
Requirements
Components Used
Conventions
Metrics
Administrative Distance
Redistribution Configuration Syntax and Examples
IGRP and EIGRP
OSPF
RIP
Redistributing Static Routes Except Gateway of Last resort in RIP using Route Map
IS−IS
Connected Routes
Avoiding Problems Due to Redistribution
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5
How to Redistribute Single Static Route
Related Information

Introduction
The use of a routing protocol to advertise routes that are learned by some other means, such as by another routing protocol, static routes, or directly connected routes, is called redistribution. While running a single routing protocol throughout your entire IP internetwork is desirable, multi−protocol routing is common for a number of reasons, such as company mergers, multiple departments managed by multiple network administrators, and multi−vendor environments. Running different routing protocols is often part of a network design. In any case, having a multiple protocol environment makes redistribution a necessity.
Differences in routing protocol characteristics, such as metrics, administrative distance, classful and classless capabilities can effect redistribution. Consideration must be given to these differences for redistribution to succeed. Prerequisites
Requirements
There are no specific requirements for this document.

Components Used
The information in this document is based on these software and hardware versions:

• Cisco IOS® Software Release 12.2(10b)
• Cisco 2500 Series Routers
The information in this document was created from the devices in a specific lab environment. All of the devices used in this document started with a cleared (default) configuration. If your network is live, make sure that you understand the potential impact of any command.

Conventions
Refer to Cisco Technical Tips Conventions for more information on document conventions.

Metrics
When you redistribute one protocol into another, remember that the metrics of each protocol play an important role in redistribution. Each protocol uses different metrics. For example, the Routing Information
Protocol (RIP) metric is based on hop count, but Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) and Enhanced
Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) use a composite metric based on bandwidth, delay, reliability, load, and maximum transmission unit (MTU), where bandwidth and delay are the only parameters used by default. When routes are redistributed, you must define a metric that is understandable to the receiving protocol. There are two methods to define metrics when redistributing routes.

You can define the metric for that specific redistribution only: router rip redistribute static metric 1 redistribute ospf 1 metric 1

Or you can use the same metric as a default for all redistribution (Using the default−metric command saves work because it eliminates the need for defining the metric separately for each redistribution.): router rip redistribute static redistribute ospf 1 default−metric 1

Administrative Distance
If a router is running more than one routing protocol and learns a route to the same destination using both routing protocols, then which route should be selected as the best route? Each protocol uses its own metric type to determine the best route. Comparing routes with different metric types cannot be done. Administrative distances take care of this problem. Administrative distances are assigned to route sources so that the route from the most preferred source will be chosen as the best path. Refer to Route Selection in Cisco Routers for more information about administrative distances and route selection.
Administrative distances help with route selection among different routing protocols, but they can cause problems for redistribution. These problems can be in the form of routing loops, convergence problems, or inefficient routing. See below for a topology and description of a possible problem.

In the above topology, if R1 is running RIP, and R2 and R5 are running both RIP and IGRP and redistributing
RIP into IGRP, then there is a potential problem. For example, R2 and R5 are both learning about network
192.168.1.0 from R1 using RIP. This knowledge is redistributed into IGRP. R2 learns about network
192.168.1.0 through R3, and R5 learns about it from R4 using IGRP. IGRP has a lower administrative distance than RIP (100 versus 120); therefore, the IGRP route is what is used in the routing table. Now there is a potential routing loop. Even if split horizon, or any other feature meant to help prevent routing loops comes into play, there is still a convergence problem.
If R2 and R5 are also redistributing IGRP into RIP (otherwise known as mutual redistribution) and the network, 192.168.1.0, is not directly connected to R1 (R1 is learning from another router upstream from it), then there is a potential problem that R1 will learn the network from R2 or R5 with a better metric than from the original source.
Note: The mechanics of route redistribution is proprietary on Cisco routers. The rules for redistribution on a
Cisco router dictate that the redistributed route be present in the routing table. It is not sufficient that the route be present in the routing topology or database. Routes with a lower Administrative Distance (AD) are always installed in the routing table. For example, if a static route is redistributed into IGRP on R5, and then IGRP subsequently redistributed into RIP on the same router (R5), the static route is not redistributed into RIP because it never got entered into the IGRP routing table. This is due to the fact that static routes have an AD of 1 and IGRP routes have an AD of 100 and the static route is installed in the routing table. In order to redistribute the static route into IGRP on R5, you need to use the redistribute static command under the router rip command.
The default behavior for RIP, IGRP and EIGRP is to advertise directly connected routes when a network statement under the routing protocol includes the connected interface subnet. There are two methods to get a connected route:
• An interface is configured with an IP address and mask, this corresponding subnet is considered a connected route.
• A static route is configured with only an outgoing interface, and not an IP next−hop, this is also considered a connected route.
Router#conf t
Router(config)#ip route 10.0.77.0 255.255.255.0 ethernet 0/0
Router(config)#end

Router#show ip route static
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S 10.0.77.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0

A network command configured under EIGRP, RIP or IGRP that includes (or "covers") either of these types of connected routes includes that subnet for advertisement.
For example, if an interface has address 10.0.23.1 and mask 255.255.255.0, the subnet 10.0.23.0/24 is a connected route and will be advertised by these routing protocols when a network statement is configured as follows: router rip | igrp # | eigrp # network 10.0.0.0

This static route, 10.0.77.0/24, is also advertised by these routing protocols, because it is a connected route and it is "covered" by the network statement.
See the Avoiding Problems Due to Redistribution section of this document for tips on how to avoid this problem. Redistribution Configuration Syntax and Examples
IGRP and EIGRP
This output shows an IGRP/EIGRP router redistributing static, Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), RIP, and
Intermediate System−to−Intermediate System (IS−IS) routes. router igrp/eigrp 1 network 131.108.0.0 redistribute static redistribute ospf 1 redistribute rip redistribute isis default−metric 10000 100 255 1 1500

IGRP and EIGRP need five metrics when redistributing other protocols: bandwidth, delay, reliability, load, and MTU, respectively. An example of IGRP metrics follows:
Metric
bandwidth delay reliability load MTU

Value
In units of kilobits per second; 10000 for Ethernet
In units of tens of microseconds; for Ethernet it is100 x 10 microseconds = 1 ms
255 for 100 percent reliability
Effective load on the link expressed as a number from 0 to 255 (255 is 100 percent loading)
Minimum MTU of the path; usually equals that for the Ethernet interface, which is 1500 bytes

Multiple IGRP and EIGRP processes can run on the same router, with redistribution between them. For example, IGRP1 and IGRP2 can run on the same router. However, running two processes of the same protocol on the same router is rarely necessary, and can consume the router's memory and CPU.

The redistribution of IGRP/EIGRP into another IGRP/EIGRP process does not require any metric conversion, so there is no need to define metrics or use the default−metric command during redistribution.
A redistributed static route takes precedence over the summary route because the static route has an administrative distance of 1 whereas Eigrp summary route has an administrative distance of 5. This happens when a static route is redistributed with the use of redistribute static under the Eigrp process and the Eigrp process has a default route.

OSPF
This output shows an OSPF router redistributing static, RIP, IGRP, EIGRP, and IS−IS routes. router ospf 1 network 131.108.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 redistribute static metric 200 subnets redistribute rip metric 200 subnets redistribute igrp 1 metric 100 subnets redistribute eigrp 1 metric 100 subnets redistribute isis metric 10 subnets

The OSPF metric is a cost value based on 108/ bandwidth of the link in bits/sec. For example, the OSPF cost of Ethernet is 10: 108/107 = 10
Note: If a metric is not specified, OSPF puts a default value of 20 when redistributing routes from all protocols except Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routes, which get a metric of 1.
When there is a major net that is subnetted, you need to use the keyword subnet to redistribute protocols into
OSPF. Without this keyword, OSPF only redistributes major nets that are not subnetted.
It is possible to run more than one OSPF process on the same router. However, running more than one process of the same protocol is rarely needed, and consumes the router's memory and CPU.
You do not need to define metric or use the default−metric command when redistributing one OSPF process into another.

RIP
Note: The principles in this document apply to RIP versions I and II.
This output shows a RIP router redistributing static, IGRP, EIGRP, OSPF, and IS−IS routes. router rip network 131.108.0.0 redistribute static redistribute igrp 1 redistribute eigrp 1 redistribute ospf 1 redistribute isis default−metric 1

The RIP metric is composed of hop count, and the maximum valid metric is 15. Anything above 15 is considered infinite; you can use 16 to describe an infinite metric in RIP. When redistributing a protocol into
RIP, Cisco recommends that you use a low metric, such as 1. A high metric, such as 10, limits RIP even further. If you define a metric of 10 for redistributed routes, these routes can only be advertised to routers up to 5 hops away, at which point the metric (hop count) exceeds 15. By defining a metric of 1, you enable a route to travel the maximum number of hops in a RIP domain. But, doing this increases the possibility of

routing loops if there are multiple redistribution points and a router learns about the network with a better metric from the redistribution point than from the original source, as explained in the Administrative Distance section of this document. Therefore, you have to make sure that the metric is neither too high, preventing it from being advertised to all the routers, or too low, leading to routing loops when there are multiple redistribution points.

Redistributing Static Routes Except Gateway of Last resort in RIP using
Route Map
This configuration is an example of redistributing static routes except gateway of last gateway resort in RIP through routemap.
Initial Configuration for this example: router rip version 2 network 10.0.0.0 default−information originate no auto−summary
!
ip forward−protocol nd ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.32.32.3 ip route 10.32.42.211 255.255.255.255 192.192.192.102 ip route 10.98.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.32.32.1 ip route 10.99.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.32.32.1 ip route 10.99.99.0 255.255.255.252 10.32.32.5 ip route 67.129.103.128 255.255.255.240 10.32.31.1 ip route 156.55.231.0 255.255.255.0 10.32.32.5 ip route 172.16.28.0 255.255.252.0 10.32.32.5 ip route 192.168.248.0 255.255.255.0 10.32.32.5 ip route 199.43.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.32.32.5 ip route 204.103.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.32.32.5

Complete these steps in order to configure this:
1. Create an access−list in order to match all networks that needs to be redistributed
Router#show access−lists 10
Standard IP access list 10
10 permit 10.32.42.211
20 permit 10.98.0.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255

30 permit 10.99.0.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255
40 permit 67.129.103.128, wildcard bits 0.0.0.15
50 permit 156.55.231.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255
60 permit 172.16.28.0, wildcard bits 0.0.3.255
70 permit 192.168.248.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255
80 permit 199.43.0.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255
90 permit 204.103.0.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255

2. Call this access−list in a route−map.
Route−map TEST
Match ip address 10

3. Redistribute in RIP using route−map at and remove the default information originate command from the rip process.
Router RIP version 2 network 10.0.0.0 redistribute static route−map TEST no auto−summary

IS−IS
This output shows an IS−IS router redistributing static, RIP, IGRP, EIGRP, and OSPF routes. router isis network 49.1234.1111.1111.1111.00 redistribute static redistribute rip metric 20 redistribute igrp 1 metric 20 redistribute eigrp 1 metric 20 redistribute ospf 1 metric 20

The IS−IS metric must be between 1 and 63. There is no default−metric option in IS−ISyou should define a metric for each protocol, as shown in the example above. If no metric is specified for the routes being redistributed into IS−IS, a metric value of 0 is used by default.

Connected Routes
Redistributing directly connected networks into routing protocols is not a common practice and is not shown in any of the examples above for this reason. However, it is important to note that it can be done, both directly and indirectly. In order to directly redistribute connected routes, use the redistribute connected router configuration command. You should also define a metric in this case. You can also indirectly redistribute connected routes into routing protocols as shown in this example.

In this example, Router B has two Fast Ethernet interfaces. FastEthernet 0/0 is in network 10.1.1.0/24 and
FastEthernet 0/1 is in network 20.1.1.0/24. Router B is running EIGRP with Router A, and OSPF with Router
C. Router B is mutually redistributing between the EIGRP and OSPF processes. This is the pertinent configuration information for Router B:
Router B interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.0 interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 20.1.1.4 255.255.255.0 router eigrp 7 redistribute ospf 7 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500 network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 auto−summary no eigrp log−neighbor−changes
!
router ospf 7 log−adjacency−changes redistribute eigrp 7 subnets network 20.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

If you look at the routing table for Router B, you see the following: routerB#show ip route
Codes: C − connected, S − static, I − IGRP, R − RIP, M − mobile, B − BGP
D − EIGRP, EX − EIGRP external, O − OSPF, IA − OSPF inter area
N1 − OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 − OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 − OSPF external type 1, E2 − OSPF external type 2, E − EGP i − IS−IS, L1 − IS−IS level−1, L2 − IS−IS level−2, ia − IS−IS inter area
* − candidate default, U − per−user static route, o − ODR
P − periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set

C
C

20.0.0.0/24
20.1.1.0
10.0.0.0/24
10.1.1.0

is is is is subnetted, 1 subnets directly connected, FastEthernet0/1 subnetted, 1 subnets directly connected, FastEthernet0/0

From the configuration and the routing table above there are three things to notice:
• The networks in question are in Router B routing table as directly connected networks.
• Network 10.1.1.0/24 is part of the EIGRP process and network 20.1.1.0/24 is part of the OSPF process. • Router B is mutually redistributing between EIGRP and OSPF.

Below are the routing tables for Routers A and C. routerA#show ip route
Codes: C − connected, S − static, I − IGRP, R − RIP, M − mobile, B − BGP
D − EIGRP, EX − EIGRP external, O − OSPF, IA − OSPF inter area
N1 − OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 − OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 − OSPF external type 1, E2 − OSPF external type 2, E − EGP i − IS−IS, L1 − IS−IS level−1, L2 − IS−IS level−2, * − candidate default
U − per−user static route, o − ODR
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/24
10.1.1.0
20.0.0.0/24
D EX
20.1.1.0
C

is subnetted, 1 subnets is directly connected, FastEthernet0 is subnetted, 1 subnets
[170/284160] via 10.1.1.4, 00:07:26, FastEthernet0

routerC#show ip route
Codes: C − connected, S − static, I − IGRP, R − RIP, M − mobile, B − BGP
D − EIGRP, EX − EIGRP external, O − OSPF, IA − OSPF inter area
N1 − OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 − OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 − OSPF external type 1, E2 − OSPF external type 2, E − EGP i − IS−IS, L1 − IS−IS level−1, L2 − IS−IS level−2, ia − IS−IS inter area
* − candidate default, U − per−user static route, o − ODR
P − periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set

C
O E2

20.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
20.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet1
10.1.1.0 [110/20] via 20.1.1.4, 00:07:32, FastEthernet1

Router A has learned about network 20.1.1.0/24 via EIGRP, which is shown as an external route, because it was redistributed from OSPF into EIGRP. Router C has learned about network 10.1.1.0/24 via OSPF as an external route, because it was redistributed from EIGRP into OSPF. Although Router B is not redistributing connected networks, it does advertise the network 10.1.1.0/24, which is part of the EIGRP process redistributed into OSPF. Similarly, Router B advertises network 20.1.1.0/24, which is part of the OSPF process redistributed into EIGRP.
Refer to Redistributing Connected Networks into OSPF for more information about connected routes being redistributed into OSPF.
Note: By default, only EBGP−learned information is candidate to be redistributed into IGP when the redistibute bgp command is issued. The IBGP routes is not redistributed into IGP until the bgp redistribute−internal command is configured under the router bgp command. But precautions must be taken in order to avoid loops within the Autonomous System when IBGP routes are redistirbuted into IGP.

Avoiding Problems Due to Redistribution
In the section on administrative distance you saw how redistribution can potentially cause problems such as below optimal routing, routing loops, or slow convergence. Avoiding these types of problems is really quite simplenever announce the information originally received from routing process X back into routing process
X.

Example 1

In the previous topology, R2 and R5 are doing mutual redistribution. RIP is being redistributed into IGRP and
IGRP is being redistributing into RIP, as this configuration shows.
R2:
router igrp 7 network 181.16.0.0 redistribute rip metric 1 1 1 1 1 router rip network 178.1.0.0 redistribute igrp 7 metric 2

R5: router igrp 7 network 181.16.0.0 redistribute rip metric 1 1 1 1 1 router rip network 178.1.0.0 redistribute igrp 7 metric 2

With the previous configuration you have the potential for any the the problems previously described. In order to avoid them, you can filter routing updates as follows:
R2:
router igrp 7 network 181.16.0.0 redistribute rip metric 1 1 1 1 1 distribute−list 1 in s1 router rip network 178.1.0.0 redistribute igrp 7 metric 2

access−list 1 deny 192.168.1.0 access−list 1 permit any

R5: router igrp 7 network 181.16.0.0 redistribute rip metric 1 1 1 1 1 distribute−list 1 in s1 router rip network 178.1.0.0 redistribute igrp 7 metric 2 access−list 1 deny 192.168.1.0 access−list 1 permit any

The distribute lists added to the configurations, as shown above, filter any IGRP updates that come into the serial 1 interface of the routers. If the routes in the updates are permitted by access list 1, the router accepts them in the update; otherwise it does not. In this example, the routers are being told that they should not learn network 192.168.1.0 through the IGRP updates they receive on their serial 1 interface. Therefore, the only knowledge these routers have for network 192.168.1.0 is through RIP from R1.
Also keep in mind that in this case it is not necessary to use the same filter strategy for the RIP process because RIP has a higher administrative distance than IGRP. If routes that originate in the IGRP domain were fed back to R2 and R5 through RIP, the IGRP routes would still take precedence.

Example 2

Using the topology as above, another method, which is sometimes more preferable, to avoid redistribution problems can be demonstrated. This method uses route−maps to set tags for various routes. Routing processes can then redistribute based on the tags. Note that redistribution based on tags do not work with RIP version 1 or IGRP.
One of the problems you can run into in the previous topology is as follows:

R1 advertises network 192.168.1.0 to R2. R2 then redistributes to EIGRP. R5 learns the network via EIGRP and redistributes it to RIPv2. Depending on the metric that R5 sets for the RIPv2 route, R6 might prefer the less desirable route through R5 instead of through R1 to reach the network. The following configuration helps to prevent this by setting tags and then redistributing based on the tags.
R2:
router eigrp 7 network 181.16.0.0 redistribute rip route−map rip_to_eigrp metric 1 1 1 1 1
!−−− Redistributes RIP routes that are

!−−− permitted by the route−map rip_to_eigrp

router rip version 2 network 178.1.0.0 redistribute eigrp 7 route−map eigrp_to_rip metric 2
!−−− Redistributes EIGRP routes and set the tags

!−−− according to the eigrp_to_rip route−map

route−map rip_to_eigrp deny 10 match tag 88
!−−− Route−map statement to deny any routes that have a tag of "88"

!−−− from being redistributed into EIGRP

!−−− Notice the routes tagged with "88" should be the EIGRP

!−−− routes that are redistributed into RIPv2

route−map rip_to_eigrp permit 20 set tag 77
!−−− Route−map statement to set the tag

!−−− on RIPv2 routes redistributed into EIGRP to "77"

route−map eigrp_to_rip deny 10 match tag 77
!−−− Route−map statement to deny any routes that have a

!−−− tag of "77" from being redistributed into RIPv2

!−−− Notice the routes tagged with "77" should be the RIPv2

!−−− routes that are redistributed into EIGRP

route−map eigrp_to_rip permit 20 set tag 88
!−−− Route−map statement to set the tag on EIGRP

!−−− routes redistributed into RIPv2 to "88"

R5: router eigrp 7 network 181.16.0.0 redistribute rip route−map rip_to_eigrp metric 1 1 1 1 1
!−−− Redistributes RIPv2 routes that are permitted

!−−− by the route−map rip_to_eigrp

router rip version 2 network 178.1.0.0 redistribute eigrp 7 route−map eigrp_to_rip metric 2
!−−− Redistributes EIGRP routes and sets the tags

!−−− according to the eigrp_to_rip route−map

route−map rip_to_eigrp deny 10 match tag 88
!−−− Route−map statement to deny any routes that have a tag

!−−− of "88" from being redistributed into EIGRP

!−−− Notice the routes tagged with "88" should be the EIGRP routes

!−−− that are redistributed into RIPv2

route−map rip_to_eigrp permit 20 set tag 77
!−−− Route−map statement to set the tag on rip routes

!−−− redistributed into EIGRP to "77"

route−map eigrp_to_rip deny 10 match tag 77
!−−− Route−map statement to deny any routes that have a tag

!−−− of "77" from being redistributed into RIPv2

!−−− Notice the routes tagged with "77" should be the RIPv2 routes

!−−− that are redistributed into EIGRP

route−map eigrp_to_rip permit 20 set tag 88
!−−− Route−map statement to set the tag on EIGRP routes

!−−− redistributed into RIPv2 to "88"

With the above configuration performed, you can look at some specific routes in the routing table to see that the tags have been set. Below shows output from the show ip route command for specific routes on R3 and
R1:
R3#show ip route 178.1.10.8
Routing entry for 178.1.10.8/30
Known via "eigrp 7", distance 170, metric 2560512256
Tag 77, type external
Redistributing via eigrp 7
Last update from 181.16.2.10 on Serial0, 00:07:22 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 181.16.2.10, from 181.16.2.10, 00:07:22 ago, via Serial0
Route metric is 2560512256, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 20010 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1 Kbit
Reliability 1/255, minimum MTU 1 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1

R1#show ip route 181.16.2.4
Routing entry for 181.16.0.0/16
Known via "rip", distance 120,
Tag 88
Redistributing via rip
Last update from 178.1.10.5 on
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 178.1.10.5, from 178.1.10.5,
Route metric is 2, traffic

metric 2

Serial0, 00:00:15 ago
00:00:15 ago, via Serial0 share count is 1

EIGRP uses five different variables to calculate the metric. However, redistributed routes do not have these parameters, which causes routes to not be set uniformly. The best practice is to set a default−metric when redistributing routes. By setting the default metric, the performance of EIGRP can be improved. For EIGRP, the default values are entered with this command:
Router(config−router)#default−metric 10000 100 255 100 1500

Example 3
Redistribution can also take place among different processes of the same routing protocol. The following

configuration is an example of a redistribution policy used for redistributing two EIGRP process running on the same router or on multiple routers: router eigrp 3 redistribute eigrp 5 route−map to_eigrp_3 default−metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
!−−− Redistributes EIGRP 5 into EIGRP 3, setting the tags

!−−− according to the route map "to_eigrp_3"

router eigrp 5 redistribute eigrp 3 route−map to_eigrp_5 default−metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
!−−− Redistributes EIGRP 3 into EIGRP 5

!−−− Routes with tag 33 will not be redistributed

!−−−
!−−−
!−−−
!−−−
!−−−

due to route map "to_eigrp_5"
Though the default−metric command is not required when redistributing between different EIGRP processes, you can use it optionally as shown above to advertise the routes with specific values for calculating the metric.

route−map to_eigrp_3 deny 10 match tag 55
!−−− Route−map statement used to deny any routes that have a tag

!−−− of "55" from being redistributed into EIGRP 3

!−−− Notice the routes tagged with "55" should be the EIGRP 3 routes

!−−− that are redistributed into EIGRP 5

route−map to_eigrp_3 permit 20 set tag 33
!−−− Route−map statement used to set the tag on routes

!−−− redistributed from EIGRP 5 to EIGRP 3 to "33"

route−map to_eigrp_5 deny 10 match tag 33
!−−− Route−map statement used to deny any routes that have a tag

!−−− of "33" from being redistributed into EIGRP 5

!−−− Notice the routes tagged with "33" should be the EIGRP 5 routes

!−−− that are redistributed into EIGRP 3

route−map to_eigrp_5 permit 20 set tag 55
!−−− Route−map statement used to set the tag on routes

!−−− redistributed from EIGRP 3 to EIGRP 5 to "55"

These are just a few examples of filtering strategies used for the intent of this document. However, there might be other valid strategies you can use. Refer to the section on Filtering Routing Information in
Configuring IP Routing Protocol−Independent Features for more information.

Example 4
For example, you have two routers, one is a high end router running BGP protocol, and the other one is low end router running RIP protocol. When you redistribute BGP routes into RIP, it is possible that you see some packets become lost.
The redistribution of BGP into RIP protocol is generally not recommended and protocols like iBGP, OSPF, and EIGRP are scalable and have wide options available.
In case you encounter this scenario, which is the redistribution between BGP to RIP, and lose some packest, it possible that you have to configure this command on the RIP process:
Router(Config)#router rip
Router(Config−router)# input−queue 1024
Note: Consider the use of the input−queue command if you have a high−end router that sends at high speed to a low−speed router that might not be able to receive at the high speed. The configuration of this command help prevent the loss of information from the routing table.

Example 5

This example illustrates Redistributing Static Route into RIP routing protocol. As per the topology, we have three routers (R1, R2, and R3). R1 and R2 have RIP configured on interface Fast Ethernet 0/0. R1 has a static route to reach the Lo 0 interface (ip address 3.3.3.3/32) of Router R3. This static route is redistributed in RIP routing protocol. Router R3 is configured with a default route R3# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
FastEthernet 0/0.
R1(config)# ip route 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255 10.13.13.3
R1(config)# router rip
R1(config−router) redistribute static metric 10

On Router R2, route 3.3.3.3 can be seen via the show ip route command:

R2#show ip route
Codes: C − connected, S − static, R − RIP, M − mobile, B − BGP
D − EIGRP, EX − EIGRP external, O − OSPF, IA − OSPF inter area
N1 − OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 − OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 − OSPF external type 1, E2 − OSPF external type 2 i − IS−IS, su − IS−IS summary, L1 − IS−IS level−1, L2 − IS−IS level−2 ia − IS−IS inter area, * − candidate default, U − per−user static route o − ODR, P − periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
C
R

192.12.12.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
3.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
3.3.3.3 [120/10] via 192.12.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0

How to Redistribute Single Static Route
In order to redistribute single static route, use route−map to select the static route that needs to be redistributed. Router(config)#access−list 1 permit
Router(config)#route−map permit 10
Router(config−route−map)#match ip address access list number
Router(config)#router eigrp
Router(config−router)#redistribute static route−map metric

Related Information
• RIP and OSPF Redistribution
• Redistribution Between Enhanced IGRP and RIP
• White Paper − Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
• Redistributing Between Classful and Classless Protocols: EIGRP or OSPF into RIP or IGRP
• BGP Case Studies
• redistribute Command Reference
• RIP Support Page
• OSPF Support Page
• IGRP Support Page
• EIGRP Support Page
• Technical Support & Documentation − Cisco Systems

Contacts & Feedback | Help | Site Map
© 2014 − 2015 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Policy | Trademarks of
Cisco Systems, Inc.

Updated: Mar 22, 2012

Document ID: 8606…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Paper Route

...The Paper Route The stench was getting unbearable; I couldn’t hide out here any longer, and the bluebottle flies circling around were not making things any better. They seem to particularly like a yellowing nasty looking piece of what looked like a slice of pizza. The garbage bin I was holed up in wasn’t particularly roomy or comfortable what with the peeling green paint and rusted corners. But I hadn’t had the option of choosing to hide out in a five star hotel with room service and air conditioning! I still had no idea how everything had gone so terribly wrong. The day had started so well, the sun bright and shiny, with the usual Saturday morning chores going on our street; lawns being mowed, cars being washed and kids playing around. I had woken up late as I always do on Saturdays, with the sun already up lighting my bedroom. My parents were out, they had a thing and I was all alone in the house. ‘Do the dishes and take out the trash’ was the note that greeted me on the fridge ‘Love, mum’, I looked at the note and carefully scrutinized the intricate handiwork and wondered for the hundredth time how my mum always managed to write in such a way. Breakfast consisted of berrybear cornflakes and milk; I love my cereals soggy because you sort of bring the taste out. After doing the dishes, I left to get my day’s supplies and get started on my paper route. I met old Mrs. Dorothy sitting on her porch as usual, a red wagon parked on her lawn she was so old that she got lost......

Words: 403 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Women and Their Route to Success

...Women and their route to success: could the barriers be completely broken down? Ginna Munoz Molloy College Abstract Undoubtedly women have made extraordinary strides from the standpoint of their careers. It is now possible to see a woman running companies and occupying the most prestigious positions worldwide. However, the representation of women in business is still low in comparison with men. On one hand, many researches provide evidences of the existence of different types of discrimination against women, and on the other hand, some studies show a positive and promising panorama for women. Nowadays, women are seen as the core of the economy and it is possible that within a generation a majority of working wives will outearn their husbands. These researches provide solid foundations to think that the barriers affecting women negatively could be broken. Nevertheless, the most value stride women can achieve is to change the vision about themselves so that new female generations grow without the stereotypes that currently prevent them from succeeding. Women and their route to success: could the barriers be completely broken down? Over recent decades women have made clear strides professionally. Today it is possible to see women performing in fields and taking on positions previously blocked for them. Nevertheless, the representation of women in the business world is still very small in comparison with that of men. There is evidence that women continue to face......

Words: 3063 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Route Planning

...viršyti keturių. 4. Muitinės kontrolės priemonių tarptautinis pripažinimas. Muitinės kontrolės priemonės, priimtos krovinio išvykimo šalyje, yra pripažįstamos valstybių į kurias krovinys yra siunčiamas, bei valstybių per kurias atliekamas tranzitas. Gabenant prekes, kurioms taikoma TIR procedūra, užplombuotose automobilių transporto priemonėse, jų fizinis tikrinimas atliekamas pasirinktinai. Kilus įtarimui arba gavus operatyvinę informaciją, kad transporto priemonėje gali būti prekių, nenurodytų CMR važtaraštyje, arba ne tos prekės, mutinės pareigūnui pareikalavus, atliekamas detalus prekių tikrinimas. Atlikus prekių fizinį tikrinimą uždedamos naujos plombos. Kroviniai gabenami pagal TIR procedūras šalių pasienio muitinėse (en route) neapmokestinami importo, eksporto muitais ir mokesčiais ar užstatu. Sąskaita-faktūra Šis dokumentas ruošiamas kuomet vienas asmuo siunčia krovinį kitam asmeniui. Jame nurodomi kiekvienos šalies vardai bei adresai, krovinio kiekis, krovinio vieneto ir bendra kaina, sandėrio data ir kt. Gali būti įrašyti ir nurodymai apie krovinio pristatymo būdą. Krovinio kilmės dokumentai Dokumentas reikalingas kuomet tarp šalių yra susitarimai dėl lengvatinių mokesčių. Krovinio draudimo dokumentai Paprastai krovinio draudimu yra suinteresuoti krovinio siuntėjas ar gavėjas. Apdraudus krovinį žala atlyginama šiais atvejais: krovinio sugadinimo (sunaikinimo) dėl visų galimų transporto priemonių avarijų;......

Words: 5538 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

Ccnp Route Ccnp Nstructor Lab Menual V6.0

...CCNP ROUTE 6.0 Instructor Lab Manual This document is exclusive property of Cisco Systems, Inc. Permission is granted to print and copy this document for non-commercial distribution and exclusive use by instructors in the CCNP TSHOOT course as part of an official Cisco Networking Academy Program. CCNPv6 ROUTE Chapter 1 Lab 1-1, Tcl Script Reference and Demonstration Instructor Version Topology Objectives • • Use Tcl scripts to verify full connectivity. Identify causes of failures. Background The Cisco IOS Scripting feature provides the ability to run Tool Command Language (Tcl) commands from the Cisco IOS command-line interface (CLI). Tcl scripts can be created to accomplish routine and repetitive functions with Cisco IOS-based networking devices. In this lab, you create and execute a Tcl script that sends pings to multiple IP addresses in the network to test overall network connectivity. Note: Cisco IOS Release 12.3(2)T and later supports Tcl scripting. Required Resources • • 2 routers (Cisco 1841 with Cisco IOS Release 12.4(24)T1 Advanced IP Service or comparable) Serial and console cables Note: This lab uses Cisco 1841 routers with Cisco IOS Release 12.4(24)T1 and the advanced IP image c1841-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T1.bin. Other routers (such as a 2801 or 2811) and Cisco IOS Software versions can be used if they have comparable capabilities and features. Depending on the router model and Cisco IOS Software version, the commands available and......

Words: 171031 - Pages: 685

Premium Essay

Static Ip and Connected Routes

...connected routes IP routing defines how an IP packet can be delivered from the host at which the packet is created to the destination host. Hosts and routers participate in the IP routing process. The list summarizes a host’s logic when forwarding a packet, assuming that the host is on an Ethernet / wireless LAN. When sending a packet, compare the destination IP address of the packet to the sending host’s perception of the range of addresses in the connected subnet, based on the host’s IP address and subnet mask. If the destination is in the same subnet as the host, send the packet directly to the destination host. ARP is needed to find the destination host’s MAC address. If the destination host is not in the same subnet as the host, send the packet directly to the host’s default gateway. ARP is needed to find the default gateway’s MAC address. Routers use the following steps: the packet must first be received, whereas the sending host begins with the IP packet in memory. For each received frame, use the data-link trailer frame check sequence (FCS) field to ensure that the frame had no errors; if errors occurred, discard the frame and don’t continue to the next step. Check the frame’s destination data link layer address, and process only if addressed to this router or to a broadcast/multicast address. Discard the incoming frame’s old data-link header and trailer, leaving the IP packet. Compare the packet’s destination IP address to the routing table, and find the......

Words: 756 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Roots and Routes

...Running head: ROOTS AND ROUTES Roots and Routes: Past, Present and Future Tekulve Thomas DeVry University SOCS335 Roots and routes are an integral part of everyone’s daily lives. Our roots ultimately shape who we are and dictates the path we will walk in life. I personally feel that my roots drive me to be the individual that I am today and helps guide me for the challenges I will face tomorrow. Even though I love to learn new things, I don’t like to sacrifice the required time to do extensive homework assignments. Honestly, I would be very happy to just go to work and come home and drink a beer while watching TV. Sometimes the word lazy describes me the best. Unfortunately, that was and is still a term many people use to portray a large percentage of the African-American population. Sadly, there are quite a few negative stigmas against African-Americans in our society today. It is strongly believed by some people that we do not work as hard as other ethnic groups to achieve our goals. Another assumption is that African-American males have an increased sexual appetite, therefore being more prone to be unfaithful to their significant other. In an attempt to not be categorized, I established and maintain my individualism by remaining unstressed and unaffected by the negative stigmas that surround me. I strongly believe that I must continuously improve in all areas of my life,......

Words: 932 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Navigation Application of Given Route on Android

...一个鸡蛋的暴走活动是自定义路线导航软件的一个典型应用。针对此活动, 我对软件进行了优化。导航软件在活动中取得了非常好的效果。 关键词:定位服务;自定义路线;导航软件;百度地图 API 1 复旦大学本科毕业设计 Abstract With the development of positioning technic, LBS applications are widely used in our life. The traditional maps are gradually disappeared and electronic maps are used instead. The electronic maps like vehicle navigators and navigation apps makes a new style of navigation. However, these won’t work in special conditions, such as custom routine. That’s the reason the custom route navigator is needed. I designed a custom route navigator application on cell phone based on Android OS. It can display the map view and current location, alarm when the user arrive some given places or go wrong. This application will help the user arrive the terminus as soon as possible and keep them in the right ways. This application is used in a charity activity “the rampage of an egg”. I optimized this application so that it can be more suitable for this activity. Finally, it got a big success. Keywords : LBS, custom route, e-navigator, Baidu Map API 2 复旦大学本科毕业设计 目录 摘 要............................................................................................................................ 1 Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.绪论............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1......

Words: 3822 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Route to Market Coordinator

...collecting information in areas where the literacy levels are low as the respondents may not be able to understand the purpose or the language of the EDS FORMAT & VISI FORMAT. There are chances of biasness in some answers as most of people while in the market places are in a hurry and asking question in such ambience is not very fruitful or good idea. During the survey, the ambience of Kanpur was not well due to extremely hot climate. This report is based on the data & information which was given by the retailers and it has been assumed that they had given correct information.I tried to overcome on these limitations. 60 61 Area Covered .Mall Road (Direct Route):-Mall Road are belongs to direct route. This areas given to me by asst. sales manager I have to getinformation about the reason.Shubham Agency (Indirect Route):-Canal Road, Ghantaghar, Hulaganj, Marey Co. Bridge, Mall Road, Sutarkhana. Area CCX PCI Grand Total Canal Road 7 19 26 Ghantaghar 5 6 11 Hulaganj 10 22 32 Mall Road 2 11 13 Mare Co. Brige 4 4 8 Sutarkhana 4 14 18 Figure 1 62 Channel Type . In the channel type we find which type of shop is there like grocery shop, eating anddrinking shop, convenience, leisure. Channel PCI CCX Grand TotalConvenience 27 5 32Eating & Drinking 18 6 24Grocery 35 15 50Travel & Transports 1 1 2 Figure 2 63 Each Dealer Survey NAME OF DISTRIBUORS: - SUBHAM AGENCY AREA: - Canal Road, Ghantaghar, Hulaganj, Mall Road, Marey Co. Bridge, Sutarkhana Estim Status Cooling......

Words: 12238 - Pages: 49

Free Essay

Admin Distance & Junos Route Preferences

...NT2640 Cisco IOS Admin Distances & Juniper JUNOS Route Preferences Introduction Most routing protocols have metric structures and algorithms that are not compatible with other protocols. In a network with multiple routing protocols, the exchange of route information and the capability to select the best path across the multiple protocols are critical. Administrative distance is the feature that routers use in order to select the best path when there are two or more different routes to the same destination from two different routing protocols. Administrative distance defines the reliability of a routing protocol. Each routing protocol is prioritized in order of most to least reliable (believable) with the help of an administrative distance value. Prerequisites Requirements Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of these topics: * Basics of the routing process. Refer to Routing Basics. Components Used This document is not restricted to specific software and hardware versions. Conventions Refer to Cisco Technical Tips Conventions for more information on document conventions. Select the Best Path Administrative distance is the first criterion that a router uses to determine which routing protocol to use if two protocols provide route information for the same destination. Administrative distance is a measure of the trustworthiness of the source of the routing information. Administrative distance has only local significance, and is not advertised in routing......

Words: 1535 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Routes of Drug Administration

...BIOCHEMISTRY EXPERIMENT 4: ROUTES OF DRUG ADMINISTRATION COORDINATOR: PROF. MADYA DR. AMIN MALIK SHAH NAMES : FATIN NASUHA BINTI MAHYUDDIN MATRIC NO : 123877 DATE OF EXPERIMENT : 10 APRIL 2015 AIMS To compare the influence of the routes of administration on the onset and duration of action in response to a hypnotic drug, sodium pentobarbitone (60mg/kg), in mice. INTRODUCTION Drugs need to reach the sites of action in order to produce an effect. A suitable route of administration is important to ensure the drug entering the blood circulation to finally reach their site of action. The selection of the best route of administration of the drug depends on its physical and chemical properties. Drugs are introduced into the body by several routes. They may be taken by mouth (orally); given by injection into a vein (intravenously), into a muscle (intramuscularly), into the space around the spinal cord (intrathecally), or beneath the skin (subcutaneously); placed under the tongue (sublingually); inserted in the rectum (rectally) or vagina (vaginally); instilled in the eye (by the ocular route); sprayed into the nose and absorbed through the nasal membranes (nasally); breathed into the lungs, usually through the mouth (by inhalation); applied to the skin (cutaneously) for a local (topical) or bodywide (systemic) effect; or delivered through the skin by a patch (transdermally) for a systemic effect. Each route has......

Words: 2720 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Route Mobile

...creative with new business models, so by all means come up with fresh ideas! If you were in the position of Edward Reinderts, 1) How would you design Routemobiel’s business network? What position would you have Routemobiel take in that network? What new partners would you need to find to fit the new strategy? 2) How should you manage your new business network such that partners are aligned with the network strategy? 3) What new value-added services could you develop to improve Routemobiel’s customer service or strengthen its product leadership? How would you position yourself towards the customer? 4) Which technical innovations could accelerate or threaten the benefits of the Route Mobiel business network, and why? ABSTRACT Started in 2005 as a player in the Dutch road assistance market, Route Mobile challenged the only player (ANWB) in this market by organizationally operating as an intermediary, orchestrating a network of business partners. Its strategy of being a cost-leadership while at the same time increasing awareness among public and transparency in the market seemed to be successful. The Dutch road assistance market attracted new entrants with even lower prices than RM. These new price-fighter entrants caused a misfit for RM with its price fighter image. RM’s service level was satisfactory but the market remained very much price-driven, with little opportunity for differentiation on service type and quality. Because of these competitive forces, in 2011,......

Words: 5870 - Pages: 24

Free Essay

Human Trafficking Trade Route

...Dying to Leave Business of Human Trafficking: Trafficking Routes Portraying the world’s countless human smuggling routes would require a map lost in a web of arrows. While the maps below are far from a complete catalog of trafficking routes, they denote some of the major regional trends in human trafficking. Source: CIA, The Protection Project, and UNICEF Europe Though most of the movement is from east to west, many migrants from Eastern Europe are also trafficked east, to the Middle East. Important gateways into Western Europe are the Strait of Gibraltar, where North Africans cross into Spain especially during the summertime, and the Adriatic Sea, where migrants, often women and girls, are trafficked from Albania to Italy. By land, migrants from Eastern Europe and Asia follow the Balkan route from former Soviet republics and satellite states through Greece. Illegal immigrants from North Africa also travel across the Mediterranean to Sicily. Many arrive in Britain by smuggling themselves from northern France across the English Channel to the port of Dover. Since the breakup of the Soviet Union, young women from Russia, Estonia, and Latvia are trafficked to Finland, where prostitution is legal, to work in the sex trade. Russian women are also trafficked to Norway and Sweden, where prostitution is also legal. The Americas Most of the movement on this map is directed toward the United States, but a number of South America migrants are trafficked to work in the......

Words: 480 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

First Global Trade Routes

...Throughout the Biological Old Regime, considered to be 1000-1500’s, the world consisted of agriculture and trading networks. The Indian Ocean especially became an important crossroads for global exchange with the majority of the wealth concentrated in Asia, particularly China and India. By examining the first global trade routes, the interactions between different groups of people, and the importance of China’s role in the global economy we will be able to see the first origins of the modern globalized world we know today. During the 1000- 1500’s Asia became the center of an extensive and systematic linkage of global trade. Interactions between multi-cultured people and diverse nations came together at many trading hubs throughout the Indian Ocean. Here India traded cotton colored textiles in exchange for food, gold, silver and other commodities. China manufactured luxurious goods, in particular silk, which became similar to a standard currency in trade and in return sought out preciosities, silver, raw materials and horses. Slaves were also a large market but were not depicted through race they were used as domestic servants to the wealthy and as labor in Africa and surrounding nations. Slaves were seen as permanent children to their owners and never provided with degrading work (Marks, 57). During 650- 1000 Arabian people carried goods, ideas and spread their language and religion throughout Asia, East Africa and Indonesia (Marks, 45). By 1000-1500’s Islam had......

Words: 1034 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

New Jersey Route 4

...Route 4 is a state highway in Bergen County and Passaic County, New Jersey, United States. The highway stretches 10.83 mi (17.43 km) from Route 20 (McLean Boulevard) in Paterson east to an interchange with Interstate 95, U.S. Route 1/9, U.S. Route 46, and U.S. Route 9W at the George Washington Bridge approach in Fort Lee. The route is a four- to six-lane 40 to 50 mph (64 to 80 km/h) divided highway its entire length, with the portion east of the Route 208 interchange in Fair Lawn a partial freeway consisting of interchanges and right-in/right-out intersections with a few businesses along the road, particularly in Paramus, where the route passes through a major shopping area consisting of numerous malls, Hackensack, Englewood, and Fort Lee. West of Route 208, the route is a surface arterial lined that runs through commercial areas. Route 4 intersects many important roads, including Route 208 in Fair Lawn and the Garden State Parkway and Route 17 in Paramus. The highway is officially named the Mackay Highway,[2] but is rarely referred to as such. Route 4 was legislated in 1927 to run from Cape May to the George Washington Bridge. This route replaced pre-1927 Route 14 between Cape May and Seaville, what was planned as pre-1927 Route 19 between Seaville and Absecon, pre-1927 Route 4 between Absecon and Lakewood and South Amboy and Rahway, and a spur of pre-1927 Route 7 between Lakewood and Freehold, with the rest of the route to be built on a new alignment. The present-day......

Words: 397 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Michigan Route

...Michigan Route Updated 1-1-12 Date: 1-9-11 Name: Gladys ======================================= Friday ============================================== Westfield IN-1 Union Street Flowers*** - 317-867-2525-101 S Union St - Becky/Craig - all set 10x Sheridan-2 Irenes* - 317-758-5415 – 414 South Main - Rachel – all set 1x/were closed on Friday Tipton-3 Bouquet Barn** - 765-675-2901 - 223 Ash St - Tammy – THAT B FINE Jean's Flowers** - 765-675-7591 - 125 W Jefferson St - Jean/Lee – not interested 4x Sharpsville-4 Brumbaugh Florist*** - 765-963-2739 - 4158 N 400 W - JoLynn – OK U CAN STOP Russiaville-5(Back-up) The Rose Garden* - 765-883-8434 - 100 W Main St - Kathy/Tim – pass this time 1x Kokomo-6 Banner Flower House*** - 765-459-5166 - 1017 S Buckeye - Janice – don’t need 1x Bowden Flower/Gifts*** - 800-546-3301 - 313 US HWY 31 - Dick/Linda – all set 2x Flowers by Ivan/Rick* - 765-457-5541 - 404 E Harrison St - Ivan - don’t need 18x Jefferson House/Flow*** - 765-452-8269 - 4300 W Jefferson Rd –Pam – were ok 3x White Lily Flower - 765-459-0637 - 2130 West Sycamore Street (NEW) Susan – not interested 3x Burlington-7 (Back-up) Burlington Flowers* - 765-566-2016 - Main St - Pat Carousel Flowers - 765-566-2061 - 705 Michigan Rd, (NEW) Flora-8(Back-up) Flower Shoppe - 574-967-3022 - 7 S Center St (NEW) – don’t need 1x/won’t be here 1x Galveston-9 Joy Florals*** - 574-699-0506 - 202 S Sycamore St – Pam –......

Words: 5844 - Pages: 24

Red haired curly chick give... | Télécommande SOMFY Telis RTS 1 Pure | OBLIQ® iPhone 8/7/Plus [Flex Pro] TPU Leather Case SHOCKPROOF Slim Protective