Premium Essay

Socratic Questions

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By birdsdad
Words 619
Pages 3
Preacher: An atheist cannot be a moral person. Without faith in God, no human being can be moral at all. You must first have faith in God in order to have any capacity for morality. Faith in God is the only true basis of morality. Socrates: It sounds like being an atheist is an unfortunate state of being. Preacher: The atheists are most unfortunate Socrates. Socrates: Sadly, I am more unfortunate than the atheists. I do not even understand the nature of morality. Thus, I could not tell you whether or not you need to first believe in the gods in order to be moral. So I ask you to help me and teach me something important. Preacher: Of course, Socrates. That is why I am here. Socrates: Thank you my good friend. I would like you to answer a question. What is morality? Preacher: Morality is the expression of human behavior that is based on the knowledge of right and wrong. Socrates: And one must believe in the gods in order to know what is right and wrong? Preacher: Exactly. It is the knowledge of God, which comes through faith that gives us the ability to know right and wrong. And Socrates, there are no gods. There is only the one almighty God who created all things and redeems us through his son Jesus Christ. Socrates: I am afraid I have never been very good at understanding all the amazing stories about all the different gods. I must admit that I am very excited about the idea that knowing your God will also give me the knowledge of right and wrong. But there is just one thing I would like to understand, if you could instruct me. Preacher: What is your question? Socrates: You say that knowing God will give me the knowledge of right and wrong. Preacher: Yes. Socrates: In what area of life will the believer know right and wrong as a result of believing in God? Preacher: The knowledge of God permeates our whole…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Essay Questions

...Essay Questions Kristy Bazzanella Liberty University Essay Questions Assessment is a vital component in the counseling process. Use of both informal and formal assessment methods ensure that clinicians judgments are non-biased, and when utilized correctly aide in formulating of case conceptualizations and treatment plans (Whitson, 2013). The primary purpose of assessments, for the counselor, is to obtain information to effectively counsel clients. According to Whitson (2013), once all information is gained, the counselor, can “either formally or informally, diagnose the client” (p.285). It is critical that the counselor choose assessments that are both reliable and valid. The choice of assessment type and instrument will vary depending on the presenting problem, age, and cognitive and developmental state of client. Assessments will also vary according to settings. For example, the choice of assessment instruments utilized by a school counselor will differ greatly from the assessments utilized in a drug treatment or psychiatric facility. Assessments can have either a negative or positive impact on treatment planning. Counselors who use informal assessment techniques, such as unstructured interviews may find that the information gathered is not reliable and, therefore, prone to error (Whitson, 2013, p.111). Inexperienced counselors who use unstructured interviews have been observed to focus on minor issues and have failed to collect adequate......

Words: 750 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Socratic Seminar

...technique to prove that. He would start by asking a straightforward question, and then it would grow into a heated debate. I like this quality about him because it shows that he his strong willed and determined and he doesn’t care what people think of him. One of Socrates qualities that I admire most is the fact that he didn’t look like your typical philosopher. He was short and ugly and only possessed life’s necessities. This shows that he didn’t want people to look at him for his possessions or looks; he just wanted people to notice his teachings. Socrates inspires me to be determined and to look deeper into questions. I think that Socratic Seminars will be a great learning tool for our class. A Socratic Seminar is an organized debate that allows everyone to voice their opinions without intense conflict. I think that this will be good for our class because I like to hear what other classmates think about passages, and stories that we read in class. I think that this will be good because we will be able to form new opinions based on our classmate’s thoughts and feedback. These Seminars are also good because there really isn’t “right” answer, so we can get into deep discussions without worrying about what we say is right or wrong. For example, our values essay that we have been writing feature things that we value in our lives. Some things that I value in my life, others may not. So if we reviewed our essays in a Socratic Seminar, we could go on for hours about our opinions......

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

It Questions

...could harm the processor unit. Throttling also helps to reduce power consumption when demands are low. 4. (TCO 6) Discuss bad sector errors. (Points : 10) Bad sector errors are the track and sector markings that fade off the hard drive over a lengthy time period or if a section of the drive has become dangerous. When this happens the best thing to do is create a backup and replace the hard drive 5. (TCOs 7, 11) Describe a domain name and provide examples of domain names. (Points : 10) A domain name it a texted based name that is unique that identifies the network. A host name and a domain name make up a fully qualified. Some examples of domain names are Hhoward.netflicks.com or www.autozone.com. 6. (TCO 10) List five questions you might want to use to interview a user to begin the troubleshooting process. (Points : 10) 1. What seems to be the problem? 2. When did the problem start? 3. What programs were you using? 4. Have you made any changes to your system? Such as new hardware or software or have you deleted any programs from your system? 5. Can you show me how the problem occurred, so I can try to reproduce it? 7. (TCO 10) Explain why it is a good idea to trade suspected bad for known good when troubleshooting a PC. (Points : 10) It is a good idea to trade bad components for good ones when you are trying to troubleshoot a bad computer system while using a system exactly the same and running correctly. Taking the bad parts......

Words: 551 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Socratic Methods

...SOCRATIC Based on excerpts from The Expert Educator (Jones, et al. , 1994) Definition and Description The Dictionary of Education describes the Socratic method as "a process of discussion led by the instructor to induce the learner to question the validity of his reasoning or to reach a sound conclusion." The strategy derives its name from the approach used by Socrates as he assumed the role of intellectual midwife. The Socratic approach was built upon the assumption that knowledge was within the learner and proper questioning and commentary could cause this knowledge to surface. Socrates, as instructor, attempted to follow the student's argument wherever it led. The key to the Socratic approach is that the teacher's comments and questions must enable the learners to discover meaning for themselves. In a typical classroom situation, the instructor would use the Socratic approach when the situation arose. It would be necessary for a learner to make a statement, often of a value nature which could be further pursued. The instructor would then enter into a dialogue with the learner, following the argument until the learner had thoroughly questioned the answer and gained some insight into the logic used or the attitudes and beliefs held. Example An example seems almost imperative to further explain the Socratic strategy .The following dialogue finds Socrates awaiting his own trial for impiety (irreverent). He is seeking knowledge concerning piety from Euthyphro, who is......

Words: 1886 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Socratic Methods

...medical treatment, the practice of medicine, and the other forms of money making? These are things which we call troublesome but advantageous. We should never take them for themselves, but we accept them for the sake of the rewards and other consequences which they bring. Question: how are gymnastic exercises and the undergoing of medical treatment forms of money making? Socrates’ response to Glaucon: Amongst those which he, who would be blessed, must love both for their own sake and for their consequences. Glaucon to Socrates: That is not the opinion of most people. They place it in the troublesome class of good things, which must be pursued for the sake of the reward and the high place in public opinion which they bring, but which in themselves are irksome and to be avoided. Glaucon is renewing Thrasymachus’ argument: 1. I shall state what is said to be the nature and origin of justice. 2. I shall assert that all who practice it do so unwillingly, and that they do so not because justice is good but because it is indispensable. 3. That this conduct of theirs is reasonable; for the life of the unjust is far better than that of the just, according to their statement. Question: What does Glaucon mean when he says, “By nature men say, to do injustice is good, to suffer it evil”? Gluacon to Socrates: But there is more evil in suffering injustice than there is good in inflicting it. Therefore when men act unjustly towards one another, and......

Words: 2056 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Socratic Seminar

...Socratic Seminar Reflection Before the seminar, I liked the text The Scariest Thing I Know. I liked it since the text was descriptive and interesting to read, I also thought that there was a lot of hidden metaphor in the story which was interesting to decipher. My thoughts immediately after reading the text were that Kid Death was really a metaphor for Nick who had always hid behind a mask to appear frightening and cool but once you “took off his mask.” He was just another Geek like Kid Death. I also thought that the Angel must also be a metaphor for something, and I realized that it was a metaphor for the angel that had saved Nick. I thought that Kid Death and the Angel bundled together represented what we perceive as the “Devil and Angel on our shoulders.” The Devil is Kid Death and the angel being the angel. This showed nicks inner battle to either remain behind a mask and be cool like Kid Death and make Bad things happen. Or be good like the angel and not be so cool but still be good, in the end he chose the path of the Angel and this changed his life since he started being good and not always acting tough since he knew what happens if he does. Before the seminar, I had a pretty clear idea of what the subject of the story was. I remembered the general area of the subject of the story was to constantly travel the good path in life. In the scene near the end of the text where Nick was “frozen in time” and was looking at the angel saving his brother. He could......

Words: 912 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Socratic Method

...would consider their lifestyles to be the darkest evils of all, they are merely doing what it takes to survive role life has handed them. These guys will murder you without a second thought because you threatened the life of their boss’s daughter, but they have zero guilt for these necessities. In their opinion, if you were unintelligent enough to take the risk, you were unintelligent to lay dead in the dirt. It was entirely your fault, and the idea that someone may judge them for this decision in the future has never even been considered. If we take this into consideration, there isn’t a soul on this planet qualified to determine what is truly right or wrong universally. Socrates: Do you have any thoughts on why I may have asked you this question? Nick: I feel that you are trying to prove that punishment for an evil act is unjustified because your conclusion about evil is that no man commits an evil act with the knowledge that it is evil. You state that if this is the case, then all evil acts are acts of ignorance. Socrates: If an individual is unaware of the moral dilemma that his or her actions may pose, what action do you feel should be taken? Nick: Ignorance is not an excuse. Socrates: Do you feel that a crime that is broken accidentally as a result of the non-existance of such knowledge is grounds for disciplinary action as well? Nick: I certainly do. It is your duty to maintain control over your own behaviors and actions at all time, even in circumstance where......

Words: 1889 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Discuss Questions

...Discussion Questions (Week 6) THE GOAL Chap 1 – 15 1. Do you perceive that the people at the Bearington plant were like most manufacturing people in most companies? 2. Do you feel that the Bearington plant has the right equipment and technology to do the job? 3. What is the “Goal”? How is it related to the three performance measurements: NP, ROI & CF? Why does Alex need another set of measurement: Throughput, Inventory, OE? 4. How is "productivity" defined traditionally? How does Jonah define "productivity"? 5. How does Jonah define "Throughput", "Inventory", and "Operating Expense"? How are these definitions different from traditional definitions? 6. Using the robots as an example, explain: (1) How the standard cost system defines "efficiency" (2) How high efficiency could lead to local optimum 7. What are those three questions that Jonah asked Alex about the productivity of the robots? 8. Using the analogy between the hiking and a manufacturing operation, explain the phenomena of “dependent events” and “statistical fluctuations”. Explain what a “balanced plant” is and explain why it would not work. 9. Using the dice game to explain the phenomena of “dependent events” and “statistical fluctuations”. Explain why a “balanced plant” would not work. 10. Explain another real-life example to describe the phenomena of “dependent events” and “statistical fluctuations”? 11. The hiking did not go very well first, why? What did Alex do to improve the pace of the hiking? Why did he......

Words: 993 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Questions

...Please answer the following questions based on the video: 1. To what extent is our personality dictated by our genetic makeup?  Many of the personality traits that we have are either genetic or learned. For example, if a mother was loud and liked to express her opinion, as her daughter gets older, she has the same trait. This was both learned and genetic, because the genetic side was that it’s her mother and the learned side is because the young girl saw this as she grew up. 2. Is it formed by experience or do we inherit it?  Personality is formed by both experience and inheritance, just depends on how exactly the personality trait was formed by the individual. Many children copy what their parents do when they are younger, like cussing, fighting, or even acticing a certain way. Once they start getting older, many of the traits that we had when we were younger have gone away but a few stay. These are also inherited because they are traits that keep up with you in adulthood. 3. Provide an analysis of each panelist's viewpoint.  Prof. John Carey His biggest comebacks were science related. Prof. Peter McGuffin Peter’s point on twins were interesting. Twins that grew up in different areas, like separated at birth could live similar lives, is one thing that Peter seemed to talk about. He also believed that parents passed on many genes to their children, and that’s how personality is formed. Dr. Micheal Maler He was very into animals being tested......

Words: 381 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Pre-Socratics vs Sophists

...tells us that one of the questions that the Pre-Socratic philosophers asked was “What lies behind the world of appearance?” This question While Sayre (2011) tells us that the Pre-Socratics “were scientists who investigated the nature of things”. This question goes beyond the physical world and what might be in the next. Being that I was raised in a home where it was all about religion I always believed that there was a “heaven” with streets made of gold, beautiful oceans of crystal blue, and angels flying around singing. As I got older I was one of those people that didn’t just believe something because I was told to. I don’t think that a question like this can be “fixed” in place for most people and I know that it wasn’t in me. So at this point in my life even though I do believe that there is an “after-life” I don’t believe that there is the “heaven” and “hell” that I was raised to believe in. I have concluded that not everyone is going to have the same answers to questions such as these but that doesn’t make one person right and one person wrong. Maybe in the end since I believe that there is something that comes after this life that I will go somewhere that is my “heaven” or “hell” and that someone that doesn’t believe will just “stop” being. I have no “proof” to answer this question but I don’t think anyone does which is why most people that ask this question go off of something called belief or faith. As stated above I am answering this question off of how I grew up and...

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

What Is a Socratic Seminar?

...received the sheet describing my first Socratic Seminar a few thoughts came to mind. At first I was confused. “What is a Socratic Seminar?” I thought. Second, “this could help my grade”. Finally I said to myself “this is going to be fun”. The nights leading up to the seminar I read through the question and Alice in Wonderland, searching for quotes and evidence to answer the questions given out. In my opinion I found some quality quotes to answer questions that supported my interpretation of the text. Walking in the first day of the seminar I was ecstatic. I had all my notes in order, had my book in hand, and was already brainstorming ideas for discussion. Right at the beginning of the discussion I came out firing valuable points. In my opinion the points I had were very good points, they were backed by textual evidence, and I discussed them in a respectful manner. Throughout the period I did same thing a couple more times. As the first day of the discussion was coming to a conclusion I thought to myself I did very well in my first day of my first Socratic Seminar. Day two started similar to day one. I took copious notes while giving excellent input to the discussion. However, it did not go as routinely as I thought it was going to. The final questions perplexed me. As I sat and pondered on what to put into the seminar I was having trouble. When I got home and opened my notes to tweak some points I had I knew that day three had the hardest questions in store. I buckled......

Words: 511 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Questions

...Questions 1. Taking into account information above, what type of organizational structure does the company belong? Why? Please explain. Mechanistic vs Organic Grand Candy is an Organic company as there are few rules. There is also an informal communication. 2. What type of organizational design will better suit to this firm? a) Simple b) functional c) divisional d) team structure The organization use team structure design both in stores and factory. A team consists of professionals with various skills. According to company's CEO (chief executive officer Hovhannes Aidinyan) if one member of a team should be fired all team members should give an agreement. 3. What type of departmentalization does the company use in the factory? a) functional b) customer c)process d)product In the contrary of stores and cafes the factory creates teams using a product departmentalization. It is necessary as and most suitable way of departmentalization as company produces more than 400 products. Questions 1. Taking into account information above,what type of organizational structure does the company belong? Why? Please explain. Mechanistic vs Organic MTS uses mechanistic organizational structure. First of all it is very big for being organic. Which is characteristic for mechanistic organizations, it has many rules, formulized communication channels in order to manage behavior and performance of huge amount of employees. According to changes given above,...

Words: 481 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Socratic Ethics Essay

...Ethics is defined as the branch of philosophy with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions. Socrates discusses this many times in his teachings, specifically in the readings, Euthyphro, the Apology, the Crito and the Phaedo. Socrates’ main question was “What is the good life?” and his pursuit was to find out how to live this “good life”. Socrates’ pursuit of the “good life” helped him to identify knowledge with virtue. He equated knowledge with good or virtue and ignorance with bad or evil. Since no one would knowingly harm themselves, if harm came to a person, then that person must have acted in ignorance. This led him to the thought that if knowledge could be learned, so could virtue. This meant that virtue could be taught, so Socrates had conversations with anyone who boasted about being an expert of a certain subject. This would lead him to gain more knowledge (virtue), which in turn would help him in his goal to lead and teach “the good life”. In the Euthyphro, Socrates starts chatting with a man who is in court to prosecute his father for murder. This man, Euthyphro, claims to be an expert on piety (an expert of religious knowledge), and since Socrates is being prosecuted for impiety, he thinks he will learn how to escape prosecution from this expert. Socrates asks Euthyphro for a universal definition of piety, both for his own......

Words: 2643 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Study Questions

...Name of student: Course: Tutor: Date of submission: Question one How does Phaedrus respond to Lysias’ speech? What do you think evokes Phaedrus’ response? Include a quotation from the text to support your conclusion. Phaedrus mentions that Lysias speech about love after fashion ingeniously proves that a non lover should be accepted instead of the lover. Phaedrus response is evoked by the fact that Lysias’ speech has clearly demonstrated the difference between a lover and non lover. The speech has proven weighty benefits of being a non lover to a lover, for example a non lover is in control of his own consciousness, thus desires good, and not controlled by opinions of the general public. He asserts at the end of reading the speech to Socrates by emphasizing the excellence in use of language. He says, “Now, Socrates, what do you think? Is not the discourse excellent, more especially in the matter of the language?” Question two How does Socrates initially respond to Lysias’ speech at 234d? Read carefully, and explain what you think is going on here. Again, refer to the text to support your reading. Socrates does not respond to the content of Lysias speech at first instance. Rather he is mesmerized by the way Phaedrus delivers the speech to him. He becomes absorbed in the speech albeit because of Phaedrus presentation. Socrates believes Phaedrus is trying to show-off skills which clearly to him, Phaedrus is a novice as compared to him. He observes, “…And this I owe to...

Words: 589 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Pre-Socratic Philosophers

...Pre-Socratic Philosophers I believe many of the pre-Socratic philosophers had some interesting ideas about how life has come to be. The philosopher that I found the most compelling was the Atomist. The Atomist believed that all things were composed of atoms which are tiny, microscopic, and unbreakable and are composed of the same matter but different sizes, shapes and weight (Moore & Bruder, 2008). The Atomist thought that the atoms movements were pre-determined and physical was the reason why. They believed that the fate of an atom was already planned and would not change based on its experiences. Compelling Ideas What I found to be the most compelling was that in an age before science started progressing and with no telescopes, the Atomist believed in something that was yet to be discovered. They had the right area of thought in mind and later through science atoms were discovered. The thing that interests me the most is that the Atomist almost hit it spot on. However, I do not believe that an atoms motion has been pre-determined, rather I believe that they move freely based on change and influence. An example would be if atoms make up an animal then when that animal evolves and changes throughout the years then its movements are not pre-determined. The atoms that make up the animal would be constantly changing meaning that their “fate” would also change. The movement would have to be free forming. The Atomist had some great ideas and some were proven right by science...

Words: 275 - Pages: 2

Barriers in Communication - 1064 Words | HD Edge of the Empire (2010) | [P] 01006a800016e000 nsp