Premium Essay

The Evidence of the Filed

In: Business and Management

Submitted By yancie
Words 27367
Pages 110
Journal of Financial Economics 60 (2001) 187}243

The theory and practice of corporate "nance: evidence from the "eld
John R. Graham , Campbell R. Harvey *
Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02912, USA Received 2 August 1999; received in revised form 10 December 1999

Abstract We survey 392 CFOs about the cost of capital, capital budgeting, and capital structure. Large "rms rely heavily on present value techniques and the capital asset pricing model, while small "rms are relatively likely to use the payback criterion. A surprising number of "rms use "rm risk rather than project risk in evaluating new investments. Firms are concerned about "nancial #exibility and credit ratings when issuing debt, and earnings

We thank Franklin Allen for his detailed comments on the survey instrument and the overall project. We appreciate the input of Chris Allen, J.B. Heaton, Craig Lewis, Cli! Smith, Jeremy Stein, Robert Taggart, and Sheridan Titman on the survey questions and design. We received expert survey advice from Lisa Abendroth, John Lynch, and Greg Stewart. We thank Carol Bass, Frank Ryan, and Fuqua MBA students for help in gathering the data, and Kathy Benton, Steve Fink, Anne Higgs, Ken Rona, and Ge Zhang for computer assistance. The paper has bene"ted from comments made by an anonymous referee, the editor (Bill Schwert), as well as Michael Bradley, Alon Brav, Susan Chaplinsky, Magnus Dahlquist, Gene Fama, Paul Gompers, Ravi Jagannathan, Tim Opler, Todd Pulvino, Nathalie Rossiensky, Rick Ruback, David Smith, Rene Stulz, and seminar particiH pants at the Harvard Business School/Journal of Financial Economics Conference on the interplay between theoretical, empirical, and "eld research in "nance, the 2000 Utah Winter Finance Conference, the University of Wisconsin and the 2001…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Parole Evidence

...How justified is the fact that Parole Evidence Rule has outlived its importance in the modern day life? The parol evidence rule has long been a controversial element of the common law system. It has been frequently attacked for the injustices that result from its application and sometimes even for a lack of rationality in its justification. This exposition results from the conviction that useful light can be shed on the problems surrounding the parol evidence rule by an examination of its status in other common law jurisdictions, where it has also been the subject of constant dispute throughout the previous half century. The written document produced by the parties is merely a memorandum of the agreement that they have reached. Consequently, when a court attempts to resolve a dispute regarding the agreement, the written document is construed as persuasive evidence of what was agreed, and can be contradicted by other evidence tending to show that the actual agreement was something different. By contrast, the objective theory of contracting holds that the written document is in fact the agreement itself, so that in attempting to discern the nature of the bargain between the parties it is improper to admit evidence that contradicts the written document. Since the actual intentions of the parties are not being considered by the court, evidence that would tend to demonstrate that their intentions were something other than the written document reflects is simply......

Words: 1873 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Evidence

...Rule. The exclusionary rule mandates that evidence obtained from an illegal arrest, unreasonable search, or coercive interrogation must be excluded from trial. Under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, evidence is also excluded from trial if it was gained through evidence uncovered in an illegal arrest, unreasonable search, or coercive interrogation. Like the exclusionary rule, the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine was established primarily to deter law enforcement from violating rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.(Legal Dictionary, 2008) The name fruit of the poisonous tree is thus a metaphor: the poisonous tree is evidence seized in an illegal arrest, search, or interrogation by law enforcement. The fruit of this poisonous tree is evidence later discovered because of knowledge gained from the first illegal search, arrest, or interrogation. The poisonous tree and the fruit are both excluded from a criminal trial.(Legal Dictionary, 2008) That being stated, then no the Supreme Court should not hold up his conviction, they should actually over turn it. Also this would open up to double jeopardy as well if they tried the try him again for the same crime. Should the womans in court identification hold up? No not at all had Crain actually een arrested the correct way this could have been different and may have held up in court. The problem is the start of this case was wrong and any and all evidence collected is not allowed to be used in......

Words: 1090 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Christian Evidences

...Non-Biblical Writers Firstly, the New Testament would be totally adequate to prove Jesus was a real person in history. The evidence presented in the New Testament was written by contemporaries of Jesus, four were eyewitnesses, three accompanied Jesus, and all the writings are in remarkable agreement. They stand the tests of genuineness and historicity. Consider this: One may present a case for Jesus by presenting just one of the Gospels, let’s say the book written by Luke to Theophilus. Luke states, 1Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, 2just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. 3Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus.” That, in itself, is evidence. Then when adding the other gospels our case becomes stronger because we have ‘corroborating evidence.’ ***Corroborating Evidence is evidence that supports, confirms, strengthens or adds to already existing evidence.*** Then, take the NT letters that were written by Paul, Peter, James, & John and you have even more compelling, corroborating evidence. The NT alone is sufficient proof of Jesus’ historical existence. We all know that Christianity is not the worship of the man Jesus. Our faith is in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. If Jesus never existed......

Words: 2102 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Evidence Tracking

...Evidence Tracking Properly handling evidence is critical to crime solving, improper deviations to the handling can make it impossible to prosecute using the evidence collected. This paper will outline will track the evidence from a chosen crime scene through all the proper handling processes. This paper will describe the chosen crime scene scenario, describe the collected evidence and proper collection, recording of the evidence, chain of evidence, processing, interpretation methods, preservation of the evidence, proper presentation methods for different types of evidence, and the consequences of mishandling the evidence collected. The Crime and Processing Protocols The chosen crime scene scenario is a sexual assault; the first responding officer will have been notified of a possible rape and traveled to an apartment complex at 306 Timber Road, Apartment 12-B to investigate. Upon arrival, the first crime scene procedure is to make sure the crime scene is safe and the possible offender has been arrested or is no longer on the scene. If the struggle were still occurring, this would be the point to render aid. The next procedure would be to determine the extent of the crime and to secure the scene from intrusion to preserve any evidence. It is important for the responding officer to keep their superiors informed of their activities. At this point the responding officer will touch nothing and document all of their observations and actions, if the scene had been disturbed in......

Words: 1515 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Evidence

...particular time as in R v Lumley where the accused, a woman, was tried for bigamy. It was proved that the woman married A in 1836, left him in 1843, and married another man in 1847. Nothing was heard of A after the accused left him, nor was any evidence given of his age, but the judge, holding that there was a presumption of law that A was alive at the date of the second marriage, withdrew the case from the jury and directed them to return a verdict of guilty. It was upheld by the Court of Crown Cases Reserved that there was no presumption of law either in favour, or against, the continuance of A's life up to 1847. The conviction was quashed. (d) Presumption of death . There is a presumption of law as to death arising from seven years' unexplained absence. In Chard v Chard , it was alleged that the ceremony of marriage in 1933 between the petitioner and the respondent was a nullity. The petitioner had been married to another woman in 1909 and had last heard of her in 1917. The question was whether she should be presumed to be dead in 1933. The court inferred that he was alive then, and held the ceremony of 1933 null. Sachs J stated that for the presumption to take effect it must be shown – (i) that there is no affirmative evidence that the person in question was alive at some time during a continuous period of seven years or more from persons who would be likely to have heard of him over that period; (ii) that those persons who are likely to hear of him have not......

Words: 3324 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Evidence

...Case 1 The court ruled the State failed to show that the items seized were the same items tested because the description of the items by the chemist did not match exactly the description given by the arresting officer. The court also held the State did not establish proof of handling, delivery, presence and safekeeping, which were necessary to establishing chain of custody. To avoid this result the police should always properly document the evidence and who has control of the evidence by using badge numbers and names on the forms provided for the evidence. Case 4 The defendant did intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause bodily injury to Shelby Hooper by biting her.At trial, the State introduced evidence that the police were dispatched to a hotel room that had recently been the scene of an altercation between appellant and Hooper.   Hysterical and crying, Hooper told the officers that appellant had struck her with his fists and bitten her.   Consistent with Hooper's statements, officers observed a cut on her lip and bite marks on her back and buttocks.   After admitting, during questioning, that he had hit Hooper in the head with a closed fist, appellant was arrested. Hooper testified for the defense. She stated that she had provided the police with a misleading picture of what really occurred on the evening of the alleged assault. With regard to the allegation that appellant hit her with his hand, she claimed that she was the aggressor that evening and that......

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Forensic Evidence

...application of science to the law. In recent years the use of forensic science has become increasingly necessary to help with criminal and civil investigations. Although forensic evidence is admissible in court one must keep in mind how that evidence made its way to the court system. I will take you through the process. For there to be admissible evidence for a court case there must be physical evidence which would have been collected at a crime scene therefore there must have been some kind of crime committed. A crime with physical evidence doesn’t necessarily mean something violent but it can be. Theft, arson, car accident and murder are just a few examples of what a crime can be. The process begins when the crime has been committed, to the officers arriving on the scene, to surveying the scene, collecting the evidence, submitting it to the lab, submitting it as evidence and finally the acceptance of the evidence. When a call is sent out regarding a possible crime and the first officer arrives on scene it is that officer’s obligation to do a few things as precise as possible: 1. seek medical attention for those who may need it, 2. arrest or detain any perpetrators, and 3. secure the crime scene. Securing the crime scene is extremely important because you want to be able to retrieve as much evidence as possible. By securing the crime scene you are blocking off the area from unauthorized personnel. You want to keep the foot traffic to a minimum to prevent......

Words: 1263 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Admissible Evidence

...For evidence to be admissible, it must meet each qualification or test of the admissibility formula. First I will define authenticity. When you think of the word authentic or authenticity the first thing that comes to mind is something that is genuine, or unquestionable about its trueness. In other words, authenticity simply means that the character of the evidence is what it professes to be. Secondly evidence must also be relevant for it to be admissible in court. The term relevancy means related or connected with; something that can support the trueness of the evidence or situation at hand. And lastly, when I assess of the word competency I think of mental capacity but in the world of law competency as used to describe evidence means that the evidence is relevant and is appropriate confirmation that is not barred by any exclusionary rule. Evidence can be inadmissible all though it may be both authentic and relevant because of its incompetency based on the exclusionary rule such as public policy (spousal privileges), reliability ( statement of witness-hearsay), and undue prejudice. Evidence can be relevant and authentic but is considered inadmissible if the evidence that is be considered is based on other offenses. An example While studying the formula this week for admissibility= authenticity +relevancy +competency, I also wanted to added that although evidence may not be directly related to the case it can be admitted because of other offenses or its......

Words: 295 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Laws of Evidence

...Laws of Evidence Assignment 5 Using just the Federal Rules of Evidence and your knowledge of the hearsay rule and its exceptions, please discuss briefly whether each of the following nine out of court “statements” may be allowed into evidence or whether they are barred by the hearsay rule: 1) The five (5) statements that appear in “Practice Application 12.1" in your textbook, which appears at the end of Chapter 12 (page 323) of your textbook 2) The four (4) statements that appear in “Practice Application 13.1" in your textbook, which appears at the end of Chapter 13 (page 362-363) of your textbook You do not need to cite outside cases for this assignment. I am just looking for a short explanation for each one as to whether it is admissible under the hearsay rule. You may and should ignore all other evidentiary issues other than the hearsay rule! Practice Application 12.1 The Defendant is charged with falsely spreading a bomb scare at his school. At trail, 1. Prosecution offers witness, Marge, who testifies that she was standing in the school hallway when she heard a student walking by say that a bomb had been planted and it would go off at noon. This testimony by Marge would be admissible under the Fed. R. Evid rule 803(3). Which says that “[a] statement of the declarant’s then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a......

Words: 1379 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Evidence

...Evidence October 2007 Brief 6 of 6 issue brief In February 2007, AcademyHealth conducted a meeting on behalf of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation examining the role of consumer engagement in improving the quality of health care. In preparation for this meeting, five papers were commissioned on the following subjects: consumer activation, consumer choice of health plan and provider, consumer choice of treatment, patient navigation, and the appropriate role for consumers. This issue brief is based on the consumer choice of health plans and providers paper, which was authored by Jonathan Kolstad and Michael Chernew, Ph.D. Consumer Choice in the Health Insurance and Provider Markets: A Look at the Evidence Thus Far may or may not be evidence-based. Because consumer choice of health plans and providers drives cost and quality outcomes, consumers are being asked to make use of these formally reported data as they assume greater responsibility for their health and health care decisions. Despite the momentum in this area, it is not easy for consumers to make evidencebased decisions about their health plans and providers. There are several reasons for this. First, there is a relative dearth of information on quality. Second, choosing between health plans is not as simple as it once was because there is no one-size-fits-all or “right” answer. Third, out-of-pocket costs are increasingly a factor. Consumers are also at a distinct information disadvantage when it comes......

Words: 2269 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Audit Evidence

...standard explains what constitutes audit evidence and establishes requirements regarding designing and performing audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence. 2.     Audit evidence is all the information, whether obtained from audit procedures or other sources, that is used by the auditor in arriving at the conclusions on which the auditor's opinion is based. Audit evidence consists of both information that supports and corroborates management's assertions regarding the financial statements or internal control over financial reporting and information that contradicts such assertions. OBJECTIVE 3.     The objective of the auditor is to plan and perform the audit to obtain appropriate audit evidence that is sufficient to support the opinion expressed in the auditor's report.1/  SUFFICIENT APPROPRIATE AUDIT EVIDENCE 4.     The auditor must plan and perform audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a reasonable basis for his or her opinion. 5.     Sufficiency is the measure of the quantity of audit evidence. The quantity of audit evidence needed is affected by the following: • Risk of material misstatement (in the audit of financial statements) or the risk associated with the control (in the audit of internal control over financial reporting). As the risk increases, the amount of evidence that the auditor should obtain also increases. For example, ordinarily more evidence is needed to respond to......

Words: 1847 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Evidence

...consolidation of fingerprint databases will enable cross-referencing to be done easily. For instance, the PDRM-BIOFIS fingerprint database contains the fingerprints of criminals. These criminals are often under travel restriction, and upon cross-referencing with the NERS fingerprint database will allow easy refusal of entry and exit at immigration points. Identification of fingerprint is often useful and regularly resorted to when necessary. In the case of PP v. Toh Kee Huat[2] , Ong J acquitted the accused at the close of the prosecution because the only evidence against the accused was his fingerprint and the ‘accused’s fingerprint’, among other unidentified ones on the window of the car, which was left standing in a place accessible to anyone, cannot be legally sufficient to infer his guilty. “With respect, I do not understand what is meant by, legally sufficient’. At any rate, the weight of evidence of finger prints can never be decried. The respondent’s finger print was found on the side surface of the glass. The mark could not have been made there except after someone (if not himself) had unlawfully tampered with the locked car to gain entry. That finger print could only have been made during the hours of darkness when the car was taken, or before its discovery next morning. The position of the mark alone makes it self-evident that was not made by a casual passer-by.” There is no question that a clear prima facie case had been made out which if......

Words: 9471 - Pages: 38

Premium Essay

Biological Evidence

...!1 Biological Evidence Pedro Brache CJS/215 12/22/2014 Jerry Shoate !2 Biological Evidence Biological evidence is evidence that can be tested through DNA mapping and other profiling methods. Each specific type of evidence, whether it be saliva sample or semen sample, needs special techniques in acquiring and preserving in order to avoid cross contamination. These types of evidences are cross examined with a suspected person to either exclude them or prosecute them for the crime. In this paper I will discuss the different types of evidence and how it is preserved when it is obtained from a crime scene. Different Types of Evidence A forensic team might encounter different types of evidence at a crime scene. It is on the team to handle and ensure the proper transportation of that evidence to the laboratory. There are different teams assigned to a specific type of evidence. Some are in charge of ballistics for example, while others handle blood stains. Different crimes may present different types of evidence to look for. In a sexual assault case, investigators may be looking for bodily fluids or hair samples. Blood is a very good source of evidence. The DNA can be extracted from the blood and help narrow down suspects. The way the blood spatters are found in the crime scene can help investigators piece together the events of the crime. This is why it is important to correctly document and handle it while avoiding cross contamination. Forensic scientists are faced with......

Words: 1066 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Evidence

...HPNA Position Statement Evidence-Based Practice Background Increased attention is being directed toward the development of methods that can provide valid and reliable information about what works best in healthcare. The careful scientific evaluation of clinical practice became a prominent focus during the second half of the 20th century.1 More recently, attention has been paid to methods of determining which of multiple proven approaches to a healthcare problem works best for which patients.2 Evidence-based practice encompasses implementing the best-known practices into the clinical setting using a scientific approach. It evolved from evidence-based medicine, which was developed in Canada to teach medical students. “Evidence-based medicine has been defined as the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.”3, p. 3 The National Quality Forum’s report A National Framework and Preferred Practices for Palliative and Hospice Care Quality is a consensus report that is a first step toward introducing evidence-based measures into palliative practice on a formal, national level.4 The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) supports organizations in their efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare by facilitating the use of evidence-based research findings in clinical practice.5 The nursing discipline has also embraced evidence-based practice over the past 25 years, initially......

Words: 1545 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Forensic Evidence in It

...U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice APR. 04 Special REPORT Forensic Examination of Digital Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 John Ashcroft Attorney General Deborah J. Daniels Assistant Attorney General Sarah V. Hart Director, National Institute of Justice This and other publications and products of the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice can be found on the World Wide Web at the following site: Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij APR. 04 Forensic Examination of Digital Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement NCJ 199408 Sarah V. Hart Director This document is not intended to create, does not create, and may not be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party in any matter civil or criminal. Opinions or points of view expressed in this document represent a consensus of the authors and do not represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The products, manufacturers, and organizations discussed in this document are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute product approval or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Justice. This document was prepared under Interagency Agreement #1999–IJ–R–094......

Words: 22743 - Pages: 91

Sofort-Kaufen | Death Note Rewrite (Dub) | Nhạc pop, rock...