Free Essay

The Power of Government 

In: Other Topics

Submitted By alvinwood57
Words 276
Pages 2
The Power of Government
Alvin Woodall
National Government 1103

The project that I choose was “The power and influence of political parties in state/ local government and how it has changed over the years.” I will show what powers state/local governments have and some of the changes that state/local government has gone through. What the state/local government did in the past. How political parties influence what goes on in state/local government in the present. How these powers and influence affect the people and what the people can do to control this power and influence of the political parties in state/local government. How the power of the state governor has changed since colonial times. What responsibilities the state government has to local governments. How the local governments influence the state government. Show the different kinds of local governments and what powers they have. How the state/local government political parties differ in what they think. I will show how County Governments, Town or Township Governments, Municipal Governments and Special-Purpose Local Governments work. What means political parties use to get the people to vote for them. How the political parties in state/local government could use their power and influence for the good or bad of the people. What Special-Purpose Local Governments are and how they help the community. How the power and influence the political parties in state/local government affect the national government and how this affects the people. The power structure the state/local government had after the Revolution and the power structure it has now. Why it changed so much and what caused it to change.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Absence of a Separation of Powers in Britain Gives the Government Too Much Power

...absence of a separation of powers in Britain gives the government too much power.’ Discuss. 1c) Britain's govt. is too powerful due to its absence of a separation of powers. Britain’s executive, legislative and judiciary are fundamentally connected. Many are part of two or more these powers, such as the PM who is in both the executive and the legislature. Therefore a large majority can do as it pleases. The Govt. controls itself and can create legislation and our flexible constitution to suite its own interests and these places too much power in our elected body. If a party holds a large majority in parliament it can pass any bills it likes. This is partially due to the whipping system where party members (known as whips) have to vote with the interests of the party in mind. The opposition, the minority is powerless as even if they are against the legislation it will still be passed by the whips and party members. Any opposition is purely advisory and the PM doesn’t have to listen to them. This is too much power for a govt. to have as it’s uncontrollable. (This was apparent in Blair’s leadership). The party in power effectively become in control of both the Executive and the legislature. Our PM, David Cameron sits in the HOC as an MP, and is a major party of both the Executive and the legislature himself, whereas in America the president is not allowed to sit in congress. It means the Executive and legislature are controlled by one central power, the PM and 10 Downing......

Words: 857 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Realistic Is It for the Uk Government to Think Nuclear Power Has a Role to Play in Plugging the Energy Gap?

...How realistic is it for the UK government to think nuclear power has a role to play in plugging the energy gap? Introduction In recent years there has been much debate about the energy gap in the UK. According to Black (2005) the “energy gap” is the shortfall of fossil oil, natural gas and other fossil fuels, and this phenomenon is due to there is an increase trend for the need of fuels in Britain. However, we must face the phenomenon that fossil fuels will run out in the near future. Due to this energy gap, we need to look for alternative sources of energy, and the UK government wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, so they believe that nuclear power can close the energy gap. However, critics have pointed out the dangers of using nuclear power. This report will examine how realistic the UK government is being in believing that nuclear power can successfully close the energy gap. It will begin with a literature review highlighting the main advantages and disadvantages of using nuclear power. Next the key issues will be analysed and discuss. Finally, a conclusion will be drawn. Literature Review One of the main arguments in favour of using nuclear power to close the UK energy gap is that are 70 per cent of our low-carbon electricity comes from nuclear energy in UK. (Nuclear Industry Association, 2012) In addition, the Nuclear Industry Association (2012) have showed the nuclear stations reduce 7% to 14% of greenhouse gas emissions in the UK,......

Words: 913 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Negotiations Between Afghan Government and the Taliban Interest vs. Power and Position

...Negotiations Between Afghan Government and the Taliban Interest Vs. Power and Position In 2007 a series of increasingly violent attacks in many provinces and the capital of Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai decided to negotiate with the Taliban, and offered them senior government positions in exchange for peace focusing on public interest. Dispirited by losses at the hands of NATO bombings, the Taliban also decided to talk. However, the Taliban’s demands changed, and dramatically increased every year. The parties have not reached an agreement yet because of the Taliban’s excessive demands. The Taliban’s excessiveness in the past few years bring up the question: Are the Taliban exclusively focused on position and power, and the government on interest? This difference is critical because if the Taliban is only focused on position and power, the government is see as an opponent rather than a partner and the goal of this negotiation is victory rather than an agreement. Most of the Taliban are a group of angry people who are ready to lose anything to gain power. While the top tier of the Taliban comprises the ideologues, a majority of the members are not in the group for defending or promoting an ideology. Many are in this group because they do not have alternative employment opportunities from the government. Several are dismayed at the progress made by the government and disappointed with the unfulfilled promises that......

Words: 2532 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Do You Agree with the View That in the Years 1515-1525 Henry Viii Wholly Surrendered Power in Government to Cardinal Wolsey?

...Do you agree with the view that in the years 1515-1525 Henry VIII wholly surrendered power in government to Cardinal Wolsey? To a certain extent within 
Source 4 (by J.J. Scarisbrick 1968) supports the idea that possibly Henry VIII actually did surrender power over to Wolsey. The evidence within the source that suggests this possibly for being the truth is ‘a self-indulgent King had wholly surrendered the cares of the state into the Cardinals hands’. To further support this case, it is clear that Wolsey was extremely powerful, he had vast amounts of bishoprics (Archbishop of Canterbury, Tournai, Durham just to name a few) and was the head of things such as the Star Chamber where Wolsey got himself heavily involved with. This is shown when you compared the number of cases Wolsey took on (120) compared to that of Henry VII who dealt with only 12. Also Wolsey had control of all of the state finances and could make large changes to things such as the taxation system he was able to introduce a new form of tax known as the ‘Subsidy’ which was more popular since it meant the poor payed far less tax than previously than with the old 15’s and 10’s taxation method. This new taxation method allowed Wolsey to pay for king’s foreign affairs. As well as this ‘subsidy’, since Wolsey had such significant power he was able to also raise considerable amounts of capital through other means, such as through ‘benevolences’ and enforced loans from the nobility, which raised £200,000 in 1522.......

Words: 902 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Claim: in Any Field—Business, Politics, Education, Government—Those in Power

...Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based. With the emphasis on the importance of revitalization to an enterprise in any field, the statement claim that changing leadership every five years will help an enterprise to achieve success. Well, revitalization is indeed essential to a successful enterprise; but the success of an enterprise is determined not only by revitalization, perseverance and consistency are also important. Besides, to make revitalization, new leadership sometimes is not a good resort; willingness to accept new ideas is the key. From these perspectives, simply changing leadership every five years is not a good way to ensure success of an enterprise. To any field, revitalization is crucial to an enterprise’s continuous booming. Through revitalization, we break former restrains on our mind and try different approaches to reach our goals. Good ideas and significant discoveries are always reaped in these new attempts. Before Columbus’ time, the only sea route from Europe to Asia was the one that bypass Africa. But Columbus dared to try a totally different way. As a result, he inadvertently discovered a new continent full of promising opportunities. We see......

Words: 652 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The House of Lords Is Now More Effective Than the House of Commons in Checking Government Power. Discuss

...'The House of Lords is now more effective than the House of Commons in checking government power'. Discuss In theory the House of Commons is the dominant chamber as it is elected while the House of Lords plays more of a revising role, issues to be considered include the powers of each chambers, the fact the House of Lords is more independently minded and the impact of the whips. It will ultimately be argued that the House of Commons remains far more effective due to having greater powers in checking the government power. Firstly, the House of Commons has the ultimate check on government power via a vote of no confidence, this last happened in 1979 when Margaret Thatcher was able to be elected due to the Labour government's failure. The vote of no confidence allows the House of Commons to directly confront the government which creates a mutual respect between the government and the House of Commons as they can get rid of a government if they believe the government is failing to use its power correctly and effectively. Also, only the House of Commons has the power to reject legislation compared to the House of Lords which can only suspend the legislation for a maximum of 2 years. For example, in 2001 the House of Lords voted 317-68 against a fox hunting ban, and in 2004 they again threw out the plans for a complete ban, however in November 2004 the parliamentary act was invoked and the bill came into force in 2005. However, the fact the House of Lords is more......

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Us Government Significant Powers

...US Government Significant Powers There are twenty-five states that allow their governor’s to have significant powers. Line Item Veto Line item veto is the power that governors can veto a certain part of a bill while signing the rest of the bill into law. There are forty-three states that allow line item vetoes of appropriations and nineteen states allow this type of veto for other than appropriations. Governors Out of forty-four presidents, only seventeen were ever governors before they became president. The most recent were Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush. Term Limits There are fifteen states that enforce term limits for their legislators. Direct Democracy Many states exercise a direct democracy through initiative-twenty-four states; the referendum-thirty-three states; and the recall-fifteen states. Judges All states have trial courts, three-quarters of the states have intermediate appellate courts, and thirty-eight states elect their judges. Municipal Government 1. Commission Plan – This form of government combines the legislature and the executive branch of state governments into a single body. There are around three to nine elected officials who are responsible for running the municipality, and each of these members have a specific duty. This type of government was founded in 1901 by Galveston, Texas. 2. Council-Manager Plan – This form of government is mostly used in larger cities. Under this type of government the...

Words: 425 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The House of Lords Is Now More Effective Than the House of Commons in Checking Government Power.’ Discuss.

...Powers of House of Commons and the House of Lords The House of Commons has, theoretically, a massive amount of formal power. It has a sovereign legislature, and can make, amend or un-make any law it wishes, and can be only delayed by the House of Lords. Can remove the government of the day in a vote of confidence. E.g. 1979 vote of no confidence in James Callaghan's Labour government. However, in reality it has only a limited influence over legislation due to executive domination of the House of Commons: the Westminster voting system offers the government majority control over the Commons and the party discipline system allows ministers to control backbenchers. Formal mechanisms to ensure accountability like Question Time and select committees are often relatively weak. But, declining levels of party unity have led to more independent, educated and assertive backbenchers, who are able to exert a greater influence. E.g. Conservative backbench rebellion 2011 on having an EU membership referendum, where a massive 81 conservative MPs voted for having it. However, counterbalancing this is a growing trend for landslide majorites, which allows governments to resist pressure from backbenchers and opposition. The formal powers of the House of Lords are, in contrast, quite unimpressive. Lords can only delay legislation from the Commons for a year maximum. Cannot delay money-related bills. Cannot remove the government of the day and can only veto a very limited range of......

Words: 441 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Separation of Powers Hinders Effective Government in the United States. Discuss

...‘The separation of powers hinders effective government in the United States’. Discuss The ‘separation of powers’ is a theory – adopted from Montesquieu in 1748 – where political power is distributed over the 3 branches of government. This was put in place to create a limited government which would essentially help to avoid tyranny and protect the liberty of citizens. Neustradt stated that it was the institutions that are separate and not the powers. If the branches were totally separate, power would be difficult to exercise especially with the use of checks and balances. Instead there is a separation of personnel, where not one member of one branch can work within another branch. So all in all, the US government created a doctrine of ‘shared powers’, where checks and balances are needed. Madison agreed with this, and said: ‘you must first enable the government to control the governed, and in the next place oblige it to control itself’. Some of the checks and balances include: the president checking congress by presidential veto; the presidential veto is checked by congressional override; the supreme court uses judicial review to decide whether legislation or actions are unconstitutional; presidential appointments are confirmed, and treaties ratified by the Senate; and finally the president is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, but only congress can declare war. Checks and balances are needed alongside the separation of powers. Checks and balances are......

Words: 1064 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...and promoting the general welfare. Page 6,7,8 Separation of power : Page 24 1. The Separation of Powers How did the Constitution divide power between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government? What are the different roles played by each of these branches in American national government? o Separation of powers divides power among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches as distinct departments of American national government. ▪ This endows several different institutions—the Congress, the executive branch, and the judicial branch—with the ability to influence the nation’s agenda and affect decisions. ▪ This also establishes a system of checks and balances in which power is divided to ensure that no one branch becomes predominant. o Within the system of separated powers, the framers provided for legislative supremacy, listing the powers of the national government in Article I of the Constitution, which deals with the Congress. o Presidential government has emerged, particularly after 1937, such that Congress and the president perpetually compete for contrul of the national government, particularly during periods of divided government. o The separation of powers system of checks and balances relies on the goal-seeking behavior of puliticians acting within the various institutions of the national government. Exemplifying the Rationality Principle, the give-and-take......

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Government: Constitutional Powers and Limits

...more perfect Union” (US Const. Preamble). They intended to establish a central government without granting it too much power. To ensure that, the framers both, limited and empowered the government in certain ar- eas. But since the original seven articles of the Constitution are over 200 years old, the framers could not foresee the expansion of the government’s power that has happened until the present day. With the “war on terror” being one of the governments priorities, questions arise if the gov- ernment has become too powerful, especially with regard to practicing surveillance. This essay aims to analyse the limits and powers given to the government by the framers in the seven Arti- cles of the Constitution, and finally apply these Articles to the government’s practice of sur- veillance today. The most essential points limiting the government’s power is the separation of power and the system of checks and balances. The federal government itself consists of three branches, the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; in other words, Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court. The power is divided between these three branches in order to keep any of them from becoming too powerful. Thus, the framers intended to prevent a corruption of power and tyranny over the states by imposing controls on each branch. The legislative branch, for in- stance, is kept in check by the President, who has the power to veto bills proposed by the for- mer, to call or adjourn a meeting of......

Words: 1221 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

In What Ways Did the First World War Lead to a Greater Power for the Federal Government?

...‘I not only use the brains that I have, but all that I can borrow’. Despite expansion during Woodrow Wilson’s first term as president, the federal government on the eve of World War I remained small. Although the federal government meddled in a few areas of economic life, it was for most citizens remote and unimportant. Throughout the essay I shall be examining how the Federal Government gained greater power through the First World War During the war the government built up the armed forces to strength of four million officers and men. Of those added to the armed forces after the U.S. declaration of war. Men alone, however, did not make an army. They required barracks and training facilities, transportation, food, clothing, and health care. They had to be equipped with modern arms and great stocks of ammunition. I believe that this strengthened the Federal Government because of the fact that they had such a big army due to the amount of conscription during the war, people would be afraid to go against the government in case the army would get involved, therefore giving the government more power over the people. Another way in which the Federal Government increased its power was through The Espionage Act, June 1917 and The Sedation Act, May 1918. The Espionage Act made it illegal to encourage disloyalty or obstruct military recruitment and could be punished by a big fine or imprisonment of up to 20 years. The first target of the Espionage Act was anti-war labour organisers......

Words: 625 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

To What Extent Does Parliament Effectively Control Government Power?

...Government is, in theory, accountable to Parliament, however it is difficult for this to be the case when government makes up a large part of Parliament. So when examining how effective Parliament is at controlling the power of the executive, all of the below has to be considered. The role of select committees and departmental select committees are very important in the control of government’s power. These committees scrutinize government policy, as well as raising public awareness of it, in great detail. The line of questioning is very different, and considerably more in depth, than if the queries were raised in the House of Commons; this is because evidence is gathered in advance and the committees demand answers with substance, opposed to filibustering or rhetoric. Evidence has shown that 40% of committee recommendations to government has then been applied to policy. However, it is not so much that the recommendations are a control of the executive, but the fear the committees induce in the government; the government knows that, if they make a policy that is not in the public’s interest, they will be exposed. That being said, in a legal sense, select committees have no control or power over government, which could be argued makes them ‘watchdogs without teeth’. The committees are also, in part, made up of MPs belonging to the governing party and may not want to scrutinize their party as it may be damaging to their career prospects. The House of Lords cannot block......

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Separation of Powers Hinders Effective Government in the Usa. Discuss.

...The separation of powers hinders effective government in the USA. Discuss. (30 marks) The ‘separation of powers’ is a theory where political power is distributed over the 3 branches of government. This was put in place to create a limited government which would essentially help to avoid tyranny and protect the liberty of citizens. Some of the checks and balances include: the president checking congress by presidential veto; the presidential veto is checked by congressional override; the supreme court uses judicial review to decide whether legislation or actions are unconstitutional; presidential appointments are confirmed, and treaties ratified by the Senate; and finally the president is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, but only congress can declare war. Checks and balances are needed alongside the separation of powers. Checks and balances are essential for the scrutiny of the three branches of government, however they come with some disadvantages. One reason as to why the separation of powers hinders effective government in the USA is because there is often a divided house within government which subsequently results in gridlock when passing legislation or when each branch exercises their powers. It is not uncommon that the majority party in congress is the opposite of the party that the President belongs to. This usually means that the legislative and executive have contrasting views. Most recent presidents have accused the Senate of either rejecting or......

Words: 920 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Three Arms of Government and the Separation of Powers

...The three arms of government and the separation of powers • What are the three arms of government? • Explain the meaning of the doctrine of the separation of powers, and its rationale. • Discuss the extent to which the doctrine of the separation of powers is followed in practice in Australia. • 3 arms of govt: legislature (parliament), executive (“government”) and the judiciary • Parliament/legislature – makes laws (legislation / statutes / Acts of Parliament) • Executive/ government – formulates policy, “manages the country”; they do administer the law through government departments (e.g. Dept of Immigration applies The Migration Act to specific cases); collect taxes (revenue), and provide essential services (e.g. hospitals, roads, education) • Judiciary = courts/judges; apply and interpret the law (judges do make law but most of the time this is a slow, evolutionary process) • Rationale / justification for the separation of powers doctrine is that a concentration of power in one person (or one group of people) is likely to lead to corruption (an abuse of power). • Is the separation of powers doctrine observed in practice in Australia? • There is no true separation between the executive and legislative branches – as the party holding a majority of seats in the House of Reps is entitled to form government (and in practice, government is “in control” of Parliament, at least the House of Reps). • There is a true separation between the judiciary and the other......

Words: 379 - Pages: 2

Beyoncé - I AM... World Tour. | Pertinence | The Great Indian Laughter Challenge