Premium Essay

Two Principles of Justice

In: English and Literature

Submitted By pics
Words 2253
Pages 10
Outline and assess deliberative democracy as alternative to representative democracy 1. Introduction
Democracy can be defined as a government system in which the main power in making every government level decision is made by investing the power in public. There are many types of democracies. The main and important form of democracy which has dominated more than half of the world is the representative democracy (TORRES, 2006). However, there are other types of democracies as well which have been found by researchers to be of vital importance. Deliberative democracy is that form of democracy which has started taking its place. There are many difference and similarities between representative and deliberative democracy. This essay comprises of the detailed discussion on how deliberative democracy can be utilized in place of representative democracy. The importance of deliberative democracy is also mentioned along the conclusions in the end. 2. Representative democracy
Representative democracy is one of the oldest forms of democracies. In a representative democracy, all the eligible citizens are allowed to elect their official representative. That official representative is selected on the basis of the area, domination or any other basis. It varies from one country to another. The definition of “eligible” citizen also varies from one country to other. These elected representatives of the public then represent that specific group of people in government (Stasavage, 2007). The main body of the government consists of a number of elected representatives. These officials then further select their leaders through a proper voting process. In this way, its representative democracy acts as the government of the people, by the people and for the people. For representative democracy, there must exist a tough competition between different standing parties of the country.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Social Justice Versus Criminal Justice

...SOCIAL JUSTICE This is a sample paper for Dr. Matthew Robinson’s class … CJ 5150, “American Justice System and Social Justice” at Appalachian State University The paper is not be used for any purpose other than illustration for students in the class!!! Social Justice versus Criminal Justice Appalachian State University Social Justice versus Criminal Justice In this paper I will discuss how different aspects, policies, and procedures of the United States criminal justice system are inconsistent with the principles of social justice posited by John Rawls and David Miller. The criminal justice system does not promote socially just outcomes or practices. First of all, the criminal justice system is not really a system at all; it is a network. Second, criminal justice places greater emphasis on crime control, rather than due process rights. Our system encourages punishment rather than rehabilitation. Finally, criminal justice policies such as the death penalty and the war on drugs reflect prejudices within the system, resulting in unequal treatment. Before beginning to explain these flaws within criminal justice, I will first define social justice and explain the essential social justice principles suggested in Rawls and Miller’s theories. Social Justice Justice is based on two supposedly equal conceptions. First, guilty offenders are held accountable for their actions and second, that criminal justice......

Words: 5791 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Cpc Is Aimed so That a Litigant Should Get a Fair Trial in Accordance with the Accepted Principles of Natural Justice.

...accepted principles of natural justice.” INTRODUCTION Before the project topic is introduced, the researcher would like to write about what exactly is the principle at the very core of this topic: the principles of natural justice. It evolved from common law and sets to show a set of procedural principles which ever judicial and administrative body must follow whenever it taken a decision affecting the rights of any particular individual. It essentially follows the two most basic principles. The first one being the principle of nemo judex in causa sua, which is the rule against bias; and the other being audi alteram partem, which is the rule of fair trial. This right to a fair hearing has also been put up in Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 6(1) of the European Convention of Human Rights, showing how important the principles of natural justice are all over the world. Article 14 of the Indian Constitution is at the core of how natural justice functions in India. The fact that every person is guaranteed equality amongst all citizens shows how the very basis of all decisions in the country is based on the pillars of natural justice. All procedural laws of the State follow these principles and as we have seen over time, the judiciary has been very harsh on acts which deny a person his rights. The Civil Procedure Code is what defines all procedural laws in the realm of civil law in the country and strictly follows these mentioned principles......

Words: 1162 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Justice

...WHAT IS THE PLACE O F CORRECTIVE JUSTICE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE? BY SIMON CONNELL* I. WHY ASK "WHAT IS THE PLACE OF CORRECTIVE JUSTICE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE?" Traditionally, "justice" in criminal sentencing has been concerned with allowing society to respond to the offender's criminal wrongdoing by providing punishment, deterrence and denunciation. Corrective justice, the notion that a person who wrongfully harms someone else should put that harm right, has traditionally been associated with compensation and the civil law. Compensation has. increasingly become a function of the criminal law in New Zealand, bringing with it the philosophical baggage of corrective justice. A key part of the traditional notion of "justice" in criminal sentencing is that the offender's penalty should be proportional to their wrongdoing. This is refiected in the "totality principle": that the totality of the offender's penalty should refiect the totality of their wrongdoing.' For corrective justice to be done, the offender^ must provide compensation to the victim that makes up for the harm that has been caused, not compensation that is proportional to the offender's wrongdoing. However, a morally repugnant act can result in minimal loss, while a far less blameworthy act can result in catastrophic loss. As the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Personal Injury in New Zealand' puts it: "Reprehensible conduct can be followed by feather blows, while a moment's inadvertence could call down the heavens."...

Words: 6329 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

Justice

... | | |College of Criminal Justice and Security | | |CJA/374 Version 3 | | |Juvenile Justice Systems and Processes | Copyright © 2011, 2010, 2009 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Course Description This course is a general orientation to the field of juvenile justice, including causation theories and the development of system responses to delinquent behavior. The problems facing juveniles today are addressed, and adult and juvenile justice systems are compared, including initial apprehension, referral, and preventive techniques. Specific issues examined include chemical dependency, mental illness, and compulsive and habitual offenders. Special attention is given to the problems inherent in the police handling of juveniles and the function of juvenile courts. Policies Faculty and students/learners will be held responsible for understanding and adhering to all policies contained within the following two documents: • University policies: You must be logged into the student website to view this document. • Instructor policies: This document is posted in...

Words: 2517 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Justice

...辩论同忓婚姻……………………………………………………………………254 第事十四读 美奜生活…………………………………………………………………………..264 2 Contents Lecture 1 The Moral Side of Murder……………………………………………….276 Lecture 2 The Case for Cannibalism………………………………………………..286 Lecture 3 Putting a Price Tag on Life……………………………………………….299 Lecture 4 How to Measure Pleasure………………………………………………...310 Lecture 5 Free to Choose…………………………………………………................321 Lecture 6 Who Owns Me? ………………………………………………….............330 Lecture 7 This Land is My Land…………………………………………………....344 Lecture 8 Consenting Adults…………………………………………………..........354 Lecture 9 Hired Guns………………………………………………….....................366 Lecture 10 Motherhood…………………………………………………..................378 Lecture 11 Mind Your Motive…………………………………………………........390 Lecture 12 The Supreme Principle of Morality……………………………………..399 Lecture 13 A Lesson in Lying…………………………………………………........407 Lecture 14 A Deal is a Deal…………………………………………………............416 Lecture 15 What's a Fair Start?…………………………………………………......425 Lecture 16 What Do We Deserve?………………………………………………….436 Lecture 17 Arguing Affirmative Action…………………………………………….446 Lecture 18 What’s the Purpose?………………………………………………….....460 Lecture 19 The Good Citizen………………………………………………….........470 Lecture 20 Freedom VS. Fit…………………………………………………...........480 Lecture 21 The Claims of Community……………………………………………...490 Lecture 22 Where Our Loyalty Lies………………………………………………...497 Lecture 23 Debating Same-Sex Marriage…………………………………………..507 Lecture 24 The Good......

Words: 93248 - Pages: 373

Free Essay

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied

...Hayley Masi May 8, 2013 Law Lipman E1 Justice Delayed is Justice Denied The term “Justice delayed is justice denied,” was written by William Ewart Gladstone (1809-1898). Gladstone was one of the greatest English politicians and was also former British Prime Minister. It has several possible origins, one of which is the Magna Carta, clause 40 which states, “To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice.” A prompt trial is guaranteed by the sixth amendment of the United States Constitution. A defendant who is held in jail for a lengthy period of time prior to his day in court could ultimately be found not guilty and then will have been in a sense wrongfully imprisoned. Trials that are pushed back for years may mean that witnesses may be lost or their memories may fade and a guilty man could walk. Victims of crimes and their families must prolong an agonizing ordeal awaiting their day in court. Parties on both sides of the law may be adversely affected by a justice system that is slow and inefficient. In the New York Times, an article written showed that in the Bronx there were more people waiting for their trial then in the rest of the city combined. This borough “was responsible for more than half of New York City’s criminal cases that were over two years old, and for two-thirds of the defendants waiting for their trials in jail for more than five years.” Of the cases eventually tried in the Bronx, less than half of......

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Principles of Natural Justice

...Delhi Bar Council takes suo motu action against advocate AP Singh for "professional misconduct" Pallavi Saluja On September 17, 2013 - 6:51pm 7 The Bar Council of Delhi today issued a show cause notice to defence lawyer AP Singh for making unwarranted statements outside the court premises after the sentencing of his clients, convicts in the December 16 gang rape case. Singh had defended accused Akshay Thakur and Vinay Sharma in the recently concluded Delhi gang rape trial. Speaking to Bar & Bench, the Delhi Bar Council’s Chairman, Surya Prakash Khatry said, “We have issued a show cause notice to AP Singh. We have taken a suo motu action against him for his “professional conduct”. We have gone through the newspapers and various clippings capturing his remarks. The Bar Council has unanimously decided to issue notice. Out of 25 members, about 19 members were present at the meeting today”. Singh has to now either appear before the Council or file his reply by October 11 this year. Singh is in trouble for his remarks to media persons that he would burn his daughter alive if she has premarital sex or moves around at night with her boyfriend. However, Singh later told media that he had made the remarks under pressure from an individual, whom he described as an “anti-social element.”  The Bar Council Secretary Murari Tiwari told Bar & Bench that they had received several oral complaints from various NGOs and other groups condemning the statement made by Singh after...

Words: 261 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

A Theory of Justice

...A Theory of Justice, by John Rawls Tier III 415A Home Page A Theory of Justice, by John Rawls, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971. This outline of an extended book review is based in large part on notes composed by Darrell Huwe. I have attempted with limited success to understand Rawls' book - please do not regard this as being in any sense an authoritative summary of Rawls' thought. I personally find this book particularly difficult to penetrate, perhaps because my training is in the physical sciences rather than philosophy, and I generalize quite beyond the evidence when I suspect that others also find it less than accessible. I hope that this review is helpful. The Chronicle of Higher Education has published an article, "The Enduring Significance of John Rawls", by Martha Nussbaum. John Rawls died at age 81 on November 24, 2002. Dick Piccard General Conception All social primary goods - liberty and opportunity, income and wealth, and the bases of self-respect are to be distributed equally unless an unequal distribution of any or all of these goods is to the advantage of the least favored. Social Contract John Locke: Free people need to agree on some ground rules in order to live together in harmony. Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham: Act so as to maximize good (pleasure) in the aggregate. Later twist: minimize pain. From either perspective, your actions are judged good or bad depending on the consequences they have for you and...

Words: 1539 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Criminal Justice Week Two

...programs is to gather data in order to make informed decisions. Lawmakers, politicians, and policy makers throughout the criminal justice system use this data to create social policy. A successful crime-reporting program in the United States would be made up of an accurate statistical picture of crime. Crime rates, arrest rates, and clearance rates are all statistical data for making informed decisions within the criminal justice system. Crime rates are per capita, meaning they are gathered and divided by a certain number of people. Arrest dates are data that is gathered at a local level. Clearance rates are data from the local police of crimes solved by them. In an effort to combat criminal activity an improved correlation between crime rates, arrest rates, and clearance rates would be better communication. The police should better communicate with each other and the courts. The courts and the FBI should better communicate with each other. Possibly having a central data base with a certain group of people overseeing it. With all of the information in one place, this group would be able to send out memos to all the statistical authorities relating to what the others have gathered. The more informed and communicative the people who work in the criminal justice system are, the more it will improve. Refrences uop. (2011). Criminal Justice Today. Retrieved from uop, CJS/200 website....

Words: 250 - Pages: 1

Premium Essay

Justice

...The three stages of Justice Justice is where the good reap rewards, the bad reap punishment. Justice can be split into three major categories: political, personal, and supernatural. Social justice includes the legal system, personal justice is where a ones own ethics, and supernatural justice is like karma. Webster's dictionary describes justice as "The administration of law; especially : the establishment or determination of rights according to the rules of law or equity." There are two influential people who argue opposite ideas and opinions on this. Sandel who believes justice is more “distributive” than punishing. While Immanuel Kant, proposed a different approach he stated that human beings should be respected because they can reason with others. Sandel does not believe there should be a political decision on justice because when there is free economic practice where both the buyer and the seller benefit this would allow for prostitution, buying of votes, and immigration. “First, individual rights cannot be sacrificed for the sake of the general good, and second, the principles of justice that specify these rights cannot be premised on any particular vision of the good life. What justifies the rights is not that they maximize the general welfare or otherwise promote the good, but rather that they comprise a fair framework within which individuals and groups can choose their own values and ends, consistent with a similar liberty for others.”(sandel) Kant concluded......

Words: 574 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

A Theory of Justice

...A Theory of Justice Rawls In 1985, John Rawls published his essay A Theory of Justice in which he defined social justice by applying social contract approach and introducing a hypothetical state – the Original Position with veil of ignorance. First of all, Rawls believed that the principles of justice should help society to govern its structure and protect the rights of everyone in the society. Then Rawls proposed the idea that justice can be called “fairness”. Since he claimed that the principles of justice should be decided in advance in order to regulate the society more efficiently, a group of chosen people must determine the set of principles of justice. Given the importance of such task, there is no doubt that the group of chosen people ought to have the knowledge in relative fields and the capacity to think rationally in order to make the best decisions, if not for anyone else, at least for themselves. In this case, we refer to the participant with rationality a rational agent. If we assumed that every party were a rational agent, we are, in fact, acknowledging that rational agent would determine the principles of justice with the purpose of maximizing benefits for him and for people with similar background based on the given status quo and specific traits of society he is currently living in. Hence, if we only choose people who are rational, we would face two problems including constant argument, which would fail to deliver any reasonable agreement when......

Words: 1288 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Justice

...Justice in the workplace: Why it is important and why a new public policy initiative is needed Provocation Series Volume 2 Number 3 Professor Paul Edwards FBA, Industrial Relations Research Unit, Warwick Business School and Senior Fellow, Advanced Institute of Management Research Justice in the workplace Contents Executive summary 3 Introduction 6 Job quality and limited success in dealing with it 8 The proposals: building workplace justice 13 Workplace justice 19 Limits to legally based solutions 24 Labour market and employer-led changes 27 Constraints and possibilities 31 Concluding remarks 39 References 42 Notes 45 Acknowledgements The help and encouragement of Keith Sisson have been crucial to the production of this paper, which is a completely revised version of the 2005 Annual Employment Relations Lecture, Keele University. I am grateful to colleagues at Keele and to the audience there, and also to David Coats and Paul Marginson, for comments and suggestions. I take sole responsibility for the views expressed. 2 Justice in the workplace Executive summary The goal of improving fairness in the workplace has been central to UK public policy since 1997. For rather longer, companies have spoken of employee empowerment through such things as teamwork. Much has been done in both areas, but major concerns remain. In relation to fairness, employee rights give entitlements, but these rights also need to be meaningful and effective. In the workplace,...

Words: 15329 - Pages: 62

Premium Essay

Justice

...1. Social justice and equity is more important than economic justice and equity. Social justice generally refers to the idea of creating a society or institution that is based on the principles of equality and solidarity, that understands and values human rights, and that recognizes the dignity of every human being Defining Social Justice Social justice encompasses economic justice. Social justice is the virtue which guides us in creating those organized human interactions we call institutions. In turn, social institutions, when justly organized, provide us with access to what is good for the person, both individually and in our associations with others. Social justice also imposes on each of us a personal responsibility to work with others to design and continually perfect our institutions as tools for personal and social development. Defining Economic Justice Economic justice, which touches the individual person as well as the social order, encompasses the moral principles which guide us in designing our economic institutions. These institutions determine how each person earns a living, enters into contracts, exchanges goods and services with others and otherwise produces an independent material foundation for his or her economic sustenance. The ultimate purpose of economic justice is to free each person to engage creatively in the unlimited work beyond economics, that of the mind and the spirit. Social justice based on the values of fairness, equality and respect...

Words: 3417 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Justice

...Justice The dictionary defines justice as “1. the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness: to uphold the justice of a cause. 2. rightfulness or lawfulness, as of a claim or title; justness of ground or reason: to complain with justice. 3. the moral principle determining just conduct. 4. conformity to this principle, as manifested in conduct; just conduct, dealing, or treatment. 5. the administering of deserved punishment or reward.” Justice is primarily the call for a fair and even response to wrong behavior. Although it calls for fairness in all things, as a concept it most often applied to punitive measures against sinful or criminal acts rather than rewards for virtuous behavior. Justice is not simply punishment, however. It is the entire process by which guilt is determined and an appropriate response measured. Many religions base their concept of the afterlife on justice. The powers that be weigh the sins a person has committed in their life against their virtues and determine a just fate. In some cases justice places the soul in a permanent afterlife like heaven or hell. In other faiths the soul is believed to reincarnate in a new body that will teach the soul lessons it need for spiritual growth beyond the vices it engaged in in its last life. This a concept called karma, a kind of cosmic justice carried out by the universe itself. Some religions have rules and laws that are meant to be enforced by humans, like the laws in the book......

Words: 592 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Principle of Distributive Justice

...Principle of Distributive Justice Considered as one type of justice, distributive justice is a central concept in the Catholic tradition and is closely linked to the concepts of human dignity, the common good, and human rights. Considered as an ethical principle, distributive justice refers to what society or a larger group owes its individual members in proportion to: 1) the individual’s needs, contribution and responsibility; 2) the resources available to the society or organization (market considerations would be included under this, as well as other financial considerations); and 3) the society’s or organization’s responsibility to the common good. In the context of health care, distributive justice requires that everyone receive equitable access to the basic health care necessary for living a fully human life insofar as there is a basic human right to health care. The principle of distributive justice implies that society has a duty to the individual in serious need and that all individuals have duties to others in serious need. In decisions regarding the allocation of resources, such as rationing decisions, the duty of society is not diminished because of the person’s status or nature of illness. Everyone is entitled to equal access to basic care necessary for living in a human way. Triage must presume an essential equality of persons. In other words, allocation decisions should not be based upon judgments of the quality of persons. Benefits and burdens should also be...

Words: 1343 - Pages: 6

Portable Triangle Backpack Zipper Camera Bag Case for Canon Nikon Sony SLR DSLR | Baixar toque para celular | ATENCIÓN: Cuidado con estos posts