Free Essay

Was War Communism the Main Reason Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Remain in Power Between 1918-1924?

In: Historical Events

Submitted By hmnewman
Words 662
Pages 3
Was war communism the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to remain in power between 1918-1924?

There were many reasons why the Bolsheviks were able to remain in power. Lenin and Trotsky teamwork and leadership gave them a great advantage because they really knew how to control their team. The red army was incredibly stronger than the whites. The red army knew what they were fighting for whereas the whites really didn’t have any idea of what their ambition was. The Bolsheviks also had the central lines, which enabled them to travel all around the country guaranteeing that the red army troops could get all the necessities that they needed. Finally, war communism was also a contributor to why the Bolsheviks were able to remain in power. Although it kept the troops fed and healthy, it had devastating effects on the rest of the public who weren’t soldiers. This caused havoc in Russia, but was unfortunately vital during the Civil War.

Lenin and Trotsky were responsible for everything that the Bolsheviks were linked to; Lenin was more based in the organisation and policies of the party. Lenin created and put the War Communism in order, which caused disruption and huge complications in Russia. This caused anger between the peasants, working class and the Bolsheviks. Lenin also solved his own problem, by creating the New Economic Policy. The new economic policy again, created and solved lots of Russia’s problems. Trotsky was more in charge of the military side of the Bolsheviks. He controlled the Red Army and what they did, he was very effective in his leadership of the Red Army because he was a brilliant speaker. A good example of his control was that he stomped out the Krondsadt Uprising of 1921. Their leadership was strong, and together made a perfect match; they each covered half of the party so nothing would fail them. You never got a sense that they didn’t get along together, which made them appear bold and in control. Individually they were independent and intelligent characters, which came across a lot in their actions. Although they weren’t a big reason why they were able to stay in power, their leadership held the party together very well.

Another reason why they were able to remain in power was the weakness of the Whites. Their weakness gave the Reds a huge advantage, as it meant that the Reds could over power them. The whites were divided into two sections, lead by Kolchak and Denikin. They hated each other, and therefore didn’t communicate. This caused confusion in the Whites because they were telling everyone two different things. Overall, the Whites had no main ambition for fighting, but were deeply divided to communicate to one and other. The only thing keeping them united was their hatred for the Bolsheviks. The only thing that gave the Whites an advantage was that the British, French and Americans supported the Whites because they wanted Russia back in the war against Germany. Foreign support was sort of counter-production because it allowed the Reds to play the patriotic role and claim to be defending Russia. Although the Whites were weak, the reason they were able to keep hold of power was due to the Red’s success.

The Whites were divided socially, by the two generals, but were also geographically divided. The Whites were dispersed all across Russia, which again caused a lot of communication issues. In comparison, the Reds were in good control by Lenin and Trotsky. The Reds had the central railway lines, which enabled Trotsky to travel across Russia to make sure he could deploy his troops, and also make sure they had the supplies and equipment that they needed. The Reds also had control of Petrograd and other major cities, which enabled a large amount of communication with their people. The Whites had no form of transportation, which meant that they couldn’t form groups and generate some sort of plan.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

How Successful Were the Bolsheviks in Consolidating Their Power Between 1917 and 1924?

...How successful were the Bolsheviks in consolidating their power between 1917 and 1924? Scott Anderson In the period 1917-24, the Bolsheviks successfully managed to remain in control of Russia. Consolidating their power meant that they were able to increase their influence within Russia. However, the process to becoming the absolute power was very gradual and involved some very key decisions. To determine how successful we must consider whether the Bolsheviks made any mistakes or could have done anything more effectively. Firstly, we must look at the initial problems facing the Bolsheviks when they came to power in 1917. After completing the revolution many of the problems of Tsarist Russia still remained, leaving Lenin and the Bolsheviks to solve the problems swiftly in order to increase their claim to power. The problems of lawlessness, land redistribution, attitude of peasantry, the war, economic problems and issues to do with the Constituent Assembly all had to be resolved. The party also had created new problems when it came to power; these were mainly caused by groups and people not supporting the party. On top of all this, the Bolsheviks had no real plans for their Government, they had no experience of Government, they had expected a world revolution and they had expected the State to just wither away. The Bolsheviks also did not control the whole of Russia. Most of the country was oblivious to the fact that they were in power, the Revolution occurred in towns and......

Words: 973 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Important Were the Mistakes of His Opponents in Explaining Stalin’s Victory in the Power Struggle Between 1924 and 1928?

...How important were the mistakes of his opponents in explaining Stalin’s victory in the power struggle between 1924 and 1928? Many historians would argue that the mistakes of his opponents played a vital role in explaining Stalin’s victory in the power struggle. However, whilst this did contribute, it is likely that Stalin’s role as General Secretary was the most important factor, with the Lenin Legacy also playing a role. The mistakes of Stalin’s opponents aided him in his victory in the power struggle because these mistakes made them easier to defeat and led instead to Stalin becoming increasing popular. For instance, Stalin’s main opponent was Trotsky, but that face that Trotsky supported the notion of “World Revolution” made him unpopular, as it was a policy that was viewed as putting the needs of other countries before those of Russia and it didn’t show faith in the Soviet people. Additionally, Zinoviev and Kamenev made the mistake of not initially supporting the 1917 October Revolution, which meant that they were therefore considered disloyal to the Bolshevik party and to Lenin. Stalin was consequently able to accuse them of factionalism and eliminate them as opposition. However, another historical interpretation could be that the Lenin Legacy contributed to Stalin’s victory. This is because, by linking himself to Lenin, Stalin portrayed himself to be loyal to Lenin and a suitable successor. For instance, by expanding the party in tribute to Lenin through......

Words: 569 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Russian Civil War

...CIVIL WAR EVENTS - the Brest Litovsk Treaty (March 1918) was negotiated by Trotsky….he and he Bolsheivks wanted the int’l rev to spread and so from their vantage point the treaty were “stalling tactics”…the treaty gave up Poland, Baltics, and all territory in the North that Russia had gained since 1618…all told 1.3 mill km2, 26% of her people and 75% of her iron and capacity…needless to say Lenin had hard time “selling” the Treaty - the October coup d’état = “beginning of the Revolution” not end….Bolsheviks in the provinces + the centre had to be decide how to handle local Soviets which asserted authority but happened to be dominated by Mensheviks. - long difficult struggles against anarchy, decentralization + separatist tendencies lay ahead – the future form of gov’t = an “open question” - for Lenin, “Dictatorship of proletariat” was what the revolution needed…now this was a slogan and principle that fit into the circumstances of the winter 1917–1918…but, what did it mean? meant: a) crushing counter revolution of the old ruling class – the dictatorship would have to have coercive organs like Tsarist police (i.e. the Bolsheviks would assemble the Cheka) b) that the dictatorship of Bolshevik Party and other political parties was incompatible…and would pose problems c) that giving broad powers to unions + factory committees could in itself be problematic… what if worker ideas differed from Bolsheviks? Problems for the Bolsheviks 1) one underlying problem......

Words: 3349 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years 1945-55? agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945-55? It is clear that the Second World War played a vital part in improving the lives of African Americans between 1945 and 1955. However, the impact of the war was lessened by other factors that brought about change such as the civil rights groups and President Truman. These factors were able to convert de jure change into de facto change; something the Second World Wars alone was unable to do. World War Two had a dramatic effect on civil rights for Black Americans. Over 1.2 million black men joined the U.S army during the war and the experience radicalised them. Northern blacks were often trained in rural military camps in the Southern states, this was their first experience of formal racial segregation. They were appalled to know they were fighting a racist opponent, yet being treated as a second class citizen and receiving prejudice treatment back home. Consequently, the black soldiers used the ‘Double V’ sign, which meant they were fighting for two victories: victory overseas and victory over racism at home. The war also began to change the racist attitudes of whites. The United States and her allies were fighting a racist opponent, Hitler, who passionately believed in a ‘Master race’. In the past, white supremacy groups such as the Ku Klux Klan had presented racism as something that was both natural and noble, however, the racist......

Words: 1431 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Brutality of the Bolsheviks Was the Main Reason Why They Remained in Power in the Years 1917-24?

...I believe that the brutality of the Bolsheviks was the main reason why they remained in power. However on the other hand it could be due to other factors such as the Sovnarkom and the weakness of the White’s. Firstly another reason why the Bolsheviks remained in power was because of their brutality using the CHEKA. This was established by Lenin on the 20th of December 1917. It was used as a secret police force to deal with opposition. The CHEKA used many methods all of which were brutal and included arrests, kidnapping, torture, sending of to labour camps and murder. This meant hat through the CHEKA Lenin could deal with any opposition that could affect his remaining in power. Secondly, One reason why the Bolsheviks remained in power was because of their brutality was due to Trotsky and the red army. For example Trotsky introduced the death penalty for any conscripts who deserted the army. He blackmailed them into doing this by holding their families hostage. This meant that not only did the army hold together but was also being trained by the best people there were around. Meaning this would enable them to have a much better chance of lacking opposition e.g. the white’s. This is a brutal and forceful tactic for the Bolsheviks and it worked. Not only did this lead them to win the civil war but in turn by doing that, the Bolsheviks remained in power. Lastly, another reason why the Bolsheviks remained in power because of their brutality was due to the murder of the royal......

Words: 817 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Bolsheviks Consolidated Their Power in the Years After the October/November Revolution Mainly Through the Use of Violence Against Their Opponents

...The Bolsheviks acted in a brutal manner during the year 1917-1924; however this was why they remained in power after the October/November revolution. However their survival can also be attributed to the weakness of their opposition, who displayed a lack of organisation and unification. There were other reasons for the Bolsheviks' remaining in power after the revolution, such as the efficiency and strong leadership of the Bolsheviks, and their geographical advantages; but these were ultimately not as significant as the weaknesses of their opposition, as their survival was dictated by how they exploited their enemies' flaws. The brutal methods of violence employed by the Bolsheviks certainly helped the Bolsheviks to remain in power. The use of the Cheka was one such brutal method; it ensured that the Bolsheviks remained the dominant authority, by suppressing their opponent’s activity through the use of terror. However the Bolsheviks were only able to do this because their opposition was too weak to rebel; the Bolsheviks had gained dominance, while all others were clearly weak and submissive. This meant that the Bolsheviks use of terror only had the effect of making a weak opposition even weaker, therefore this form of brutality was only successful due to an already weak opposition. Violence was also seen as key for maintaining power as the freely elected Constituent Assembly was dissolved at gunpoint in January 1918. This showed that the Bolsheviks were prepared to go to......

Words: 861 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

“the Bolshevik State Under Lenin Between 1918 and 1924 Was a Ruthless Dictatorship, Caring Little the Russian People.” to What Extent Do You Agree with This Statement?

...“The Bolshevik state under Lenin between 1918 and 1924 was a ruthless dictatorship, caring little the Russian people.” To what extent do you agree with this statement? After having overthrown the weak Provisional Government in the October Revolution of 1917, the Bolsheviks had seized power in Russia. Although they were a quite small party, that at first only had power in Petrograd, they managed to gain support and power throughout the whole country, turning it into a Bolshevik dictatorship. (Oxford 113) This was only possible because of their driven leader, Lenin, their equally motivated military leader Trotsky and the promises they made to the soviet people. Some of these are: the most famous phrase: “Peace, Bread, Land”, which captured the needs of the people in three simple words, the promise of “Soviet Power” above all and the abolition of private property and redistribution of said property. (Oxford 115) Even though this seemed very promising and beneficial for the Russian people, the methods of the Bolsheviks were less than ethical and, even though promising that it was all for the people, very controversial. The first thing to be determined, is whether Russia under the Bolsheviks was a dictatorship, and if so, a dictatorship of a single person, in this case Lenin, or the dictatorship of the whole party, Lenin’s role not being as important as historians have played it out to be. (Oxford 136) The Bolsheviks have not concealed the idea of making the country a......

Words: 1047 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Causes of the First World War

...The causes of the FIRST WORLD WAR 1_ The assassination at Sarajevo. (political murder) On 28th June Franz Ferdinand and his wife visited the Town of Sarajevo. The Archduke was the heir to the throne of the Empire of Austria-Hungary. As the car passed along the street, someone threw a bomb at it. The bomb bounced off the back of the car and exploded, injuring an officer in the car behind. The Archduke and his wife were unhurt. Later that day the Archduke said that he wanted to change his plans and visit the injured officer in hospital. He set off again by car, but the driver was not told the route had change. Some minutes later a man called Gavrilo Princip shot them and died. 2_ The great powers in 1914. If see the map the six most important and powerful countries in Europe were split into two armed groups. The triple Alliance. Central powers. Germany: was made up of many small states that had united and become one country only as recently as 1871. Otto von Bismarck, who was the Chancelor of the newly united Germany, firmly believed that all questions of the day could be solved by military strength by blood and iron. The stong national feeling in Germany and its wealth from industry made the Germans keen to play a leading part in world affairs. Kaiser Wilhelm II was impatient to make Germany the leading country in Europe. Austria-Hungary: the empire of Austria-Hungary was Germany´s oldest ally. German was the language of Government, but each group spoke its own......

Words: 3793 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Asses the Reasons Why Lenin and the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in October 1917

...The Bolshevik seize of power in October 1917 was undoubtedly a turning point for Russia’s political situation and a point that would set the tone for the future rulings. It can be easily argued that the Bolsheviks were only able to take over as a result of the long term weaknesses and failures of the Provisional Government. However, as with all events in history, the final seizure in October would not have been possible had it not been for the more recent, trigger causes. The roles of Lenin and Trotsky, during the later months of 1917, were key factors in allowing the takeover to happen; and the extremely poor decisions and military leadership executed by Kerensky strengthened the Bolsheviks position for revolution. Whilst these short term causes played a major role in October, it cannot be argued that without the weaknesses of the Provisional Government, the Bolsheviks would not have been sitting in power by the end of 1917. The weakness of the Provisional Government was one the most important factors in the Bolshevik takeover in October 1917. After the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II in March 1917, the Provisional Government, formed from some of the previous Dumas, was set up to govern Russia. The new government was weak and unstable from the start, mainly due to whom it was made up of. It was a coalition, if you could call it that, between the Liberals, the Mensheviks and the Social Revolutionaries; and thus the new government had no unity from the start. With each part...

Words: 2132 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

How Far Were Divisions over the Continuation of the New Economic Policy Responsible for the Outcome of the Responsible for the Outcome of the Power Struggle in the Ears 1924-1929?

...How far were divisions over the continuation of the New Economic Policy responsible for the outcome of the responsible for the outcome of the power struggle in the ears 1924-1929? NEP (New Economic Policy) was created on the 21st March 1921(till 1922) was deemed after the Russian civil war, it represented more a Capitalism economy than a communist one. NEP was a solution to the problems which were faced by War communism. Introduced in 1918 War communism was used to replace the system of state capitalism. It was mainly enforced by the Cheka and Red Army, it led to a deprived industry with a lack of resources and workers and a famine in 1929 with attack on agriculture. This led to uprisings, most infamous was the Konstadt rising of 1921. The Kronstadts originally were strong supporters of the Bolsheviks however they saw of the oppression of War communism as unfair. The result was 60, 000 ordered by Trotsky to attack the Konstadt base. The uprising was supressed. Lenin took the lesson of the Kronstadt to heat and to avoid public embarrassment he decided it was time to end war communism and lead towards more to NEP. At the Tenth Conference of the Communist Party, which opened in March 1929 Lenin announced that the Kronstadt rising had lit “lit up like a lightning flash”. Therefore NEP was introduced as a temporary matter to solve the problem of famine and Bolshevik opposition. However NEP managed to cause divisions in the party between the left and right. I would say NEP was an......

Words: 1918 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years to 1945-55?

...How far do you agree the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years to 1945-55? I agree thoroughly that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason behind the improvement in the loves of African Americans. There are two other factors which help elevate the position of African Americans after the war these were the Federal Government and the NAACP. The Federal Government can be split into two parts the President and the Supreme Court. Before the Second World War most of the African Americans were working in the south of the country in agriculture. For many they had been born into that life and their parents and grandparents had been slaves. World War two had large impact on the lives of African Americans because it gave a chance for people to start anew. Many people had become tiered of doing hard manual labour every day in the farms. The 1920 and 30s had already seen an increase in the number of black people coming down from the south to the northern and western areas. These areas were considered to be industrial areas. After the war started new jobs were created this meant the demand for workers increased. More black people stated to migrate to the north and west for a job. For many of the black people this could have been a raise in there level of confidence. A crucial part of the employment was in the army, many men had signed up to protect their county. Figures show the migration of black......

Words: 1328 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was the Main Reason for Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in 1917.

...agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness of the provisional government, the home front and most importantly Trotsky role all played a significant role to why the Bolsheviks were successful. Lenin’s leadership played a significant role to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917 due to his clear and persuading aims. Lenin was an influential figure in the eyes of the proletariat. Due to the April thesis clear aims resulted in that he was able to gain greater support and he succeeded in having 200,000 members. The vast amount of members meant that the Bolsheviks had greater support when it came to seizing power. The main aims of the April theses were, Peace, Land and Bread and power to the soviets. Many supported the idea of Peace, Land and bread as they were fed up with the affect the war was having on them and wanted to bring it to an end, people were also starving due to the war and therefore welcomed the idea of Peace, Land and bread. Lenin also promised the confiscation of landed estates from landowners and the aristocracy. The slogan all power to the soviets played on the......

Words: 1325 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Why Were the Bolsheviks Able to Seize Power Without Widespread Popular Support?

...Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power without widespread popular support? The Bolsheviks came into power for many reasons. The provisional government was now weak, they hadn’t kept the promises they had made and had little support because of the Bolsheviks were basically handed the power. The Bolsheviks were a left wing party however they were not first choice to govern Russia, however the Bolshevik claimed power in the name of the people so didn’t need overall support. The Bolsheviks had suffered a great loss in the July days when they tried to provide leadership as soldiers and industrial works protested against the provisional government, they used the Bolsheviks slogan ‘All power to the soviets’. However the military attacked the pacifist protests and began to repress the Bolsheviks. Lenin went in to hiding whereas the other Bolshevik leaders were arrested, this lead to a temporary decline in Bolshevik power and influence. Lenin and the leaders remained hidden/locked away until Kerensky released them in a response to the Kornilov affair, where the commander and chief of the army attempts to march and army to Petrograd, the Provisional Government have no choice but to release the Bolsheviks that were imprisoned to help prevent the attempted coup. Another of the Bolsheviks slogans was “Peace, Bread, Land”. N the cities many workers were starving as the peasants were hoarding food or fighting in the war. This meant that there want enough food for everyone, the......

Words: 675 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Bolshevik Consolidation of Power

...How did the Bolsheviks consolidate their power in the first few months after the October 1917 Revolution? (30 marks) Lenin’s Bolshevik takeover of power in Russia left the country confused and inquisitive into what the future may hold, with their recently adopted power only leaving them with a tenuous grip around the nation. The majority of Russia predicted that the Bolshevik’s would only last a matter of weeks, before worsening economic and social issues would leave their power insecure and prove too difficult for them to correct. Also the opposition was gathering momentum which Lenin knew had to be stopped in its tracks before any attacks were made on his newly formed government, consolidating power was key for the Bolsheviks and the first few months were paramount to their success. Right from the start Lenin realised that opposition was plentiful to one-party rule and his emerging Bolshevik dictatorship. Still throughout the cities many working class citizens still supported the idea of Soviet power, not Bolshevik power. The majority expected the Socialist to remerge from the dismantled Provisional Government and reinstate their power over Russia, but Lenin had always proposed to rule alone and made it clear that his party were going to merciless to any opposition that came between him and total supremacy. At the top of Lenin’s list of objectives was forming his new government, named the Council of People’s Commissars, also known as the Sovnarkom. This came as a surprise...

Words: 2013 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Structure of the Prc Into 6 Regions Was the Main Reason Mao Was Able to Consolidate His Power over China, How Far Do You Agree?

...Mao used various tactics and strategies to be able to consolidate his power over china. He used social, admin, military and political aspects to help him in the process. I do agree that the structure of the PRC in the 6 regions played a huge role in Mao’s consolidation of power but I don’t think it was the main reason. I believe that along with it, other factors were equally as important, such as training people who weren’t members of the CCP to join the government, terror with mass killings, imposed starvation and letting the national capitalists keep their job until he needed them to, so that the system was stable enough for him to control. He also made land reforms and introduced a registration system, which also helped consolidate his power. Mao also extended his political control with the “anti-movements” and the Politburo. The Anti-Movements was a movement against waste, bribery, and inefficiency. It was used as an excuse to getting rid of anybody standing in Mao’s was of ruling. He used to get rid of the people whom he had given jobs to in the beginning, those who weren’t past of the CCP, accusing them of inefficiency. He called these people “the bureaucratic capitalist class”. The Politburo was a circle of twenty leading members of the Communist Party, and the carried the government under the authority of Mao of course. So it was the party that ruled, and not the people. This helped Mao have a better control on the decisions taken for the country and therefore......

Words: 421 - Pages: 2

Ready to Take a Chance Again | 新三國志手機版-光榮特庫摩授權 | Writing Persuasive or Argumentative Essays